OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on Data Center Regulations - July 20, 2026

City Council & Boards — Monday, July 20, 2026
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, July 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:13:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

A quorum of the Planning and Zoning Commission is present.

0:03

And the meeting has been posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act of the Texas government code.

0:09

At this time, I'll have Corey discuss the items on tonight's work session agenda.

Speaker 2

0:19

Good evening, commissioners.

0:21

It's nice to see you again so soon after the last meeting.

0:23

We will try not to have more special meetings in the next few months, but I can't promise.

Unassigned speaker

0:29

So

Speaker 2

0:29

we only have one item on the agenda tonight, so it should be a pretty uh pretty much of a recap from the last meeting.

0:36

But oh, we've got the wrong

Speaker 3

0:38

presentation.

Unassigned speaker

0:41

That

Speaker 2

0:42

was last meeting.

0:44

What in the world?

Unassigned speaker

0:48

I

Speaker 2

0:48

thought I'd just open that.

0:56

Okay.

0:57

Try this again.

1:00

Okay.

1:03

Sorry about

Unassigned speaker

1:04

that.

Unassigned speaker

1:04

So

Speaker 2

1:04

we have one item on the agenda this evening, and so that's really all we have on the work session agenda.

1:08

We don't have any additional just specific to work session topics.

1:12

So I'm gonna run through this, but I will say that I would like to spend as much time as we can on this in the actual regular meeting since that's a public hearing, so the public can hear kind of the entirety of the presentation.

1:22

Um happy to answer any questions.

1:24

We also have the city attorney

Unassigned speaker

1:25

here.

Speaker 2

1:26

Um should you have any questions, and we may have some executive session uh legal advice at some point during this meeting.

1:37

So the public hearing that's on the agenda tonight is not specific to any one particular case or data center or proposed data center, it is simply a text revision.

1:46

It's a proposed change to our zoning ordinance related to data centers and the allowance for them in certain zones by right or by special use permit.

1:54

But um, just to kind of step back, I went through a little bit of this last meeting, but again, this is the the public hearing this evening, so I want to make sure to get into all the details for you.

2:04

Um, so the history of this um the section of the ordinance or this code, if you will, for related to data centers,

Speaker 1

2:11

um,

Speaker 2

2:11

really want to kind of get into the why, uh, why did we ever amend the regulations related to data centers?

2:18

I know that I personally have had a lot of questions about it.

2:20

I'm sure that you and the council have also received questions about why we took any action to change the code last year.

2:26

Um, and then

Unassigned speaker

2:27

uh

Speaker 2

2:27

what research we conducted kind of before we moved into changes uh to the code.

2:33

So last spring we were pro uh we were approached by a possible data center developer who uh was looking for properties to develop small scale data centers.

2:44

Uh so I think our code, I'll get into the definitions a little bit more, talks about those being 10,000 square foot or less.

2:50

I don't know that we had a specific square footage that was proposed at the time, but just based on kind of the the state of the city and how built out we are, and not a ton of just open land area, the discussion centered pretty much around small scale facilities.

3:06

And so when we were looking at ordinances and drafting

Unassigned speaker

3:09

uh

Speaker 2

3:09

changes to the code, that was really what was in the back of our

Unassigned speaker

3:12

mind.

Speaker 2

3:12

Um we didn't have any data centers that we knew of, at least operating within the city and didn't have anything defined in our code, and so just like we would with any other proposed use, we started the process of uh reaching out to other communities.

3:26

Um, this is just a little snippet from one of the tables.

3:29

It's not the whole thing, but part of the table that we were using to kind of just track notes internally

Unassigned speaker

3:34

on

Speaker 2

3:34

what other cities were doing, had they added in a use for data centers, where were they permitted, what was the definition, all those sorts of things.

3:41

So we just kind of gather information from a number of other places to kind of just see what everybody else is doing.

3:47

We certainly don't want to reinvent the wheel if somebody has already gone through this process and and figured things

Unassigned speaker

3:52

out.

Unassigned speaker

3:53

So

Speaker 2

3:53

it became pretty apparent through that process that there was no one size fits all.

3:57

Uh, a whole lot of cities had not taken any action related to data centers at the time.

Unassigned speaker

4:01

Um,

Speaker 2

4:01

some of you that were on the commission probably remember that.

Unassigned speaker

4:04

Uh

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Data Center Regulations█████████████████████████████████████████████61%
Procedural█████████████████23%
Zoning Regulations████6%
Public Safety███4%
Public Engagement█2%
Property Tax Assessment█1%
Affordable Housing█1%
Environmental Protection█1%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on Data Center Regulations - July 20, 2026

The North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Commission met on Monday, July 20, 2026, for a work session at 6:30 PM and a regular meeting at 7:26 PM. The primary agenda item was a public hearing (Case TR26-04) on proposed amendments to Chapter 118 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding data center facilities. After extensive public testimony and deliberation, the commission voted unanimously (7-0) to recommend requiring a Special Use Permit (SUP) for all future data centers, changing the current by-right allowances in several zoning districts.

Work Session (6:30 PM)

The work session began with a presentation by Director of Planning Cori Reaume on the regular meeting agenda. The commission then entered Executive Session at 6:59 PM to seek legal advice from the City Attorney on the posted subject matter (TR26-04), concluding at 7:20 PM. No future agenda items were proposed.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No speakers came forward during the general public comment period (A.2).
  • Twelve residents spoke during the public hearing on TR26-04. All expressed support for the text amendment requiring Special Use Permits (SUPs) for data centers, while many urged the adoption of further stringent regulations:
    • Luke Carnevale (5610 Southern Hills Dr) supported the SUP as a first step and requested mandatory distance requirements, raising concerns about EMF radiation.
    • Mark Vaughn (5901 Pedernales Ridge), a 32-year veteran of the data center industry, supported the SUP and requested more use categories, a ban on cryptocurrency mining, height limits, closed-loop water systems, and third-party sound studies.
    • Amber Monaghan (7544 Field Stone Dr) requested regulations addressing infrasound and low-frequency noise, and a distinction between traditional, AI, and crypto data centers. She described a 50 megawatt data center as using energy equivalent to roughly 40,000 homes.
    • Lydia Mahserjian (5610 Valhalla Dr) cited the 12,000 square foot Woolliger Way data center, permitted by right with no public notice, as evidence of the gap the SUP would close.
    • Kristina Carnevale (5610 Southern Hills Dr) emphasized the need for objective measurable conditions for SUP approval, including noise limits and independent compliance testing. She referenced a proposed 330,000 square foot, 50 megawatt data center.
    • Deborah [Jogu/Krager] (57 Southern Hayes Dr) thanked the commission for taking the issue seriously and urged strong action to protect residents.
    • Christopher Skirvin (Foster Village North) supported the SUP and a minimum 300-foot residential buffer zone, arguing data centers place unyielding strain on the grid.
    • Lindsey Eagan (5601 Havana Dr) stated the SUP alone was insufficient without strong underlying standards, and asked the commission to do more to establish regulations now.
    • John Schleeter (6553 Northern Dancer Dr) argued property value impacts should be a primary concern for the commission.
    • Karran Martin (5614 Westchase Dr) asked the commission to distinguish AI data centers, argued 250-foot setbacks were insufficient, and stressed that resident health and nearby businesses should be prioritized over potential tax revenue.
    • Becky Hernandez (7708 Westcliff Dr) requested pre-development sound studies, a review of the sound ordinance to address gaps between industrial and residential limits, and a ban on cryptocurrency operations.
    • Aubrey Recchia (8721 Copper Canyon Rd) spoke against new data centers without specific restrictions, citing concerns about the power grid, resource depletion, and the societal impacts of AI technologies.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation: Director of Planning Cori Reaume presented the history of data center zoning, including definitions adopted in 2025 for Small Scale (up to 10,000 sq ft) and General (over 10,000 sq ft) data centers. She detailed current by-right permissions and public concerns (water usage, power usage, noise). She reviewed actions in other cities (Fort Worth P&Z denial of regulations, Hill County lawsuit reversal of a moratorium) and formally recommended requiring a Special Use Permit (SUP) for all data centers, framing it as an immediate step one.
  • Commissioner Deliberation: Commissioners discussed the flexibility of the SUP process for site-specific evaluation. Commissioner Narayana raised questions about the definition of primarily used and proposed a tiered approach. Chair Carpenter framed the SUP as a tool for local control, allowing the city to manage a rapidly evolving industry without being locked into a premature set of criteria. The City Attorney confirmed that developing criteria could be applied during SUP review even while formal regulations are being drafted.

Key Outcomes

  • Recommended Approval of TR26-04: The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the text amendment to the City Council. This amendment changes the permit requirement for all data centers from Permitted by Right to requiring a Special Use Permit (SUP) across all zoning districts.
  • Next Steps: The City Council is scheduled to consider the item at its meeting on July 27, 2026.
  • Commitment to Future Work: Staff committed to continuing development of detailed regulations for data centers, including potential noise standards, setback requirements, and a tiered classification system.

Meeting Transcript

A quorum of the Planning and Zoning Commission is present. And the meeting has been posted in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act of the Texas government code. At this time, I'll have Corey discuss the items on tonight's work session agenda. Good evening, commissioners. It's nice to see you again so soon after the last meeting. We will try not to have more special meetings in the next few months, but I can't promise. So we only have one item on the agenda tonight, so it should be a pretty uh pretty much of a recap from the last meeting. But oh, we've got the wrong presentation. That was last meeting. What in the world? I thought I'd just open that. Okay. Try this again. Okay. Sorry about that. So we have one item on the agenda this evening, and so that's really all we have on the work session agenda. We don't have any additional just specific to work session topics. So I'm gonna run through this, but I will say that I would like to spend as much time as we can on this in the actual regular meeting since that's a public hearing, so the public can hear kind of the entirety of the presentation. Um happy to answer any questions. We also have the city attorney here. Um should you have any questions, and we may have some executive session uh legal advice at some point during this meeting. So the public hearing that's on the agenda tonight is not specific to any one particular case or data center or proposed data center, it is simply a text revision. It's a proposed change to our zoning ordinance related to data centers and the allowance for them in certain zones by right or by special use permit. But um, just to kind of step back, I went through a little bit of this last meeting, but again, this is the the public hearing this evening, so I want to make sure to get into all the details for you. Um, so the history of this um the section of the ordinance or this code, if you will, for related to data centers, um, really want to kind of get into the why, uh, why did we ever amend the regulations related to data centers? I know that I personally have had a lot of questions about it. I'm sure that you and the council have also received questions about why we took any action to change the code last year. Um, and then uh what research we conducted kind of before we moved into changes uh to the code. So last spring we were pro uh we were approached by a possible data center developer who uh was looking for properties to develop small scale data centers. Uh so I think our code, I'll get into the definitions a little bit more, talks about those being 10,000 square foot or less. I don't know that we had a specific square footage that was proposed at the time, but just based on kind of the the state of the city and how built out we are, and not a ton of just open land area, the discussion centered pretty much around small scale facilities. And so when we were looking at ordinances and drafting uh changes to the code, that was really what was in the back of our mind. Um we didn't have any data centers that we knew of, at least operating within the city and didn't have anything defined in our code, and so just like we would with any other proposed use, we started the process of uh reaching out to other communities. Um, this is just a little snippet from one of the tables. It's not the whole thing, but part of the table that we were using to kind of just track notes internally on

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com