OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - September 22, 2025

City Council & Boards — Monday, September 22, 2025
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, September 22, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:43:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

1:18

Good evening and welcome to the Northwestern Hills City Council Work Session.

1:22

It's five o'clock, and I will call them Monday, September 22nd, 2025 City Council Work Session Order.

1:27

The quorum of the city council is present, and the meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act of the Texas Government Code.

1:34

Items listed for discussion on the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss the items and receive information from the staff.

1:41

The city council will not take action on any of the items listed on the discussion during the work session.

1:46

Any members of

Unassigned speaker

1:47

the

Speaker 1

1:47

public wishing to address the council regarding the items listed on the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting.

1:58

The first item is to give the council the opportunity to ask questions

Unassigned speaker

2:01

on

Speaker 1

2:01

the items of the regular agenda that the council has not had clarification of this

Unassigned speaker

2:05

time.

Speaker 1

2:06

Any questions on anything that's on the regular agenda?

Unassigned speaker

2:08

It's

Speaker 1

2:09

relatively short one tonight.

2:11

So uh next item, Trudy Lewis.

2:17

The do you really have time to do this?

2:20

The uh the the uh legislative special session uh updates and bills now in effect.

Speaker 2

2:27

I appreciate the question.

2:31

We'll see,

Speaker 1

2:32

we'll see.

Speaker 2

2:32

Yeah, okay.

Unassigned speaker

2:47

Well,

Speaker 2

2:47

it was an active session.

2:48

It was definitely definitely an active session.

2:50

And uh we've certainly talked a few times as a group about um

Unassigned speaker

2:55

what

Speaker 2

2:56

happened during the session and also the two special called sessions, and so tonight we just want to bring forward um where we landed in terms of what's immediately effective and also as of September the first.

3:06

We do include in the city manager's uh weekly report uh the TML legislative update.

3:12

So the September legislative update from TML included this information.

3:16

We're not gonna assume that you read um that extensive report, and so tonight we're gonna go through um some of that information so that we can all get our bearings about things that'll be coming to you.

3:27

Certainly we're gonna bring these as we need to as they affect different parts of the city, our ordinances, our procedures, so on and so forth.

Unassigned speaker

3:35

So

Speaker 2

3:36

just some information um in terms of by the numbers.

3:39

We that the first we could file for bills starting in November.

3:43

So before the session officially convened, November 11th through March 14th, where the the dates where bills could be filed for the regular session.

3:51

Official session was January the 14th through June the second.

3:54

That was 140 days.

3:56

We did have two special called sessions.

3:58

The first started July 21st through August 5th, with the second being called from the 15th through the tw through the 4th of September.

4:05

So just 21 days.

4:44

Um ballot proposition language that's drafted by a home rule city.

4:47

So really people are able to file for complaints if they have them to have that language to be reviewed.

4:52

Also, if there's any proposition that seeks a voter approval rate, uh that the statement must be included.

5:03

So you all, you know, we we don't always think about it, but there are times when school districts and other taxing entities may have things that are coming forward for tax rate changes, and they may say it's a tax decrease because the rate's going down.

5:14

But the state really is wanting to make sure that we have proper disclosures in place to say that this is in fact a tax increase if you're going to the voters about the tax rate.

5:23

Bidding threshold is something we've talked about before.

5:26

So as we know that that threshold is going from 50,000 to 100,000.

5:30

The last time there was a change, it was about 20 years ago, and back in 2007 that moved it from 25 to 50,000.

5:37

So again, that's gone from 50,000 to 100,000.

5:39

We talked about that for some charter ballot language as a group previously as

Unassigned speaker

5:44

well.

Unassigned speaker

5:45

So

Speaker 2

5:46

there are a few things affecting bond and property tax reporting.

5:49

The first one is the comp troller is now going to maintain a database that has to do with current and historical information regarding property tax rate elections and also bonds that were issued by taxing entities.

6:01

So that's information, of course, we have, but the comprollers now going to be that the house, if you will, for reporting all of this across different taxing entities.

6:09

When we receive the information from the Comptroller's office about how to submit to this database, that is something that we will

Unassigned speaker

6:15

do.

Speaker 2

6:16

House Bill 3526 requires that the bond review committee to develop and maintain a searchable database on its website that provides information on each bond proposed or issued by a local government.

6:30

So again, this is really about creating more disclosures, creating databases, providing more readily available information about bond activity.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Short Term Rental Regulations██████████████████████████████30%
Procedural██████████10%
Zoning Regulations█████████9%
Legal█████████9%
Water And Wastewater Management████████8%
Technology and Innovation██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Government Ethics███3%
Property Tax Assessment███3%
Summary of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - September 22, 2025

The North Richland Hills City Council convened on Monday, September 22, 2025, for a work session at 5:00 PM followed by a regular meeting at 7:00 PM. The work session focused on legislative updates from the 89th Texas Legislature, utility billing challenges, and proposed short-term rental regulations. The regular meeting included public comments, approval of a consent agenda, appointment of Youth Advisory Committee members, and an amendment to the tax rate adoption ordinance. Key actions included unanimous approval of the consent agenda and youth committee appointments, while the short-term rental public hearing was continued to October 13, 2025.

Work Session – Legislative Update (89th Texas Legislature)

  • Trudy Lewis presented an overview of bills from the regular session (140 days, January 14 to June 2) and two special called sessions (July 21-August 5 and August 15-September 4).
  • Key effective changes include: bidding threshold increase from $50,000 to $100,000; new cybersecurity and AI training requirements; expanded cottage food vendor definitions (gross income ≤ $150,000); limitations on city code enforcement licensing; new deannexation petition processes; and restrictions on city regulation of no-impact home-based businesses (HB 2464).
  • Staff noted that several bills apply to cities with populations >150,000 and thus do not directly affect North Richland Hills. The city will bring back ordinance revisions as needed.

Work Session – Utility Billing Issues

  • Trudy Lewis and Paulette Hartman detailed the city's transition from a 27-year-old legacy system to a new software launched in March 2025, coinciding with a lockbox banking change and a citywide meter replacement project.
  • The utility billing department (7 staff) received over 6,000 calls per month initially; three temporary staff were added. Billing cycles (zones 11-18) experienced delays and compressed billing periods (as short as three weeks between bills).
  • Meter replacement is nearly complete; a lockbox transition from Frost Bank to JP Morgan Chase caused payment delays. No disconnections have been enforced for several months.
  • The city plans to hire an additional permanent staff member in fiscal year 2026 (starting October 1, 2025) and implement a chatbot and voice AI to improve customer service. An efficiency audit is scheduled.
  • Councilmember Mitchell asked about an after-action review; staff confirmed the audit will address lessons learned. Councilmember Ricky requested clarification on billing normalization; staff stated all cycles should return to normal by end of October 2025.

Work Session – Short-Term Rental Regulations

  • Corey presented proposed changes to the draft ordinance based on extensive public feedback (hundreds of pages of comments, town halls, and public hearings).
  • Key amendments include: removing the 50-unit minimum for multifamily complexes; allowing tenants to apply with owner consent; adjusting the initial registration deadline to January 31 (aligned with annual renewal); and replacing administrative warrant provisions with permit suspension/revocation if reinspection is not possible.
  • Parking regulations were discussed: the original draft prohibited on-street parking for STRs. Council consensus leaned toward aligning with home occupation parking rules (parking in driveway or immediately adjacent curb). Councilmember Bradley noted Arlington’s similar prohibition was upheld in court.
  • The zoning component would permit STRs by right in R7MF, C1, C2, and Town Center Neighborhood Core, but the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended removal of Town Center Neighborhood Center. Staff will present a final draft at the October 2 P&Z meeting and to council on October 13.
  • City Attorney Bradley provided a legal analysis, noting that all three constitutional challenges (retroactivity, due process, equal protection) raised in public comments have been rejected in cases against Arlington, Grapevine, and Fort Worth. He emphasized that the proposed ordinance’s occupancy limit (tracking Fair Housing Act recommendations) is distinct from the invalidated limit in the Austin Zatari case.
  • Councilmember Roberts expressed concern about removing inventory from the housing market; other members noted the ordinance aims to address nuisance complaints.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Lindsay Bednar (6609 Central Ave): Argued that well-managed STRs can prevent issues and that a zoning ban is an outright prohibition; questioned data linking STRs to housing affordability.
  • Gopi Cantamanini (7012 Bursey Rd N): Described investing life savings into an STR property based on staff assurance that future regulations would likely grandfather existing operations; asked for occupancy limits that allow 3 per room plus 2 additional guests to sustain debt payments.
  • Tracy Bennett (3825 Scruggs Dr): Reported that only two multifamily complexes in the city (managed by same company) allow STRs, implying the multifamily provision is ineffective; argued housing affordability issues stem from post-COVID migration, not STRs.
  • Citizens Presentations: Diana Duran (Potato King food truck) requested revision of the COVID-era ordinance prohibiting tents, tables, and chairs outside food trucks; William Bach (6640 Brookshire Trl) requested parking accommodations for recreational vehicles and trailers.

Consent Calendar (Unanimously Approved 7-0)

  • B.1: Minutes of September 8, 2025 City Council meeting.
  • B.2: Resolution No. 2025-040 – participation in national opioid settlement agreements (Purdue Pharma, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, Zydus).
  • B.3: First and second amendment to TxDOT Multiple Use Agreement for additional Flock Safety ALPR cameras.

Discussion Items

  • Youth Advisory Committee Appointments (G.1): Paulette Hartman presented Resolution No. 2025-041 appointing eight new members (Reagan Russell, Rehan Suleiman, Tyler Sonye, Abigail Parks, Gift Shone, Ian Settlmeyer, Holden Hayes, Kira Loney) for the 2025/2026 academic year. Six current members were recognized. Unanimously approved 6-0 (Councilmember Roberts abstained due to conflict of interest).
  • Tax Rate Disclosure Amendment (G.2): Chase presented an amendment to Ordinance No. 3924 to include omitted statutory disclosure language for the no-new-revenue maintenance and operations rate. The adopted tax rate of $0.497841 per $100 valuation remains unchanged and below the no-new-revenue rate. Unanimously approved 7-0.

Key Outcomes

  • The consent agenda (Items B.1, B.2, B.3) was approved unanimously (7-0).
  • Resolution No. 2025-041 appointing the Youth Advisory Committee was approved (6-0 with one abstention).
  • The amendment to Ordinance No. 3924 regarding tax rate disclosure was approved (7-0).
  • The public hearing on short-term rental regulations was continued to the October 13, 2025 regular meeting. Staff will incorporate council feedback on parking (align with home occupation rules) and present a revised draft to the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 2.
  • Council will consider possible abatement of penalties for back hotel occupancy taxes in executive session.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening and welcome to the Northwestern Hills City Council Work Session. It's five o'clock, and I will call them Monday, September 22nd, 2025 City Council Work Session Order. The quorum of the city council is present, and the meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act of the Texas Government Code. Items listed for discussion on the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss the items and receive information from the staff. The city council will not take action on any of the items listed on the discussion during the work session. Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding the items listed on the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting. The first item is to give the council the opportunity to ask questions on the items of the regular agenda that the council has not had clarification of this time. Any questions on anything that's on the regular agenda? It's relatively short one tonight. So uh next item, Trudy Lewis. The do you really have time to do this? The uh the the uh legislative special session uh updates and bills now in effect. I appreciate the question. We'll see, we'll see. Yeah, okay. Well, it was an active session. It was definitely definitely an active session. And uh we've certainly talked a few times as a group about um what happened during the session and also the two special called sessions, and so tonight we just want to bring forward um where we landed in terms of what's immediately effective and also as of September the first. We do include in the city manager's uh weekly report uh the TML legislative update. So the September legislative update from TML included this information. We're not gonna assume that you read um that extensive report, and so tonight we're gonna go through um some of that information so that we can all get our bearings about things that'll be coming to you. Certainly we're gonna bring these as we need to as they affect different parts of the city, our ordinances, our procedures, so on and so forth. So just some information um in terms of by the numbers. We that the first we could file for bills starting in November. So before the session officially convened, November 11th through March 14th, where the the dates where bills could be filed for the regular session. Official session was January the 14th through June the second. That was 140 days. We did have two special called sessions. The first started July 21st through August 5th, with the second being called from the 15th through the tw through the 4th of September. So just 21 days. Um ballot proposition language that's drafted by a home rule city. So really people are able to file for complaints if they have them to have that language to be reviewed. Also, if there's any proposition that seeks a voter approval rate, uh that the statement must be included. So you all, you know, we we don't always think about it, but there are times when school districts and other taxing entities may have things that are coming forward for tax rate changes, and they may say it's a tax decrease because the rate's going down. But the state really is wanting to make sure that we have proper disclosures in place to say that this is in fact a tax increase if you're going to the voters about the tax rate. Bidding threshold is something we've talked about before. So as we know that that threshold is going from 50,000 to 100,000. The last time there was a change, it was about 20 years ago, and back in 2007 that moved it from 25 to 50,000. So again, that's gone from 50,000 to 100,000.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com