OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Post Falls, Idaho/Planning and Zoning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Post Falls Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - July 15, 2026

Planning and Zoning Commission — Wednesday, July 15, 2026
BodyPost Falls, Idaho
SessionPlanning and Zoning Commission
DateWednesday, July 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:41

Call the meeting to order.

0:42

Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:46

Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which one nation under your body.

0:56

Liberty and Justice Foral.

1:01

All right.

1:02

Good evening.

1:02

Welcome to planning the zoning commission meeting on July 14th, 2026.

1:08

Let's start with roll call, please.

1:10

Carrie?

1:11

Here.

1:12

Stephenson?

1:12

Here.

1:13

Schlan Hauer?

1:14

Here.

1:14

Shreiber.

1:15

Here.

1:15

Will ham?

1:16

Here.

1:16

Flock.

1:17

Here.

1:17

All right.

1:20

Any ceremonies, announcements, appointments, or presentations.

1:23

Uh there are none.

1:24

None tonight.

1:26

Any amendments to the agenda?

1:28

Nope.

1:30

Okay.

1:31

From the commission members, any declaration of conflict, ex parte contacts, or site visits.

1:38

Seeing none.

1:39

Uh consent calendar, please.

1:42

Thank you, Commissioners.

1:43

We have four items tonight.

1:45

Uh meeting min approval of the meeting minutes from June 9th.

1:49

Meeting minutes from June 18th.

1:51

Meeting minutes from June 30th.

1:55

And the reason decision for the Tamarek Mountains home appeal.

2:00

File number APL 26-1.

2:03

Okay.

2:04

Just real quick, let the record show Mr.

2:06

Kimball is here now.

2:08

Uh any questions on the consent calendar from anyone?

2:12

Just one brief question.

2:14

On the reason decision file, uh uh from uh Tamarac Mountain Homes.

2:22

So just so I understand on a appeal like that, it doesn't go any further than us.

2:27

It's done at that point, and it's it doesn't go on to city council.

2:31

Is that correct?

2:33

So the decision is you'll be done with it.

2:37

It could be that the decision uh should somebody else want to appeal that decision to the city council.

2:43

Oh, that could go through the same process at the council level.

2:46

But if nobody appeals, it's done at that at here.

2:50

Fourteen days after tonight.

2:52

Okay.

2:55

Just ask him.

2:57

Cool.

2:58

Yeah, this is the first time we had one of those.

3:00

I've never had one in my almost ten years doing this.

3:03

So you missed it.

3:05

Hey, vacation was planned way before then, sorry.

3:08

I'm just kidding.

3:09

All right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████92%
Zoning And Development████8%
Summary of Proceedings

Post Falls Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - July 15, 2026

The Post Falls Planning and Zoning Commission met on July 15, 2026, for a regular meeting. The meeting was called to order with the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. Commissioners Carrie, Stephenson, Schlan Hauer, Shreiber, Will ham, and Flock were present, with Commissioner Kimball arriving shortly after the start. The meeting was brief, with no public hearings or citizen comments, and focused primarily on approving the consent calendar and discussing future scheduling.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent calendar included four items: approval of meeting minutes from June 9, June 18, and June 30, 2026, and the reason decision for the Tamarak Mountains Home appeal (File APL 26-1).
  • Commissioner Stephenson asked whether the appeal decision was final at the commission level or could be appealed further. Staff clarified that the decision becomes effective 14 days after the meeting, and it may be appealed to the city council within that window. If no appeal is filed, the decision is final.
  • The consent calendar was approved unanimously on a roll call vote: Carrie (yes), Kimball (yes), Stephenson (yes), Schlan Hauer (yes), Shreiber (yes), Will ham (yes), Flock (yes).

Discussion Items

  • Future Scheduling: Commissioner Stephenson inquired about the number of items moving toward public hearing, noting that two months ago the commission discussed adding extra meetings due to a heavy workload, but the current agenda was light. Staff responded that a busy spring is typical, followed by a summer lull, and that future agendas for August are being prepared.

Key Outcomes

  • The consent calendar was approved unanimously (7-0).
  • No public hearings, citizen comments, or unfinished business were addressed.
  • The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent.

Meeting Transcript

Call the meeting to order. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which one nation under your body. Liberty and Justice Foral. All right. Good evening. Welcome to planning the zoning commission meeting on July 14th, 2026. Let's start with roll call, please. Carrie? Here. Stephenson? Here. Schlan Hauer? Here. Shreiber. Here. Will ham? Here. Flock. Here. All right. Any ceremonies, announcements, appointments, or presentations. Uh there are none. None tonight. Any amendments to the agenda? Nope. Okay. From the commission members, any declaration of conflict, ex parte contacts, or site visits. Seeing none. Uh consent calendar, please. Thank you, Commissioners. We have four items tonight. Uh meeting min approval of the meeting minutes from June 9th. Meeting minutes from June 18th. Meeting minutes from June 30th. And the reason decision for the Tamarek Mountains home appeal. File number APL 26-1. Okay. Just real quick, let the record show Mr. Kimball is here now. Uh any questions on the consent calendar from anyone? Just one brief question. On the reason decision file, uh uh from uh Tamarac Mountain Homes. So just so I understand on a appeal like that, it doesn't go any further than us. It's done at that point, and it's it doesn't go on to city council. Is that correct? So the decision is you'll be done with it. It could be that the decision uh should somebody else want to appeal that decision to the city council. Oh, that could go through the same process at the council level. But if nobody appeals, it's done at that at here.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com