OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Park Ridge, Illinois/City Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - September 15, 2026

City Council & Commissions — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyPark Ridge, Illinois
SessionCity Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:33:33

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:04

Hold on.

0:05

We don't get to choose.

0:15

All right, all right.

0:16

We're gonna call to call to the meeting to order here for this uh the city council and uh but what am I at?

0:23

I'm not looking at my thing.

0:24

Planning zoning commission for Tuesday, September 15th, we're gonna call to uh order.

0:28

Josie, would you be kind enough to give me a roll call?

0:31

We shall commissioner Gilpin is absent.

0:34

Commissioner Karstins.

0:35

Here commissioner Shepherd, absent.

0:38

Commissioner Papracky.

0:39

Here, Chair Hanlon.

0:41

Here.

0:42

Commissioner Coogan is absent.

0:45

Commissioner McMillan is absent.

0:47

Commissioner Hutchinson.

0:49

Here.

0:49

Commissioner Schubert.

0:50

Here.

0:51

And for staff, we have planner Claudia Hampel.

0:54

We have myself, Josie Farrachi for admin, and also Mr.

0:58

Steinfelds is not here as well.

1:00

The Aldermanic liaison.

1:02

Thank you and welcome.

1:05

All right.

1:05

First thing up on our agenda tonight is uh the approval of the minutes from the August 25th meeting.

1:11

Did everybody get a chance to read the August 25th minutes?

1:14

Yes.

1:14

And does anybody have any thoughts, changes, suggestions, please go ahead.

1:18

Yes.

1:18

Uh spoken to the staff prior to this, but I want to get it on record.

1:23

Um couple nitpicky things.

1:25

The on page one, uh we are we approved the July 28th minutes, so the date was incorrect on page one.

1:35

Also on page uh one Karsten's is listed twice under the vote.

1:43

A Praki is omitted, so Proc needs to be added back in.

1:47

And the same is on page eight, the two votes on page eight.

1:52

Papraki is missing and needs to be added in, and Carson's is duplicated.

1:58

So it needs to be unduplicated.

2:01

Also on page six of eight, I would like to request, suggest, ask for uh the second to last paragraph.

2:13

It says the commission generally supported the revised proposal, and I think that's potentially misleading.

2:21

I think what we did was we acknowledge that the revised proposal incorporated changes in response to earlier feedback.

2:29

I think that's more an accurate statement.

2:32

Um and then uh commissioners nonetheless continue to raise substantial questions and concerns regarding intensity, density, scale, neighborhood impacts, transitions from R2 to R4.

2:45

The the minutes say transition from B4, I'm sorry, to B4.

2:50

Uh and it should be from R2 to B4 zoning, parking traffic, etc.

2:55

Based on whether the proposed benefits justified the requested zoning relief.

3:01

And I will be giving these notes to whoever will be making these edits.

3:07

But those that's yeah, we already got them.

3:10

Perfect.

3:11

Excellent attention, DT Tell.

3:12

Really good.

3:13

Good feedback.

3:14

Thank you.

3:15

Anyone else?

3:16

All right, would somebody like to make a motion to accept the meetings with the proposed edits uh by uh Commissioner Schubert?

3:26

So move.

3:27

Second.

3:28

All in favor?

3:29

Aye, aye.

3:30

Aye, all right, wonderful.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Code█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Procedural██████████████████████24%
Public Safety█████████10%
Public Engagement██████7%
Parks and Recreation███3%
Disability Rights██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Public Transportation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting

Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2026 – 7:00 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 505 Butler Place, Park Ridge, IL

The Park Ridge Planning and Zoning Commission convened on September 15, 2026, to address a continued site plan review, three park district storage shed proposals, a public hearing for a map amendment, and a discussion on potential permitted land uses in the B-4 Uptown subdistricts. The meeting also included public comments on non-agenda items and a City Council liaison report.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes – August 25, 2026: Approved with corrections. Commissioner Schubert noted the date on page one was incorrect, Commissioner Paprocki was omitted from votes, and a paragraph on page six was revised to state: “the commission acknowledged that the revised proposal incorporated changes in response to earlier feedback, but commissioners nonetheless continued to raise substantial questions and concerns regarding intensity, density, scale, neighborhood impacts, transitions from R-2 to B-4 zoning, parking, traffic, etc., based on whether the proposed benefits justified the requested zoning relief.” The motion to approve as amended carried unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Non-Agenda Items:
    • Philip Sipgar asked where to find information about the proposed hotel project (continued to September 29, 2026). Staff directed him to the Park Ridge website under Planning & Zoning, where packets are posted the Friday before each meeting. He also inquired about the quorum for voting; staff confirmed that five commissioners constitute a quorum.
    • Diana Tomaska raised three issues: (1) the vacant former Burger King building – she stated it appears unused and questioned the city’s oversight, asking for due diligence; (2) inadequate disability parking in the uptown area, particularly along Main Street and Northwest Highway, noting that only one spot exists and that removal of spaces has harmed access for elderly residents; (3) speeding and lack of enforcement near Carpenter School, requesting speed bumps and better police presence. Commissioners noted these concerns are more appropriate for City Council and encouraged her to attend the next council meeting.
  • Public Hearing – MA-26-06 (Map Amendment at 1032 Parkwood Avenue): Six residents spoke in opposition to the rezoning from R-2 to R-4:
    • Julian Rosales (23-year resident) argued the change would create parking issues, set a precedent for multi-unit development in single-family neighborhoods, and noted the property was purchased by an LLC, not a resident. He presented a petition with 155 signatures opposing the rezoning.
    • Neil Jaffe (35-year resident) cited existing congestion from commuter parking, school bus route difficulties, and safety concerns near busy intersections. He warned that approval would encourage other LLCs to pursue similar changes.
    • Matthew Abraham (new homeowner) asked what objective planning principle would prevent future R-4 rezoning requests on other residential streets if this were approved.
    • Richard Kvorka noted that the applicant’s LLC (M2 Global LLC) is not in good standing with the state of Illinois (delinquent since June 1, 2026). He also described the narrow street geometry and parking challenges.
    • Joseph Labetsky referenced the staff memorandum and the 1996 Comprehensive Plan, stating the property is part of a continuous R-2 block and that rezoning would increase traffic, parking congestion, and safety risks for children.
    • Voula Asmacopoulos (next-door neighbor) expressed confusion about the applicant’s intentions and emphasized the street is already congested; she urged denial.
    • A final speaker, who did not give a name on record, stated support for rejecting the rezoning and commended the commissioners’ understanding of the issues.

Discussion Items

  • Continued Site Plan Review – ZPR-26-10 (245 Vine Avenue): The applicant requested a continuance to October 13, 2026. The commission voted unanimously to continue the case.
  • Site Plan Reviews for Park District Storage Sheds: Three identical applications for 10’ x 12’ prefabricated storage sheds (9.7’ height) on gravel bases with ground anchors were presented:
    • ZPR-26-11 (1200 N Dee Road – Northwest Park): Staff noted the shed would have been 5 feet into the front yard setback; the applicant agreed to move it to an appropriate location. Approved 5-0 with no conditions.
    • ZPR-26-12 (733 N Prospect Avenue): Approved 5-0 with no conditions.
    • ZPR-26-13 (1600 S Lincoln Avenue): Approved 5-0 with no conditions.
  • Public Hearing – MA-26-06 (Map Amendment at 1032 Parkwood Avenue): The applicant, Emile Malavacci and Antonio Fenitson (homeowner), requested rezoning from R-2 (Single-Family Residential) to R-4 (Multi-Family Residential) to allow two dwelling units on the 11,465 sq. ft. lot. They expressed confusion about the scope, initially describing a subdivision or duplex, but staff clarified the application was solely for a zoning map amendment, not a specific development plan. Commissioners questioned the lack of hardship, the property’s compatibility with surrounding R-2 uses, and the absence of public benefit. The commission found no compelling reason to rezone. Following public testimony, the commission reviewed the 12 standards for map amendments and concluded that the proposal did not meet the criteria. A motion to recommend approval to City Council failed; the commission voted unanimously (5-0) to deny the map amendment.
  • Discussion on Potential Permitted Land Use Types in B-4 Uptown Subdistricts: Staff asked the commission for a “temperature check” on whether to consider making medical/dental clinic uses (e.g., IV hydration, Botox, physical therapy) permitted by right or with fewer restrictions in certain contexts (e.g., upper floors, transitional subdistrict). Commissioners expressed interest in further discussion, noting that such uses are currently special uses and that a distinction between ground-floor and upper-floor uses might be warranted. Staff will bring more detailed information to a future meeting (likely October 2026).

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes Approved: August 25, 2026 minutes approved with corrections (unanimous).
  • Continued Case (ZPR-26-10): Continued to October 13, 2026 (unanimous).
  • Three Park District Sheds Approved: All approved 5-0 with no conditions.
  • Map Amendment Denied (MA-26-06): The commission voted 5-0 to recommend denial of the R-2 to R-4 rezoning at 1032 Parkwood Avenue. The motion to recommend approval failed with no votes in favor.
  • B-4 Uptown Land Use Discussion: Staff to return with additional analysis on medical/dental clinic uses at a future meeting.
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:30 p.m. (approximate, based on transcript).

Meeting Transcript

Hold on. We don't get to choose. All right, all right. We're gonna call to call to the meeting to order here for this uh the city council and uh but what am I at? I'm not looking at my thing. Planning zoning commission for Tuesday, September 15th, we're gonna call to uh order. Josie, would you be kind enough to give me a roll call? We shall commissioner Gilpin is absent. Commissioner Karstins. Here commissioner Shepherd, absent. Commissioner Papracky. Here, Chair Hanlon. Here. Commissioner Coogan is absent. Commissioner McMillan is absent. Commissioner Hutchinson. Here. Commissioner Schubert. Here. And for staff, we have planner Claudia Hampel. We have myself, Josie Farrachi for admin, and also Mr. Steinfelds is not here as well. The Aldermanic liaison. Thank you and welcome. All right. First thing up on our agenda tonight is uh the approval of the minutes from the August 25th meeting. Did everybody get a chance to read the August 25th minutes? Yes. And does anybody have any thoughts, changes, suggestions, please go ahead. Yes. Uh spoken to the staff prior to this, but I want to get it on record. Um couple nitpicky things. The on page one, uh we are we approved the July 28th minutes, so the date was incorrect on page one. Also on page uh one Karsten's is listed twice under the vote. A Praki is omitted, so Proc needs to be added back in. And the same is on page eight, the two votes on page eight. Papraki is missing and needs to be added in, and Carson's is duplicated. So it needs to be unduplicated. Also on page six of eight, I would like to request, suggest, ask for uh the second to last paragraph. It says the commission generally supported the revised proposal, and I think that's potentially misleading. I think what we did was we acknowledge that the revised proposal incorporated changes in response to earlier feedback. I think that's more an accurate statement. Um and then uh commissioners nonetheless continue to raise substantial questions and concerns regarding intensity, density, scale, neighborhood impacts, transitions from R2 to R4. The the minutes say transition from B4, I'm sorry, to B4. Uh and it should be from R2 to B4 zoning, parking traffic, etc. Based on whether the proposed benefits justified the requested zoning relief. And I will be giving these notes to whoever will be making these edits. But those that's yeah, we already got them. Perfect. Excellent attention, DT Tell.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com