OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Olympia Finance Committee Meeting – April 20, 2026 Briefings on Cost Allocation, Building and Fleet Electrification

City Council & CommissionsTuesday, April 21, 2026
BodyOlympia, Washington
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, April 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:24:11

Transcript — Verbatim
0:05

All right, Sean.

0:08

Good afternoon and welcome to the Monday April 20th, 2026 meeting of the finance committee of the Olympic City Council called the order at 4:30.

0:20

And we have all three of the council member members of the finance committee in attendance.

0:28

We have an agenda that was set out ahead of the meeting.

0:31

I would like to make the motion.

0:35

I'd like to make motion.

0:39

Second.

0:46

We have an agenda for tonight.

0:48

Sean, do we have anybody sign up for public comment?

0:51

Excuse me.

0:58

Okay.

1:00

How about the minutes from the March 16th meeting?

1:04

Oh I would love to move to approve the minutes from the March 16th.

1:10

Right.

1:10

All in favor of approving the March 16th meeting minutes as published, say aye.

1:15

Aye.

1:16

Great.

1:16

We have a set of minutes approved.

1:19

That brings us right up to committee business.

1:21

We're gonna start unless giving us budget cost allocation spotlight.

1:33

Hi finance committee and numbers for the record, Joe budget and finance measure.

1:43

So of course we're gonna set what a cost allocations are, the different types that are available to us, other general contributions, and then have a question.

1:57

So cost allocations are um our way to administratively distribute fairly cost of internal services to the R2 types or internal and external.

2:34

So the cost out of each model that we have uses the different metrics to allocate all those costs to prove the funding.

2:46

So for example, human resources summits uh all these partnership device, and so um can't just say all that.

2:58

I think probably get it across based on uh split for personal TV and also we have two types of uh cost allocations, we have direct costs, and those are the ones that can be specifically identified to part of the city of it, and then indirect costs uh use the sort of methodology manager AD.

3:38

So the one thing that people need to realize is that for the indirect cost allocation, you're looking at the last completed year data, and so for example, um normally parts let's say the three send send new positions each year, but for some reason this year they're recording that cost won't be recognized as a cost allocation until 2025.

4:14

Adding it to you.

4:16

So some of the uh choices that people see are actually going back two years as wider increase.

4:27

I'm gonna say that happens a lot in departments as we put the budgets together and the finance team does indirect cost allocations, and partners will see that number fluctuate, and they'll say, Well, I didn't add anything this this this year, and I'm like well, no, it's two years ago, right?

4:42

You added these, and so that's why the indirect costs up across the board for departments.

4:48

So I would say, you know, during the budget processes I meet with partners, probably one of the most common questions I get in the financing yet, so is rather fluctuation of indirect costs.

5:02

So two questions on that, like if I just know why it needs to be then delayed.

5:11

How do budget like how does that help a budget manager plan what their budget is, and is that really meeting the intended purpose of when you're not exactly recruiting recouping funds at the time you service the way you would if you were at this, I don't know, seems so like it is it is delayed.

5:33

So you know we start our budget process in May.

5:37

Um, and so we don't even have a metric 2026 to use for 2027.

5:42

So we do have to use five, and then also it is um not necessarily a budgeting tool is recruited uh for the expenditures of services that you're seeing, and so you have to read four years, uh and then again, we're we're already starting to have six can't utilize the actual commercial to recruit those costs.

6:09

Um it is in some ways it's actually a kind of a nice thing because you can have a large spike and we do have your average by your average, and so there's a smoothie factor, so you shouldn't see too much like the true spike of what you get, um, but there is a lot of fluctuation, and then there's also you know, as um departments grow or are eliminated, or programs are all limited that changes the cost for everybody.

6:45

Um, and so uh those are things that people also have to realize is that doesn't necessarily mean I do something.

6:57

Um rent house allocations, we have city hall rent, maintenance center rent, those we can directly attribute to the person who programs we utilize that space is the allocated engineering rate, salaries all of them supply the does get allocated out to products that so there's some things that are true current year costs, and so like um the numbers I have are for 2024, but um we had allocated out the true 100% cost for it, it came up to 52 or during the balancing budget we've um process.

7:46

We decided not to fully load that for costs, and so we ended up just structing 377, and that was a balancing mechanism.

7:54

Um, and the same thing happens with kind of the maintenance there.

7:58

So we do have some flexibility to make adjustments of it for indirect cost allocations, those are for the city manager's office, and goal human resources information services the front desk is one of the uh cost centers and the first techniques, and um like I said, we there are many many different factors that are utilized, so like in finance and cost table and most costs.

8:31

Um we have uh a budget is the dollar, probably um payroll is legal is the number of requests that they process for each department, and so there are many different factors to make sure that everybody's taking their fair share.

9:01

But the other reason this is really important is we have lots of different funds, right?

9:05

So we don't just have a general fund, we have utilities, utilities look in utility rates because their fair share of indirect too.

9:13

So parks, every department has some share of these indirect that gets factored in your general fund budget, utility rates, parks fees, all those things take indirect costs to account as part of development budget.

9:34

And so this is just an example of the total administrative cost is 17.8 million.

9:40

Um utilized factors such as FTE count, number of agenda items for council, the overclass, number of unions for HR and recruitments and for IT devices, and so from that that cost gets allocated out.

9:56

That doesn't mean that all of it can allocate out 100%.

10:01

So there are some funds that we determined can't support the cost.

10:07

So the general fund has to absorb those.

10:10

So like housing homeless or HUD.

10:19

It still gets allocated out.

10:28

And then of course there's other general fund contributions, which you're aware of, you know, the general fund supports the dumb support facilities because there are buildings that are like facility for soft facilitating the building and all the repair maintenance and then um workers' compilers, which we need to have the state plan, and we have a legacy plan.

10:53

So those are still kind of general overview of cost that we're supposed to question John.

11:15

I I am wondering I um I I was just getting some other downtown rental rates, and so if you do forty if it was a thousand foot space, that'd be 4300 a month.

11:29

Um so I just what does that include that is it including utilities?

11:37

Does it include us budgeting for replacement of the city hall?

11:40

I where are we at?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Technology and Innovation███████████████████████23%
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████18%
Capital Facilities Planning████████████████16%
Environmental Protection██████████10%
Fiscal Sustainability███████7%
Fleet Management███████7%
Climate Action Planning██████6%
Public Engagement█████5%
Grant Funding██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Olympia Finance Committee Meeting – April 20, 2026

The Olympia City Council Finance Committee met on Monday, April 20, 2026, from 4:30 PM to 6:54 PM in Council Chambers and virtually. All three committee members attended: Chair Clark Gilman, Kelly Green, and Robert Vanderpool. The meeting featured three major committee business items—a budget spotlight on cost allocations, a briefing on the City Building Electrification Plan and Facility Condition Assessment, and a presentation on the Fleet Electrification Plan and EV Charging Recommendations. Staff also provided updates on the new Monthly Financial Report Power BI Dashboard and the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report process. There was no public comment.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (26-0299): The committee unanimously approved the March 16, 2026 Finance Committee meeting minutes after a motion by Kelly Green and second by Robert Vanderpool.

Discussion Items

  • Budget Spotlight: Cost Allocations (26-0296)

    • Senior Budget & Finance Manager Joan Lutz presented the monthly budget spotlight on cost allocation, explaining how the City maintains a cost allocation plan to fairly recover General Fund costs from supported funds. The presentation covered direct and indirect cost allocation methodologies, including a two-year lag for indirect cost data that leads to fluctuations in departmental budgets. Total administrative costs allocated are $17.8 million annually. The committee discussed the methodology, the smoothing effect of averages, and the inclusion of building capital replacement in indirect costs after a study by SCS. The goal is to avoid relying on one-time money and create a more sustainable budget. The presentation was received.
  • Briefing on City Building Electrification Plan, Facility Condition Assessment and Future Funding Strategies (26-0266)

    • Public Works Director Mark Russell and Facilities Manager Eli Cole presented the results of a facility condition assessment (FCA) and building electrification plan for 15 city facilities, updated in partnership with a consultant. The FCA observed deficiencies where assets have passed their useful life, prompting replacement and electrification opportunities. Key statistics: the Olympia Center requires $3.4 million in critical assets over five years, $6.1 million over 10 years, and $40 million over 30 years. Citywide, the 30-year facility funding need is approximately $28 million (for replacement of assets at end of life) plus $36.6 million for full building electrification and decarbonization over 13 years, totaling $97.6 million. Current annual revenue into the facility fund (Fund 335) averages $1.8 million, leaving an annual deficit of $5.4 million. The committee asked about energy cost impacts, lifecycle planning, the role of grants and state/federal incentives, and trade-offs in building design (e.g., windows vs. insulation). Staff noted that some buildings (like the Olympia Center and Washington Center for Performing Arts) are heavy natural gas users, and converting to electric will require system redesigns. The discussion highlighted the challenge of timing investments and the potential savings from avoided future carbon costs.
  • Fleet Electrification Plan and Electric Vehicle Charging Recommendations (26-0297)

    • Deputy Public Works Director Thahn Jeffers and Fleet Operations Supervisor Jaime Mastache presented the City's Fleet Electrification Plan. The city has 340 pieces of equipment across 17 facilities; 238 are suitable for electrification, and 35 electric vehicles (EVs) are already in the fleet. A major success: switching heavy-duty vehicles from diesel to renewable diesel reduced fleet greenhouse gas emissions (excluding fire) by 49% compared to the 2019 baseline (2,200 metric tons). The plan recommends a phased approach: Phase 1 (2026-2030) aims to transition 24 vehicles (realistic based on current conversion rate of 5-10 per year). Total cost for converting 220 vehicles to EVs is $26 million (today's dollars), plus $7.5 million for 63 charging stations (with 34 Level 2, 11 DC slow chargers, and 18 DC fast chargers). The committee discussed challenges such as space constraints at the maintenance center, copper wire theft at charging stations, and the higher total cost of ownership for heavy-duty EVs (e.g., a refuse truck costing $1 million vs. $500,000 conventional). Staff highlighted innovative funding mechanisms, including a carbon mitigation fee on non-EV purchases that builds a fund for charging infrastructure, and successful grants (e.g., Volkswagen settlement covering 75% of a $470,000 EV). The presentation was received.

Reports and Updates

  • Monthly Financial Report Power BI Dashboard: City Manager Jay Burney and Finance Director Michael Githens previewed the new interactive Power BI dashboard that replaces the static 70+ page PDF monthly financial report. The dashboard features a summary page with watch list items (police/fire overtime, jail costs, sales tax) and allows drill-down into specific funds and revenue categories. It will be soft-launched to the public and presented to the full City Council at a future meeting. The committee praised the tool for enhancing transparency and analysis efficiency, noting it frees staff from manual data updates.
  • Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR): Director Githens reported that the ACFR is nearing completion. The state auditor's office has contacted the city to schedule a pre-conference and entrance conference for the financial audit, including a federal single audit for grant funds. The committee was invited to attend the audit conferences.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken on the three committee business items; all presentations were received and discussions concluded.
  • The committee approved the March 16, 2026 meeting minutes unanimously.
  • The new Monthly Financial Report Power BI Dashboard will be rolled out to the public and full City Council in the coming weeks.
  • Staff will continue to develop the dashboard and provide training materials for the community.
  • The Finance Committee will meet again on the same day next month (May 20, 2026) at 4:30 PM.

Meeting Transcript

All right, Sean. Good afternoon and welcome to the Monday April 20th, 2026 meeting of the finance committee of the Olympic City Council called the order at 4:30. And we have all three of the council member members of the finance committee in attendance. We have an agenda that was set out ahead of the meeting. I would like to make the motion. I'd like to make motion. Second. We have an agenda for tonight. Sean, do we have anybody sign up for public comment? Excuse me. Okay. How about the minutes from the March 16th meeting? Oh I would love to move to approve the minutes from the March 16th. Right. All in favor of approving the March 16th meeting minutes as published, say aye. Aye. Great. We have a set of minutes approved. That brings us right up to committee business. We're gonna start unless giving us budget cost allocation spotlight. Hi finance committee and numbers for the record, Joe budget and finance measure. So of course we're gonna set what a cost allocations are, the different types that are available to us, other general contributions, and then have a question. So cost allocations are um our way to administratively distribute fairly cost of internal services to the R2 types or internal and external. So the cost out of each model that we have uses the different metrics to allocate all those costs to prove the funding. So for example, human resources summits uh all these partnership device, and so um can't just say all that. I think probably get it across based on uh split for personal TV and also we have two types of uh cost allocations, we have direct costs, and those are the ones that can be specifically identified to part of the city of it, and then indirect costs uh use the sort of methodology manager AD. So the one thing that people need to realize is that for the indirect cost allocation, you're looking at the last completed year data, and so for example, um normally parts let's say the three send send new positions each year, but for some reason this year they're recording that cost won't be recognized as a cost allocation until 2025. Adding it to you. So some of the uh choices that people see are actually going back two years as wider increase. I'm gonna say that happens a lot in departments as we put the budgets together and the finance team does indirect cost allocations, and partners will see that number fluctuate, and they'll say, Well, I didn't add anything this this this year, and I'm like well, no, it's two years ago, right? You added these, and so that's why the indirect costs up across the board for departments. So I would say, you know, during the budget processes I meet with partners, probably one of the most common questions I get in the financing yet, so is rather fluctuation of indirect costs. So two questions on that, like if I just know why it needs to be then delayed. How do budget like how does that help a budget manager plan what their budget is, and is that really meeting the intended purpose of when you're not exactly recruiting recouping funds at the time you service the way you would if you were at this, I don't know, seems so like it is it is delayed. So you know we start our budget process in May. Um, and so we don't even have a metric 2026 to use for 2027. So we do have to use five, and then also it is um not necessarily a budgeting tool is recruited uh for the expenditures of services that you're seeing, and so you have to read four years, uh and then again, we're we're already starting to have six can't utilize the actual commercial to recruit those costs. Um it is in some ways it's actually a kind of a nice thing because you can have a large spike and we do have your average by your average, and so there's a smoothie factor, so you shouldn't see too much like the true spike of what you get, um, but there is a lot of fluctuation, and then there's also you know, as um departments grow or are eliminated, or programs are all limited that changes the cost for everybody. Um, and so uh those are things that people also have to realize is that doesn't necessarily mean I do something. Um rent house allocations, we have city hall rent, maintenance center rent, those we can directly attribute to the person who programs we utilize that space is the allocated engineering rate, salaries all of them supply the does get allocated out to products that so there's some things that are true current year costs, and so like um the numbers I have are for 2024, but um we had allocated out the true 100% cost for it, it came up to 52 or during the balancing budget we've um process. We decided not to fully load that for costs, and so we ended up just structing 377, and that was a balancing mechanism. Um, and the same thing happens with kind of the maintenance there. So we do have some flexibility to make adjustments of it for indirect cost allocations, those are for the city manager's office, and goal human resources information services the front desk is one of the uh cost centers and the first techniques, and um like I said, we there are many many different factors that are utilized, so like in finance and cost table and most costs. Um we have uh a budget is the dollar, probably um payroll is legal is the number of requests that they process for each department, and so there are many different factors to make sure that everybody's taking their fair share. But the other reason this is really important is we have lots of different funds, right? So we don't just have a general fund, we have utilities, utilities look in utility rates because their fair share of indirect too. So parks, every department has some share of these indirect that gets factored in your general fund budget, utility rates, parks fees, all those things take indirect costs to account as part of development budget. And so this is just an example of the total administrative cost is 17.8 million. Um utilized factors such as FTE count, number of agenda items for council, the overclass, number of unions for HR and recruitments and for IT devices, and so from that that cost gets allocated out. That doesn't mean that all of it can allocate out 100%.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com