OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Meeting - December 9, 2024

City Council & Boards — Monday, December 9, 2024
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, December 9, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:30:32

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:28

We'll start as soon as uh Councilman Vaughn's ready.

Unassigned speaker

0:40

Good

Speaker 1

0:40

evening, welcome to North Ritson Hill City Council meeting work session.

0:43

It is 5 p.m.

0:44

And I'd like to call the Monday, December 9th, 2024 City Council work session to order.

Unassigned speaker

0:50

A

Speaker 1

0:50

quorum of the city council is present.

0:52

The meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and the Texas Government Code.

0:57

Items listed for discussion in the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss items and receive information from staff.

1:04

The city council will not take any action on the items listed for discussion during the work session.

1:09

Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed in the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting.

1:21

Um give the council an opportunity to ask questions the items on the regular agenda.

1:26

That council has not clarified at this time.

1:32

Yeah.

Unassigned speaker

1:34

Hey

Speaker 2

1:34

Clayton, is Clayton

Unassigned speaker

1:36

here?

Unassigned speaker

1:36

Oh

Speaker 2

1:38

hey, Clayton, I have a uh question on uh item C six, which is the uh storage.

Unassigned speaker

1:45

And

Speaker 2

1:45

just wanted to make sure that in the memorandum on page um four, I believe.

Unassigned speaker

1:52

It

Speaker 2

1:52

talks about the uh analysis of how much uh how many storage units we

Unassigned speaker

1:56

have

Speaker 2

1:56

in the city.

1:58

And it says there's

Unassigned speaker

2:00

the

Speaker 2

2:00

storage unit per capita ratio is about one per nine NRH residents.

2:05

Does that sound right?

2:06

Because wouldn't that be if there's seventy thousand people?

2:10

We've got about

Speaker 3

2:11

close to seven thousand units.

2:14

I'll go I'll double member, but as we were writing a yes, it was a striker to me as well.

Speaker 2

2:19

Okay, well that's that's yeah, it should be like seventy-eight, thousand, but that's a lot of units.

2:23

Okay, right.

2:24

And has there been any other interest in that property that you know of uh other than recently?

Speaker 3

2:29

So uh we did have a development application submitted uh earlier this year for a car wash at the hard corner of Harwood and uh 26.

2:38

Uh that, however, um kind of falls off.

2:41

It was a formal development review committee site plan application and zoning change application.

Unassigned speaker

2:46

Um

Speaker 3

2:46

but they decided to withdraw their application, so it did not make it to the planning zoning commission or city council.

2:51

Okay,

Speaker 2

2:51

thanks for clarification.

2:52

Man 7,000 units.

2:54

We have a lot of stuff on it.

2:55

I'll

Speaker 3

2:55

triple check on it.

Speaker 1

3:01

Anyone else?

3:05

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

3:06

Uh

Speaker 1

3:06

we're to discuss the 2025 City Council meeting schedule.

3:11

Alicia Richardson

Speaker 4

3:18

Mayor and Council, the item before you this evening is to discuss the upcoming schedule for 2025.

3:24

Um each year c staff brings forward an item at your December meeting to talk about uh the 2025 City Council meeting schedule.

3:32

And the purpose for this is that we've got some meetings that traditionally the second meeting in November and December, the City Council opts to um cancel that meeting.

3:40

So let's start at the beginning.

3:41

So city council meetings are held on the second and fourth Monday of each month.

3:44

Historically, we've got some meetings that um conflict with some of our meeting dates, and those are either rescheduled or canceled at um the direction of the city council.

3:52

The first one is gonna be the March 10th, 2025 meeting.

3:56

That conflicts with the National League of Cities Conference.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning████████████████████████24%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Procedural████████8%
Zoning Regulations███████7%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Traffic Management█████5%
Legislative Engagement████4%
Public Safety████4%
Technology and Innovation████4%
Summary of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Meeting Summary - December 9, 2024

The City of North Richland Hills City Council met on Monday, December 9, 2024, for a Work Session at 5:00 PM followed by a Regular Meeting at 7:35 PM at City Hall. The Work Session included discussions on the 2025 meeting schedule, the city's legislative program, facility naming policies, and a TxDOT proposal to install raised medians on Boulevard 26. The Regular Meeting featured public hearings on several zoning cases and unanimously approved a consent agenda, routine contracts, and resolutions related to technology, infrastructure, and finance.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved Unanimously (7-0): The Council approved the consent agenda containing 16 routine items (B.1 – B.16). Key items included the approval of minutes, right-of-way abandonments (Guy Street, Stardust Drive), a channel rehabilitation contract ($189,661), a GIS services contract ($200,000 using ARPA), technology contracts with Visionality ($188,000) and FreeIT Data Solutions ($500,000), the purchase of a Frazer ambulance ($460,460), a Case backhoe ($189,150), books ($160,000), a change order for the NRH2O Water Park Nitro Blast construction ($209,178.50), a mountain bike pump track at Fossil Creek Park ($185,665.50 using ARPA), treadmills for the NRH Centre ($90,711.32), and an ordinance clarifying the spelling of Denney Drive.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Shauna Stiles (3908 Lochridge Court) opposed the proposed raised medians on Boulevard 26, arguing that medians would increase driver frustration and worsen accidents rather than reduce them. She urged the Council to prioritize fixing the "vortex" intersection of Davis Boulevard and Glenview.
  • Mary Michaels (8401 Revenue Way), representing her Liberty Village HOA, thanked the city for the public meeting on the Davis Boulevard median project. She raised concerns about speed variations (40 to 50 mph) on Davis Boulevard and expressed worry that the median might increase U-turns through her neighborhood entrance.
  • Sayeda Syed (6705 Sapphire Circle North, Colleyville), a candidate for the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) Board of Directors, urged the Council to vote for her with their 37 allocated votes. Ms. Syed emphasized her previous experience working at TAD and her role as a whistleblower, contrasting her background with other candidates.
  • L.C. Tubb (8333 Davis Boulevard) spoke during the UHaul public hearing, arguing against the staff recommendation for 3,000K lighting. He stated that TxDOT specifications do not currently require 3,000K lights, noting that 3,000K provides roughly 20% less light than 5,000K.

Discussion Items

  • Work Session – 2025 City Council Meeting Schedule: City Secretary Alicia Richardson presented the draft 2025 schedule. Council directed staff to reschedule the March 10 meeting to March 3 (due to the National League of Cities Conference), the May 12 meeting to May 14 (for election canvassing), and the May 26 meeting to May 27 (Memorial Day holiday). Council also canceled meetings on July 14, July 28, November 24, and December 22.
  • Work Session – Legislative Program: Assistant City Manager Trudy Lewis presented the city's State Legislative Program for the 89th Texas Legislative Session, emphasizing four guiding principles and priorities such as preserving local control and revenue sources. Councilmember Blake expressed concerns regarding language opposing "further restrictions" on debt issuance, preferring to avoid advocating for a blanket policy. Consensus was reached on the strategy of using relationship management and joint letters rather than an outside firm.
  • Work Session – Naming of Facilities: Councilmember Mitchell requested a discussion on adding language to the city's Naming Board ordinance to allow renaming facilities if the honoree falls out of good standing, and to require a 90-day waiting period after retirement or death before naming. City Manager Hartman recommended using language from the recently approved charter amendment regarding removal from office.
  • Work Session – TxDOT Raised Medians on Boulevard 26: Assistant City Manager Caroline Waggoner detailed TxDOT's proposed safety improvement project for 1.5 miles of Boulevard 26 from Rodger Line Road to Rufe Snow Drive. Council discussed traffic conflict data, the potential impact on businesses, and the need for adequate U-turn radiuses. The consensus was to support TxDOT's project conceptually while stipulating continued input on design, particularly regarding the problematic "vortex" intersection of 26 and Davis.
  • City Manager Report: City Manager Paulette Hartman provided an update on the search for a new Police Chief (goal to name a finalist by end of February and a new chief by end of February). She introduced Jennipher Castellanos as the new Manager of Strategic Initiatives and outlined the new NRH LiNKS (Linking Innovation, Knowledge, and Strategy) Unit, a team focused on operational excellence, efficiency audits, and data-driven decision making. Hartman also noted the upcoming work on the charter review committee and a capital improvements advisory committee for a potential May 2026 bond election.
  • Regular Meeting – C.5 Zoning (Hoberer): The Council discussed a zoning change from AG to R-2 for 0.73 acres at 8900 Amundson Drive. Staff recommended immediate approval despite the applicant's preference to wait, arguing the property is non-conforming under AG. The applicant requested a postponement to seek a waiver on platting costs. Council and staff urged moving forward to resolve the non-conforming status and enable the carport construction. Approved 7-0.
  • Regular Meeting – C.6 UHaul Self-Storage Facility: A public hearing was held on a request from DCG Engineering Inc. and UHaul for a revision to an existing special use permit (SUP) and a new SUP for a 4-story, 936-unit climate-controlled storage facility at 8225 Boulevard 26. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended converting the request to a Nonresidential Planned Development (NR-PD). The major point of discussion was lighting; staff recommended 3,000 Kelvin lights to align with dark sky standards and city code, while the applicant requested 5,000 Kelvin. Council approved the ordinance with an allowance for 5,000K lights.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved 7-0 (Items B.1 – B.16).
  • Public Hearings (Zoning) Approved (all 7-0):
    • C.1 Compton ADU (Ordinance 3879): Approved 7-0.
    • C.2 Holden AG to RE-1 (Ordinance 3880): Approved 7-0.
    • C.3 Figueroa RE-1 to R-2 (Ordinance 3881): Approved 7-0.
    • C.4 Figueroa R-2 to RE-1 (Ordinance 3882): Approved 7-0.
    • C.5 Hoberer AG to R-2 (Ordinance 3874): Approved 7-0.
    • C.6 UHaul Storage/SUP (Ordinance 3883): Approved 7-0. The motion included an amendment to allow 5,000 Kelvin lighting over the staff recommendation of 3,000K.
  • Contracts & Resolutions Approved (all 7-0):
    • F.1 Tyler Technologies Technology Contract ($4,000,000): Approved 7-0.
    • F.2 Kroger Opioid Settlement Resolution: Approved 7-0. Estimated award of $11,027.67.
    • F.3 TAD Board Election: Approved Resolution No. 2024-051 casting 37 votes for candidate Mike Alfred. Approved 7-0.
    • F.4 Youth Advisory Committee Appointments: Approved 7-0.
    • F.5 Official Newspaper Designation (Commercial Recorder): Approved 7-0.
    • F.6 Certificates of Obligation Bond Issuance (Series 2025): Approved 7-0. The bond issue totaling $5,105,000 was awarded to Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. at a true interest cost of 3.599%.
  • Executive Session Actions (both 7-0):
    • Authorized the City Manager to enter into a termination agreement with PG Investco LLC for the property at 6701 Davis Boulevard, including the payment of $1,020,000 in exchange for other consideration, and accepted the assignment of a purchase agreement with Terry N. Snyder.
    • Authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute a purchase and sale agreement with El Trust Investments, LLC, for the property at 7913 Main Street in the amount of $300,000.

Meeting Transcript

We'll start as soon as uh Councilman Vaughn's ready. Good evening, welcome to North Ritson Hill City Council meeting work session. It is 5 p.m. And I'd like to call the Monday, December 9th, 2024 City Council work session to order. A quorum of the city council is present. The meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and the Texas Government Code. Items listed for discussion in the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss items and receive information from staff. The city council will not take any action on the items listed for discussion during the work session. Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed in the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting. Um give the council an opportunity to ask questions the items on the regular agenda. That council has not clarified at this time. Yeah. Hey Clayton, is Clayton here? Oh hey, Clayton, I have a uh question on uh item C six, which is the uh storage. And just wanted to make sure that in the memorandum on page um four, I believe. It talks about the uh analysis of how much uh how many storage units we have in the city. And it says there's the storage unit per capita ratio is about one per nine NRH residents. Does that sound right? Because wouldn't that be if there's seventy thousand people? We've got about close to seven thousand units. I'll go I'll double member, but as we were writing a yes, it was a striker to me as well. Okay, well that's that's yeah, it should be like seventy-eight, thousand, but that's a lot of units. Okay, right. And has there been any other interest in that property that you know of uh other than recently? So uh we did have a development application submitted uh earlier this year for a car wash at the hard corner of Harwood and uh 26. Uh that, however, um kind of falls off. It was a formal development review committee site plan application and zoning change application. Um but they decided to withdraw their application, so it did not make it to the planning zoning commission or city council. Okay, thanks for clarification. Man 7,000 units. We have a lot of stuff on it. I'll triple check on it. Anyone else? Okay. Uh

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com