OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Richland Hills Charter Review Commission Meeting – May 27, 2025

City Council & Boards — Tuesday, May 27, 2025
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateTuesday, May 27, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 48:19

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:05

Provided in the event there is one vacancy in any office with a three-year term with an unexpired term of 364 days or less may be filled by appointment of the mayor with approval of council to provide that vacancies in any office with a three-year term within an expired term of greater than 364 days must be filled by special election within 120 days of the vacancy.

0:29

And all that's presented as a question that voters would then answer affirmatively yes or

Unassigned speaker

0:33

no.

Unassigned speaker

0:37

I

Speaker 1

0:37

I don't think uh Mr.

0:38

Chairman, I suggest to you before that may have some questions to cross discussion, and maybe there's some revisions or changes that that the commission may want to uh to consider for this one.

0:48

I don't have anything specific.

0:50

So uh we had talked about again going through all of these propositions before the commission making the ultimate recommendations, uh but we can certainly have discussion now if there are any questions about this one.

1:00

I just have we have a limited question here.

Unassigned speaker

1:03

Um I've got two uh eight or said personal might take three sixty shall serve served about

Speaker 2

1:19

constituted election person does not serve if they have more than three six without their requirements that what it's like

Speaker 1

1:28

so

Unassigned speaker

1:29

I'm

Speaker 2

1:29

gonna

Unassigned speaker

1:30

go back here.

Unassigned speaker

1:32

Okay, is that the very last one?

Speaker 1

1:35

Last bullet there

Unassigned speaker

1:36

says that parson dictates an office after serving period that it says three six it shall serve for I'm sorry, what that's what we four that we're seeing.

Speaker 1

1:49

Yeah, so it's your referencing the kind of the red line of what the provision of the charter would look like, and that was subsection says that if someone vacates after serving 360 days, so that was discussed.

2:01

If someone were to take office and they were to vacate that office before they served a full year, uh the suggestion at our last conversation was that if they did it before, it would not be counted as a term against them

Unassigned speaker

2:14

before 360 days was served.

Unassigned speaker

2:15

So work on that person not necessarily the election time because we have two processes.

Unassigned speaker

2:21

That's correct.

Unassigned speaker

2:22

Second slash

Speaker 2

2:24

five.

Speaker 1

2:25

It's my understanding that the intention.

2:27

My understanding is the intention is this would be prospected.

2:30

So once it's adopted into the charter, that's when we begin to count moving forward.

2:36

Only would be things after terms served after it was adopted in the charter would count towards this limit.

2:42

That's my that's my understanding.

Unassigned speaker

2:45

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

2:47

Commissioner McCartney.

Unassigned speaker

2:49

Yeah, that's fine as well.

Unassigned speaker

2:51

There's gonna be prospective.

Unassigned speaker

2:57

I think go forward and trying to make it separate for 15 years from now, not looking back.

Speaker 3

3:10

Another people here

Unassigned speaker

3:14

about here just as much.

Speaker 3

3:18

Uh the other question.

3:22

All right, uh section three eight terms.

Speaker 1

3:42

Uh the next one is to accomplish term limits.

3:45

Uh specifically, this accomplishes or provides that a person can serve three terms as mayor, the person can serve three terms as council member.

3:52

That's what is to be accomplished by this proposition in the language that's proposed to be added to the charter.

3:59

When we drafted proposition B for this purpose, we'd ask the question shall Section 3A be added to Article 5 of the Northwoods Hills Home Rule Charter to provide that a council member shall be limited to three terms as a council member, but may serve three additional terms as mayor, and to provide that the mayor shall be limited to three terms as mayor, but may serve three additional terms as council member.

4:24

They this would uh apply.

4:31

So this one thing I want to note is being proposed as a separate proposition.

4:36

There's the potential that a three-year term proposition is turned down by the voters, and a term limit proposition is approved by the voters.

4:45

So just one thing to have in the back of your mind is is this is this your recommendation for term limits regardless of the change to the term?

Unassigned speaker

4:55

Uh and if not, does that promise for uh once you consider any additional language here to how this is presented to the voters?

Speaker 1

5:02

So technically it could be

Speaker 3

5:04

six

Speaker 1

5:05

of mayor,

Speaker 3

5:06

six is council members, twelve years total compared to if they change the terms to be eighteen.

Speaker 1

5:13

18 total, that's correct.

5:18

Versus six mayor, six council member with a two-year term.

Speaker 3

5:23

Any question?

5:26

Guess not section three, adding automatic resignation on becoming candidate for another office.

Speaker 1

5:35

This is what we we call the resign to run provision.

5:38

Uh this the purpose of this proposition will be to add resigned to run language to the charter to mirror requirements of section 65b article 16 of the Texas Constitution.

5:52

As proposed, proposition C would read Article 5, Section 3 of the North Richard Hills Home World Charter, be amended to provide the mayor or council member with more than one year and 30 days remaining in the term shall automatically resign their office upon becoming a candidate for any office of profit or trust other than the office then held and provide for filling the vacancy in the manner consistent with filling up vacancies.

6:21

So this language is is taken directly from the Constitution.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Charter Review████████████████████████████████████████40%
Election Regulations██████████████████████████████30%
Planning And Zoning███████████████15%
Municipal Court████████████12%
Procedural███3%
Summary of Proceedings

North Richland Hills Charter Review Commission Meeting – May 27, 2025

The North Richland Hills Charter Review Commission met on Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Workroom at City Hall, 4301 City Point Drive. Chair Ricky Rodriguez presided, and the meeting was adjourned at 4:53 p.m. The Commission voted 7-0 to approve the minutes and ballot propositions concerning City Council terms, term limits, resign-to-run, Municipal Court judge terms, and Planning and Zoning Commission terms. Commissioner Kelvin Deupree was absent.

Consent Calendar

  • C.1 – Approval of Minutes (March 24, 2025): Motion by Russ Mitchell, seconded by Jack McCarty, to approve the prior meeting minutes. Motion carried 7-0.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No citizens requested to speak. There were no public comments.

Discussion Items

  • C.2 – Proposition A (Three-Year Terms): City Attorney Bradley Anderle presented proposed ballot language to amend Article V, Sections 3 and 7, and add Section 3A. The proposition would: elect Mayor and Council members for three-year terms; require election by majority vote; establish a transition election schedule; define 730 days served as a three-year term; treat a person vacating office after serving 360 days as having served a term; allow vacancies with 364 days or less remaining to be filled by Mayoral appointment with Council approval; and require special elections within 120 days for vacancies with more than 364 days remaining. Commissioners discussed that the provision would apply prospectively, so only terms served after adoption would count toward term limits. Motion by Billy Parks, seconded by Russ Mitchell. Motion carried 7-0.
  • C.3 – Proposition B (Term Limits): Mr. Anderle presented language to add Section 3A limiting Council members to three terms as Council member, with up to three additional terms as Mayor; and limiting the Mayor to three terms as Mayor, with up to three additional terms as Council member. The Commission noted that if voters approved term limits but rejected three-year terms, the limits would still apply under two-year terms. Motion by Danny Roberts, seconded by Russ Mitchell. Motion carried 7-0.
  • C.4 – Proposition C (Resign to Run): Mr. Anderle presented two options from the Texas Constitution that would require automatic resignation for candidates with more than one year and 30 days remaining in their term. Commissioners expressed support for removing any time limitation, stating that an elected official should resign upon becoming a candidate for another office regardless of time remaining. Commissioner Jack McCarty said he did not see the point in a time limit, and Vice Chair Matt Blake agreed that a candidate's focus shifts after announcing. The Commission reached consensus to strike the time limitation. Motion by Matt Blake, seconded by Danny Roberts, to approve the amended proposition stating that a Mayor or Council member shall automatically resign upon becoming a candidate for any office of profit or trust other than the office then held. Motion carried 7-0.
  • C.5 – Proposition D (Municipal Court Judge Term): Mr. Anderle presented language to strike the requirement that the Municipal Court judge's term coincide with the Mayor's term, noting that if three-year Council terms were approved while the judge remained on a two-year term, the existing requirement would be impossible to satisfy. The Commission discussed whether to combine this with Proposition A but decided to keep it separate to avoid making the ballot proposition too long. Motion by Cecille Delaney, seconded by Matt Blake. Motion carried 7-0.
  • C.6 – Proposition E (Planning and Zoning Commission Terms): Mr. Anderle presented language providing three-year terms for Planning and Zoning Commission members, with appointment and duration coinciding with Council terms. Discussion noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission is the only board whose term details are in the charter. Commissioner McCarty suggested removing the specific three-year language and simply requiring terms to coincide with Council terms, so the term would automatically match whatever term Council members have. The Commission adopted that amendment. Motion by Matt Blake, seconded by Jack McCarty. Motion carried 7-0.

Key Outcomes

  • All six action items were approved unanimously, with each carrying 7-0.
  • The Commission approved five ballot propositions (A–E) for potential submission to voters, with amendments to Proposition C (removing the time limitation) and Proposition E (removing the specific three-year term language).
  • The Commission decided not to combine the Municipal Court judge provision with the three-year terms proposition.
  • The next Charter Review Commission meeting was scheduled for June 9, 2025, prior to the City Council meeting, to review the final language before referral to Council.

Meeting Transcript

Provided in the event there is one vacancy in any office with a three-year term with an unexpired term of 364 days or less may be filled by appointment of the mayor with approval of council to provide that vacancies in any office with a three-year term within an expired term of greater than 364 days must be filled by special election within 120 days of the vacancy. And all that's presented as a question that voters would then answer affirmatively yes or no. I I don't think uh Mr. Chairman, I suggest to you before that may have some questions to cross discussion, and maybe there's some revisions or changes that that the commission may want to uh to consider for this one. I don't have anything specific. So uh we had talked about again going through all of these propositions before the commission making the ultimate recommendations, uh but we can certainly have discussion now if there are any questions about this one. I just have we have a limited question here. Um I've got two uh eight or said personal might take three sixty shall serve served about constituted election person does not serve if they have more than three six without their requirements that what it's like so I'm gonna go back here. Okay, is that the very last one? Last bullet there says that parson dictates an office after serving period that it says three six it shall serve for I'm sorry, what that's what we four that we're seeing. Yeah, so it's your referencing the kind of the red line of what the provision of the charter would look like, and that was subsection says that if someone vacates after serving 360 days, so that was discussed. If someone were to take office and they were to vacate that office before they served a full year, uh the suggestion at our last conversation was that if they did it before, it would not be counted as a term against them before 360 days was served. So work on that person not necessarily the election time because we have two processes. That's correct. Second slash five. It's my understanding that the intention. My understanding is the intention is this would be prospected. So once it's adopted into the charter, that's when we begin to count moving forward. Only would be things after terms served after it was adopted in the charter would count towards this limit. That's my that's my understanding. Thank you. Commissioner McCartney. Yeah, that's fine as well. There's gonna be prospective. I think go forward and trying to make it separate for 15 years from now, not looking back. Another people here about here just as much. Uh the other question. All right, uh section three eight terms. Uh the next one is to accomplish term limits. Uh specifically, this accomplishes or provides that a person can serve three terms as mayor, the person can serve three terms as council member. That's what is to be accomplished by this proposition in the language that's proposed to be added to the charter. When we drafted proposition B for this purpose, we'd ask the question shall Section 3A be added to Article 5 of the Northwoods Hills Home Rule Charter to provide that a council member shall be limited to three terms as a council member, but may serve three additional terms as mayor, and to provide that the mayor shall be limited to three terms as mayor, but may serve three additional terms as council member. They this would uh apply. So this one thing I want to note is being proposed as a separate proposition. There's the potential that a three-year term proposition is turned down by the voters, and a term limit proposition is approved by the voters. So just one thing to have in the back of your mind is is this is this your recommendation for term limits regardless of the change to the term? Uh and if not, does that promise for uh once you consider any additional language here to how this is presented to the voters? So technically it could be six

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com