OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Plano, Texas/Planning and Zoning
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Plano Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - January 5, 2026

Planning and Zoning — Monday, January 5, 2026
BodyPlano, Texas
SessionPlanning and Zoning
DateMonday, January 5, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:11:01

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:01

Welcome to the January 5th, 2026 City of Plano Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.

0:06

I'll call the meeting to order at 6 o'clock p.m.

0:09

If you all would please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:30

Thank you very much.

0:32

Um comments of public interest.

Unassigned speaker

0:35

Do

Speaker 2

0:36

have one registered speaker.

0:37

This portion of the meeting is to allow up to three minutes per speaker with 30 total minutes on items of interest or concern

Unassigned speaker

0:43

and

Speaker 2

0:43

not on items that are on the current agenda.

0:46

Planning and zoning commission may not discuss these items but may respond with factual or policy information.

Unassigned speaker

0:51

The

Speaker 2

0:51

planning and zoning commission may choose to place the item on a future agenda.

Unassigned speaker

1:01

We

Speaker 2

1:02

have Mrs.

1:03

Crystal Curry registered.

Unassigned speaker

1:11

I

Speaker 1

1:11

don't see anybody coming forward.

1:14

So okay.

1:14

Next item.

Unassigned speaker

1:17

Is this what we come for?

Speaker 2

1:20

If you registered ahead of time.

Speaker 1

1:24

Okay.

1:26

Um let's move move on to consent agenda, please.

Speaker 2

1:41

Items may be removed from this agenda for individual consideration by commissioners or staff.

Speaker 1

1:47

Commissioners, any items that anybody wants removed from the consent agenda.

1:52

Commissioner Lingenfelder.

Speaker 3

1:54

I move that we approve the consent agenda as recommended by staff.

1:59

Commissioner Ollie.

Speaker 1

2:00

The second.

2:02

Commissioner Bender, you had your line.

2:04

Okay, never

Unassigned speaker

2:04

mind.

Speaker 1

2:05

Um second.

2:07

Please vote.

2:15

Motion passes eight to zero.

2:18

Items for individual consideration.

Speaker 2

2:20

Items for individual consideration.

2:22

Public hearing items.

2:23

Unless instructed otherwise by the chair, speakers will be called and the order registrations are received.

2:28

Applicants are limited to a total of 15 minutes of presentation time with a five-minute rebuttal if needed.

2:34

Remaining speakers are limited to 30 total minutes of testimony time with three minutes assigned per speaker.

2:42

Administrative consideration items must be approved if they meet city development regulations.

2:46

Legislative consideration items are more discretionary, except as constrained by legal considerations.

2:51

Non-public hearing items.

3:09

Agenda item number one.

Unassigned speaker

3:43

The

Speaker 4

3:43

purpose of this preliminary plot is to consider a variance to the subdivision ordinance.

4:07

This requirement serves several purposes.

4:12

It allows adequate access for public safety to all the residential lots as well as access and ease of use for public open space areas, and it allows residential blocks to be reasonably scaled in order to create visual breaks in the environment.

4:43

The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or injurist to other properties.

4:51

Below you'll see two images within the development.

5:03

This is to allow access to the associated open space areas for those having residential lots that are in the middle of those blocks in order for them to have a more ease of access to open space, which is beneficial to health and public safety.

5:23

Additionally, um due to the irregular shape of this lot as well as other surrounding geographical elements, such as uh being at the corner of two type B thoroughfares, Winthaven, Spring Creek Parkway, locating uh additional driveway entries that would create breaks in the blocks uh would be difficult considering on the north side of the property having a entry on that blue arrow on the image to the left, having a driveway there would create limited distance between Pine Haven and the main subdivision entry, which I've highlighted on the image to the right, having a main subdivision entry with more of a um with longer uh with uh having the main subdivision entry be a longer entrance uh is better for residents in order to access the property, and then additionally along Spring Creek, you'll see that there would, if there were to be a driveway there for the image to the left, that a uh visibility easement would be needed, and that would significantly reduce the or increase the rear setback of those properties and make it difficult to develop that property.

Unassigned speaker

6:41

So

Speaker 4

6:41

this is the unique geographic and topic um those are unique to the site.

6:50

Additionally, um the variance does not vary any of the provisions of the zoning ordinance or comprehensive plan, and as I mentioned, it is of a regular shape.

7:00

Based on those uh issues, staff is recommending approval uh of this project with a variance to the subsection 5.2 point B.6A of the subvision ordinance in order to allow blocks A, B, and F to have more than 20 units on one side as shown on the preliminary plot.

Unassigned speaker

7:17

Thank

Speaker 4

7:17

you, and I'm available to answer any questions.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████74%
Procedural██████████17%
Public Safety█2%
Transportation Safety█2%
Zoning█2%
Public Engagement█2%
Religious Freedom█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Plano Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - January 5, 2026

The City of Plano Planning and Zoning Commission met on January 5, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included an approved consent agenda, a public hearing for a tabled rezoning request for the Meadows Baptist Church property, a request for a preliminary plat variance, an amendment to a Specific Use Permit for a new car dealership, and a presentation on Module 2 of the zoning and subdivision ordinance rewrite. The meeting adjourned at 7:15 PM.

Consent Calendar

  • The Commission unanimously approved the consent agenda as recommended by staff (Motion passed 8-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Non-Agenda Public Comments: No registered speakers came forward.
  • Agenda Items 2A & 2B – Meadows Baptist Church Rezoning (Public Hearing):
    • Philip Langley (Ranch Estate Circle): Reported that 99 residents are opposed to the rezoning while 6 support it. He expressed concern that the proposed plan leapfrogs from estate development to urban use (SF6) and urged the Commission to adhere to the city's established transition plan.
    • John Marlowe (Stony Hollow Residents Association HOA President): Speaking on behalf of the majority of the 605 homes in the HOA, he expressed strong opposition. Concerns included the reduction from two-acre estate lots to smaller SF6 lots, overcrowding of Hickey Elementary School, and increased traffic congestion in an area already heavily impacted by Plano East Senior High School.
    • John Jacobson (Ridgetop Lane): Opposed the rezoning, arguing that the proposed density does not fit the character of the surrounding estate neighborhoods. He noted that the city has historically rejected similar high-density proposals in this area.
    • David Keith (Ranch Estates): Chose to defer his comments until the meeting in February.

Discussion Items

  • Agenda Item 1: Preliminary Plat Variance (Subdivision 5.2.B.6A): Staff presented a request to allow blocks A, B, and F to have more than 20 continuous dwelling units on one side. The variance was justified by the site's irregular shape and geographic constraints near Windhaven and Spring Creek Parkway. The applicant confirmed buildings will contain three to six units. Fire and police services approved the plans. The Commission approved the variance unanimously.
  • Agenda Items 2A & 2B: Rezoning and Plat for Meadows Baptist Church (Tabled): The applicant requested a tabling to February 2, 2026 to refine the concept plan after meeting with nearby property owners. Staff confirmed a traffic impact analysis (TA) was not required, though a traffic section would be in the staff report. The applicant's engineer stated they are working on a revised concept plan. The Commission unanimously granted the tabling request for both items.
  • Agenda Items 3A & 3B: Specific Use Permit (SUP) Amendment for New Car Dealer: Staff proposed expanding existing SUP 539 to include an adjacent lot (Lot B) for accessory major vehicle repair and administrative offices serving the main dealership on Lot A. Lot B cannot be used for vehicle sales displays and the use must remain subordinate to the main dealership. The Commission approved the amendment and site plan unanimously.
  • Agenda Item 4: Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance Rewrite – Module 2: Consultants from Freese Nichols presented Module 2 covering administrative and zoning procedures. Key proposals included formalized pre-application meetings, a new tiered site plan amendment process, and significantly tightened eligibility requirements for Planned Development (PD) districts. New PDs must demonstrate a clear public benefit aligned with the Comprehensive Plan, reflect innovation exceeding base zone standards, and cannot be used if a standard district or SUP can accommodate the development. Commissioners praised the new PD eligibility requirements and the removal of outdated platting barriers in the original donation area.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved (8-0).
  • Agenda Item 1 (Preliminary Plat Variance): Approved as recommended by staff (Motion: Bronsky, Second: Alley. Vote: 8-0).
  • Agenda Item 2A (Rezoning Request): Tabled to the February 2, 2026 meeting (Motion: Bronsky, Second: Alley. Vote: 8-0).
  • Agenda Item 2B (Related Plat): Tabled to the February 2, 2026 meeting (Motion: Bronsky, Second: Bender. Vote: 8-0).
  • Agenda Item 3A (SUP Amendment): Approved as recommended by staff (Motion: Bronsky, Second: Lingenfelter. Vote: 8-0).
  • Agenda Item 3B (Site Plan): Approved as recommended by staff (Motion: Lingenfelter, Second: Alley. Vote: 8-0).
  • Agenda Item 4 (Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Module 2): Accepted as substantially complete (Motion: Bronsky, Second: Lingenfelter. Vote: 8-0).

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to the January 5th, 2026 City of Plano Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. I'll call the meeting to order at 6 o'clock p.m. If you all would please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. Thank you very much. Um comments of public interest. Do have one registered speaker. This portion of the meeting is to allow up to three minutes per speaker with 30 total minutes on items of interest or concern and not on items that are on the current agenda. Planning and zoning commission may not discuss these items but may respond with factual or policy information. The planning and zoning commission may choose to place the item on a future agenda. We have Mrs. Crystal Curry registered. I don't see anybody coming forward. So okay. Next item. Is this what we come for? If you registered ahead of time. Okay. Um let's move move on to consent agenda, please. Items may be removed from this agenda for individual consideration by commissioners or staff. Commissioners, any items that anybody wants removed from the consent agenda. Commissioner Lingenfelder. I move that we approve the consent agenda as recommended by staff. Commissioner Ollie. The second. Commissioner Bender, you had your line. Okay, never mind. Um second. Please vote. Motion passes eight to zero. Items for individual consideration. Items for individual consideration. Public hearing items. Unless instructed otherwise by the chair, speakers will be called and the order registrations are received. Applicants are limited to a total of 15 minutes of presentation time with a five-minute rebuttal if needed. Remaining speakers are limited to 30 total minutes of testimony time with three minutes assigned per speaker. Administrative consideration items must be approved if they meet city development regulations. Legislative consideration items are more discretionary, except as constrained by legal considerations. Non-public hearing items. Agenda item number one. The purpose of this preliminary plot is to consider a variance to the subdivision ordinance. This requirement serves several purposes. It allows adequate access for public safety to all the residential lots as well as access and ease of use for public open space areas, and it allows residential blocks to be reasonably scaled in order to create visual breaks in the environment.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com