OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Peekskill City Council Work Session - November 17, 2025

Meeting PortalMonday, November 17, 2025
BodyPeekskill, New York
SessionMeeting Portal
DateMonday, November 17, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:36:53

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

November 17th, 2025.

0:02

We have a lengthy agenda with about uh 16 items and then an executive session for a discussion of matters concerning the medical financial credit or employment history of a particular person, persons or corporation or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person, persons, or corporations.

0:24

At this time, I'll turn it over to our city manager.

0:26

Okay.

0:27

Good evening, Mayor and Council.

0:28

Good evening.

0:30

We do have a busy agenda for you tonight.

0:33

We're gonna start off with uh looking at uh some answers to some questions that were brought up about the consolidated fee schedule.

0:43

So I'm gonna share the screen.

0:46

And uh I think we we did take this opportunity to do a more thorough review.

0:53

This is a 29-page uh document, and so uh Carol brought back some more um changes after a deeper dive into some of the particulars uh that she deals with in her department having to do with site plans.

1:16

But we wanted to start off with the building permit renewal fee comparison, and so we've got we brought back some more information about how that works for most municipalities.

1:31

So what we found was that so we have a um Carol, would you go?

1:54

Yeah, that would be great, thank you.

1:56

So in uh when we we looked at Yorktown, the town of Austening, the village of Osing, Beacon, and Cortland, uh to get some uh information about how they renew a building permit after 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months.

2:17

And uh Yorktown does have a 250 dollar or 50 percent of the original fee, whichever is less after 12 months.

2:27

After 24 months, they have 200, they have the same fee again, and after 36 months, they have a request for a total of the first and the second renewal fee, so a total of five hundred dollars or fifty percent of the original fee, whichever is less, and I guess that would be a hundred percent of the original fee, whichever is less, and or the uh and the full original amount.

2:55

So they actually do a hundred plus percent after 36 months penalty.

3:01

Um the town of Asening just has a flat 50 percent of original fee after 12 months with no additional information about whether or not they um make any changes afterwards, and the village does not state its fee, but I uh we did try to find out more information about that, and we will still look for that.

3:25

I do believe that there is some legislated fee that they might have in their uh either in a resolution or in uh practice or in their legislation.

3:37

Beacon does $35 after 12 months uh and there's no extensions after that, and uh one year with no extensions.

3:52

And what that means is that they're saying if you're if you go past the last date, you just have to apply again.

4:00

So what they're really telling you is they have a 100% fee.

4:04

However, it would be with any changes in the fee schedule, those would be they would be responsible for those as well.

4:13

Courtland does 200 after 12 months, 200 plus 50 percent of the original fee not to exceed 2,000 uh for uh after 24 months and every six months thereafter uh for residential and then for commercial uh they do the same thing and all permits with no activity in the first 12 months, they ask for 100% of the original permit fee.

4:45

And that really gets to the core of why building departments want to have this kind of uh a fee structure because it does protect the city from people who make no effort to move their project forward so that the city isn't left with um people who uh are are just not working on what they said that they were gonna work on.

5:10

So those are the um examples that we have the city is recommending that uh that we somehow legislate this um this need to to incentivize uh a a permit holder to complete their job.

5:33

And so uh we also wanna note that we have legislated discretion in in the building department to waive the fee for extraordinary circumstances, and that is something that we have not uh used often.

5:50

Um and we want to be careful about the way we use that, but we could also look at actually listing the reasons for that discretion and and what kinds of things that could be used for and using it more often.

6:05

We're still recommending that uh there be a line in the sand at some point, and so we recommend renewal fees be five percent over twelve months with a max of a hundred and fifty for residential and a thousand for commercial, twenty-five percent over twenty-four months with a max of two fifty for residential and five thousand for commercial and no further renewals, which would require a new application at one hundred percent of the fee after twenty-four months.

6:35

Uh so this is something that we know there's times to discuss this.

6:39

That's why we brought the fee schedule forward so early because we know that there's often something that we need to look at.

6:50

I know that I would like to see uh a potential three year extension uh on our books.

6:58

Um it's getting harder to get work done these days with delays in materials and contractors, um and I and I hate using money to penalize a project that is in process.

7:12

So I'd really like this to take a look at adding a third year option.

7:18

Um I think in my ideal situation, I'd like to see I I I think the f the five percent one fifty one thousand makes sense for the first year.

7:29

I think the second year, I think five thousand is too much.

7:34

I think for the for the commercial we should go to twenty five hundred, so it should be two fifty and twenty-five hundred.

7:40

And then following that sort of same line at 36, maybe we go to fifty percent five hundred five thousand.

7:57

Any other comments?

8:01

Uh the town, like they they they do it 250 or 50 percent.

8:09

How so let's say so on some of these commercial uh applications, you might have a fifty thousand dollar uh fee initially.

8:21

And so what that means is that they would have a 250 dollar late fee.

8:30

So that's the cap.

8:31

That's the cap.

8:33

That's how it works for Yorktown.

8:35

So it's more 50% of the original fee.

8:39

Whichever is less.

8:41

Whichever is less.

8:43

So they go to the 250.

8:45

That would be 250.

8:49

And then after in Yorktown after 36 months, they charge the $50,000 plus um the total of the first and second renewal fee on top of that.

9:03

It's it's too much.

9:04

Yeah.

9:04

Yeah.

9:04

I I do think that there I would still um ask the council to consider a fourth year, maybe or some outer limit just to make sure that if you have a property that is absolutely not making any real effort that there be some sort of uh way of holding them accountable to get the work done.

9:29

Yeah, I just think we have to just be careful with extending, extending, extending, because the whole point of having this conversation is to, you know, um deter, you know, people from just sitting on projects.

9:42

Encourage them to do it.

9:43

Or encourage them, you know, but um again, I there's just things that I see in the city that you know I'm not gonna say that, but you know, just I think if those deals were in other hands, they probably would have moved the quicker.

10:00

But um, and I can't speak to why the projects are taking so long, but some of these things are like years, and they're just like eyesaws in the downtown, and I have you know, we have no idea really what's going on.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Permitting and Compliance██████████████████████████26%
Environmental Protection█████████9%
Public Safety████████8%
Parking Management████████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████7%
Zoning And Land Use███████7%
Parks and Recreation██████6%
Water And Wastewater Management█████5%
Procedural████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Peekskill City Council Work Session - November 17, 2025

The Common Council held a work session on November 17, 2025, at 6:30 PM in the Common Council Chamber to discuss 16 agenda items and an executive session. The meeting covered fee schedules, youth programming, street closures, fireworks contracts, water maintenance materials, parking policies, pier management, and sustainability initiatives. Most items received consensus to bring forward formal resolutions at a subsequent meeting.

Discussion Items

  • 2026 Consolidated Fee Schedule – City Manager Matt and Finance Director Carol presented a revised fee schedule, focusing on building permit renewal fees. Proposed fees: 5% over 12 months (max $150 residential, $1,000 commercial); 25% over 24 months (max $250 residential, $5,000 commercial); no further renewals after 24 months. Council members debated extensions, good-faith efforts, and penalties. Councilman Fernandez suggested a third-year option at 50% (max $500/$5,000). Councilwoman Talbot emphasized distinguishing penalties from extensions based on project progress. Staff will return with legislation on December 1st. Also discussed parkland fee increase to $5,750 per dwelling unit and increases in variance fees to cover legal notice costs ($400). Fee schedule changes to be refined.

  • MOU with Peekskill City School District – Youth Bureau Director Tuesday McDonald requested approval of an independent contractor services agreement for Francis Dow to provide mentorship at the middle school from Sept 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026, same terms as prior years. Councilwoman Talbot raised concerns about gender-neutral programming; McDonald clarified that the Youth Bureau offers inclusive programs and partners with Girl Scouts. Council approved bringing a resolution.

  • Street Closures for HoliYay Market and New Year’s Eve – Police Chief detailed street closures for HoliYay Market (Railroad Avenue) and New Year’s Eve (multiple streets from 8 PM Dec 31 to 1 AM Jan 1, with additional closures during fireworks 11:30 PM–12:30 AM). No overtime costs. Council approved resolutions.

  • Fireworks Contracts – Recreation Director Jonathan Zamora presented contracts with Garden State Fireworks. New Year’s Eve display: $8,500 (up from $7,500 due to tariffs). July 4th, 2026 (250th anniversary): $50,925 (up from $35,000 due to 135% tariffs). Zamora explored drone shows but found them more expensive. Council discussed partnering with other groups to offset costs. Approved bringing resolutions.

  • Water Maintenance Materials and Treatment Plant Chemicals Bids – Water Superintendent Dave Rambo presented bids resulting in an overall 11-12% cost decrease for materials and chemicals. Approved bringing resolution.

  • Downtown Parking Payment In-Lieu Fee – Planning’s Carol updated on the fee, with changes: easier opt-out for large projects, neutrality on pass-through to tenants, exemption for one- or two-unit conversions. Public hearing remains open; adoption anticipated on Nov 24.

  • Downtown Intersection Design RFP – Planning’s Peter Irwin presented a Momentum Fund project to improve four intersections (Main at Nelson, Division, Bank; South Division between South and Brown) with stamped crosswalks, ADA ramps, new signals. Budget ~$1.8M including design. Council approved authorizing RFP for engineering services.

  • Fleischmann Pier 2026 RFP – Planner Matthew Rudikoff proposed issuing an RFP for one or more boat operators and pier management services for 2026, with a five-year license term (with termination provisions). Evaluation criteria include marketing, local business connections, employee training, purchasing from Peekskill businesses. Discussion on conflict of interest if boat operator also manages pier. Carol noted city oversight. Council approved issuing RFP.

  • 1050 Lower South St. Referral to Planning Commission – Carol described a special permit for North Line Utility to store heavy equipment outdoors at the former BASF site (12.86 acres, M2B district). Councilman Fernandez and Deputy Mayor expressed concerns about blight and buffering. Staff will provide more details. Council approved referral to Planning Commission with council as lead agency for environmental review.

  • Winter Parking on Elm Street – Police Chief requested adding the 700 block of Elm Street (Ringold to Chauncey Place) to alternate-side winter parking, responding to a resident's request after school district restrictions. Pilot for one year. Councilman Fernandez expressed concerns about emergency routes and handicap parking. Council approved pilot.

  • CEEP 2026 Agreement Renewal – City Manager recommended renewing the Center for Economic and Environmental Partnership at $45/hour, not to exceed $38,440. They have helped secure grants exceeding costs. Council approved.

  • Green Purchasing Policies – Two policies presented: a general Green Purchasing Policy and a Green Fleet Policy, aiming for Climate Smart Community certification. Exceptions allowed when cost-prohibitive. Fleet manager role to be assigned to finance. Council approved bringing resolutions.

  • Emergency Masonry Work at Paramount – City Manager reported water damage from a masonry wall; emergency repair quote $11,500, within budget. Council approved.

Key Outcomes

  • Building permit renewal fees: Staff directed to bring revised legislation on December 1st incorporating council feedback on third-year option and caps.
  • MOU for Francis Dow: Resolution to be presented for approval.
  • Street closures for HoliYay Market and New Year’s Eve: Resolutions authorized.
  • Fireworks contracts for New Year’s Eve and July 4th: Resolutions authorized.
  • Water maintenance materials and treatment chemicals bids: Resolution to accept lowest bids.
  • Downtown parking in-lieu fee: Adoption expected November 24.
  • Downtown intersection design RFP: Resolution to issue RFP.
  • Fleischmann Pier RFP: Resolution to issue RFP for 2026 operations.
  • 1050 Lower South St.: Referral to Planning Commission with council as lead agency.
  • Winter parking pilot on Elm Street: Resolution to implement.
  • CEEP agreement renewal: Resolution to sign.
  • Green purchasing policies: Two resolutions to adopt.
  • Emergency masonry repair: Resolution approved.

Council also received liaison reports and went into executive session for personnel matters.

Meeting Transcript

November 17th, 2025. We have a lengthy agenda with about uh 16 items and then an executive session for a discussion of matters concerning the medical financial credit or employment history of a particular person, persons or corporation or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal, or removal of a particular person, persons, or corporations. At this time, I'll turn it over to our city manager. Okay. Good evening, Mayor and Council. Good evening. We do have a busy agenda for you tonight. We're gonna start off with uh looking at uh some answers to some questions that were brought up about the consolidated fee schedule. So I'm gonna share the screen. And uh I think we we did take this opportunity to do a more thorough review. This is a 29-page uh document, and so uh Carol brought back some more um changes after a deeper dive into some of the particulars uh that she deals with in her department having to do with site plans. But we wanted to start off with the building permit renewal fee comparison, and so we've got we brought back some more information about how that works for most municipalities. So what we found was that so we have a um Carol, would you go? Yeah, that would be great, thank you. So in uh when we we looked at Yorktown, the town of Austening, the village of Osing, Beacon, and Cortland, uh to get some uh information about how they renew a building permit after 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. And uh Yorktown does have a 250 dollar or 50 percent of the original fee, whichever is less after 12 months. After 24 months, they have 200, they have the same fee again, and after 36 months, they have a request for a total of the first and the second renewal fee, so a total of five hundred dollars or fifty percent of the original fee, whichever is less, and I guess that would be a hundred percent of the original fee, whichever is less, and or the uh and the full original amount. So they actually do a hundred plus percent after 36 months penalty. Um the town of Asening just has a flat 50 percent of original fee after 12 months with no additional information about whether or not they um make any changes afterwards, and the village does not state its fee, but I uh we did try to find out more information about that, and we will still look for that. I do believe that there is some legislated fee that they might have in their uh either in a resolution or in uh practice or in their legislation. Beacon does $35 after 12 months uh and there's no extensions after that, and uh one year with no extensions. And what that means is that they're saying if you're if you go past the last date, you just have to apply again. So what they're really telling you is they have a 100% fee. However, it would be with any changes in the fee schedule, those would be they would be responsible for those as well. Courtland does 200 after 12 months, 200 plus 50 percent of the original fee not to exceed 2,000 uh for uh after 24 months and every six months thereafter uh for residential and then for commercial uh they do the same thing and all permits with no activity in the first 12 months, they ask for 100% of the original permit fee. And that really gets to the core of why building departments want to have this kind of uh a fee structure because it does protect the city from people who make no effort to move their project forward so that the city isn't left with um people who uh are are just not working on what they said that they were gonna work on. So those are the um examples that we have the city is recommending that uh that we somehow legislate this um this need to to incentivize uh a a permit holder to complete their job. And so uh we also wanna note that we have legislated discretion in in the building department to waive the fee for extraordinary circumstances, and that is something that we have not uh used often. Um and we want to be careful about the way we use that, but we could also look at actually listing the reasons for that discretion and and what kinds of things that could be used for and using it more often. We're still recommending that uh there be a line in the sand at some point, and so we recommend renewal fees be five percent over twelve months with a max of a hundred and fifty for residential and a thousand for commercial, twenty-five percent over twenty-four months with a max of two fifty for residential and five thousand for commercial and no further renewals, which would require a new application at one hundred percent of the fee after twenty-four months. Uh so this is something that we know there's times to discuss this. That's why we brought the fee schedule forward so early because we know that there's often something that we need to look at. I know that I would like to see uh a potential three year extension uh on our books. Um it's getting harder to get work done these days with delays in materials and contractors, um and I and I hate using money to penalize a project that is in process. So I'd really like this to take a look at adding a third year option. Um I think in my ideal situation, I'd like to see I I I think the f the five percent one fifty one thousand makes sense for the first year. I think the second year, I think five thousand is too much. I think for the for the commercial we should go to twenty five hundred, so it should be two fifty and twenty-five hundred. And then following that sort of same line at 36, maybe we go to fifty percent five hundred five thousand. Any other comments? Uh the town, like they they they do it 250 or 50 percent. How so let's say so on some of these commercial uh applications, you might have a fifty thousand dollar uh fee initially. And so what that means is that they would have a 250 dollar late fee. So that's the cap. That's the cap. That's how it works for Yorktown. So it's more 50% of the original fee. Whichever is less. Whichever is less. So they go to the 250.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com