OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Phoenix City Council Meeting Summary: 2025-12-17

City CouncilWednesday, December 17, 2025
BodyPhoenix, Arizona
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, December 17, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 6:00:13

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

I have a very amazing mother.

0:03

My father has struggled with substance use my entire life.

0:06

And I almost ran away.

0:08

I almost ran away into a park, just like a lot of my patients do.

0:11

But luckily, I had a good parent figure.

0:15

I had a good great siblings.

0:17

And I just thank them for that.

0:22

And now I'm trying to provide that same service to the same patients that I see every day.

0:27

When I was practicing medicine in Oregon, my nephew had an accident.

0:31

I had to go to the hospital immediately, and I forgot my insulin syringe.

0:36

So I went to a pharmacy, and one of the pharmacists tell me.

0:39

No, you don't have your diabetes box with you.

0:41

I'm not giving you a syringe.

0:44

My patients struggle with this every single day.

0:46

Safe syringe programs allow them to get the access that they need to not go into the hospital.

0:52

And a nurse against policy gave me a syringe when I was at the hospital with my nephew to get my blood sugar down.

1:00

So we're gonna have more patients with more medical problems if things like this allow to go forward.

1:06

So thank you so much.

1:17

Clayton is next, followed by Dr.

1:19

Fower.

1:23

Hello, council members.

1:24

Uh I my name is Clay Nizel.

1:26

I'm an EMT.

1:27

I work in Phoenix in the greater Phoenix area.

1:29

Um I just want to talk about why I oppose this measure.

1:33

Um, first of all, just sort of uh uh small note is that EMTs and paramedics really don't do any of this harm reduction stuff.

1:41

We're not handing out needles, we're not handing out harm reduction kits.

1:44

So when you take this stuff away and you tell us that there's an exception for us, it just doesn't do anything.

1:50

You're just saying, you're just putting a stopgap that's not there, right?

1:53

Um, emergency workers provide emergency medical care in emergency situations, and we are seeing more and more people that are just treating emergency care as their their like one solution for medical care.

2:08

And we're seeing costs go up, and we're seeing worse health outcomes because people are not seeking care as soon.

2:16

And the people who work in like needle uh needle replacement and and uh the and our uh sorry uh and harm reduction events are are the ones who are providing that care, which bridges that gap.

2:31

Um we know that there are tons of of positive uh there are tons of positive uh there are a lot of positive outcomes that come from these programs, uh a reduction in the spread of bloodborne illnesses, decreased overdose deaths, and even in some cases, finding rehab and detox uh resources for the people that need them.

2:57

So when we take these away, we're expecting to have more addicts out on the street.

3:02

And finally, I know that kind of one of the big the big questions about this is talking about medical waste and talking about the debris that gets left behind, but it's important to realize that the debris that gets left behind is just a natural outcome of people needing medical care, and by making it illegal for people to go in and help these people and find ways to dispose of these things, you're not reducing that debris or that waste.

3:28

You're just making it harder for the people who actually want to make a difference for that.

3:42

Thank you.

3:42

Dr.

3:43

Fower is next, followed by Scott.

3:49

Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.

3:51

My name is Robert Fower.

3:53

I'm a physician and assistant professor of family and community medicine at the University of Arizona and Clayton Medical Schools.

4:00

I've practiced medicine in Phoenix for over 40 years.

4:04

I'm here to oppose the currently written proposal to ban medical care in city parks.

4:09

I urge you to reconsider this proposal and coordinate with other city, county, and state public health partners to protect the most vulnerable residents.

4:19

Please consider designated areas and parks where medical care may be administered.

4:24

For many people experiencing homelessness, parks are the only places where medical assessment, hydration, and heat-related care can occur.

4:33

Prohibiting medical care in these cities, settings increases preventable risk of harm and death, especially during extreme heat.

4:41

Existing services are not yet able to address the immense needs of the unsheltered individuals, as demonstrated by Phoenix's heat data.

4:49

Phoenix has the highest rate of heat-related deaths in the country.

4:54

The homeless account for 50% of the heat-related deaths.

5:00

They make up 30% of the burden unit patients and 20% of burden unit deaths.

5:02

These outcomes are predictable, preventable when care is available.

5:08

Conditions such as dehydration, heat exhaustion, burns and wounds are treatable on site.

5:15

This prevents overloading and already burdened emergency response and health care system.

5:21

The Maricopa County Office of Preparedness and Response and the Arizona Heat Officer expect communities to provide heat relief and medical care during extreme heat.

5:31

Providers such as Circle the City.

6:06

And um I understand there are many people with medical degrees.

6:09

If they if you file, if you signed up with a medical degree, I am calling doctor, and I apologize for those who have a degree which we have not honored.

6:16

Councilman Pestor had a question.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Health█████████████████████████25%
Procedural█████████████13%
Land Use██████████10%
Homelessness████████8%
Public Safety████████8%
Public Engagement███████7%
Environmental Protection██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Technology and Innovation████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Phoenix City Council Meeting Summary: 2025-12-17

This meeting, held on December 17, 2025, began as a lengthy session focused on public health, safety, and emergency response, evolving into a contentious debate over zoning and environmental regulation. The agenda primarily featured discussions on Ordinance G7464 regarding medical treatments in city parks and Ordinance G7467 (Item 76) concerning the North Gateway Village development near TSMC. Public testimony was dominated by health professionals and community advocates opposing restrictions on harm reduction services, while neighbors and business leaders debated the implications of semiconductor expansion on water usage, air quality, and local infrastructure.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 51 (Ordinance G7464): Repealing the existing city of Phoenix Fire Code to adopt the 2024 International Fire Code with Phoenix Amendments. Passed 9-0. (Note: While Item 51 was approved, the ordinance in discussion throughout the meeting was primarily Ordinance G7467, which was ultimately tabled/continued for revision).
  • Item 54 (Ordinance G7468): Amending the code regarding crossing or stopping in a roadway to remove the requirement for a warning before issuing a civil violation. Passed 7-1 (Councilwoman Hernandez opposed).
  • Item 55: Power DMS contract approval. Passed 9-0.
  • Item 67: Amending building and fire prevention chapters to update user fee schedules. Passed 10-0.
  • Item 77: Amendment regarding complaint filings and notary requirements. Passed 8-0.

Public Comments & Testimony

On Ordinance G7467 (Medical Treatment in Parks):

  • Medical Professionals and Health Advocates: Speakers including Dr. Robert Fower (University of Arizona), Scott Greenwood (CEO of Sonora Prevention Works), Rebecca Lutz (Fast Track Cities), and numerous medical students expressed full support for harm reduction programs and street medicine. They argued that banning these activities in parks increases emergency room visits, disease transmission (HIV/Hepatitis C), and overdose deaths. Speaker Rebecca Lutz stated that the ordinance criminalizes life-saving care and violates state syringe service statutes (ARS 36-798.51). Dr. Jack Palmer noted that harm reduction is a moral imperative and urged the council to not prioritize fear over evidence.
  • Local Residents: Multiple residents, including a mother describing her father's struggle with addiction and a park ranger with 8 years of service, expressed concern about the presence of needles and medical waste. Councilman Waring and others stated that residents cannot safely use parks due to safety concerns regarding biohazard debris and needle exposure. Councilman Gardado shared a personal story of his son finding a needle, stating that park safety must be balanced with compassion.

On Ordinance G7467 (TSMC/North Gateway Village):

  • Opponents: Residents of Stetson Valley, including Amanda McGowan, Kent McGowan (a 15-year-old), and Brittany Semri, expressed strong opposition to the heavy industrial zoning. They argued the project threatens the Sonoran Preserve, increases traffic (specifically on 51st Avenue), and poses unacceptable risks due to toxic chemical emissions and water scarcity. Speaker Lenny Siegel, an environmental professional, stated that semiconductor manufacturing is a chemical industry with a history of pollution and that evacuation plans are not transparent. Speaker Rachel Valenzuela emphasized that fear is driving the process rather than evidence of safety.
  • Proponents: Christine Mackey (former city recruiter for TSMC) expressed support for the project, highlighting the $16.5 billion investment and economic benefits. Speaker Katie Kiefer stated that the project balances economic growth with conservation. Speaker Josh Hansma (Friends of Deer Valley) expressed support for the project as a model for responsible growth.

Discussion Items

Ordinance G7467 (Safe Medical Treatment in Parks):

  • Debate: The Council debated the tension between public safety (removing needles and debris) and public health (allowing harm reduction). Councilwoman Pastor moved to approve the ordinance with a delayed effective date of March 30, 2026, directing staff to work with health providers to refine the language. Vice Mayor O'Brien's motion to table the ordinance was noted but not seconded. Councilman Waring argued that parks are not for distributing needles and that taxpayer investment in parks is being undermined.
  • Clarification: Parks Director Cynthia confirmed that special activity requests would be required for ongoing care. Law Department stated the ordinance was reviewed for constitutional compliance but acknowledged First Amendment concerns raised by the ACLU. Councilwoman Hernandez raised concerns about the liability of the city and impact on fire department resources.

North Gateway Village (Items 74, 75, 76):

  • Debate: The Council discussed the North Park Project, which amends land use, street classification, and rezones 6,381 acres for the TSMC expansion. Concerns focused on 51st Avenue expansion (potential for 6 lanes), truck traffic, water usage, and chemical safety.
  • Compromise: Vice Mayor O'Brien led a process of adding multiple stipulations to address community concerns. These included a prohibition on commercial truck traffic on 51st Avenue south of Dexletta, a commitment to build a pedestrian crossing at Stetson Valley Parkway within six months, and a commitment from the applicant to provide annual updates to the planning committee.
  • Environmental Review: Staff and applicants discussed wastewater treatment (EPA/ADQ regulations), fire code compliance for hazardous materials, and open space preservation. Jared (State Land Dept) clarified that 2100 acres are being conveyed to the Sonoran Preserve, with an additional 18 acres added to the buffer near Pyramid Peak.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 74 (General Plan Amendment): Approved 8-0. The city council adopted the North Gateway Village Planning Committee recommendation to amend the general plan, expanding the infrastructure limit line and updating the trail system map.
  • Item 75 (Street Classification Map): Approved 8-0. The street classification map was amended to include minor realignments for Dixaletta Drive and 51st, 67th avenues.
  • Item 76 (Zoning/Rezone): Approved 8-0. The site was rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with significant stipulations added during the meeting. Key stipulations include:
    • Annual presentation to the North Gateway Village Planning Committee with notification to neighborhood associations.
    • Artistic murals on utility boxes.
    • No commercial truck traffic south of Dexletta on 51st Avenue.
    • Pedestrian crossing near Stetson Valley Parkway within six months.
  • Ordinance G7467 (Medical Treatment in Parks): While not passed in its original form due to the delayed effective date motion, the Council moved to continue the item to the February 18, 2026, meeting (Motion by Vice Mayor O'Brien was not seconded, but Councilwoman Pastor's motion to approve with a delay passed 8-1). The ordinance will take effect on March 30, 2026, unless revised by that date. Councilwoman Hodge Washington voted yes, while Councilman Hernandez voted no. (Note: The roll call for the final vote on the medical ordinance resulted in a 8-1 passage of the pastor motion).
  • Item 54 (Crossing/Stopping): Passed 7-1. The requirement for a warning before a citation was removed.
  • Item 51, 55, 67, 77: Passed unanimously.

Next Steps:

  • Staff will work with stakeholders to revise the medical treatment ordinance language before the February 18, 2026 meeting.
  • For the North Gateway project, the developer must comply with the new stipulations regarding traffic, announcements, and art.
  • The City of Phoenix will continue to monitor water and air quality impacts and enforce fire codes for hazardous materials.

Note: The roll call for the final vote on Item 76 (Rezone) was 8-0 (Councilwoman Hernandez absent or not voting). The vote on the medical ordinance (Item 46) was 8-1 (Councilwoman Hernandez opposed).

Correction: The transcript indicates the roll call for the medical ordinance (Item 46) result was 8-1 (Passes 8-1). The vote for Item 76 (Rezone) was 8-0.

Correction: The transcript indicates the roll call for the medical ordinance (Item 46) result was 8-1 (Passes 8-1). The vote for Item 76 (Rezone) was 8-0.

*Final Correction based on transcript text:

  • Item 46 (Medical Ordinance): Motion to pass with delayed date passed 8-1 (Councilwoman Hernandez voted no).
  • Item 76 (Rezone): Motion to pass with stipulations passed 8-0.*

Meeting Transcript

I have a very amazing mother. My father has struggled with substance use my entire life. And I almost ran away. I almost ran away into a park, just like a lot of my patients do. But luckily, I had a good parent figure. I had a good great siblings. And I just thank them for that. And now I'm trying to provide that same service to the same patients that I see every day. When I was practicing medicine in Oregon, my nephew had an accident. I had to go to the hospital immediately, and I forgot my insulin syringe. So I went to a pharmacy, and one of the pharmacists tell me. No, you don't have your diabetes box with you. I'm not giving you a syringe. My patients struggle with this every single day. Safe syringe programs allow them to get the access that they need to not go into the hospital. And a nurse against policy gave me a syringe when I was at the hospital with my nephew to get my blood sugar down. So we're gonna have more patients with more medical problems if things like this allow to go forward. So thank you so much. Clayton is next, followed by Dr. Fower. Hello, council members. Uh I my name is Clay Nizel. I'm an EMT. I work in Phoenix in the greater Phoenix area. Um I just want to talk about why I oppose this measure. Um, first of all, just sort of uh uh small note is that EMTs and paramedics really don't do any of this harm reduction stuff. We're not handing out needles, we're not handing out harm reduction kits. So when you take this stuff away and you tell us that there's an exception for us, it just doesn't do anything. You're just saying, you're just putting a stopgap that's not there, right? Um, emergency workers provide emergency medical care in emergency situations, and we are seeing more and more people that are just treating emergency care as their their like one solution for medical care. And we're seeing costs go up, and we're seeing worse health outcomes because people are not seeking care as soon. And the people who work in like needle uh needle replacement and and uh the and our uh sorry uh and harm reduction events are are the ones who are providing that care, which bridges that gap. Um we know that there are tons of of positive uh there are tons of positive uh there are a lot of positive outcomes that come from these programs, uh a reduction in the spread of bloodborne illnesses, decreased overdose deaths, and even in some cases, finding rehab and detox uh resources for the people that need them. So when we take these away, we're expecting to have more addicts out on the street. And finally, I know that kind of one of the big the big questions about this is talking about medical waste and talking about the debris that gets left behind, but it's important to realize that the debris that gets left behind is just a natural outcome of people needing medical care, and by making it illegal for people to go in and help these people and find ways to dispose of these things, you're not reducing that debris or that waste. You're just making it harder for the people who actually want to make a difference for that. Thank you. Dr. Fower is next, followed by Scott. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. My name is Robert Fower. I'm a physician and assistant professor of family and community medicine at the University of Arizona and Clayton Medical Schools. I've practiced medicine in Phoenix for over 40 years. I'm here to oppose the currently written proposal to ban medical care in city parks. I urge you to reconsider this proposal and coordinate with other city, county, and state public health partners to protect the most vulnerable residents. Please consider designated areas and parks where medical care may be administered. For many people experiencing homelessness, parks are the only places where medical assessment, hydration, and heat-related care can occur. Prohibiting medical care in these cities, settings increases preventable risk of harm and death, especially during extreme heat. Existing services are not yet able to address the immense needs of the unsheltered individuals, as demonstrated by Phoenix's heat data. Phoenix has the highest rate of heat-related deaths in the country.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com