OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

AboutAPILinkedIn
Home/Powell, Ohio/City Council & Boards
★ ★ ★PUBLICRECORDJUL 21 2026
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Powell City Council Regular Meeting - July 21, 2026

City Council & Boards — Tuesday, July 21, 2026
BodyPowell, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateTuesday, July 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:44:27

Transcript — VerbatimClick a line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:04

I will call the July 21st, 2026 Powell City Council meeting to order.

0:10

Elaine, will you please call the role?

0:12

Yes.

0:12

Thank you.

0:13

Leaf Carlson?

0:14

Here.

0:14

Tom Count?

0:15

Here.

0:15

Carlos Crawford.

0:17

Tyler Herman.

0:20

Not present.

0:21

Heather Carr?

0:22

Yeah.

0:22

Kevin Lester.

0:23

Here.

0:24

Kurt Rampe.

0:26

Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:30

Pledge Allegiance of the United States of America.

0:34

And then to the Republic for which it stands.

0:36

One nation under God.

0:38

Indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:47

So I will apologize in advance.

0:49

We have a very heavy agenda this evening, so we're going to get right into it.

0:55

The first item on the agenda is a presentation.

0:59

It is the Scieta Street Extension Bridge Type Analysis presented by Aaron Stanford, our city engineer.

1:07

Mike Murray, American Structure Point, and Sage Flanagan with American Structure Point.

1:20

This is something we've been at for quite a while.

1:23

Some of these plans go back over a decade.

1:34

What's before council tonight is a recommendation, one of three that's been submitted for the bridge span that will become part of phase two's project.

1:44

Council's action tonight is not indicative of any specific course of action.

1:49

It's an assignment of a concept that will then be further driven to specific set of design, uh, land acquisition and construction.

1:59

So with that, I'll turn it over to Aaron and he can do his presentation and we'll take questions at uh at the end.

2:05

Thank you.

2:06

Thank you, Andy, and members of council.

2:09

Um, as Andy indicated, uh, we're here before you tonight as a pretty important interim milestone in our design process.

2:17

When we first set um this design contract up, what we wanted to do was have a point in the phase two design where we looked at and provided three separate options for the the stream crossing that we'll talk about here in a minute, um, which is very important not only to what that structure can mean, not only to our network but to the community, but it also obviously impacts uh budget, schedule, and the design.

2:41

So as we got to this point, we're gonna bring forward the analysis, the recommendation, um, and from there with the recommendation, we'll keep American structure point on their design, um, giving some guidance on what that structure should be.

2:55

As we uh previously mentioned, I'm making the presentation today.

2:59

We're we're joined here by Mike Murray and Sage Flanagan.

3:02

They're here if we have any technical questions, they're here and available.

3:06

Um, just a real brief overview of the project.

3:09

So the area that we're talking about is is kind of midway in that Soada Street extension.

3:15

Uh there's the Bartholomew Run is the stream that travels through there, um, which necessitates um either a culvert bridge uh being constructed as part of the project.

3:27

Uh a little bit more background in the project.

3:30

It's being currently designed in two separate phases.

3:33

So currently we're working on the public parking area, and then the site street extension from Liberty to the western edge of this bridge.

3:42

This the second phase will include the bridge, um, some of the abutments, the walls, the plaza, and the roundabout and the extension over to Grace.

3:52

The bridge type study, it's a preliminary engineering report, and we use it to evaluate, compare, and select the most feasible and cost-effective bridge design in a specific site.

4:01

So some of the things that we'll look for is the bridge type.

4:04

We'll look at the flood weight of the floodplain we have to span if there's constraints, either financially, physically, uh, we'll look at some environmental impacts and of course construction cost.

4:16

Briefly, just an I want to provide an image of you know, this is the challenge that we had to look at when we're looking at this site and the crossing.

4:25

So you can see on the left side of the screen uh the current terminus of side, so you can pick up on that point of where that road will be extended, and then on the right side of the screen, you see where Susan Lane ties in or the drive that will you know in the future be Susan Lane.

4:40

The connection from side will be slightly north of Entertaining.

4:43

If you look at the floodplain and floodway, you can kind of see why.

4:47

Um near that intersection, you can see the floodway where it juts up to the north, which not only provided an area where we had to influence the intersection, but you can also see one of the things that we looked at was it the narrowest place to cross that floodway.

5:01

In addition to this analysis, the bridge type study, American Structure Point has also done a detailed hydrology and hydraulic analysis.

5:10

So they're looking at you know everything that's happening within that stream, and they're also looking at the impacts from setting either of these structures that we're going to talk about tonight.

5:22

In addition to that, some of the things that they provided feedback on is uh constructability, contextual appropriateness, um, economy or cost, and if there's any other site constraints.

5:34

So, what they have developed and brought back to us are three separate alternatives.

5:38

Um we've named them each A through B.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████18%
Parks and Recreation█████████████████17%
Zoning Regulations████████████12%
Budget Review██████████10%
Public Engagement████████8%
Planning And Zoning████████8%
Procedural███████7%
Disability Rights██████6%
Real Estate Development███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Powell City Council Regular Meeting - July 21, 2026

The Powell City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 47 Hall Street, Powell, Ohio. Business included a bridge type presentation for the Scioto Street Extension, routine consent items, three resolutions covering veterans recognition, parks master plans, and playground equipment, and a detailed discussion of the rewrite of the city's planning and zoning code.

Bridge Presentation: Scioto Street Extension Bridge Type Analysis

  • City Engineer Aaron Stanford, P.E., presented the bridge type study, joined by Mike Murray, P.E., and Sage Flannagan, P.E., of American Structurepoint, Inc., the design consultant.
  • The study evaluates and compares three bridge design alternatives (A, B, and C) for the bridge that will be part of phase two of the Scioto Street Extension, from Liberty Street to the western edge of the bridge.
  • Staff presented the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative; at least one alternative would require a longer construction time than the other two.
  • In response to council questions about whether costs included labor and installation, staff clarified that the analysis was specific to the bridge type for this project.
  • Staff noted that a council majority choosing to deviate to alternative A or C would affect limited city resources. No vote was taken; the item was for discussion and direction.

Consent Calendar

  • The council approved the minutes of the June 16, 2026, regular council meeting.
  • The consent agenda, containing the monthly reports from the police, finance, economic development, human resources, public service, engineering, planning and zoning, building, and community engagement departments, was approved in one motion. No member pulled a report for separate discussion.

Resolution 26-34: "Unmarked but Unforgotten" VSC Agreement

  • The resolution adopts an agreement connected to the "Unmarked but Unforgotten" veterans recognition program and the public plazas of the Scioto Street Extension adjacent to Powell Cemetery.
  • A public commenter expressed support and referenced the city's previously authorized funding of up to $125,000, stating that "all veterans need to be recognized while they're alive and while they're passed."
  • The resolution was adopted.

Resolution 26-35: Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Bennett Farm Master Plan

  • The resolution adopts the POW Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the Bennett Farm Master Plan and authorizes the city manager to take actions necessary for implementation.
  • Discussion emphasized that the plan retains flexibility; specific themes and items, such as projects at Selden City Park, will come back before council through future planning exercises.
  • The resolution was adopted.

Resolution 26-36: Adventure Park Playground Equipment Purchase

  • The resolution authorizes the city manager to purchase playground equipment for the Adventure Park playground replacement project from GameTime through the Omni Partners cooperative purchasing agreement.
  • Councilman Herman, who was absent, and the speaking council member had both expressed interest in fixing the city's aging playground equipment faster and completing more sites per year.
  • The speaking council member worked with finance to add approximately $15,000 for two additional connections to park features, and stated that the city "never has to choose between affordable and including every child again," expressing support for the enhanced design.
  • Phasing discussion noted the 2026 work would add a safe passage path to two areas, with the 2027 phase extending the blue surfacing under all of the swing bays.
  • The purchase is included in the 2026 capital budget. The resolution was approved.

Ordinance 2026-14: New Planning and Zoning Code

  • The ordinance repeals the current Part 11 of the codified ordinances and adopts a new planning and zoning code, described by staff as the result of about two years of work supported by multiple city departments.
  • The rewrite consolidates regulations so users do not need to search through 10 to 15 sections, establishes 10 zoning districts, and uses tables in which "P" means permitted by right and "C" means conditional use requiring additional public review. Use-specific standards are included.
  • New permitting software and a web portal will provide a one-stop shop for planning, building, and engineering information, including permit types, approval steps, and timelines.
  • Council involvement shifts to an earlier point in the development process: some approval steps would be removed from council, while council would retain authority over key criteria. A council member described this as an earlier "bite of the apple."
  • Discussion also addressed public street construction standards, with the possibility of working with Liberty Township Fire on access flexibility when the city engineer is satisfied, and an extension to bridge the period until the new zoning code takes effect, under which certain uses would be prohibited city-wide.
  • The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its July 15, 2026, meeting, and staff recommended city council action at the August 4 meeting. A related resolution would come after adoption of the zoning code but before its effective date, with final approval timed for the first September meeting to align with the effective date.
  • A council member voiced support for the proposed changes, which had been presented to the finance committee, and described an example in which council members had questioned an architect's judgment to illustrate the need for a streamlined process.

Resources for Next Year's Appropriations

  • Finance staff member Samantha presented the annual estimate of resources anticipated to support next year's appropriations; no major concerns were raised.
  • The version before council changed slightly from the finance committee's version due to debt discussions and the timing of this year's and next year's debt issuance. The finance committee had reviewed the matter in detail in May and supported the legislation.

Upcoming Committee Meetings

  • Tree Board: July 29, 2026, at 1:00 p.m.
  • Development Committee: August 4, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.
  • Finance Committee: August 11, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.
  • Planning and Zoning Commission: August 12, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.
  • Operations Committee: August 18, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.
  • Powell Development Corporation: August 25, 2026, at 12:00 p.m.

Key Outcomes

  • The consent calendar, including the June 16, 2026, minutes and all monthly departmental reports, was approved.
  • Resolutions 26-34, 26-35, and 26-36 were adopted.
  • Ordinance 2026-14 was discussed in depth, with a roll-call vote called at the close of the meeting. Individual vote tallies were not included in the transcript provided.
  • No member of the public spoke during the non-agenda citizen participation period.

Meeting Transcript

I will call the July 21st, 2026 Powell City Council meeting to order. Elaine, will you please call the role? Yes. Thank you. Leaf Carlson? Here. Tom Count? Here. Carlos Crawford. Tyler Herman. Not present. Heather Carr? Yeah. Kevin Lester. Here. Kurt Rampe. Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Pledge Allegiance of the United States of America. And then to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. So I will apologize in advance. We have a very heavy agenda this evening, so we're going to get right into it. The first item on the agenda is a presentation. It is the Scieta Street Extension Bridge Type Analysis presented by Aaron Stanford, our city engineer. Mike Murray, American Structure Point, and Sage Flanagan with American Structure Point. This is something we've been at for quite a while. Some of these plans go back over a decade. What's before council tonight is a recommendation, one of three that's been submitted for the bridge span that will become part of phase two's project. Council's action tonight is not indicative of any specific course of action. It's an assignment of a concept that will then be further driven to specific set of design, uh, land acquisition and construction. So with that, I'll turn it over to Aaron and he can do his presentation and we'll take questions at uh at the end. Thank you. Thank you, Andy, and members of council. Um, as Andy indicated, uh, we're here before you tonight as a pretty important interim milestone in our design process. When we first set um this design contract up, what we wanted to do was have a point in the phase two design where we looked at and provided three separate options for the the stream crossing that we'll talk about here in a minute, um, which is very important not only to what that structure can mean, not only to our network but to the community, but it also obviously impacts uh budget, schedule, and the design. So as we got to this point, we're gonna bring forward the analysis, the recommendation, um, and from there with the recommendation, we'll keep American structure point on their design, um, giving some guidance on what that structure should be. As we uh previously mentioned, I'm making the presentation today. We're we're joined here by Mike Murray and Sage Flanagan. They're here if we have any technical questions, they're here and available. Um, just a real brief overview of the project. So the area that we're talking about is is kind of midway in that Soada Street extension. Uh there's the Bartholomew Run is the stream that travels through there, um, which necessitates um either a culvert bridge uh being constructed as part of the project. Uh a little bit more background in the project. It's being currently designed in two separate phases. So currently we're working on the public parking area, and then the site street extension from Liberty to the western edge of this bridge. This the second phase will include the bridge, um, some of the abutments, the walls, the plaza, and the roundabout and the extension over to Grace. The bridge type study, it's a preliminary engineering report, and we use it to evaluate, compare, and select the most feasible and cost-effective bridge design in a specific site. So some of the things that we'll look for is the bridge type. We'll look at the flood weight of the floodplain we have to span if there's constraints, either financially, physically, uh, we'll look at some environmental impacts and of course construction cost.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com