The Providence City Council committee (chaired by Vice Chairwoman Shelley Peterson) met on February 4, 2026, to consider three agenda items: a resolution supporting state legislation to create a Crook Point Bridge Authority, a zoning ordinance amendment introducing new building design standards, and a comprehensive zoning amendment with technical updates. The committee voted to approve the bridge resolution unanimously and continued the two zoning items to a public hearing scheduled for the following week.
Let's see. Welcome to the committee I wanted this. Today is Wednesday, February. I'm Shelly, because I feel like if we're maybe all here, I'm not. Um, can you please call the Chairman Pedro Escalon? Absolutely. Vice Chairwoman Shelley Peterson here. Thank you very much. Um resolution encouraging the General Assembly to pass legislation, establishment establishment bridge authority. I do. And if they didn't take it with the record, we already have things she'd got there. Thank you for being here, Chief. Sure. Anyway. Um, so the resolution before you is um consistent with other resolutions we provided to the council that provide support for state legislation. Part of the mayor's agenda this year was to create this uh Crook Point Bridge Authority. All the state legislation does is enable us to create the authority. The idea behind this is that we would then contemplate taking the Crook Point Bridge from which is currently owned by Riot to city possession. Um we did want to do that direct to the city, so this enables us to create an authority so that should we decide to take the bridge, it would be taken by the authority, kind of similar to the how the building authority works. Um so this is just the first step, the process of taking the bridge, and the discussion about that would come to the council also for approval. This is just getting us started on that process. We do need to move quickly because the bridge is scheduled for demolition in 2026-2027. There's six million dollars in the uh Department of Transportation STIP that's allocated to that. If if this building isn't, if this bridge is not demolished, that money would then be invested in the cruise um site that we've been working on by India Point, and so DOT is committed to repurposing that money for the development of that cruise terminal, which would be great. Um, but if we don't move quickly, they're just gonna use the money to take the bridge down. Okay, thank you. Um, I want to acknowledge uh councilwoman Ryan if you thank you very much for being here with us today. Thank you, Chair. Um does anybody have any questions? Yes, okay, yeah, go ahead. Six million dollars. You're talking about who has the money, the State Department of Transportation. If we don't get the bridge, we'll have that money. You're saying that would go reallocated to somewhere. If we don't take the bridge, that money will be used to tear down the bridge. So we're trying to do a safety bridge? We're gonna we would like to take the bridge into the city possession. And what we want to do with the bridge? Um to be determined. There's been a in 2021 they did a design competition. Um, you know, nothing has to be done to the bridge today. Uh it would be for the city to work to work on in the future if we decided to take the bridge. Again, this just enable it creates an authority, enables us to create an authority to then contemplate the taking of the bridge. Well one, we have the one, we have the authority to this bridge. We own the bridge, right? No, this creates a separate group that would manage the bridge if we took the bridge, but it just enables us to create the separate group. It doesn't actually take the bridge. That would have to come back for further action. And yeah, please go ahead. If we do we have any idea how much would cost us to demolish this bridge if we if the whoever owns the bridge now would say how this visa matter, yeah, like we wouldn't intend if we took it, we wouldn't intend to demolish it.