Historic & Landmarks Preservation Board Meeting - March 26, 2026
Historic & Landmarks Preservation Board Meeting - March 26, 2026
The Historic & Landmarks Preservation Board met on Thursday, March 26, 2026, at 7:30 p.m. in the Common Council Chamber. The board approved the previous meeting's minutes and considered two new applications: a renewal for renovations to the Assumption Church parking lot and signage at 920 First Street, and a temporary storefront sign for Kathleen's Tea Room at 982 Main Street.
Consent Calendar
- Unanimously approved the draft minutes of the December 4, 2025 meeting as written.
Discussion Items
-
Application 1: 920 First Street – Assumption Church (Renewal of Previously Approved Plans)
Applicant Father Esteban Sanchez and architect Chris Borchardt (CBDB Architecture) presented a renewal request for a previously approved parking lot renovation project. The project includes repaving, adding a second entrance/exit on Union Street, improving pedestrian safety, installing landscaping, and adding signage and lighting. The original approval expired due to delays with the Archdiocese of New York. The board discussed several concerns: font choices (Copperplate and Vivaldi were deemed not historically appropriate), the need for detailed lighting specifications and a clear lighting plan, material samples (brick, stucco, pavers), the height and style of proposed signage, and the number and type of light fixtures. Chair members suggested separating approvals or requiring additional documentation. No final vote was taken on the application. -
Application 2: 982 Main Street – Kathleen's Tea Room (Temporary Storefront Signage)
Applicant Joseph Thompson proposed vinyl graphics applied to the existing storefront glazing for a temporary six-to-twelve-month tenant at 982 Main Street. The white letters with gold outlines on a soft green (Parisian patina) background match the original Kathleen's Tea Room branding. Board members expressed no objections. The proposed sign is temporary and will be removed when the tea room moves to its permanent location across the street.
Key Outcomes
- December 4, 2025 Minutes: Approved unanimously.
- Assumption Church Application: The board did not approve the application as presented. It was continued to the next meeting (tentatively April 23, 2026). The applicant was asked to return with: a lighting plan with fixture specs and locations, material samples (brick, stucco, pavers), a revised sign design with a more historically appropriate font (matching existing building inscriptions), and mechanical drawings of the sign. A separate condition was discussed for lighting and materials.
- Kathleen's Tea Room Application: Approved unanimously. The temporary vinyl signage was permitted as proposed.
Meeting Transcript
December 4th, 2025 meeting. Were there any questions or concerns as written? No. None. No. Motion to approve is written. Second. All in favor? Aye. So motion passes. First applicant this evening is for 921st Street, the Assumption Church. Good evening, Father. Good evening, everyone. My name is Father Sanchez, the pastor from Church of the Assumption. First thing most thank you for all the work you do on behalf of our city to look more beautiful than cities. Also, we are here to ask for a new approval a renewal of the approved plans, which were already approved almost a year and a half ago. And we were not able to begin the work because of some technicalities with our archidioces of New York. So after the plans were approved, I submitted for the approval from my immediate bus, but because of some again, technicalities, they were just approved a more a month and a half ago. So when the permit yeah, you provided to us already expired. So we are here to ask you for the renewal of that is that plan already. Yes. Understood. Thank you. Go ahead. Um and while Father is doing that, I guess if you want, I can give you just a quick rundown of what we were actually doing back there, you know, a year and a half ago. That'll be helpful because a lot of us are new to Yeah, uh fair enough, because I know there's a bunch of new faces that are um are on the board here. So Mary Allen's probably the only person who was there. Yeah, um long time have not seen you in a while, but nice to see you again. I was wondering what happened to it. Um as Father said, um ultimately uh we did everything that we were doing and handling it kind of in-house, and uh when the Archdiocese got involved, uh they have consultants who basically charge the Archdiocese of New York a large amount of money for consulting services and basically inserted themselves into the process and slowed everything down. So um that's why we're back in front here tonight. Uh real quick, uh, my name is Chris Borchardt uh from CBDB Architecture. Um and um in terms of getting the PDFs you said hit the on the share screen. You have the PDFs open, don't you want? Uh you could start with basically S10. Okay, which is the main site. Oops, I think I got the wrong one there. Okay. Go to here and share screen. Okay, cool. Okay, um so before I kind of start to get into the PDFs a little bit, just in real basic um terms. Um the purpose of the main goal of the project or the main purpose of the project was to approve the functionality of the existing parking lot. Um it started out as a kind of a repaving job, um, just to some of the asphalt paving is probably dates to the 60s and 70s, uh, you know, in front of the school building and stuff like that. So that was kind of the impetus for the project was to just repair the paving. And as we started to get into the design of it and trying to figure out how we could maximize uh the number of spaces available, maybe some of the features, um, and more s probably most importantly, um just access to the the actual parking lot. At the current moment, there's really one entrance all along the sidewalk um on union or on first street. And um, so we're proposing to basically add a second entrance on union. Uh that would basically uh first street at that section is a one-way street. So everybody coming out of the parking lot is making that one left turn and dumping into you know, kind of the downtown area right there with um very little uh options to move traffic out after a mass or something like that. So like I said, the big idea was to basically introduce a uh new entrance and exit off uh at Union Street and then um rework the existing bollards that are ringing the perimeter of the site um to close those off to where people aren't like cutting through areas that they're not supposed to and coming up on the sidewalk where they're not supposed to and kind of trying to separate the vehic vehicular traffic from the pedestrian traffic, especially like on a real busy, you know, ten minutes before mass on a Sunday morning, it gets kind of crazy up there.
openpublica.com