The Oakland Public Ethics Commission (PEC) held a regular meeting via teleconference on August 10, 2022, at 6:30 p.m. The meeting included votes to renew virtual meeting authority, approve meeting minutes, elect a Vice Chair, accept a stipulated enforcement penalty, and receive reports on subcommittees, enforcement, and the executive director. Public comment raised concerns about agenda distribution and meeting notice compliance.
Good evening, everyone. Um, welcome to the It is now August, the August meeting of the Oakland Public Ethics Commission. We have a quorum, we have at least four commissioners. I will take a roll call for attendance. So we have four commissioners here. All right. And we'll start off with any staff and commission announcements. Hi, Chair Pratit. Uh, this is Suzanne Doran, Acting Director. I have a couple announcements. The first is for scheduling. Um, we talked in past meetings about the commission's interest to act as a hearing officer at future administrative hearings, and staff is preparing a training for that. And we expect that we'll conduct that as a special meeting in September. So if anybody has any dates that you would want us to block out because you're not available, that would be helpful if you could let staff know and um we'll start working on that date as soon as we can. Um, the other announcement I wanted to make is that uh in May, the city changed its um customer service management platform, and that affected our subscriber list for the public ethics commission that's managed by our digital services department. And um, we did get uh an email from at least one subscriber who said that he didn't receive his agenda mailings in June. So we've been we've met with digital services when we're trying to determine um exactly what happened and and who was affected, um, and make sure that that's corrected going forward. So if there's um anybody watching who's a subscriber and you've been having any issues, please reach out to us and let us know that so we can make sure that you're included in the future. And um I was gonna ask our our counsel from the city attorney's office, Ms. Shaffi, could you let us know if there's any other corrective action that the commission needs to take? Good evening, commissioners and staff and members of the public. Trisha Shaffee with the Oakland City Attorney's Office. Uh no, based on the municipal code section 2.20.090. The mere fact that an agenda subscriber did not receive his agenda does not mean that any cure or corrective action needs to be taken legally. Thank you. Um, I have one announcement. Um, I will not be, I'll be out of town for the next commission meeting on the 14th of September. Um, be unavailable the entire week of September 12th through the 16th, and that's I will be out of town. And um we may be able to address that and deal with that in another fashion based on some other actions we'll take this evening. Are there any other staff or commission announcements? Okay. Uh we will now move on to open form. Open form is a time for a member of the public to comment on any matter within the jurisdiction of the PEC that is not otherwise included in tonight's agenda. Under the Sunshine Ordinance, the commission cannot discuss the substance of any public comment made that does not pertain to an item listed on the agenda. Is there any public comment? Let's see. There's one hand um raised, and we will recognize Mr. Ralph Camps, and you will have three minutes. Hi, good evening. Um the person who was never sent agendas during the month of June or sent the agenda for the August meeting in a timely fashion. Um I think you need to go get some outside uh analysis of the need to do a cure and correct for the June meetings because the Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance are absolutely clear that you must send the agenda to all agenda subscribers that did not occur. That mandates a cure and correct for the meetings where that did not occur. There is no there's no exception to that. Now, if they're trying to claim it was a technical error, which we we have that exception in the Sunshine Ordinance, but it does not apply to this because this says you must send it to every agenda subscriber. What the sunshine ordinance addresses is if there's a technical problem, an IT problem to where it can't get sent to anybody. That's a separate issue. In this particular issue, the commission was discussing the selection of a new executive director. And basically the public had no input into that for this exact reason. And selection of a new executive director is an important issue. And the public is was denied the opportunity to participate in that discussion.