OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees Meeting - October 21, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 21, 2026
BodyPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 8:19:58

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

11:42

Good morning and welcome to the pre-agenda interviews for Wednesday, October 21st, two thousand twenty-six for the Housing Opportunity Fund Advisory Board.

11:50

Would a clerk please read the title of the bill?

Speaker 2

11:52

Bill eight fifty-three resolution appointing Jennifer Cash Wade to the Housing Opportunity Fund Advisory Board with the time to expire, September sixth, two thousand and thirty.

Speaker 1

12:03

Thank you.

12:03

For the record, we're currently joined by Councilman Woolwick.

12:06

What we'll do is we'll turn over to Miss Cash Wade.

12:09

If you would simply introduce yourself, tell us a little bit about yourself and why you want to serve on this board, and then we'll open it up for questions.

Speaker 3

13:09

So I'm familiar with um, you know, real estate, uh, the buying and selling of it uh in that on that level.

13:18

I worked for nine years as first the assistant operations manager, then the operations manager uh at the Department of Real Estate, formerly, of course, the recorder of these.

Speaker 1

14:56

With that, I'll open it up to questions from members.

14:59

Councilman World.

Speaker 4

15:00

Um yeah, thank you.

15:01

And thanks for your willingness to serve and sit on the sit on this advisory board.

15:06

Um I'm not sure if you've heard, but sort of in in the news and with the the city's financial situation, there has been um there's been talk of not funding the housing opportunity fund next year and also uh even potentially eliminating it altogether, which is very concerning to me given the um the really critical programs that it that it supports, right?

15:36

Everything from gap financing for affordable housing projects that's really enabled us to get a huge number of LITEC deals here in the city uh over the past years, um uh as well as you know, emergency rental assistance, um help for for homeowners with home repairs and uh and eviction prevention.

16:00

So I guess I just wanted to I'm I'm curious um in in your experience, well, w whether you have experience directly with neighbors who have taken advantage of these funds or just generally though if those your perspective on those issues and the need for the city to continue providing support in in Bell Tuber.

Speaker 3

16:22

Yes, um I definitely have there are uh several, I I was gonna say many, but but there are um there are several residents in the community that have taken advantage of different housing programs that are currently uh operating in the city.

16:44

We have uh they there is of course um the housing opportunity fund, uh the funds that uh other funding sources that the URA provides that have allowed residents to purchase homes that have been rehabbed.

17:02

Uh and I'm sure that some of the funds that were used for the rehab were uh uh HOF funds and other sources of funds uh through the URA, through um state grants, through you know, other local grants.

17:17

So, yes, to have those funds available for communities such as Belt Sever is uh it's it's imperative because uh we partnered with uh the Pittsburgh Housing Development Corporation to rehab five houses in our community that sold very quickly, and that would not they could not the rehab could not have occurred without uh the support of the different funding sources, and the buyers certainly could not have been able to purchase the homes.

17:54

The homes are all um uh the pricing is they're affordable, and by that there are you know certain income levels that you must be in to be eligible to purchase the homes.

18:08

And the whole uh you know purpose is to uh uh give folks who might not ordinarily be able to purchase, and not because they don't have good credit, not because they don't have you know uh jobs, um very well-paying jobs, some you know, you just kind of living paycheck to paycheck like so many, but because there are uh closing costs that are very expensive.

18:38

There are down payments that are required, and those have been we found stumbling blocks to a lot of people who have the money who are paying an enormous amount of rent and paying their own utilities.

18:52

They're doing everything but paying taxes and paying homeowners insurance.

18:58

So to transfer them into homeownership, I mean it's just uh a kind of a natural thing, and to have small things prevent them from being able to do that is um you know it's a travesty.

19:13

And so programs like housing opportunity fund, like the URA's for sale development project, like um, you know, support from the housing authority, all of those programs benefit both communities and residents.

Speaker 4

19:29

Yeah, absolutely.

19:30

I'm glad you mentioned that.

19:31

That's also another important piece of the housing opportunity fund is the is the homeowner, the down payment assistance program.

19:37

That's been a very, very popular program that's done, done very well with those funds.

19:42

Um I think too, it's uh, you know, when we talk about this uh sort of this idea that you know the housing opportunity fund is like an extra uh or somehow something that we're doing extra.

Unassigned speaker

20:00

I that's not actually the case, right?

Speaker 4

20:01

Because if my understanding is correct, I can um can council president can correct me, but um is we increased, was it the deed transfer tax?

20:09

Yes.

20:10

So we so we actually increase the deed transfer tax in order to create the housing opportunity fund.

20:14

So to eliminate that funding is actually is actually the city taking from the housing opportunity, like taking from something in order to to to fill its own budget holes.

20:27

Right, not the the housing opportunity fund never took out of the city's budget, right?

20:31

There was actual new funding created specifically for it.

20:35

So I think that's that's sort of an important uh thing to to realize, you know, going in, especially as as a member of the board and and uh hopefully fighting for this for this to for for us and the city to to continue this funding, which is really so vital.

Speaker 3

20:51

Absolutely.

20:52

And in having seen once again how these funds

Unassigned speaker

20:56

uh

Speaker 3

20:56

totally facilitate uh, you know, individuals uh in becoming homeowners, it would absolutely be devastating to take them away.

21:06

And I

Speaker 4

21:07

think too, there's also the aspect, and I don't I I I don't suppose that we have a a clear cost analysis, although it would be nice to have one is you know, especially around the eviction prevention services.

21:17

You know, if someone is evicted, that is an unhoused person on the street, and what is the cost of that, right?

21:22

Like what are we what you know, what are we paying as a city just to to to manage that?

Unassigned speaker

21:27

So so this fund is actually um, you know, uh a preventative measure that is that I think ultimately would save taxpayers money by making sure that folks can stay in the world.

Speaker 4

21:40

Well, I I appreciate you being here and you know, and your your willingness to serve.

21:45

It's uh you know, it's a lot of work and it's uh and it's uh a tough time to join the board, but I'm glad to have you.

21:52

So thank you very much.

21:54

Thank you, Councilwoman Warwick.

Speaker 1

21:58

Thank you.

21:58

Um I don't have any questions for you.

22:02

Um I've known you f for a very long time.

22:06

Um we serve on the land bank board together.

22:09

I know your work from PHDC, your advocacy there.

22:12

So I think you'll be a welcomed addition to the HOF.

22:16

Um I will simply reiterate what Councilwoman Warwick has said, which is I believe this is a critical tool um for the city of Pittsburgh.

22:24

Um if we're going to work to grow our city, then that actually means adding residents, that means adding um homeowners, that means adding to the tax base, which is actually does that, right?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing██████████████████18%
Procurement█████████████13%
Zoning Code███████████11%
Housing██████████10%
Procedural█████████9%
Public Safety████████8%
Public Comment███████7%
Budget██████6%
Short Term Rentals███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees Meeting – October 21, 2026

The Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees convened on Wednesday, October 21, 2026, at 9:30 AM in Council Chambers. The meeting covered a wide range of legislative items including zoning reform, cooperative purchasing oversight, membership dues, and various administrative resolutions. Key debates centered on a $50,000 membership for Vibrant Pittsburgh and a major zoning package addressing accessory dwelling units, parking minimums, and affordable housing bonuses. A controversial proposal to require City Council approval for cooperative purchasing contracts over $30,000 was ultimately amended to require approval only for contracts of $1 million or more, with reporting requirements for smaller purchases.

Consent Calendar

  • Appointments: Jennifer Cash Wade was appointed to the Housing Opportunity Fund Advisory Board after an interview.
  • Claim Settlements: Warrants approved for Patrick Goodfellow ($3,615.93) and Tomer Elbaz ($3,600.00) for damage from City vehicles.
  • Budget Transfer: Resolution 2026-0984 transferring $4,768.87 within the 2026 Operating Budget was approved.
  • Ordinances on Fiscal Transparency: Budget Training (2026-0985), P-Card Policy (2026-0986), and Quarterly Financial Reporting (2026-0987) were all affirmatively recommended.
  • Organizational Chart Ordinance: Council Bill 2026-0991 was held for one week to refine details.
  • Public Safety Contracts: Increased funding for Humane Animal Rescue of Pittsburgh ($151,295) was approved.
  • Easement and Bridge: Easement for Columbia Gas (2026-0979) and Swindell Bridge condemnation amendment (2026-0981) were approved.
  • Meals Program: Agreement with Pittsburgh Board of Public Education for 2026-2027 Food Service Program ($750,000) approved.
  • Technology Purchases: Warrants for OPEX Corporation ($11,470), Open Innovation Plans ($75,237.50 amendment), and eDocs Technologies ($8,845) were approved.
  • Sewage Facilities Plans: Plan revisions for 7119 Hamilton Avenue and 1 21st Street were adopted.
  • Invoices, Intradepartmental Transfers, and P-Card Approvals: All approved without objection.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • David Fisher (Wilkinsburg): Proposed creating solar energy garden parks in East Liberty and pollinator-friendly agrivoltaics along I-79.
  • Genevieve Jerome (Mount Washington): Urged strong short-term rental regulations, describing negative impacts from Airbnbs on her street (at least seven on Ulysses Street) including noise, garbage, and safety issues. Asked not to grandfather existing short-term rentals.
  • Chris Basile (Mount Washington): Supported Executive Order Phase One zoning bill (2026-0834) but requested deferring residential compatibility setback changes to later phases and preserving the Grandview Public Realm District.
  • Bill Schlachter (Mount Washington): Echoed concerns about short-term rentals and criticized the proposed zoning changes for potentially weakening protections for the Grandview Public Realm.
  • Yvonne F. Brown (Bedford): Complained about lack of bus service for seniors and a dismissive response from a county council member.
  • Unique Brown: Spoke about human nature, accountability of elected officials, and need for direct resources for housing and violence prevention.
  • Special Agent Sunshine: Provided announcements for homeless services and urged compassion.
  • Ava Meadows (address not stated): Criticized no-bid contracts under the previous administration and called for greater accountability in funding cuts, noting that a food pantry ran out of food in one hour.

Discussion Items

  • Vibrant Pittsburgh Membership (2026-0847): Council debated a $50,000 warrant for membership dues. Opponents (Councilmembers Warwick, Coghill, Charland, Salinetro) cited tight finances and unclear benefits; supporters (Council President Lavelle, Councilmember Mosley, Gross, Wilson, Strassburger) argued it is vital for attracting diverse talent and growing the city’s tax base. The motion passed 5–4.
  • Zoning Reform Package (2025-1545): This omnibus bill includes inclusionary zoning additions, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), removal of minimum off-street parking, and an affordable housing bonus program. Council first amended by substitution with the Planning Commission’s June 2026 recommendations. Three additional amendments were offered: (1) extending the affordability period from 20 to 35 years (approved); (2) removing the option for four bonus points in NDO/LNC zoning districts to prevent overdevelopment (approved); (3) correcting multi-suite residential use criteria (approved). Councilmembers Gross, Mosley, Warwick, and Strassburger spoke in support of the compromise. The bill was affirmatively recommended.
  • Short-Term Rental Ordinance (2026-0008): Held for six weeks pending receipt of the Planning Commission’s report on a companion zoning bill.
  • Executive Order Phase One Zoning (2026-0834): Amended by staff to fix a compatibility standard error, and further amended verbally to strike “or meals or both” from a definition. Approved as amended.
  • Cooperative Purchasing Oversight (2026-0994): Councilmember Warwick introduced a bill requiring City Council approval for cooperative (piggyback) contracts over $30,000 annually. After debate, a substitute amendment by Councilmember Wilson raised the threshold to $1 million for council approval and required OMB to send weekly notices for purchases between $30,000 and $1 million. The amendment passed 7–1–1 (Councilmember Gross opposed, Warwick abstained). The bill as amended was affirmatively recommended.
  • Petition for Historical Marker (2026-0993): Held for a cablecast public hearing regarding the return of the “Workplace Accidents and the Law” marker to Market Square.

Key Outcomes

  • Vibrant Pittsburgh Membership: Approved 5–4 (Ayes: Wilson, Lavelle, Gross, Strassburger, Mosley; Noes: Salinetro, Charland, Coghill, Warwick).
  • Zoning Reform (2025-1545): Affirmatively recommended as amended. Key amendments: increase affordability period to 35 years, restrict height bonuses in NDO/LNC districts, and correct text.
  • Cooperative Purchasing (2026-0994): Amended to require council approval for contracts ≥$1 million and weekly written notice for purchases ≥$30,000. Affirmatively recommended.
  • Organizational Chart Ordinance (2026-0991): Held one week for revisions.
  • Short-Term Rental Ordinance (2026-0008): Held six weeks.
  • Rezoning of 1070 Banksville Ave (2026-1011): Held for public hearing.
  • Public Hearing on Historical Marker (2026-0993): Scheduled for cablecast.
  • All other items on the consent calendar and committees were approved as recommended.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning and welcome to the pre-agenda interviews for Wednesday, October 21st, two thousand twenty-six for the Housing Opportunity Fund Advisory Board. Would a clerk please read the title of the bill? Bill eight fifty-three resolution appointing Jennifer Cash Wade to the Housing Opportunity Fund Advisory Board with the time to expire, September sixth, two thousand and thirty. Thank you. For the record, we're currently joined by Councilman Woolwick. What we'll do is we'll turn over to Miss Cash Wade. If you would simply introduce yourself, tell us a little bit about yourself and why you want to serve on this board, and then we'll open it up for questions. So I'm familiar with um, you know, real estate, uh, the buying and selling of it uh in that on that level. I worked for nine years as first the assistant operations manager, then the operations manager uh at the Department of Real Estate, formerly, of course, the recorder of these. With that, I'll open it up to questions from members. Councilman World. Um yeah, thank you. And thanks for your willingness to serve and sit on the sit on this advisory board. Um I'm not sure if you've heard, but sort of in in the news and with the the city's financial situation, there has been um there's been talk of not funding the housing opportunity fund next year and also uh even potentially eliminating it altogether, which is very concerning to me given the um the really critical programs that it that it supports, right? Everything from gap financing for affordable housing projects that's really enabled us to get a huge number of LITEC deals here in the city uh over the past years, um uh as well as you know, emergency rental assistance, um help for for homeowners with home repairs and uh and eviction prevention. So I guess I just wanted to I'm I'm curious um in in your experience, well, w whether you have experience directly with neighbors who have taken advantage of these funds or just generally though if those your perspective on those issues and the need for the city to continue providing support in in Bell Tuber. Yes, um I definitely have there are uh several, I I was gonna say many, but but there are um there are several residents in the community that have taken advantage of different housing programs that are currently uh operating in the city. We have uh they there is of course um the housing opportunity fund, uh the funds that uh other funding sources that the URA provides that have allowed residents to purchase homes that have been rehabbed. Uh and I'm sure that some of the funds that were used for the rehab were uh uh HOF funds and other sources of funds uh through the URA, through um state grants, through you know, other local grants. So, yes, to have those funds available for communities such as Belt Sever is uh it's it's imperative because uh we partnered with uh the Pittsburgh Housing Development Corporation to rehab five houses in our community that sold very quickly, and that would not they could not the rehab could not have occurred without uh the support of the different funding sources, and the buyers certainly could not have been able to purchase the homes. The homes are all um uh the pricing is they're affordable, and by that there are you know certain income levels that you must be in to be eligible to purchase the homes. And the whole uh you know purpose is to uh uh give folks who might not ordinarily be able to purchase, and not because they don't have good credit, not because they don't have you know uh jobs, um very well-paying jobs, some you know, you just kind of living paycheck to paycheck like so many, but because there are uh closing costs that are very expensive. There are down payments that are required, and those have been we found stumbling blocks to a lot of people who have the money who are paying an enormous amount of rent and paying their own utilities. They're doing everything but paying taxes and paying homeowners insurance. So to transfer them into homeownership, I mean it's just uh a kind of a natural thing, and to have small things prevent them from being able to do that is um you know it's a travesty. And so programs like housing opportunity fund, like the URA's for sale development project, like um, you know, support from the housing authority, all of those programs benefit both communities and residents. Yeah, absolutely. I'm glad you mentioned that. That's also another important piece of the housing opportunity fund is the is the homeowner, the down payment assistance program. That's been a very, very popular program that's done, done very well with those funds. Um I think too, it's uh, you know, when we talk about this uh sort of this idea that you know the housing opportunity fund is like an extra uh or somehow something that we're doing extra. I that's not actually the case, right? Because if my understanding is correct, I can um can council president can correct me, but um is we increased, was it the deed transfer tax? Yes. So we so we actually increase the deed transfer tax in order to create the housing opportunity fund. So to eliminate that funding is actually is actually the city taking from the housing opportunity, like taking from something in order to to to fill its own budget holes. Right, not the the housing opportunity fund never took out of the city's budget, right? There was actual new funding created specifically for it. So I think that's that's sort of an important uh thing to to realize, you know, going in, especially as as a member of the board and and uh hopefully fighting for this for this to for for us and the city to to continue this funding, which is really so vital. Absolutely. And in having seen once again how these funds uh totally facilitate uh, you know, individuals uh in becoming homeowners, it would absolutely be devastating to take them away. And I think too, there's also the aspect, and I don't I I I don't suppose that we have a a clear cost analysis, although it would be nice to have one is you know, especially around the eviction prevention services. You know, if someone is evicted, that is an unhoused person on the street, and what is the cost of that, right? Like what are we what you know, what are we paying as a city just to to to manage that? So so this fund is actually um, you know, uh a preventative measure that is that I think ultimately would save taxpayers money by making sure that folks can stay in the world. Well, I I appreciate you being here and you know, and your your willingness to serve. It's uh you know, it's a lot of work and it's uh and it's uh a tough time to join the board, but I'm glad to have you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com