OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/North Richland Hills, Texas/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - July 27, 2026

City Council & Boards — Monday, July 27, 2026
BodyNorth Richland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, July 27, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:26:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:12

That's not out of the good

Speaker 1

0:24

evening.

0:24

Welcome to the North Richland Hill City Council work session as 5 p.m.

0:27

And I will call the Monday, July 27, 2026, City Council work session to order.

0:32

A quorum of the City Council is present.

0:34

The meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Tex So Meetings Act of the Texas Government Code.

0:39

Let the record reflect that council member Matt Blake is absent.

0:44

Items listed for the discussion on the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss the items and receive information from the staff.

0:53

The city council will not take action on any of the items listed for discussion during the work session.

0:57

Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed on the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting.

1:07

Moving to the first item on here, it gives the council an opportunity to ask questions for the items on the regular agenda that the council has not had clarification on at this time.

1:17

Does anybody have anything any clarification on?

Speaker 2

1:20

I got a couple questions.

1:22

Um the wing aviation for Richmond Plaza.

1:31

Are they buying a building or are they leasing a spot and just using the parking

Unassigned speaker

1:36

lot

Speaker 2

1:38

as a

Unassigned speaker

1:40

place

Speaker 2

1:40

for the drones to be?

Unassigned speaker

1:42

I

Speaker 1

1:42

think they're leasing a spot that's there on the front of the parking lot.

Speaker 3

1:45

It is, it's just completely in the parking lot.

1:47

There's no attachment to a building or no construction of a building aside from their proposed um accessory structure that would house their equipment outside in the parking lot.

Unassigned speaker

1:57

The

Speaker 2

1:58

circle we have on the picture included part of the building.

2:01

That's the reason I was wondering if they were buying the building or leasing the building, but they're just only doing the parking lot, right?

Speaker 3

2:06

There's no no component of the building that they're leasing.

2:09

I'd have to see what exhibit you're looking at.

2:11

It's just the it's a rectangular area in the parking lot on the kind of the far south.

2:16

What is it, southwest end of the parking lot where it's just unused, unutiled underutilized parking area.

Speaker 2

2:21

Okay, just the picture shows part of the building.

2:24

That's the reason I was asking that question.

2:25

That's it's that's fine.

2:27

There's

Speaker 3

2:27

a there's you

Speaker 2

2:28

clarified it.

Speaker 3

2:28

There's a site plan in the packet as well that shows really the outlines of that that specific area in the parking lot.

Speaker 2

2:34

And that's where I came up with

Unassigned speaker

2:36

it.

Speaker 4

2:37

So not a building.

Speaker 2

2:48

Okay.

Speaker 3

2:49

Sorry, we have some slides in the in the presentation that'll show you the specific location as well.

Speaker 1

2:55

Okay.

2:56

Um was that the just the address that was associated with it that it could be.

Speaker 3

2:59

It probably

Speaker 1

2:59

is just building.

Speaker 3

3:00

It probably is just the notification area that you're looking at.

3:02

There's a there's a site plan exhibit as well.

3:05

That's um, it's a black and white um sheet as a backup document that shows specifically in the parking lot what portion would be.

Unassigned speaker

3:14

Yeah, it just shows it in the parking lot.

Speaker 2

3:17

Okay, thank

Unassigned speaker

3:18

you.

Speaker 1

3:21

Anything else?

3:22

You said a couple.

3:23

Anybody else?

3:26

Back

Speaker 4

3:26

to where

Speaker 1

3:26

it was.

3:30

Nobody has anything else.

3:31

We will move on to the next item.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability██████████████████████22%
Zoning Regulations████████████████16%
Technology and Innovation███████████████15%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Environmental Protection█████████9%
Procedural███████7%
Budget Equity Analysis███████7%
Library Improvements████4%
Surveillance Technology███3%
Summary of Proceedings

North Richland Hills City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting - July 27, 2026

The North Richland Hills City Council met on July 27, 2026, beginning with a work session at 5:00 PM to discuss certified taxable values and proposed bond election language, followed by a regular meeting at 7:20 PM. Key actions included approval of consent agenda items, public hearings on a drone delivery service revision and data center zoning amendments, appointment of municipal judges, and authorization of a lease amendment for Back Forty Smokehouse LLC.

Consent Calendar

  • All 13 consent agenda items were approved unanimously (6-0), including routine approvals such as the June 22, 2026, meeting minutes; an alcohol variance amendment; technology purchases (Distributed Antenna System, hardware, audio-visual solutions); a Ford service and parts agreement; four police-equipped motorcycles ($184,245.60); license plate reader device subscriptions (Resolutions 2026-043 and 2026-044 for combined $481,110.53 using grants from the North Texas Anti-Gang Center); grant applications for law enforcement mental health (up to $200,000) and a fire department hazmat truck ($1.95 million with a $1.05 million local match); pre-qualified engineering firms; and a School Resource Officer Sergeant agreement with Birdville ISD.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Karran Martin (5614 Westchase Drive) spoke during public comments, opposing Resolutions 2026-043 and 2026-044 for license plate reader subscriptions. She raised privacy concerns, questioned the effectiveness of the cameras, noted the total cost of nearly half a million dollars, and suggested the funds could be used for other law enforcement needs.
  • During the public hearing on the drone delivery revision:
    • Katie Bowman (Birdville ISD) spoke in support, highlighting educational partnerships and noting that FAA constraints limited available locations on the property.
    • Sean Nutt (6852 Greenleaf Drive) commented on the temporary nature of the proposed black fence, comparing it to the Walmart setups.
  • During the public hearing on data center zoning amendments:
    • Mark Vaughn (5901 Pedernales Ridge) supported requiring Special Use Permits but urged further definitions for large-scale centers, closed-loop cooling, and power density limits.
    • Karran Martin (again) supported the amendment as a first step but requested stronger regulations, including larger buffers (beyond 250 feet), bans on crypto mining, no economic incentives, and addressing heat island effects.
    • Lindsey Eagan (5601 Havana Drive) supported the amendment and asked for additional regulations such as banning crypto centers and strengthening distance requirements.
    • Yisak Worku (4928 Blaney Avenue) supported the amendment and recommended energy density requirements and updating the noise ordinance to address infrasound.
    • Amber Monaghan (7544 Field Stone Drive) supported the amendment, raising concerns about low-frequency noise health impacts and calling for independent sound studies and a fund for city-hired experts.
    • Elizabeth Reddock (4625 Mackey Drive) urged immediate approval and a moratorium on data centers, citing grid stability, noise, and distance from schools.
    • Mark Biggs (6616 Victoria Avenue) supported the amendment, stating current distance requirements are insufficient.
    • Lydia Mahserjian (5610 Valhalla Drive) supported the amendment and pointed out inconsistencies in the city's noise ordinance and setback requirements for cooling equipment.
    • Lynn (no address provided) spoke in favor of lower decibel limits, citing personal sound sensitivity.
  • One form in opposition was received but the individual did not speak.

Discussion Items

  • 2026 Certified Taxable Values: Assistant City Manager Trudy Lewis presented the Tarrant Appraisal District certified values. Market value decreased 2.7% to $8.8 billion; estimated net taxable value dropped 4.7% to $7.06 billion. New construction value fell 58.5% to $41 million, reflecting near build-out. Staff attributed compression to litigation ($228 million in property reduced from the 2025 roll, losing $1.1 million in revenue), business personal property exemptions ($68 million lost, equivalent to ~$340,000 in revenue), and increased protest activity (30% increase in protests since 2024, with average loss per protest rising from 12.5% to 17%). Residential reappraisals have been suspended since 2024 but will resume in 2027, likely triggering more protests. The TAD chief appraiser noted a shift toward an "equity spiral" methodology. The proposed budget will be based on these certified values.
  • Proposed November 2026 Bond Election: Assistant City Manager Trudy Lewis reviewed four separate propositions totaling $145,970,000, as recommended by the Capital Program Advisory Committee. Each proposition will carry the statement "THIS IS A TAX INCREASE." Proposition A: $26.3 million for reconstruction of Fire Stations 2 and 3. Proposition B: $84.26 million for reconstruction of up to 50 major and residential streets. Proposition C: $24.7 million for a city services complex consolidating public works, parks, and fleet maintenance. Proposition D: $10.71 million for library expansion and restroom reconfiguration. The election must be called by August 10, 2026, with voting on November 3, 2026. The estimated tax impact per $100,000 of value is $24.99. Any proposition that fails cannot be issued debt for three years. Council discussed interest rate assumptions and the flexibility of general proposition language to allow value engineering.
  • Wing Aviation Drone Delivery (ZC26-0162): A requested revision to Planned Development 35 on 5.267 acres at 6321 Boulevard 26 (Richland Plaza parking lot). The applicant, Wing Aviation LLC, described operations serving DoorDash deliveries using drones that pick up orders from local restaurants. The site would include a fenced landing pad (covering 31 parking spaces), a storage container/garden shed, and a generator. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-1-1 (one abstention). Council discussed the aesthetics of the fence and storage building, visibility from Boulevard 26, and the possibility of relocating the pad to the back of the parking lot. The applicant noted FAA constraints on location. City Manager Paulette Hartman suggested conditioning approval on more permanent facilities upon renewal and adding landscaping along Boulevard 26.
  • Data Center Zoning Amendments (TR26-04): Director of Planning Cori Reaume presented proposed text amendments to require a Special Use Permit (SUP) for all data centers in any zoning district, removing current by-right allowances in I-1, I-2, and C-2 districts. The current definition divides data centers into small-scale (≤10,000 sq ft) and general (>10,000 sq ft). Staff noted that SUP will allow site-specific review of impacts such as noise, water usage, and setbacks. Councilmember Roberts expressed interest in also adopting Fort Worth's proposed regulations, including a 5-decibel pre/post sound study requirement. The amendment passed 6-0, with staff committed to further developing detailed regulations.
  • Future Agenda Item: Council Member Billy Parks requested a future work session item to discuss the city's sign ordinance and options for temporary signage on main thoroughfares. The council agreed to place the item on a future agenda.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda (Items B.1–B.13): Approved 6-0.
  • Wing Aviation Revision (Ordinance No. 3962): Approved 5-1, with Council Member Mitchell voting against.
  • Data Center Zoning Amendments (Ordinance No. 3965): Approved 6-0, requiring Special Use Permits for all data centers.
  • Municipal Court Judge Appointments (Ordinance No. 3966): Approved 6-0, appointing Presiding Judge Stuart Bass and Associate Judges Lorraine Erby and Bonnie Wolf for two-year terms expiring in 2028.
  • Executive Session Action: Authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute a lease amendment with Back Forty Smokehouse LLC for properties at 8021 and 8029 Main Street (6-0).
  • Future Work Session: An item on sign ordinance review will be placed on a future agenda.

Meeting Transcript

That's not out of the good evening. Welcome to the North Richland Hill City Council work session as 5 p.m. And I will call the Monday, July 27, 2026, City Council work session to order. A quorum of the City Council is present. The meeting has been duly posted in accordance with the Tex So Meetings Act of the Texas Government Code. Let the record reflect that council member Matt Blake is absent. Items listed for the discussion on the work session agenda provide an opportunity for the city council to discuss the items and receive information from the staff. The city council will not take action on any of the items listed for discussion during the work session. Any members of the public wishing to address the council regarding items listed on the work session agenda may do so during the public comments portion of the regular meeting. Moving to the first item on here, it gives the council an opportunity to ask questions for the items on the regular agenda that the council has not had clarification on at this time. Does anybody have anything any clarification on? I got a couple questions. Um the wing aviation for Richmond Plaza. Are they buying a building or are they leasing a spot and just using the parking lot as a place for the drones to be? I think they're leasing a spot that's there on the front of the parking lot. It is, it's just completely in the parking lot. There's no attachment to a building or no construction of a building aside from their proposed um accessory structure that would house their equipment outside in the parking lot. The circle we have on the picture included part of the building. That's the reason I was wondering if they were buying the building or leasing the building, but they're just only doing the parking lot, right? There's no no component of the building that they're leasing. I'd have to see what exhibit you're looking at. It's just the it's a rectangular area in the parking lot on the kind of the far south. What is it, southwest end of the parking lot where it's just unused, unutiled underutilized parking area. Okay, just the picture shows part of the building. That's the reason I was asking that question. That's it's that's fine. There's a there's you clarified it. There's a site plan in the packet as well that shows really the outlines of that that specific area in the parking lot. And that's where I came up with it. So not a building. Okay. Sorry, we have some slides in the in the presentation that'll show you the specific location as well. Okay. Um was that the just the address that was associated with it that it could be. It probably is just building. It probably is just the notification area that you're looking at. There's a there's a site plan exhibit as well. That's um, it's a black and white um sheet as a backup document that shows specifically in the parking lot what portion would be. Yeah, it just shows it in the parking lot.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com