Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The North Richland Hills City Council convened for a work session at 5:30 p.m. followed by a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. on March 9, 2026. The work session focused on potential term limits for board and commission members and updates on efficiency audits. The regular meeting included the approval of a special use permit for a cable assembly manufacturer, a contract for playground replacement at JB Sandlin Park, and a substantial authorization for Motorola public safety radios. The meeting concluded at 7:36 p.m.
The council approved the consent agenda (7-0, motion by Blake, second by Delaney), which included:
The council met in executive session from 5:50 p.m. to 6:46 p.m. to discuss pending litigation (Jessie Goodfellow v. City of North Richland Hills; Travis Scott Gray v. City of North Richland Hills), economic development negotiations (Northeast Corner of Boulevard 26 & Harwood Road; EZ Streets Empowerment Zone), and personnel matters (City Manager). No action was taken as a result of the executive session.
We got to move that move forward. Thanks for taking care of that. Good evening, and welcome to the North Trudson Hill City Council work session. It is 5 30 p.m. and I will call the Monday, March 9, 2026 City Council work session to order. A quorum of the city council is present. The meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Tex Open Meetings Act, the Texas Government Code. Items listed for discussion on the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the City Council to discuss the items and receive information from the staff. The City Council will not take action on any of the items listed up for discussion during the work session. Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed in the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting. So any clarifications anybody needs for the uh regular meeting. Oh no. Okay. We'll move on to the next item, which is to discuss the proposed ordinance uh amending the city's code of ordinances aligning with the terms uh for the board, commissions, and committee members to city council. Alicia. Mayor and council, I'm before you tonight to discuss the term limits for the board and commission members. You might recall that I've been before you two, three, maybe four times. Um just over the um the the time frame of discussing board and commission members after the city council November election passed, proposition A and proposition B, which deals with the term length and then also the term limit of the elected officials for the mayor and council members. At the February 9th meeting, staff brought back an item for work session for the city council to discuss if they wanted to, in fact, move and extend the term from two to three years. And then we also discussed term limits that like how it was approved in proposition B for the City Council. At that February 9th meeting, the council consensus was to align the board and commission member terms with that of the elected officials. So it's moving from two to three year terms at the meeting, council discussed, and it was not the desire at the time to um include term limits for board and commission members. And then at our February 23rd meeting during future work session items, it was requested that we place another item on the work session to discuss the term limits for board and commission members. So that is the reason why this item is before you tonight for a city council to discuss if they want to um apply term limits to board and commission members anybody wants to Billy? Sir Yeah, Mayor. Um I think the reason for asking it to be put back on just to to have a more in-depth discussion about it. Uh I I know we brought it up, we had some discussion about it, especially in light of the changing with the term limits that apply to the council members. Should there be for the opportunity perhaps to uh give other citizens opportunity to serve on different boards? I I'm not though that I'm taking a hard position one way or the other. I just think it's worthy of more discussion. And I wanted us to have the opportunity to do that. Okay. If anybody wants to have more discussion, Councilmember Mitchell. Um I just, you know, I don't see the reasoning behind doing the term limits for board members, whoever the new council person becomes has