OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Oakland, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Oakland Planning Commission Meeting – September 24, 2026

City Council — Thursday, September 24, 2026
BodyOakland, California
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:15:17

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:13

Good afternoon.

0:15

This will be the September 23rd Planning Commission starting at 3 p.m.

0:21

or when we have our fourth commissioner to make a quorum.

0:26

And meanwhile, if you would like to speak on any agendized items, including open forum, please grab a speaker card from the front here, the white small cards, fill it out and turn those into Steph so she can organize them per item.

0:41

And if you parked at the Dol Zeal Garage, the city does offer promoted parking.

0:48

And Steph has the code up here to use.

0:51

We can't if you have any issues using it, unfortunately, it's through a different department with their own app.

0:59

Um, so we aren't able to help you very much with the promoted parking, but it is available.

1:06

I will leave it at that.

1:07

Thank you.

2:05

Welcome everyone to the September 23rd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting.

2:11

I'd like to call the meeting to order.

2:13

And clerk, could you please call roll?

2:17

Commissioner Rank.

2:19

Here.

2:23

Here.

2:24

Vice Chair Randolph.

2:25

Here.

2:26

Chair Ahrens.

2:27

Here.

2:28

You have a quorum.

2:30

Thank you so much.

2:31

I will move us on to Commission business.

2:34

Do we have any agenda discussion for today?

2:38

None from the Secretary.

2:40

All right.

2:40

And a director's report, no director's report today.

2:44

Informational report, no information reports today.

2:48

And committee reports, I believe we have not had any committee meetings since we last met.

2:53

That is correct.

2:54

So I will move us to commission matters.

2:58

Yes, Vice Chair.

3:00

Yeah, I just had a question.

3:01

I know last meeting I I made some comments or questions around data centers and potential specific zoning codes for them.

3:11

And then since then, there's been additional activity at the city council level with I think a potential moratorium coming and revising the planning code.

3:21

Do you have any updates or thoughts of what that might be or what would come to the commission?

3:27

Right.

3:27

We can't speak.

3:28

That's what you know is basically what we know, what went to uh life enrichment committee yesterday, I believe.

3:36

Uh so that will run its course, and if that has any implications for the planning code or the Bureau of Planning's operations, we will inform you.

3:46

Thank you.

3:52

And our city attorney notes that the draft moratorium that was considered yesterday will go to city council on October 6th.

4:00

At this point, it's uh destined for the October 26th City Council agenda.

4:06

Did I say 26?

4:07

Apologies.

4:08

Six, October 6th, City Council agenda.

4:16

Thank you.

4:17

Any other items from commissioners.

4:20

I'll just take a brief moment maybe to um reiterate.

4:24

I think earlier this year we had asked for the director to come, and so just before the end of the year, it would be great to hear from him again.

4:33

Um any updates over the last six months or so.

4:36

I know that he has a meeting usually at this time, but hopefully between now and the end of the year we can hear from him.

4:42

I will pass that request along and let you know when he intends to be here next.

4:48

Wonderful, thank you.

4:49

Okay, moving to city attorney's report.

4:53

No city attorney's report, thank you.

4:57

Okay, I will now move us on to open forum.

5:00

So this is a time for members of the public uh that can speak uh for items that are not listed on the agenda today, and I will give two minutes for each speaker.

5:11

Thank you.

5:12

All right, we have four speakers for open forum.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural████████████████████20%
Code Enforcement████████████████████20%
Public Safety█████████████████17%
Alcohol Beverage Control█████████████13%
Business Improvement Districts██████████10%
Public Comment██████6%
Zoning and Land Use██████6%
Cannabis Regulation██████6%
Data Center Regulation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Oakland Planning Commission Meeting – September 24, 2026

Note: The meeting transcript refers to September 23, 2026, but the user-provided metadata indicates the meeting occurred on September 24, 2026. This summary uses the latter date for the title but notes the discrepancy.

The meeting was called to order at 3 p.m. with a quorum present. Agenda discussion, director's report, informational reports, and committee reports were all waived. The commission discussed a potential data center moratorium moving to City Council on October 6, 2026, and the director's upcoming visit was requested.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Layla Gall (Rockridge Neighbors for Sensible Housing) expressed strong opposition to the proposed 85-foot building at 6230 Claremont (plan #26025), arguing that city staff's density bonus calculations are overly liberal and that the project is a critical test case for density laws in Rockridge. She urged the commission to scrutinize the rationale and hold staff to legal standards.
  • Victoria Griffith (resident on Florio Street, adjacent to the project) stated that the 85-foot wall would block sunlight after midday, strip her home of warmth and natural light, obstruct airflow, eliminate privacy, and adversely affect her physical and psychological well-being. She argued the design threatens neighborhood health and safety.
  • Paul Laurie (Rockridge resident, two blocks from the site) characterized the developer as a large corporate entity with low risk in the project but high consequences for the community. He warned of material degradation to the neighborhood and implored close scrutiny.
  • Isaac Cos Reed (D2 resident, Parks and Recreation commissioner) advocated for Red Fox Resources, a green business facing a neighbor complaint, and asked for a hearing date. Staff noted that October 21, 2026, lacks a quorum, so the item will be rescheduled.

Discussion Items

Public Hearing – 1437 23rd Avenue (Conditional Use Permit for Alcoholic Beverage Sales)

This item was continued from October 1, 2025, and July 15, 2026. Staff planner Mike Rivera presented the applicant's revised proposal following feedback from the Planning Commission and the City Alcohol Beverage Action Team (ABAT). Key modifications included:

  • Prohibiting anyone under 18 years old from the pool hall (removing youth activities).
  • Proposed on-site beer sales from 2 p.m. to 12 a.m. daily (the commission had earlier recommended 7 p.m.–11 p.m. weekdays, 2 p.m.–11 p.m. weekends).
  • Licensed security guard only on Saturdays from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. (the commission had recommended a guard during all alcohol sales hours).
  • New clear glazing storefront, improved lighting, and security cameras.
  • A community engagement plan with posted contact information and staff training.

Staff recommended approval subject to conditions in Attachment D.

Commissioner Questions and Discussion:

  • Vice Chair Randolph raised concerns about the security guard not being present on Fridays, the lack of a sunset or reauthorization mechanism (staff explained temporary permits are not standard but applicants can later seek condition revisions), and enforcement of under-21 alcohol restrictions. She suggested visible identification (wristbands/stamps) for patrons 21+.
  • Commissioner Rank inquired about past code violations; staff confirmed two past cases (related to unpermitted music activities) had been closed with no recent issues.
  • Commissioner Lee visited the pool hall and noted the locked door, limited furniture, and need for a social area. The applicant agreed to add seating.

The applicant, Julio Cervantes, stated willingness to implement identification systems but cited financial constraints for adding a Friday security guard. He confirmed on-site consumption only and ongoing communication with nearby Bay Tech Charter School.

Commission Deliberation: Vice Chair Randolph proposed adding conditions to the staff draft: (1) licensed security guard from 8 p.m. until closing on Fridays and Saturdays, (2) alcohol sales restricted to on-site consumption, (3) video security footage retained for at least 30 days, and (4) a visible identification system (e.g., wristbands or stamps) for patrons 21 and older (method at applicant's discretion). Commissioner Rank and Chair Ahrens expressed concerns about over-prescription and financial burden, but a motion was made and seconded.

Key Outcomes

  • Vote on 1437 23rd Avenue: The commission voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the major conditional use permit and variances, affirming staff's environmental determination, and adding the four conditions above. The decision is appealable to City Council within 17 days.
  • Minutes Approval: The minutes from the September 2, 2026, meeting were approved unanimously.
  • Next Steps: Staff noted that the data center moratorium draft ordinance will go to City Council on October 6, 2026. The SB 79 amendments are also scheduled for council on that date. The commission's next regular meeting will be duly noticed.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. This will be the September 23rd Planning Commission starting at 3 p.m. or when we have our fourth commissioner to make a quorum. And meanwhile, if you would like to speak on any agendized items, including open forum, please grab a speaker card from the front here, the white small cards, fill it out and turn those into Steph so she can organize them per item. And if you parked at the Dol Zeal Garage, the city does offer promoted parking. And Steph has the code up here to use. We can't if you have any issues using it, unfortunately, it's through a different department with their own app. Um, so we aren't able to help you very much with the promoted parking, but it is available. I will leave it at that. Thank you. Welcome everyone to the September 23rd, 2026 Planning Commission meeting. I'd like to call the meeting to order. And clerk, could you please call roll? Commissioner Rank. Here. Here. Vice Chair Randolph. Here. Chair Ahrens. Here. You have a quorum. Thank you so much. I will move us on to Commission business. Do we have any agenda discussion for today? None from the Secretary. All right. And a director's report, no director's report today. Informational report, no information reports today. And committee reports, I believe we have not had any committee meetings since we last met. That is correct. So I will move us to commission matters. Yes, Vice Chair. Yeah, I just had a question. I know last meeting I I made some comments or questions around data centers and potential specific zoning codes for them. And then since then, there's been additional activity at the city council level with I think a potential moratorium coming and revising the planning code. Do you have any updates or thoughts of what that might be or what would come to the commission? Right. We can't speak. That's what you know is basically what we know, what went to uh life enrichment committee yesterday, I believe. Uh so that will run its course, and if that has any implications for the planning code or the Bureau of Planning's operations, we will inform you. Thank you. And our city attorney notes that the draft moratorium that was considered yesterday will go to city council on October 6th. At this point, it's uh destined for the October 26th City Council agenda. Did I say 26? Apologies. Six, October 6th, City Council agenda. Thank you. Any other items from commissioners. I'll just take a brief moment maybe to um reiterate. I think earlier this year we had asked for the director to come, and so just before the end of the year, it would be great to hear from him again.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com