OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Passaic City Council Meeting - March 7, 2026: Designations, Parking Permits, and Infrastructure Updates

Council MeetingsSaturday, March 7, 2026
BodyPassaic, New Jersey
SessionCouncil Meetings
DateSaturday, March 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:26:02

Transcript — Verbatim
0:02

We welcome you to the March 5th, 2026 City Council meeting.

0:06

In accordance with Chapter 231 public laws of 1975, adequate notice of this meeting was provided by resolution of the municipal council adopted on June 17, 2025, setting forth the schedule of meetings for the year 2025-2026.

0:21

Said notice was published and posted on the City Hall Bulletin Board by the Office of the City Clerk.

0:26

Please be further advised.

0:30

The Zoom stream provided is for viewing only and is offered to the public as a convenience.com council agendas.

0:47

Instructions are also available on the last page of this agenda.

0:50

Please be guided accordingly.

0:52

Roll call, please, ma'am.

0:53

Councilman Love.

0:55

Councilwoman Mello.

0:56

President.

0:57

Councilman Mayor.

0:58

Present.

0:59

Councilman Garcia.

1:00

Present.

1:01

Councilwoman Colombo Banez.

1:03

And Council President Sher.

1:04

Present.

1:04

Shall we all please rise?

1:08

Heavenly Father, we want to thank you, Lord, for allowing us to meet this evening.

1:11

Yes, you're a police guidance in the decision.

1:13

So we'll take place this evening.

1:14

In your beloved name and friend.

1:16

Amen.

1:17

I put the back of the United States in America.

1:30

Council President, if I may.

1:32

Councilman Low just asked for a moment of silence for one of our citizens who've reached the landmark of a hundred years old, who just transitioned um on yesterday.

1:43

And that's uh Miss Rosa King.

1:56

Thank you, mom.

1:57

Thank you.

2:02

We are on the agenda tonight.

2:04

There is one addendum to item 5A.

2:07

Office of Congresswoman Lost, submitting a correspondence regarding the City of the Six infrastructure improvements project located at 86-34 and 34-10 Parker Avenue in the Say.

2:21

On the agenda, we're on room hearing of citizens room article four.

2:26

In accordance with the opening public meetings act, MJ SO10 code 4-4 that's the council opens every public meeting for comments of the public.

2:35

However, in accordance with the JSA 10 colonel 4-12, nothing in this act shall be construed to limit the discretion of a public body to permit, prohibit or regulate the active participation of any meetings.

2:48

Therefore, please be advised that the council will not entertain any comments from the citizenship communicated scene material.

3:18

If you would like to address the council, we ask you to please share with us your name.

3:24

Yes, sir.

3:29

Not kind of anybody out there.

3:30

Joshua Goldman, 185 High Street.

3:33

Uh, thank you for giving me the opportunity to address the council.

3:36

Um, I also want to thank uh uh Mr.

3:38

Fernandez for inviting myself as member of the public to attend the um planning board meeting that occurred last night to hear some of the uh discussions that went by.

3:48

I'm gonna address it's on the agenda tonight as item number 26, although I'm not speaking to what's on the agenda, just a related item that came up at the meeting last night.

3:57

Uh there's an apartment building located, uh, I believe it's 24 Orchard Street.

4:01

It's a 32 plus or minor apartment building, which is subject to that item 26.

4:06

My my uh I came up at the meeting last night within the study that was done for the the planning board that the building is a preexisting non-conforming use.

4:15

Mr.

4:15

Fernandez can correct me if I I misstated it, uh, and it was built in the proximate 1980s.

4:21

My understanding of a pre-existing non-conforming use is that it was built legally according to code at the time that it was constructed, and that the zoning or other uh ordinances changed thereafter, um, putting it into a non-conforming status.

4:34

Uh, if the building that exists was built in the 80s or potentially even before then, then it would never have been conforming at the time that it was constructed, it would be illegally constructed.

4:44

Uh and the item that the the council is now debating whether to include it in a uh uh area in need of rehabilitation in order to mitigate a lot of the challenges that are created by the not conforming use, uh in fact not necessary because if the use is not actually conforming, but in fact illegal, then the city has numerous other remedies that it can take to eliminate the use as it's occurring.

5:09

Uh and so I'm you know as a question, I'm trying to understand why the city is not uh addressing what appears to be an illegal use at that location.

5:18

Okay, Mayor, I don't know if you're comfortable offhand with such a question, or is this something that uh we'd like to uh consult with and perhaps at our next meeting have an answer at some conclusion of that?

5:34

So maybe it's possible very good, sir.

5:40

Thank you.

5:41

So um this is in reference to the item 26 on tonight's agenda.

5:47

Yes, for the designation.

5:49

So exactly when the building was built and the ordinances at the time we don't have on hand, but it is a legally occupied structure, so it's not an illegal building, it is a non-conforming building because it does not comply with any of the permitted uses under the current zoning.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████████████████████36%
Procedural█████████████████17%
Community Engagement███████████11%
Zoning Board███████7%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Affordable Housing████4%
Human Trafficking Prevention████4%
Public Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Passaic City Council Meeting - March 7, 2026

The Passaic City Council met on March 7, 2026, at 20:30 UTC to address a range of items including public comments on a property designation, multiple resolutions for road work and service contracts, ordinances for parking permits and fishing regulations, and a detailed mayoral update on parking deck funding, snow removal, and community programs. All votes were unanimous.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Joshua Goldman (185 High Street) addressed the council regarding agenda item 26, which designates a parcel at 24 Orchard Street as an area in need of rehabilitation. He questioned whether the 32-unit apartment building, built in the 1980s, was truly a pre-existing non-conforming use or actually an illegal structure, as it may not have conformed to zoning at the time of construction. He argued the city could use other remedies instead of the rehabilitation designation.
  • Mayor and Business Administrator responded that the building is legally occupied with certificates of occupancy, but it is non-conforming because it does not meet any permitted use under current zoning. They clarified that a pre-existing non-conforming use means it predated the zoning ordinance; if the building was built after the ordinance, it may have received a use variance. The designation simply starts the process, with no commitment to a plan.

Discussion Items

  • Resolutions 16–26 (Road Work, HVAC, and Designation): Councilman Love asked for clarification on alternate bids for road projects (items 20/21). The Business Administrator explained that alternates allow the city to use leftover funds by adding extra streets if base bids come in low. On item 18/19 (HVAC service), Councilman Mayor noted a $45,000 savings over two years from the new vendor, though the resolution initially appeared to show $186,000; it was corrected to $135,000. Councilman Garcia inquired about the process for item 26; the Business Administrator explained it is a resolution to designate an area in need of rehabilitation, not a plan—the next step is developing a redevelopment plan, which would come as an ordinance. The council can refuse that ordinance. All items were approved unanimously.
  • Ordinance 27 (Disabled Persons Parking): Amends designation of street departments for disabled persons by license plate. Passed for second reading.
  • Ordinance 28 (Residential Parking Permits): Creates a new residential parking permit zone near Clifton border (from Brook to Terhune). Councilman Mayor asked about criteria; the Business Administrator cited complaints during a snowstorm, but noted that vehicle ownership has increased and neighboring cities have permits. The Mayor added that this is a targeted approach; the city has seen positive feedback from previous zones. Passed for second reading.
  • Ordinance 29 (Fishing at Hughes Lake): Amends code to allow catch-and-keep of trout in line with New Jersey fishing game law. Councilman Love confirmed hook-and-line only. Passed for second reading.
  • Ordinance 30 (Affordable Housing Mandatory Set-Aside): Clarifies the language to direct readers to the schedule of regulations for density calculations. The Mayor stated it does not change the policy. Passed for second reading.
  • Payment of Bills: Approved unanimously.
  • Mayor’s Report:
    • Office of New Americans: Held a successful meeting with not-for-profits and faith-based organizations regarding resources for refugees and immigrants.
    • Expungement Clinic: Scheduled for the upcoming month, led by the assistant solicitor.
    • Solar Panel Savings Program: Over 330 residents signed up; income-eligible residents can save up to 31% on energy bills.
    • Phlebotomy Classes: Filled again; the mayor noted state legislation to support training in healthcare fields.
    • Human Trafficking Prevention: Met with the Attorney General's office to discuss initiatives ahead of FIFA events. The city has been recognized for its efforts.
    • Parking Deck Funding: The city applied for $15 million federal funding for a 400-space parking deck at Dayton Avenue, received $3 million (the $4 million previously received was taken back by the new federal administration). The mayor explained that the project is a priority due to the school complex's lack of parking; the deck would cost ~$15 million. Councilman Monk discussed the feasibility of building fewer spaces if funding is limited; the Business Administrator noted that building three to four stories is more cost-effective per space than two. The council will continue to seek additional funding.
    • Snow Removal: The recent storm cost under $30,000 (compared to $200,000 for a previous storm). A DPW truck fire was caused by a hydraulic lock from overuse; the vehicle fleet is insufficient for another major storm. The city borrowed salt and used contractors.

Key Outcomes

  • All resolutions and ordinances passed unanimously (roll call votes on each group: resolutions 1–5, 6–13, 14, 16–26, and separately on 5A; ordinances 27, 28, 29, 30; payment of bills).
  • Item 26: Approved as a resolution to designate the parcel as an area in need of rehabilitation, with no commitment to a redevelopment plan at this stage.
  • Ordinances 27, 28, 29, 30: Set down for second and final reading at the March 17, 2026 meeting.
  • Parking Deck: The city will continue to apply for additional funding; council members will receive regular updates on grant applications.
  • Snow Removal: The administration will explore converting streets to one-way during snowstorms and will report back to the council.

Meeting Transcript

We welcome you to the March 5th, 2026 City Council meeting. In accordance with Chapter 231 public laws of 1975, adequate notice of this meeting was provided by resolution of the municipal council adopted on June 17, 2025, setting forth the schedule of meetings for the year 2025-2026. Said notice was published and posted on the City Hall Bulletin Board by the Office of the City Clerk. Please be further advised. The Zoom stream provided is for viewing only and is offered to the public as a convenience.com council agendas. Instructions are also available on the last page of this agenda. Please be guided accordingly. Roll call, please, ma'am. Councilman Love. Councilwoman Mello. President. Councilman Mayor. Present. Councilman Garcia. Present. Councilwoman Colombo Banez. And Council President Sher. Present. Shall we all please rise? Heavenly Father, we want to thank you, Lord, for allowing us to meet this evening. Yes, you're a police guidance in the decision. So we'll take place this evening. In your beloved name and friend. Amen. I put the back of the United States in America. Council President, if I may. Councilman Low just asked for a moment of silence for one of our citizens who've reached the landmark of a hundred years old, who just transitioned um on yesterday. And that's uh Miss Rosa King. Thank you, mom. Thank you. We are on the agenda tonight. There is one addendum to item 5A. Office of Congresswoman Lost, submitting a correspondence regarding the City of the Six infrastructure improvements project located at 86-34 and 34-10 Parker Avenue in the Say. On the agenda, we're on room hearing of citizens room article four. In accordance with the opening public meetings act, MJ SO10 code 4-4 that's the council opens every public meeting for comments of the public. However, in accordance with the JSA 10 colonel 4-12, nothing in this act shall be construed to limit the discretion of a public body to permit, prohibit or regulate the active participation of any meetings. Therefore, please be advised that the council will not entertain any comments from the citizenship communicated scene material. If you would like to address the council, we ask you to please share with us your name. Yes, sir. Not kind of anybody out there. Joshua Goldman, 185 High Street. Uh, thank you for giving me the opportunity to address the council. Um, I also want to thank uh uh Mr. Fernandez for inviting myself as member of the public to attend the um planning board meeting that occurred last night to hear some of the uh discussions that went by. I'm gonna address it's on the agenda tonight as item number 26, although I'm not speaking to what's on the agenda, just a related item that came up at the meeting last night. Uh there's an apartment building located, uh, I believe it's 24 Orchard Street. It's a 32 plus or minor apartment building, which is subject to that item 26. My my uh I came up at the meeting last night within the study that was done for the the planning board that the building is a preexisting non-conforming use. Mr. Fernandez can correct me if I I misstated it, uh, and it was built in the proximate 1980s.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com