The North Kingstown Town Council met on Monday, August 17, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Town Hall Council Chambers. The meeting covered a range of topics including the controversial use of Flock automatic license plate readers, a proposed ordinance to ban the sale of dogs and cats in pet stores, updates on the public safety complex construction, and ongoing complaints about asphalt odors from the Bitumar facility. Public comment was extensive and passionate, with significant opposition to the Flock cameras and support for the pet store ban. The council voted 3-2 to terminate the Flock camera contract and approved a guaranteed maximum price for the public safety complex.
Good evening, everybody. Welcome to the North Kingston Town Council meeting for Monday, August 17th. Pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws 42-466C. Notice of this meeting has been posted on the Secretary of State's website. And I ask everybody to join me with a salute to the flag. Thank you. Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. Thank you. So there are a lot of people who signed up. So what I like to do before we do public comment is uh make a couple of comments on the flock cameras. Uh part in part historical and in part um what I propose we do tonight. Uh and then uh if any of the other members of the council uh want to weigh in, uh they can do so, uh obviously subject to the public's opinion, but at least based on uh uh reading the history of this, reading public comments. I think that'll give the public um a better understanding of where our mindset is. Um and then you can alter uh your comments accordingly, and then um we can make a final decision uh when the original agenda item comes when the initial when this agenda item comes up. I know there are other uh items of interest um the pet store and some others, but I think this is the most straightforward and I also think this is the most fluid, and uh I think it's the one that's changing the most. So uh with that, I'm gonna make a couple of comments on the flat cameras. Uh the flock cameras uh issue came before our council initially uh in October of 2023. Um at that time I had some real reservations. Um because of that, the town manager agreed to uh put out on the next agenda. And next agenda, um it was uh presentation was made by the chief. Um he had uh said it was a program, uh excuse me, a license plate registry uh recognition program um where license plates are captured and run through a database uh to try to catch uh criminals on a crime. Uh he also touted the um uh benefits of um uh finding people in distress um via amber or silver alerts. Um and so um and there's also no personal identification, personally identified identifiable uh information uh on the uh the cameras or uh found by the cameras themselves. Um we decided unanimously to approve a one-year contract. Uh I did it in I voted in part because of uh we had a counselor on the uh town council as a social worker, and uh she had suggested that it be good to find people in distress. Um that was a one-year contract. Um before I did vote, I did speak to uh the ACLU, uh, which I'm a 20-year member of members of my law firm who do a lot of civil uh civil rights litigation. Um, and actually a city council from Warwick who is uh who had also voted on it. Um there was no opposition from anyone in the community. Um the council again unanimously approved it. Since that time, um there's been a lot of controversy over these. Um given the fact that the chief is not here tonight, he's he's he's a way out of town. Uh, and the fact that uh we approved this in 2023 for only one year. Um I'm gonna suggest to my counsels tonight, uh, after public input that we um temporarily suspend this, possibly indefinitely, but temporarily suspend this and have an opportunity to hear what the people have to say, their concerns, allow the chief to address them, and then do this in an open and transparent forum here, because I think there's been a lot of misinformation. The only information that's come before this council uh has been in support of these flock cameras, at least in 2023, obviously in the last couple weeks. A lot of information has not come uh that support these flock cameras. Um, but there's also the information that's come. A lot of it has lacks specifics. So if there's a specific example of abuse, I think that's important. Um, and we want to hear that. Uh before we go to public comment, I would ask uh anyone on the council who wants to uh comment. I don't know if most of our bet, do you want to comment? I think that pausing it is a is a good idea, at least pausing it. Let let's get it, let it shake out a little bit. Okay. I don't know if I or Matt. No, you first spending this until the chief speak up, yeah. Sorry. Um I'm okay with suspending a decision until the chief can be present since he was involved in it originally and knows a lot about how it's used by our police department. Um I do have a lot of reservations.