OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Powell, Ohio/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Powell Development Committee Meeting: Historic Property Survey Update – October 7, 2025

City Council & Boards — Tuesday, October 7, 2025
BodyPowell, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateTuesday, October 7, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 55:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:02

Good evening.

0:03

Today is uh Tuesday, October 7th, 6 30 p.m.

0:06

And this is the uh development committee meeting of the Powell City Council.

0:14

Would you please call the rule?

0:17

Present.

0:18

Carlson here, Ross Irvine is absent.

0:21

David Lester?

0:23

Yep.

0:23

And Sean Simpson is absent.

0:26

Thank you.

0:27

Please rise and join me in the Committee of Allegiance.

0:33

I pledge allegiance to the United States of America.

0:39

One nation and justice for all the questions.

0:49

Thank you very much, everyone, and welcome.

0:51

And uh I guess without Sean and Ross, it's what do we call this?

0:55

So is it three amigos, three studios, three the three remaining okay?

1:02

And the first item on the agenda is the approval of minutes from the last meeting, which was held on August 5th of 2025.

1:11

We have uh seen the minutes.

1:13

May I have a motion to adopt the minutes to adopt second?

1:20

Any questions, comments?

1:22

Hearing none, all the infirmity.

1:27

All right, today's business, and uh we are going to get an update from the historic property survey, and I believe that's gonna be Mr.

1:36

Taylor, right?

1:37

I'll start that it really is going to be more Mr.

1:40

Stan's uh chair of the work actually was done in the planning department.

1:45

As you recall, this this discussion really started a couple years ago and really uh wanting to take a look at um what we're historic district and what does that mean?

1:56

Um Logan has taken it to the next step.

2:00

Um he's hired a hired a consultant to take a look at surveying downtown, and he and his team have put together, I think a really good presentation for you to understand what the findings were and then potentially moving forward what that means for the city.

2:15

So with that, over to Logan.

2:18

Um that I just wanted to address also in terms of timeliness.

2:21

Um City Council's endorsed a lot of activities, a lot of plans this last year.

2:26

We're in the middle of a lot of them.

2:28

What we're gonna talk about tonight has an importance of effectiveness and timeliness.

2:32

So I just wanted to be mindful of that.

2:34

Um Logan's laid it out in such a way that we can begin to endorse actions now that would take effect in the early part of the new year and line up really well for what we anticipate for the adoption of the full code rewrite, and really give ourselves and the council by extension uh some teeth in the formality of uh the historic district.

2:53

So just wanted to thank you for that.

2:55

Thank you.

2:56

No, thank you all for the introduction because a lot of this, a lot of this discussion and what I'm gonna cover tonight kind of relates to other ongoing efforts that we have the zoning code rewrite, the new permitting software.

3:07

There's a lot of alignment of just kind of whole-scale reviewing our development process, finding ways to improve upon it, uh providing the background and the information necessary to ensure that for the next 20 years we can really ensure the type of growth and revitalization that Powell wants to see.

3:25

Um, and so within this, I'll be focusing a little bit on some of the results of the historic survey.

3:31

Uh but what I think is important is to discuss how that relates to the downtown district as a whole, and then how that's going to relate to the zoning code, the regulations, policies, and then the design guidelines that we're going to be updating to reflect a lot of that.

3:45

So this survey was an important piece of the conversation to really determine which areas are in the downtown district are historic, what is the significance of those areas, you know, how can we support and establish the proper regulations to preserve those and then tailor the guidelines and other regulations to support and complement that character that uh the community wants to see, retained in downtown and improved upon in the future.

4:13

So I think an important part of this is not just to talk about the historic survey, but to also talk about how the downtown district has evolved over time.

4:24

And so one of the first things that I want to go into is just a little bit of background of the downtown boundary and kind of how we got here today.

4:31

And not unexpectedly, as PAL grew as a community, kind of the the understanding of what is the downtown district has also evolved over time.

4:41

And there's really two different ways that you can look at this.

4:44

There's the policy side, which are what are city plans, studies, efforts that have defined the boundary in a certain way.

4:51

And then there's also the public perception.

4:54

So every resident, every community member, they may look at downtown and they may see certain parts as being part of the downtown, other parts are not.

5:02

So that all of that is important information for us to understand and really make sure that we're going to reflect the downtown district in the way that the community wants to see it.

5:11

And there's a couple important considerations for why we need to define not just the overall boundary, but any local historic district that would be in there.

5:20

You have the unique zoning requirements and the guidelines that are going to align with the type of preservation and development that you would see there.

5:29

But you also have within the downtown district itself unique streetscape features.

5:34

So paver sidewalks, street lighting, elements like that that have to hit a point where they would transition to what you see in the rest of the community, but that really help define what the downtown looks like.

5:45

And then you also have that the city offers community grants within the downtown district, commercial facade grants, residential renovation that again align with that you know 30-plus year vision of revitalizing the downtown and really maintaining that as the heart of the community.

6:02

So that's one of the reasons why we wanted to go through this historic survey, properly define that, ensure that we can roll that up, and then we can have some of these larger discussions on how we can tailor this to really define what the next five, ten, twenty years look like for the community.

6:20

So when I go into this, I want to start by providing the policy direction.

6:25

And there's a number of documents that have been prepared, issued by the city that have defined the boundary in different ways.

6:32

So you had an initial area outlined that was the downtown boundary before some of what we understand it today.

6:39

So this was when POW was a relatively small community as a village.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Planning And Zoning████████████████████████████████████████43%
Procedural████████9%
Summary of Proceedings

Powell Development Committee Meeting: Historic Property Survey Update – October 7, 2025

The Development Committee met on Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 6:30 PM in Council Chambers. Members present: Carlson, Lester; absent: Irvine and Simpson. The main agenda item was an update on the Historic Property Survey and its implications for downtown regulation and the Historic Downtown Advisory Commission (HDAC). The committee discussed the survey findings, potential boundary adjustments, and staff recommendations for streamlining the review process.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the minutes from the August 5, 2025 Development Committee meeting unanimously.

Discussion Items

  • Historic Property Survey Update:
    • Logan (staff) presented an update on the historic property survey, conducted by the consultant Designing Local (based in Columbus, with a historic preservationist). The survey inventoried properties using state/federal criteria (50-year threshold) and identified a potential local historic district (light blue on map) focusing on Liberty Street and 750, including residential areas.
    • The presentation covered the evolution of the downtown boundary from policy documents and public perception, emphasizing the need to define a historic district distinct from the broader downtown overlay.
    • Staff recommended two steps: (1) amend the zoning code to remove HDAC and make the Planning and Zoning Commission the primary reviewing body for all downtown development (effective January 2026), allowing time for further community engagement on a local historic district and new guidelines; (2) use ongoing processes (zoning code rewrite) to refine the historic district and design guidelines.
    • Logan explained that the historic district would have three tiers: dark blue (historic properties with stricter preservation rules), gray (contributing non-historic properties), and unshaded downtown (areas requiring complementary but not historic-style development). He noted that the consultant's proposal may be adjusted based on recent demolitions/proposals.
  • Committee Discussion:
    • Member Carlson asked about the inclusion of parcels on Beach Ridge Drive and Grace Street; staff responded that the current overlay does not include these but noted ongoing talks to rezone the Beach Ridge site into the downtown district. Concerns were raised about excluding the shopping center and outlots east of the district.
    • Member Carlson also emphasized the need for a clear, well-defined process with timelines for applicants, and expressed a desire to preserve some form of architectural review (e.g., an architectural review board).
    • Member Lester inquired about the composition of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the potential loss of HDAC's specialized knowledge; he stressed the importance of appointing members with downtown expertise if HDAC is dissolved.
    • Mayor Counts expressed concern that the effort might impose a uniform architectural style on a diverse, eclectic downtown, and emphasized that scale and accessibility are more defining than style. He questioned whether a specialized board could make appropriate judgments without clearer guidance.
    • Vice Mayor agreed that process clarity for applicants is a top priority.
    • City Manager Taylor provided context, noting that the scientific methodology (National Park Service standards) strengthens the city's ability to preserve character while providing clarity to developers.

Key Outcomes

  • The committee discussed the option of removing HDAC but did not take a formal vote; instead, members agreed to forward the recommendation to the full City Council for broader discussion.
  • Staff committed to providing additional information on how the review process would function without HDAC, including the role of the architectural advisor, before the council deliberation.
  • The committee supported moving the recommendation forward, with the understanding that further details on handling historic preservation and applicant clarity would be developed alongside the zoning code rewrite.
  • The next Development Committee meeting is scheduled for November 5, 2025.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Today is uh Tuesday, October 7th, 6 30 p.m. And this is the uh development committee meeting of the Powell City Council. Would you please call the rule? Present. Carlson here, Ross Irvine is absent. David Lester? Yep. And Sean Simpson is absent. Thank you. Please rise and join me in the Committee of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the United States of America. One nation and justice for all the questions. Thank you very much, everyone, and welcome. And uh I guess without Sean and Ross, it's what do we call this? So is it three amigos, three studios, three the three remaining okay? And the first item on the agenda is the approval of minutes from the last meeting, which was held on August 5th of 2025. We have uh seen the minutes. May I have a motion to adopt the minutes to adopt second? Any questions, comments? Hearing none, all the infirmity. All right, today's business, and uh we are going to get an update from the historic property survey, and I believe that's gonna be Mr. Taylor, right? I'll start that it really is going to be more Mr. Stan's uh chair of the work actually was done in the planning department. As you recall, this this discussion really started a couple years ago and really uh wanting to take a look at um what we're historic district and what does that mean? Um Logan has taken it to the next step. Um he's hired a hired a consultant to take a look at surveying downtown, and he and his team have put together, I think a really good presentation for you to understand what the findings were and then potentially moving forward what that means for the city. So with that, over to Logan. Um that I just wanted to address also in terms of timeliness. Um City Council's endorsed a lot of activities, a lot of plans this last year. We're in the middle of a lot of them. What we're gonna talk about tonight has an importance of effectiveness and timeliness. So I just wanted to be mindful of that. Um Logan's laid it out in such a way that we can begin to endorse actions now that would take effect in the early part of the new year and line up really well for what we anticipate for the adoption of the full code rewrite, and really give ourselves and the council by extension uh some teeth in the formality of uh the historic district. So just wanted to thank you for that. Thank you. No, thank you all for the introduction because a lot of this, a lot of this discussion and what I'm gonna cover tonight kind of relates to other ongoing efforts that we have the zoning code rewrite, the new permitting software. There's a lot of alignment of just kind of whole-scale reviewing our development process, finding ways to improve upon it, uh providing the background and the information necessary to ensure that for the next 20 years we can really ensure the type of growth and revitalization that Powell wants to see. Um, and so within this, I'll be focusing a little bit on some of the results of the historic survey. Uh but what I think is important is to discuss how that relates to the downtown district as a whole, and then how that's going to relate to the zoning code, the regulations, policies, and then the design guidelines that we're going to be updating to reflect a lot of that. So this survey was an important piece of the conversation to really determine which areas are in the downtown district are historic, what is the significance of those areas, you know, how can we support and establish the proper regulations to preserve those and then tailor the guidelines and other regulations to support and complement that character that uh the community wants to see, retained in downtown and improved upon in the future. So I think an important part of this is not just to talk about the historic survey, but to also talk about how the downtown district has evolved over time. And so one of the first things that I want to go into is just a little bit of background of the downtown boundary and kind of how we got here today. And not unexpectedly, as PAL grew as a community, kind of the the understanding of what is the downtown district has also evolved over time. And there's really two different ways that you can look at this. There's the policy side, which are what are city plans, studies, efforts that have defined the boundary in a certain way. And then there's also the public perception. So every resident, every community member, they may look at downtown and they may see certain parts as being part of the downtown, other parts are not. So that all of that is important information for us to understand and really make sure that we're going to reflect the downtown district in the way that the community wants to see it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com