North Kingstown Planning Commission Meeting - February 3, 2026
North Kingstown Planning Commission Meeting - February 3, 2026
The North Kingstown Planning Commission met on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 6:30 PM at Town Hall. The agenda included a continued item, a surety release, a decision on a unified development review, and a discussion on relocating inclusionary units. The meeting also covered administrative actions and approval of prior minutes.
Consent Calendar
- Item 3a (Continued): Construction Cost Estimate for Wickford Junction Apartments – The applicant requested a continuance to the next meeting (February 17, 2026) due to the applicant's absence. The commission granted the continuance without objection.
- Item 3b: Surety Release for Cottages at Weeden Farm – The commission voted unanimously to recommend to the Town Council the release of the final 10% surety. The site inspection was conducted in winter conditions; the commission found the development satisfactory.
Public Comments & Testimony
- James O'Halloran (48 Joseph Court, resident of Weeden Farm) – Expressed concern that the issue of moving inclusionary units has been unresolved for many years (since 2018) and urged the commission to resolve it. He acknowledged the commission's concerns about precedent but stressed the need for finality.
- No other public comment was offered.
Discussion Items
- Item 3c: Unified Development Review – Ananda Church of Self Realization (714 Ten Rod Road) – The commission reviewed a decision granting dimensional variances (six variances totaling from 3.5 to 13.6 feet) and a combined preliminary/final plan for an access ramp and HVAC condenser. Commissioner Lipsitz read the findings of fact. The commission approved the decision with two conditions: (1) all construction in conformance with January 20, 2026 materials unless minor administrative modifications approved; (2) the applicant must work with the town engineer for an excavation permit and parking area establishment; any future improvements to the rear parking area require commission review. The motion passed with one abstention (Commissioner McCue, who was absent for that item).
- Item 3d: Discussion – Request to Move Inclusionary Units Off-Site for Cottages at Weeden Farm to 519 School Street – Nicole (planning staff) introduced this as a pre-application discussion. The applicant seeks to move two required affordable units from Weeden Farm (age-restricted, with $590/month condo fees) to a triplex at 519 School Street (VR zone, groundwater recharge overlay). Attorney John Cooper and engineer Eric Preethi presented the proposal, citing benefits: eliminating age restriction, net gain of five housing units (two market-rate at Weeden converted, three affordable at School Street), lower condo fees, and a smaller building footprint (41% reduction). Commission members expressed significant concerns:
- Relief needed: The VR zone does not permit triplexes by right; a variance would be required. Multiple commissioners (Roach, Kerr, McCue) noted the difficulty of justifying the hardship when the developer chose not to build affordable units on site as originally approved.
- Precedent: Commissioners Roach and Kerr worried that granting relief for this off-site proposal would set a precedent for future projects.
- Neighborhood fit: Concerns about parking in front (could be moved behind building) and the triplex not matching the character (single-family homes and duplexes nearby).
- Condo fees at Weeden Farm: The applicant argued that high condo fees make the on-site units less affordable, but commissioners noted that condo fees could have been managed through HOA documents.
- Timing: Commissioner Kerr pointed out that the inclusionary ordinance requires off-site units to be occupied concurrently with market-rate units, which was not met.
- Commissioner Donohoe acknowledged net benefits (housing gain, eliminating age restriction) but remained concerned about the variance burden.
- No formal application exists; the commission provided feedback that approving the required zoning relief would be difficult. The applicant indicated they may pursue a pre-application conference to refine the proposal.
Key Outcomes
- Item 3b: Motion passed unanimously to recommend the Town Council release the final 10% surety for Cottages at Weeden Farm.
- Item 3c: Motion passed (6-0-1, with McCue abstaining) to approve the dimensional variances and development plan review for Ananda Church, subject to two conditions.
- Item 3d: No formal vote. The commission directed the applicant to consider a pre-application conference to address concerns about zoning relief and site design before submitting a formal application.
- Minutes Approval: The minutes of January 20, 2026 were approved (5-0-1, with McCue abstaining).
- Administrative Actions: Staff reported that the Wickford Junction project recorded plans on Friday and a pre-construction meeting is scheduled.
- Adjournment: Motion passed unanimously at approximately 7:45 PM.
Meeting Transcript
4246 6C notice of the meeting has been posted with the Secretary of State's website. General Business 3A. Nicole, this is being continued. Yep. Steve has requested a continuance to our next meeting. He wasn't able to come tonight. All right, that was my question. But no, there's no DCR and this was just on this agenda, so we'll put it on for the 17th. Perfect. 3B, a surety release for the cottages at Weedon Farm. So that is in your pocket for tonight. Anybody have any we went to inspect it in the nice bitter cold a couple weeks ago? Everything is in working. I will say everything is in working order. It is hard to inspect a site in the winter when you're looking to see if trees are still alive. They look as good as they can at this time of the year. So we'll just take a look at them later on. Rocco's a pretty good developer. If there are any issues you would address them. Otherwise, but we found it to be satisfactory. So this is a recommendation to the council to release. Yes, to release. No, this is to release the 10%. The 10%, yes. Anyone have any issues, concerns? I would entertain a motion to release the final uh to recommend to the town council to release the final 10 percent. I make that I'll make that motion. All in favor? Aye. All opposed. The ayes have it. Uh item 3C, the decision of the unified development review of the one-dimensional variance application and two combined preliminary and final development plan review application to construct. That doesn't that's not good English. Anyway, of an ANDA church of self-realization of Rhode Island to construct a landing with an access. Sorry, there was there was some deletion that happened there, and really not all of it. Uh construct a landing with an access ramp and install a condenser located at 714 10 Rod Road, Assessor Splat 27 Lot 2, Zone Village Residential, and in the groundwater recharge overlay and scenic overlay districts. You should all have a copy of the decision at your spot. It was also emailed to you earlier. Um I spoke with Rich. I think you should at least go review it, go page by page, make sure that you have no comments or edits on each page, and then go through the findings for the record. I can read a lot. So anybody have any concerns, questions, corrections on page one. Hearing none, page two of six. Well, let's let's go through all the pages and make sure nobody had any grammar corrections, something uh four or six, anyone? Five oh six, and six of six. So the findings of fact for the zoning relief based on the application and documentation presented with the consideration that the application is at the combined preliminary and final plan stage. The North Kingstown Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact and reaches the following unified development review decisions. The zoning relief. The following dimensional variance were requested by the applicant. A, a dimensional dimensional variance of 4.4 feet to allow for the installation of an HVAC condenser unit, 5.6 feet from the southeast side yard property line, where the required setback is 10 feet in accordance with Article 2.
openpublica.com