Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The North Richland Hills City Council met in work session at 5:30 p.m. and in regular session on September 8, 2025, at City Hall. The work session included a short-term rental scheduling discussion, an e-bike safety presentation, and the city manager report. After executive session and related board meetings, the regular meeting was called to order at 7:17 p.m. and adjourned at 9:56 p.m. Council approved the consent agenda, FY 2026 budget, tax rate, drone/heliport use revisions, construction awards, an appointment, and an Atmos settlement by 7-0 votes.
I was gonna go why? Oh yeah, never mind. I know why. I understand. Those switch your alliances. Oh my gosh. Four years ago on what they're having. Good evening. Welcome to North Shit Hill City Council work session. It's 5 30, and I will call the Monday September 8, 2025 City Council work session to order a quorum of the city council is present, and the meeting has been duly posted in accordance with TechSoup Meetings Act of the Texas government code. Items listed for discussion of the work session agenda, provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss the items and receive information from staff. The city council will not take action on any of the items listed for discussion during the work session, and any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed on the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting. First item on the agenda is to give City Council opportunity to ask any questions on items on the regular agenda that the council has not had clarification on at this time. Do you have any? So I will say this because of all the discussion, everything that's going on for the short-term uh rental um items. My intent is to request um keeping the hearing open for a later date. Um so that I'm just kind of really asking, is anybody objecting to that idea so that we're gathering more information on what we're gonna be wanting to do? We got we have a lot that we need to digest, and I think that kind of extending that period just a little bit time is is uh to a better date. And also um, well, let me say that. So let me ask one, do you all object to moving it to a later date? No. Okay. Um two is um Paulette, is there a date that we think that it might be a good time that we can have and to get more information and to digest the input that we're getting. So you just to clarify, you're asking to continue you'll you would open the public hearing, uh continue it to a future date, and then also postpone the two ordinances related to D1 and D2. D one and D two. So I think um you have to do a date specific and and uh I think the first meeting in October might be good, which is October 13th. Okay. Uh that way it gives us time again to review all the input that we've had to incorporate any um input or direction that we might receive from the council tonight or in the future about changes to be made to the ordinance. I think that would give us enough time. Two separate um D one would be one motion, and then D two I think you'd have to do two separate and and it would on those, so on the hearing if y'all are w are wanting to do that, it would be a motion to continue the hearing, and you have to include date specific. So if you're interested in October 13th, uh and then on those ordinances, it would be a motion to postpone uh consideration to the October 13th meeting. Oh sorry. Just one additional item with the date specific that the time should be included as well. If you wanted to make that out that's specific. Okay, good. Anybody else have anything else about that? Thank you. Um so one thing that's coming up was Thursday night that came up for clarification on this same conversation. We're going to I I want to make sure, and and I and I requested uh the uh HOA uh documents for um Thornbridge, and they said they they limit the ability to have any um short-term rentals at all.