OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Ocala Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Summary — June 8, 2026

City Council & BoardsMonday, June 8, 2026
BodyOcala, Florida
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateMonday, June 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 43:46

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

And a portion of 23472-001-00.

0:10

Approximately 2.99 acres.

0:13

Case number Z00 ZON 26-009 quadrujudicial presented by Bria Miller.

0:23

Yes, Brea Miller, Planner 2 with the City of Ocala.

0:26

This request is for a parcel in the parcel portion to rezone from R3 multifamily residential to institutional.

0:35

Background on this property.

0:37

The subject properties consist of approximately 2.98 acres and is located at 2781 Southwest 20th Street and the northern portion of 20 um sorry 2801 Southwest 20th Street.

0:52

The request includes all of parcel 23472-004-00 and a 1.19 acre portion of parcel 23472-001-00.

1:07

The properties are currently designated with neighborhood on the future land use map and zone R3 residential.

1:14

One parcel contains an existing single family residence, while the other remaining portion is actually undeveloped.

1:58

In our analysis, the applicant is requesting to rezone the subject properties from R3 to institutional.

2:18

Additionally, the existing single family residents will be still be in be consistent with the rezoning as well, so it would not create any nonconformities.

2:49

Staff found that the port um proposed institutional zoning district is consistent with the neighborhood future land use designated designation and compatible with the surrounding development pattern.

2:59

The subject properties are served by existing public infrastructure, utilities, and adequate public facilities exist to accommodate that future development.

3:17

And based on those findings, staff recommends approval for ZON 26-0009.

3:25

And I'm available for any questions.

3:32

So it's gonna be done in the site plan.

3:51

So this, as you have pointed out, there is uh a potential access issue.

3:59

However, uh it that actually provides some protection to the neighbors because the intention is to use that property in conjunction with the property fronting on 20th, i.e.

4:11

as part of the future expansion of the capstone academy.

4:15

And it just so happens sometimes you you know things kind of fall into place, changing it to institutional allows the uh our use that we intend.

4:26

It is actually a down zoning from R3, so it would should be less intensive on the surrounding properties, and it creates almost accidentally a very nice transition from the more commercial areas back to the neighborhoods.

4:43

Um but the intention is to incorporate it into the expansion of the Capstone Academy.

4:50

Thank you.

5:00

All right.

5:01

Comment by the public is now open.

5:03

Any public comment?

5:04

Yes, ma'am.

5:06

Please state your name, your address.

5:08

You have three minutes.

5:15

I just want to know how is that rezoning that area is gonna affect the residents that are like me 300 feet away from that.

5:35

So the the thing to understand, I think, is that the current zoning of that property is R3.

5:44

We can put an ACLF there, we can put a hospital there, we can put a uh uh you know, uh uh apartment complex there.

5:53

We can do fairly intensive use.

5:56

We are actually restricting our use because our intention is to use it as a part of the capstone academy.

6:06

So a Christian school will use that property as part of their expansion on the commercial property on the front.

6:13

So in the long run, one of your protections is that whatever we do has to go through site plan approval, and the staff will tell us what or negotiate with us what buffering is required, what trees need to be left in place, what setbacks we have to have, and that kind of thing.

6:31

And the other protection is we're actually restricting what we can do with that property to a greater extent than now exists.

6:39

So is that gonna be change into a parking?

6:44

No, that's not the intention.

6:46

The intention is probably ball fields.

6:49

Thank you.

6:50

So it's gonna be like a play area.

6:52

Yes.

6:53

Okay, so what are you gonna do?

6:55

Okay, a sports area.

6:56

So what are you gonna uh what's gonna be done to this is only for public comment, it's really not a back and forth.

7:02

Okay, so my concern is right now it I live in a dead-end street.

7:08

The only access in there are the residents that live in a dead end street.

7:12

So if this is gonna be behind the house 300 feet, how are the residents gonna be uh making sure that then that's not gonna be used by anyone to just hang out, get into access to other properties?

7:28

That will be a site planning issue when we propose a site plan on what sort of access controls.

7:35

But this is gonna be a Christian school.

7:38

So there's no intention that this be anything other than kids being educated there.

7:44

And again, um this is really not an issue for this hearing because until we give them a site plan and show exactly what we want to do.

7:52

The issue is is that zoning appropriate?

7:55

And because it's a less restrictive zoning than you now have, um, it is appropriate.

8:02

Okay, my main concern is just you know, for anybody in the public to just come and have access to what they're saying is for the school.

8:13

So if it's gonna be open, that means anybody could have access in there and could be going, you know, snooping around into the into the proper, you know, the private properties.

8:24

They'll have easy access basically to the private properties.

8:28

That's my concern.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning and Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Environmental Protection█████████████████████████27%
Public Engagement████████████████17%
Procedural████████8%
Summary of Proceedings

Ocala Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Summary — June 8, 2026

The Ocala Planning & Zoning Commission met at 5:30 PM on Monday, June 8, 2026, in City Hall Council Chambers, 110 SE Watula Avenue, Ocala, Florida. The commission acts in an advisory capacity to the Ocala City Council on zoning and land development matters. The available transcript covers agenda item 7B through adjournment; earlier agenda items — including the Mockingbird Ridge and TBMI Commercial conceptual subdivisions, the Lake Louise Estates right-of-way abrogation, Future Land Use amendments, and rezoning items 7A — were listed but are not detailed in the transcript provided.

Routine and Procedural Items

  • The agenda noted that a public meeting notice was posted at City Hall and published in the Ocala Gazette on May 22, 2026.
  • Approval of the May 26, 2026 meeting minutes was listed on the agenda; no minutes document was included in the available source materials.

Public Comments & Testimony

ZON 26-0009 (Rezone to Institutional)

  • A resident living approximately 300 feet from the subject property asked how the rezoning would affect nearby residents and expressed concern that a school use behind her dead-end street could allow public access into private properties.
  • The applicant's representative responded that the change to Institutional is a downzone from R-3, that the property would be used as part of Capstone Academy's expansion, that sports fields rather than parking are intended, and that future site-plan approval would address buffering, setbacks, trees, and access controls.

PD26-0001 (Ocala 52 Partners)

  • Sherry Dobratz, 4750 SW 51st Terrace, directly east of the property, opposed the development. She stated that mining had 'clawed out 15 feet' on her property line and raised concerns about quarry ponds, sinkhole risks, groundwater contamination, well water, and stormwater carrying pollutants from 590 units into the aquifer.
  • Danielle Dobratz, part owner of Grace Hill Farm, echoed concerns about the area's pervasive sinkhole history, noting their aquifer was measured at 26 feet and that the subject property is about 15 feet lower.
  • Marcia Armstrong, 5765 SW 52nd Street, provided photographs showing mining tailings, a large dirt/limerock ridge, and the pond, and said an independent multi-point geotechnical survey should be completed before annexation and rezoning decisions. She said surrounding county properties rely on well water and that the development does not fit the area.
  • Tim Armstrong, 5765 SW 52nd Street, described past heavy blasting that shook his yard, cracked concrete, and felled trees; recounted water-quality concerns, including a warning not to eat fish from the pond; and cited sinkhole problems at Four Ranch from 2010 through 2025. He questioned why the project was being considered and alleged the applicants came to the city because the county would not approve it.
  • During the later public comment period, Tim Armstrong again disputed the agent's claim about blasting limits, citing an incident where blasting stopped only after the hospital was affected.

Discussion Items

ZON 26-0009 — 2781/2801 SW 20th Street Rezone to Institutional

  • Planner Brea Miller presented the request to rezone approximately 2.98 acres — all of Parcel 23472-004-00 and a 1.19-acre portion of Parcel 23472-001-00 — from R-3, Multi-Family Residential, to INST, Institutional.
  • Staff found the institutional zoning consistent with the Neighborhood future land use designation and compatible with surrounding development, with existing public infrastructure and adequate public facilities. Staff recommended approval.

PD26-0001 — Ocala 52 Partners Rezone and Planned Development

  • Staff presented two related requests for approximately 82.10 acres at 5575 SW 52nd Street, Parcel 23835-000-00: item 7C, a rezone from A-1, General Agriculture (County), to PD, Planned Development (City); and item 7D, adoption of the Ocala 52 Partners PD Plan and Standards Book. The agenda lists the address as 5575 SW 52nd Street, while the motion in the transcript used 5574 SW 52nd Street.
  • The applicant is Ocala 52 Partners LLC; the agent is Tillman and Associates Engineering.
  • The property is a former quarry mined from the 1960s, with reclamation completed in 2022 and the property acquired by the petitioner in 2024. Concurrent annexation and low-intensity future land use requests were previously recommended by the commission at a May 26, 2026 special meeting.
  • The PD plan divides the site into three development areas: a 4.5-acre commercial area along SW 52nd Street allowing up to about 147,000 square feet of commercial development; a 20.2-acre multifamily area with about 360 townhome and apartment units at 17.8 units per acre; and a rear 45-acre single-family area with 230 units at just over 5 units per acre. The overall density is about 7.16 units per acre.
  • Key requested variations from the zoning code include 40-foot-wide single-family lots, 20-foot-wide townhome lots, entirely private 40-foot-wide roads, sidewalks on only one side of interior streets, and deferral of the SW 52nd Street sidewalk until later phases.
  • Staff recommended approval for both items with conditions, including cessation of the existing agricultural use within one year after zoning approval or before future development, removal of existing structures and septic system, connection to city public facilities, allowance of permitted B-2 uses, private ownership and maintenance of roadways, and phased sidewalk construction along SW 52nd Street.
  • The school board representative, Allison Campbell, non-voting, noted Saddlewood is at 96% capacity with 639 students and 75 more students would put an impact on the school. She questioned whether the staff report's reference to 'school concurrency' represented a policy change. Staff replied that the term was misstated and would be clarified before City Council, and that impact fees rather than concurrency apply.
  • David Tillman, the applicant's engineer, responded to public concerns by saying subdivision development would require permits and nutrient-reduction protections compared to agricultural use, that mined sites are less prone to sinkholes, and that post-tension slabs and soil management can address soils. He said the annexation was driven by city utilities being adjacent, not by county denial, and he disputed rumors of a school bus in the pond.
  • Planning Director Aubrey Hale said the annexation transmittal was sent for state review on June 3, 2026, with review expected around July 3, 2026, and that the items may be consolidated for the August 4, 2026 City Council meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • ZON 26-0009: Motion to approve agenda item 7B carried on a roll-call vote. The commission recommended approval of the rezone to Institutional.
  • PD26-0001, Item 7C: Motion to approve the rezone of the 82.10-acre property from A-1 to PD, with conditions as defined in the staff report, carried.
  • PD26-0001, Item 7D: Motion to adopt the Ocala 52 Partners PD Plan and Standards Book, with conditions as defined in the staff report, carried.
  • The commission's actions are recommendations to the Ocala City Council. The next P&Z meeting is July 13, 2026, and the meeting was adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

And a portion of 23472-001-00. Approximately 2.99 acres. Case number Z00 ZON 26-009 quadrujudicial presented by Bria Miller. Yes, Brea Miller, Planner 2 with the City of Ocala. This request is for a parcel in the parcel portion to rezone from R3 multifamily residential to institutional. Background on this property. The subject properties consist of approximately 2.98 acres and is located at 2781 Southwest 20th Street and the northern portion of 20 um sorry 2801 Southwest 20th Street. The request includes all of parcel 23472-004-00 and a 1.19 acre portion of parcel 23472-001-00. The properties are currently designated with neighborhood on the future land use map and zone R3 residential. One parcel contains an existing single family residence, while the other remaining portion is actually undeveloped. In our analysis, the applicant is requesting to rezone the subject properties from R3 to institutional. Additionally, the existing single family residents will be still be in be consistent with the rezoning as well, so it would not create any nonconformities. Staff found that the port um proposed institutional zoning district is consistent with the neighborhood future land use designated designation and compatible with the surrounding development pattern. The subject properties are served by existing public infrastructure, utilities, and adequate public facilities exist to accommodate that future development. And based on those findings, staff recommends approval for ZON 26-0009. And I'm available for any questions. So it's gonna be done in the site plan. So this, as you have pointed out, there is uh a potential access issue. However, uh it that actually provides some protection to the neighbors because the intention is to use that property in conjunction with the property fronting on 20th, i.e. as part of the future expansion of the capstone academy. And it just so happens sometimes you you know things kind of fall into place, changing it to institutional allows the uh our use that we intend. It is actually a down zoning from R3, so it would should be less intensive on the surrounding properties, and it creates almost accidentally a very nice transition from the more commercial areas back to the neighborhoods. Um but the intention is to incorporate it into the expansion of the Capstone Academy. Thank you. All right. Comment by the public is now open. Any public comment? Yes, ma'am. Please state your name, your address. You have three minutes. I just want to know how is that rezoning that area is gonna affect the residents that are like me 300 feet away from that. So the the thing to understand, I think, is that the current zoning of that property is R3. We can put an ACLF there, we can put a hospital there, we can put a uh uh you know, uh uh apartment complex there. We can do fairly intensive use. We are actually restricting our use because our intention is to use it as a part of the capstone academy. So a Christian school will use that property as part of their expansion on the commercial property on the front. So in the long run, one of your protections is that whatever we do has to go through site plan approval, and the staff will tell us what or negotiate with us what buffering is required, what trees need to be left in place, what setbacks we have to have, and that kind of thing. And the other protection is we're actually restricting what we can do with that property to a greater extent than now exists. So is that gonna be change into a parking? No, that's not the intention. The intention is probably ball fields. Thank you. So it's gonna be like a play area. Yes. Okay, so what are you gonna do? Okay, a sports area. So what are you gonna uh what's gonna be done to this is only for public comment, it's really not a back and forth. Okay, so my concern is right now it I live in a dead-end street. The only access in there are the residents that live in a dead end street. So if this is gonna be behind the house 300 feet, how are the residents gonna be uh making sure that then that's not gonna be used by anyone to just hang out, get into access to other properties?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com