Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2026 – 7:00 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 505 Butler Place, Park Ridge, IL
The Park Ridge Planning and Zoning Commission convened on September 15, 2026, to address a continued site plan review, three park district storage shed proposals, a public hearing for a map amendment, and a discussion on potential permitted land uses in the B-4 Uptown subdistricts. The meeting also included public comments on non-agenda items and a City Council liaison report.
Hold on. We don't get to choose. All right, all right. We're gonna call to call to the meeting to order here for this uh the city council and uh but what am I at? I'm not looking at my thing. Planning zoning commission for Tuesday, September 15th, we're gonna call to uh order. Josie, would you be kind enough to give me a roll call? We shall commissioner Gilpin is absent. Commissioner Karstins. Here commissioner Shepherd, absent. Commissioner Papracky. Here, Chair Hanlon. Here. Commissioner Coogan is absent. Commissioner McMillan is absent. Commissioner Hutchinson. Here. Commissioner Schubert. Here. And for staff, we have planner Claudia Hampel. We have myself, Josie Farrachi for admin, and also Mr. Steinfelds is not here as well. The Aldermanic liaison. Thank you and welcome. All right. First thing up on our agenda tonight is uh the approval of the minutes from the August 25th meeting. Did everybody get a chance to read the August 25th minutes? Yes. And does anybody have any thoughts, changes, suggestions, please go ahead. Yes. Uh spoken to the staff prior to this, but I want to get it on record. Um couple nitpicky things. The on page one, uh we are we approved the July 28th minutes, so the date was incorrect on page one. Also on page uh one Karsten's is listed twice under the vote. A Praki is omitted, so Proc needs to be added back in. And the same is on page eight, the two votes on page eight. Papraki is missing and needs to be added in, and Carson's is duplicated. So it needs to be unduplicated. Also on page six of eight, I would like to request, suggest, ask for uh the second to last paragraph. It says the commission generally supported the revised proposal, and I think that's potentially misleading. I think what we did was we acknowledge that the revised proposal incorporated changes in response to earlier feedback. I think that's more an accurate statement. Um and then uh commissioners nonetheless continue to raise substantial questions and concerns regarding intensity, density, scale, neighborhood impacts, transitions from R2 to R4. The the minutes say transition from B4, I'm sorry, to B4. Uh and it should be from R2 to B4 zoning, parking traffic, etc. Based on whether the proposed benefits justified the requested zoning relief. And I will be giving these notes to whoever will be making these edits. But those that's yeah, we already got them. Perfect. Excellent attention, DT Tell.