OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Powell, Ohio/City Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Powell Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Summary - October 28, 2026

City Council & Boards — Wednesday, October 28, 2026
BodyPowell, Ohio
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateWednesday, October 28, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:01

Welcome to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Wednesday, October 28th of 2026.

Unassigned speaker

0:08

I

Speaker 2

0:08

can't hear

Unassigned speaker

0:08

them.

Speaker 1

0:09

Please call to order

Unassigned speaker

0:11

the

Speaker 1

0:11

roll call.

Speaker 2

0:12

David Lester.

Speaker 1

0:13

Here.

Speaker 2

0:14

Sean Simpson's absent.

0:16

Ross Irvine is absent.

0:18

Sitter on Kapaka.

Speaker 1

0:19

Yes.

Speaker 2

0:20

Blackford.

0:21

Here.

0:21

Sean Greer.

0:23

Greg Spires.

Speaker 1

0:24

Here.

0:24

Please stand for the Pledge of Land.

0:30

Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

0:35

To the Republic for which it stands.

0:38

Undergone.

0:39

Indivisible Liberty.

0:46

Planning and Zoning Commission is an advisory board to City Council.

0:50

Zoning amendments, preliminary development plans, and subdivision plots are under consideration.

0:56

In cases, City Council will receive a recommendation from the Commission.

0:59

In other cases, such as development plans or conditional uses, the Commission has the decision-making authority.

1:08

Do I have a motion to or consent vote to approve the minutes from the September 9th, 2026 meeting?

1:15

Everyone in favor say aye.

1:18

Aye.

1:19

Oh, same sign.

1:20

Motion approved.

1:24

Okay, first item.

1:28

This is case 2026-23 SP dash bunker lane fuel station.

1:36

A request for review and feedback for a fuel canopy and service building with a drive-thru on the east side of Sawmill Parkway, south of Bunker Lane.

1:44

The building is proposed to be approximately 5,000 square feet with five fuel pumps proposed at a 3,000 square foot canopy.

1:53

The site is zoned CEO commercial district.

1:56

The planning and zoning commission is the review authority for the sketch plan.

2:00

The applicant is plan for land.

Speaker 3

2:05

Good evening, and thank you for this introduction.

2:09

So we are looking at this 2.61-acre site on the east side of Somewhere Parkway, south of Bunker Lane.

2:16

And it was originally created as part of the um zoning for the Powell Grant development in 2015 as a commercial outparcel.

Unassigned speaker

2:34

How

Speaker 3

2:35

do I say that?

2:35

It's a um it's use it's um owned by Courtland Powell.

2:39

So the Powell Grant has sold that uh property to Courtland Powell.

2:44

To the south is the Woods at Big Boar Farms developments.

2:49

We have received uh quite a bit of information from adjacent property owners within that area.

2:56

There was one um letter that we received today that we were not able to put into the packet, but it is in front of you all.

3:03

So we printed that out uh for your information.

3:07

Any other uh letters that we have received were in your packet as we publish it.

3:16

Um at the time of the rezoning for the umdivision with the um with the apartments as well as the political outparcel.

3:26

There was also a plat approved, and there are certain setbacks that are included that are particularly to this site as well.

3:35

So there are setbacks and a uh tree preservation zone, no build zones and so forth included for this particular parcel, which this application adheres to as it is proposed.

3:53

For our um approval process, we are at the sketch plan stage, so that means that the planning and zoning commission can provide feedback recommendations as the application would move forward.

4:08

There are no votes taken tonight, and everything that is stated would be in an informal kind of setting.

4:17

Um, but it gives the applicant a chance to take feedback from the public as well as from the planning and zoning commission forward as they're moving to their next step, which would be a uh conditional use that the planning and zoning commission would be the final authority on as well as a development plan, which we would call major for this particular site, and um those two items can be reviewed simultaneously, and the planning and zoning commission would be the final authority on of those items.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Staff did put staff report a bit more information in terms of the comprehensive plan.

Speaker 3

5:07

You can see there that the site is in that red area.

5:32

We have here the proposed site plan.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Public Safety████████████15%
Transportation Safety███████████13%
Public Engagement████████10%
Environmental Protection███4%
Procedural██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Powell Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - October 28, 2026

The Powell Planning & Zoning Commission met on Wednesday, October 28, 2026, at 6:30 PM. The meeting included a sketch plan review for a Bunker Lane Fuel Station, a sketch plan review for a Dutch Bros Coffee on Home Road, a Major Subdivision Plat for the Kroger Site Outparcels, and the approval of previous meeting minutes.

Consent Calendar

  • The Commission unanimously approved the minutes from the September 9, 2026 meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

Case 2026-23SP: Bunker Lane Fuel Station

  • Tim Golden (392 Park Woods): Expressed opposition, citing five gas stations within a mile of the site, lighting issues, a nearby daycare and school, traffic hazards on the winding Sawmill Parkway, and the risk of environmental leaks from fuel tanks.
  • Jay Roberts (284, President, Woods at Big Bear Farms Condo Association): Expressed opposition on behalf of the 88-unit association. He noted five gas stations exist within a half-mile. Primary concerns centered on traffic backups impeding access to the condominiums and the lack of effective year-round screening due to a dead pine tree line. He requested the commission impose stringent conditions if the project proceeds.
  • Darlene Kelly (412 Parkwoods Lane): Expressed opposition. She raised concerns over increased property taxes against a background of depreciated property value, fumes impacting her home, and the risk of benzene pollutants. She proposed a setback of more than 100 feet from the tree line, enhanced vapor recovery, more evergreen planting, and a 20-foot wood-toned opaque wall similar to the one at Sheetz.
  • Sharam Shahabdin (Owner, Ivanbrook Academy): Expressed strong opposition, arguing the gas station is inherently incompatible with the adjacent preschool and daycare serving hundreds of children under five. He emphasized safety, environmental health, and traffic hazards, noting children play outdoors.
  • Shenzhen (Belwood Drive): Expressed opposition. Stated the station provides no value to the neighborhood while introducing serious environmental and health risks from fuel vapors and the potential for groundwater contamination.
  • Nan Klempnaur (407, Bearwoods Drive): Expressed opposition, urging the commission to deny the project to maintain the safety and character of the community.
  • Vincent Margello (1900 West Powell Road, 48-year resident/condo owner): Expressed cautious support. He argued the site is properly zoned commercial and a fueling station is a suitable use compared to possible alternatives. He noted the area's infrastructure was improved during the Powell Grant development. He cautioned residents against opposing the project, stating they might not prefer what else could be built there.
  • Gary Bush (393 Parkwoods Lane): Expressed opposition focused on traffic safety. He argued that vehicles slowing to enter the station would cause backups on Sawmill Parkway and increase dangerous U-turn activity within the condo development.

Case 2026-24SP: Dutch Bros Coffee, Home Road

  • Steve Cuckler (East Enoble, representing Liberty Summit): Expressed support for the project and the applicant. His only concern was managing the combined traffic flow from the Liberty Summit entrance, the OSU Medical Center, and the coffee shop drive-thru at that corner.

Case 2026-25FP: Kroger Site Outparcels

  • Alan Davies (Managing Agent, Gulf Village Property Owners Association): Communicated the Board's conditional support for the replatting, provided the three new lots are formally included in the Gulf Village development to ensure clarity on maintenance responsibilities for the private drives.

Discussion Items

Case 2026-23SP: Bunker Lane Fuel Station Commission discussion focused on providing feedback for the applicant's next application stages (Conditional Use and Development Plan).

  • Traffic & Circulation: Commissioners noted the need for a traffic study given congestion. The alignment of driveways across Sawmill Parkway was flagged for safety.
  • Architecture & Site Design: The canopy, signage, lighting, and full building elevations were cited as items needing detailed review. Parking spaces facing Sawmill Parkway were noted as needing relocation to comply with zoning.
  • Screening & Buffering: The shared tree line with the condos was acknowledged as mostly dead. The commission discussed requiring substantial, permanent screening solutions (e.g., mounding, evergreen planting, opaque fencing) rather than relying on the existing vegetation.
  • Environmental & Safety: Detailed plans for vapor mitigation, tank monitoring, soil testing, and an emergency notification system were requested due to proximity to homes, a school, and a daycare.

Case 2026-24SP: Dutch Bros Coffee, Home Road The commission noted the site's constraints. Discussion focused on drive-thru queuing capacity to prevent spillage onto Home Road, clear signage to prevent traffic confusion, and a review of the building's branding and materiality to ensure it fits the community character. The height and design of the retaining wall were flagged for future review.

Case 2026-25FP: Kroger Site Outparcels Staff presented a plat meeting all subdivision criteria. The commission briefly discussed the condition raised by the Gulf Village POA regarding maintenance responsibilities and directed staff to ensure this was resolved before the plat goes to City Council.

Key Outcomes

  • Case 2026-23SP (Bunker Lane Fuel Station): No formal decision was made. The commission provided informal feedback to the applicant. This feedback is intended to shape the formal Conditional Use and Development Plan applications.
  • Case 2026-24SP (Dutch Bros Home Road): No formal decision was made. The commission provided feedback for the applicant to incorporate as they proceed with the annexation and formal development plan.
  • Case 2026-25FP (Kroger Site Outparcels): The commission voted to recommend approval of the Major Subdivision Plat to City Council. The motion was approved unanimously via roll call (all present commissioners voted yes). Staff will confirm the lots are included in the Gulf Village maintenance framework.
  • Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned. The next regular meeting is scheduled for November 18, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Wednesday, October 28th of 2026. I can't hear them. Please call to order the roll call. David Lester. Here. Sean Simpson's absent. Ross Irvine is absent. Sitter on Kapaka. Yes. Blackford. Here. Sean Greer. Greg Spires. Here. Please stand for the Pledge of Land. Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. To the Republic for which it stands. Undergone. Indivisible Liberty. Planning and Zoning Commission is an advisory board to City Council. Zoning amendments, preliminary development plans, and subdivision plots are under consideration. In cases, City Council will receive a recommendation from the Commission. In other cases, such as development plans or conditional uses, the Commission has the decision-making authority. Do I have a motion to or consent vote to approve the minutes from the September 9th, 2026 meeting? Everyone in favor say aye. Aye. Oh, same sign. Motion approved. Okay, first item. This is case 2026-23 SP dash bunker lane fuel station. A request for review and feedback for a fuel canopy and service building with a drive-thru on the east side of Sawmill Parkway, south of Bunker Lane. The building is proposed to be approximately 5,000 square feet with five fuel pumps proposed at a 3,000 square foot canopy. The site is zoned CEO commercial district. The planning and zoning commission is the review authority for the sketch plan. The applicant is plan for land. Good evening, and thank you for this introduction. So we are looking at this 2.61-acre site on the east side of Somewhere Parkway, south of Bunker Lane. And it was originally created as part of the um zoning for the Powell Grant development in 2015 as a commercial outparcel. How do I say that? It's a um it's use it's um owned by Courtland Powell. So the Powell Grant has sold that uh property to Courtland Powell. To the south is the Woods at Big Boar Farms developments. We have received uh quite a bit of information from adjacent property owners within that area. There was one um letter that we received today that we were not able to put into the packet, but it is in front of you all. So we printed that out uh for your information.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com