The Oakland Public Ethics Commission met on Monday, July 30, 2018, at 6:30 PM in Hearing Room 1 at City Hall. The commission addressed enforcement cases, the Limited Public Financing Program for the November 2018 election, subcommittee reports, and heard public testimony. Key actions included closing two sunshine mediation cases, setting an administrative hearing for a candidate who repeatedly failed to file campaign statements, and approving meeting minutes.
Good evening. Welcome to the uh July 30th meeting of the Oakland Public Ethics Commission. Um it's 6 30, so we'll get started. Uh all um current members of the commission are here, all six of us, so we do have quorum. Um and we'll get moving. Um we'll start with staff and commission announcements. So a couple commission announcements announcements from me. Um the reason I I noted that all six members of the commission are here is because Commissioner Bryce recently resigned for personal reasons. Um so we'll be in the process of communicating with the city attorney's office to find a replacement. Um that does mean that we will um re-examine our committee assignments uh when we get to the committee announcement portion of the agenda. Um Commissioner Bryce was on two committees and the chair of one, so we'll have to find replacements for that. Um, another commission announcement is that we will have a special meeting on August 23rd at 6 p.m. Location TBD. Um there is a um uh uh uh uh sort of a I don't want to use the word perfunctory, what is the word that I mean? Um administrative action that we have to take. Thank you, Commissioner Kong. Um, with respect to the limited public financing program so that uh candidates filing to run in their November election are able to access the public funds guaranteed by that program. Um so as I again, August 23rd at 6 p.m. Um location TBD, we think tentatively hearing room four, though that's um subject to revise. Um with respect to staff announcements, I'll I'll put no there's none. Okay, I'll publicly announce that one of our staff members, Deputy Director Dalju, is expecting to no Wednesday, correct? Yes, hello, congratulations. Um and good luck to you. Um, sorry, the family is expecting, yes. Um so uh any further commissioner announcements. Okay, any public comment on the announcements. Okay. We'll move to open forum. Open forum is an opportunity for members of the public to comment on matters that are not on our agenda today. Um, because they have not been agendized, the commission does not have the opportunity to respond to anything raised in open forum, but we do welcome the public's comment. Okay. Uh no, we're gonna uh are you uh oh open form, excuse me. I'm sorry. I uh I thought you were speaking on an agenda item, but you're speaking both. Umsada, I apologize. Can you pronounce your last name for me? Olibala, thank you. The floor is yours. I speaking of open formated to the process. The process that you file as a result of filing the complaint is a non-existing process. When you get a letter that announces the date of a hearing, and it doesn't tell you where, and it doesn't tell you what time the process is incomplete. When you get a letter, it says it's an investigation, and you're not exposed to the investigative process and not when it bowed, it only reflects uh legal opinion as a attorney stand. Who is being complained about how can you enter a legal opinion and the complaint is about the individual submitting the complaint. The process how can you say you don't follow rules of procedure and enforcement of what you uh mandate to deal with, you can't follow rules of procedure of the open city council. That's what my letters say. But also the attorney's letter, they talk about rules of procedure, and you accept it. You wouldn't accept my rules of procedures. Issues, but it appears the city attorney's rules of procedure identified items to support whatever they have to say. So that's bias in the process. And I'm getting ready to deal with my issue.