The North Kingstown Planning Commission met at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, September 2, 2025, at Town Hall, 80 Boston Neck Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island. The commission considered waiver requests, two unified development review public hearings, zoning ordinance text amendments, a proposed meeting-time change, and administrative matters.
C the notice of this meeting has been posted to the Secretary of State's website. Nicole, if anyone is here for 3F, that has been asked to be moved to the September 16th meeting, correct? So we won't be hearing that tonight. And with that, we'll move to 3A, comprehensive permit and land development project master plan checklist waiver request. Franklin Commons LLP for a major land development project consisting of 66 dwelling units on property located off post road at assessors plat 136, lot 170, zoned post road. I can give a quick overview. So this is a request to um waive three items that are either on the land development project checklist or on the comprehensive permit application checklist because there's two different checklists that they have to submit for a comprehensive permit. Um you can see on the back of page one, it's for the um to not submit the fiscal impact statement, um the letter of eligibility from the state, and then the water modeling. And you've had similar requests in the past at the master plan stage to wait it again. We've even discussed the potential of moving the water modeling for sure to the preliminary stage. Um so I don't think um that would be it's it's not inconsistent with our philosophy on um when we get the water modeling anyway, they have to get the water modeling at preliminary to advance anyway. So we support the three waiver requests, and again, it's just from the checklist requirement. We see they still have to go through the full review process and come back to you later. Any questions for staff so just to clarify each of these three items will come back to us at a later application state? They'll have to submit a preliminary okay. Thank you. Do they have to take action to that effect, Nicole, or is it just granting it based on the fact that they yep and then it has to come back at preliminary? Okay. So I had to entertain a motion to waive the three items as requested. I'll make that motion. I'll second all in favor? Aye. Moving on to 3B, unified development plan review and dimensional variance requests, application of National Sign Corporation. Care of Heather Dudco to install ground mounted and warm-mounted signs on site improvements to be located at 5945 post road. Assessors plat 177 lot eight, zone post road, and in the groundwater wellhead overlay district. And 3C, which is unified development for the same applicant, same address. Good evening. I'm not sure if anyone you're here for it. If you want to come up, in case they have any questions. Either one. You can go to the table or the microphone, whatever works. Um, as Rich mentioned, this is this is actually a pretty simple application. It it has to be development plan review because it's located in the groundwater overlay, and it's actually really more of a variance request and more than uh a site plan review application. So they're looking to install ground mounted and well mounted signs on site. It's the citizens bank in the um I call it the job lot plaza, right? Where Job La is not the one across the street. Um there's an existing 14-foot tall ground-mounted sign that's going to be removed. The applicant is proposing a new 12-foot tall ground-mounted sign in a similar location. The sign, ground modern signs that are solid with no space between the primary supports, and they can't exceed five feet in height, but this proposed site is 12 feet in height, so that's why they're here for that dimensional variance. Hold on a second. They are also looking for a 6.46 square foot dimensional variance for the 16.46 square foot wall-mounted sign on the east elevation of the structure. Um, this is where signs can be no more than 10 square feet. So the 6.46 is because they're over that 10 square feet. Um, and for that same sign, it's a dimensional variance on the storefront canopy for the same size sound, same size sign for the same requirement, right? The well-mounted signs that can be used in any number, but they they can't exceed that 10 square feet. Um we have no issues with the application as presented. This is uh a pretty minor improvement to the site. Again, if this were not in the groundwater, you would not be seeing it, would be going to the zoning board only because it's in the groundwater triggers your review. Um you have to make a decision because it's unified on the zoning first before you decide on the development plan review. So at the I there's no cheat sheet for this one.