OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Special City Council Meeting on April 9, 2025: Public Reprimand of Councilmember Blake Vaughn

City Council & Boards — Wednesday, April 9, 2025
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateWednesday, April 9, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:18:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

2:16

Good

Speaker 1

2:17

evening and welcome to the North Richmond Hills City Council meeting at six o'clock.

2:22

Uh and I will call the April 9th, 2025 City Council meeting to order.

2:26

A quorum of the City Council is present, and the meeting has been duly posted according to Text Openings Act of the Texas government code.

2:34

Moving to the first item is public comments.

3:13

Yes.

3:18

Okay.

3:21

John

Speaker 2

3:22

Schleeder, um, sixty-five fifty-three Northern dancer.

3:25

Uh I'm here tonight uh to speak on this item, and by way of metaphor, if animal control were to get a call about um a loose dog in the neighborhood, and it turns out it was reported as a rabid uh pit bull.

3:46

Uh you know, that would that would uh elicit one type of response from animal control.

3:51

But if it was a hyperactive yapping Pomerinian that was out running around the neighborhood, that is certainly not an emergency.

4:00

I am just wondering why something has dragged out everyone on tonight for a specially called city council meeting uh from what my understanding from an action taken by a city council person that is really running out the clock on his city council seat with a couple of weeks left.

4:22

If there is some sort of emergency lawsuit that's been filed or action with the AG's office or something, I could understand

Unassigned speaker

4:30

it.

Speaker 2

4:30

But if this is just some hurt feelings or some, you know, somebody's gonna have to really explain to me why this level of uh back and forth and angst is being spent on something that just to me is amounting to almost nothing.

4:50

Um what I'm irritated about is I have been an area resident.

5:00

I've lived in this area my entire life.

5:03

It is disheartening to me to see the state of our city streets and roads.

5:10

There are things that need our attention in North Richon Hills.

5:14

If it was especially called city council meeting to discuss road funding, I'm all for it.

5:20

But I doubt we're here tonight for something that important.

5:24

Uh I would love to see this city council focus on business at hand, serving the citizens of this uh city and doing something that matters.

5:37

Um that's what I wanted to say.

5:40

Thank you.

Speaker 1

5:40

Thank you, John.

5:41

Um else.

5:45

Um, seeing no one else, we will um adjourn into executive session.

5:50

It's let me start reading.

5:52

Hold on.

5:52

Uh 501071, consultation with city attorney, it seeks advice opinion and contemplated litigation on the matter as duly uh, which is a which is the duty of the attorney of the governmental body of the under the Texas disciplinary rules, professional conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with the open meetings act versus investigations by city council, legal opinion related to March 24th, 2025 council meeting and providing direction to the city count city attorney and disclosure in executive session discussions.

Unassigned speaker

6:26

Uh

Speaker 1

6:26

the second item is section 551074, personnel matters to discuss the appointment, employment, evaluation, and uh reassigned duties, discipline and and dis or dismissal of a public official and employee to hear a complaint and charge against the officer or employee in uh

Unassigned speaker

6:47

uh

Speaker 1

6:47

executive session, we will be speaking on the city manager, which we will return to open session to discuss the council member place five.

6:55

Uh adjourn.

7:06

702, we're reconvening into open sessions.

7:09

Sorry, that was kind of loud, wasn't it?

7:11

Um let's

Unassigned speaker

7:13

see.

Unassigned speaker

7:15

Okay,

Speaker 1

7:15

we're in open session now, and we have we will have a public hearing of the discussion related to council member place five.

7:22

We will start with Bradley to read the resolution for consideration into the record.

7:27

He will begin as soon as the council has a copy of the to follow along, the city secretary will bring um each council member a copy uh to follow along.

Speaker 3

7:44

Mayor, I have a question for clarification.

7:48

Yes.

7:48

Is this a resolution regarding me?

7:50

But I'm only finding out about it right now, and I have no real chance to review it.

Unassigned speaker

7:55

You

Speaker 3

7:55

get to review it as we read it.

7:57

So these like one minute or so, I've got to look at what you're accusing me of and then come up with a response to it.

8:03

Is that

Speaker 1

8:04

right?

8:04

Uh not accusing you, just reading it the facts of the of what occurred on the opinion.

8:08

So

Speaker 3

8:09

it's it's something your resolution is passing about me.

Unassigned speaker

8:14

Yes.

Speaker 3

8:14

Don't you think

Speaker 1

8:14

it's we're not passing?

8:16

We're we're gonna discuss it.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████79%
Miscellaneous██████████18%
Personnel Matters█2%
Legal█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Special City Council Meeting - April 9, 2025

The North Richland Hills City Council held a special meeting on April 9, 2025, at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting focused on an executive session and subsequent public discussion regarding a resolution to publicly reprimand Councilmember Place 5 Blake Vaughn for violations of rules of procedure and house rules. The meeting adjourned at 8:13 PM.

Public Comments

  • John Schleeder, a lifetime area resident, expressed frustration that the special meeting was called to address what he perceived as a personal matter rather than pressing city issues such as road funding. He questioned the urgency and suggested the meeting was a waste of time.

Executive Session

The City Council entered executive session under Texas Government Code sections 551.071 (consultation with city attorney regarding pending litigation, investigations, and legal opinions) and 551.074 (personnel matters concerning Councilmember Place 5 and the City Manager). No specific outcomes were announced for the executive session itself.

Discussion Items

  • Resolution 2025-021: City Attorney Bradley Anderley read a lengthy resolution that detailed findings against Councilmember Blake Vaughn for actions during the March 24, 2025 City Council meeting, including: violating Robert's Rules (germaneness, personal attacks, playing a recording after objection, abrupt departure), violating House Rules (lack of respect, discussing personnel matters publicly), and conducting an unauthorized investigation of the City Manager. The resolution proposed a public reprimand, removal of Vaughn as Deputy Mayor Pro Tempore, a declaration that he does not speak on behalf of the council, and a finding that the City Manager acted properly.
  • Debate: Councilmember Vaughn argued he had not received the resolution beforehand, questioned the legal basis for each violation, and asserted that his remarks were germane and his actions protected by the First Amendment. He requested more time to prepare but was denied. Other councilmembers (Kelvin, Matt Blake, Ricky Rodriguez, Tito Rodriguez, Susie Compton, and the Mayor) expressed support for the resolution, recounting their interpretations of the March 24 meeting and criticizing Vaughn's conduct. After extended debate, a motion to call the question passed.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to suspend debate and call the question: Passed.
  • Vote on Resolution 2025-021: Approved by a vote of 6-1 (only Councilmember Blake Vaughn opposed). The resolution thus:
    • Publicly reprimanded Councilmember Blake Vaughn for violating rules of procedure and house rules.
    • Removed him from the position of Deputy Mayor Pro Tempore.
    • Affirmed that he does not act or speak with agency on behalf of the city or council regarding investigations or the flash vote survey.
    • Found that the City Manager acted in accordance with council direction and no investigation of her is warranted.
    • Directed the City Attorney to only accept legal service requests from the City Manager or Mayor unless directed by the full council.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening and welcome to the North Richmond Hills City Council meeting at six o'clock. Uh and I will call the April 9th, 2025 City Council meeting to order. A quorum of the City Council is present, and the meeting has been duly posted according to Text Openings Act of the Texas government code. Moving to the first item is public comments. Yes. Okay. John Schleeder, um, sixty-five fifty-three Northern dancer. Uh I'm here tonight uh to speak on this item, and by way of metaphor, if animal control were to get a call about um a loose dog in the neighborhood, and it turns out it was reported as a rabid uh pit bull. Uh you know, that would that would uh elicit one type of response from animal control. But if it was a hyperactive yapping Pomerinian that was out running around the neighborhood, that is certainly not an emergency. I am just wondering why something has dragged out everyone on tonight for a specially called city council meeting uh from what my understanding from an action taken by a city council person that is really running out the clock on his city council seat with a couple of weeks left. If there is some sort of emergency lawsuit that's been filed or action with the AG's office or something, I could understand it. But if this is just some hurt feelings or some, you know, somebody's gonna have to really explain to me why this level of uh back and forth and angst is being spent on something that just to me is amounting to almost nothing. Um what I'm irritated about is I have been an area resident. I've lived in this area my entire life. It is disheartening to me to see the state of our city streets and roads. There are things that need our attention in North Richon Hills. If it was especially called city council meeting to discuss road funding, I'm all for it. But I doubt we're here tonight for something that important. Uh I would love to see this city council focus on business at hand, serving the citizens of this uh city and doing something that matters. Um that's what I wanted to say. Thank you. Thank you, John. Um else. Um, seeing no one else, we will um adjourn into executive session. It's let me start reading. Hold on. Uh 501071, consultation with city attorney, it seeks advice opinion and contemplated litigation on the matter as duly uh, which is a which is the duty of the attorney of the governmental body of the under the Texas disciplinary rules, professional conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with the open meetings act versus investigations by city council, legal opinion related to March 24th, 2025 council meeting and providing direction to the city count city attorney and disclosure in executive session discussions. Uh the second item is section 551074, personnel matters to discuss the appointment, employment, evaluation, and uh reassigned duties, discipline and and dis or dismissal of a public official and employee to hear a complaint and charge against the officer or employee in uh uh executive session, we will be speaking on the city manager, which we will return to open session to discuss the council member place five. Uh adjourn. 702, we're reconvening into open sessions. Sorry, that was kind of loud, wasn't it? Um let's see. Okay, we're in open session now, and we have we will have a public hearing of the discussion related to council member place five. We will start with Bradley to read the resolution for consideration into the record. He will begin as soon as the council has a copy of the to follow along, the city secretary will bring um each council member a copy uh to follow along. Mayor, I have a question for clarification. Yes. Is this a resolution regarding me? But I'm only finding out about it right now, and I have no real chance to review it. You get to review it as we read it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com