OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Raleigh City Council Work Session: April 6, 2026

City CouncilMonday, April 6, 2026
BodyRaleigh, North Carolina
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, April 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:55:46

Transcript — Verbatim
11:35

Absent and excused, but we're glad to have everyone else.

11:40

And we will start uh with a solid waste services overview with Ms.

11:46

Gupta from Solid Waste.

11:56

Good afternoon, uh, Mayor and Council.

11:58

I'm Shika Gupta.

11:59

I'm the Solid Waste Services Director.

12:01

Um today completes three months of my service with the city, so excited to be here.

12:06

Thank you.

12:07

Um I sincerely want to thank my team and acknowledge them for all the work they've put together for this presentation and for the budget of our department.

12:18

Um they've been really patient with me and helping me learn the budget and getting me here in front of you today.

12:25

And also I sincerely want to thank our budget and finance team for their support as well as we talk about uh solid waste services budget.

12:35

So um today we'll go over what Solid Waste Services Department does, our key accomplishments for fiscal year twenty-six, our uh base budget for fiscal year twenty seven, and what proposed fee we bring to the table.

12:49

And then we we will look at some benchmarking and then our yard waste enhancement program that we have been working on.

13:19

Uh, from the uh from the organics.

13:21

This is a such a great example of circular economy at a local level and a zero waste initiative that we meet uh through this facility we have.

13:31

And under other services, um, Solid Waste Services offers an on-demand collection service such as bulky special or items um collection.

13:40

We also allow residents to schedule the removal of specific household items upon request, for example, e-waste, and then we also provide services at city sponsored and non-sponsored events.

14:33

While the total number of bus stops have remains relatively stable, container locations and collection routes are adjusted regularly.

15:04

Um this is our first year utilizing the model that has been uh created in support uh with support from uh consultant for budgeting and forecasting, and the model has the ability to forecast for 20 plus years.

15:20

Just for context, Raleigh Water and Stormwater utilize a similar model for many years, and they have reached a and to get to a stable enterprise, this is uh this is an amazing tool that we have started to use as well.

15:35

Our contract with Sonoko Recycling for processing our recyclables um in this third year, um, we are continue to provide uh conduct audits there, and what those audits help us with is kind of guide our outreach and education for specific items that we want to focus uh our residents' attention to to provide a cleaner material that we can collect through our recycling um cards.

16:08

And I'll I'll um talk this about yard waste enhancement transition from transportation a little bit more detailed, but just as a reminder, this transition was approved by council in June of 2026, and we have start we started planning for it and have been planning through this fiscal year as well.

16:27

Another major accomplishment for uh that we are continuing to work on our um yard waste center pilot for food waste processing, and we have been collecting data starting of January of 20 uh of this year, and I'm gonna provide you some more information on this on a future slide.

16:48

So for fiscal year 27, our budget um before any rate increases looks like this.

16:55

So we have a budget gap of about 8.47 million dollars, and um the revenue for our fiscal 27 is um is reducing a little bit uh because we are only uh um realizing about 1% growth rate in our revenue, as well as we have a reduction in our yard waste revenue from uh transportation not bringing the leaves that they collect to the yard waste center and giving us a tip fee.

17:21

So that's about a $637,000 reduction in our revenue there.

17:26

And then also, as you can see, our expenses have also gone up.

17:30

So just to go a little bit in more detail on that, um so our budget increased drivers are mainly personnel.

17:38

So our personal exp personnel expenses have increased 3.8 million, driven mainly by the yard waste enhancement transition since we're adding staff and trucks, and increasing in increase in benefits and merit.

17:52

Internal transfer um in expenses have increased about $600,000, which are driven by higher shared service and direct costs, risk costs, and the new fleet CIP transfer included in this year's uh budget.

18:06

And then the last but not the least is our operational expenses have also increased by about 200,000, primarily driven by higher contractual services and other operational costs.

18:15

It is also worth noting that this category includes our transfer to our CIP fund, which remains consistent with the prior year contribution of about $819,000.

18:28

So looking forward now, um, what we are proposing as a rate increase overall is about 9.8%, which amounts to $2.55 per account.

18:40

Um this increase is a little more bit more than what was presented to council at 7.7% um earlier, and oops.

18:53

It'll wake up in a second, I believe.

18:56

Um so the 7.7% was what was presented earlier, but we are looking for a 9.8% rate increase to accommodate for the yard waste enhancements that we are making.

19:06

Also, we are proposing a $10 increase in the yard waste center tip fee along with a corresponding increase to the residential minimum fee.

19:15

Historically, this minimum was um said to reflect the cost of half a ton of yard waste.

19:21

However, while the per ton tip fee has risen over time, the residential minimum has not been adjusted accordingly.

19:28

So this minimum fee will now cover the cost of processing that material.

19:33

So with weekly yard waste collection, we are hoping that um beginning with that program, it should bring um reduction in residential res uh residents having to go to the yard waste center.

19:44

So they should be able to use the weekly collection service instead of going there directly.

19:53

So we are intentionally approaching the rate increase and being proactive about it.

20:00

So if you uh so that's why we are hoping that to maintain an approximate 9.8% growth in rate over next five fiscal years.

20:07

And these rate increases are needed to offset general fund subsidy decrease and supporting our yard waste enhancement transition.

20:18

This slide provides comparison with other cities in the state as well as out of state.

20:24

So while it's challenging to identify municipalities that provide the exact same services as we do, we have compiled a group of peer cities that have similar services.

20:34

So the comparative rates shown here are based on fiscal year 26 figures.

20:40

Given the inflate inflation happening everywhere around the nation, it is likely that many of those services will uh cities will also increase their rates this year.

20:49

So we have comparison with Richmond, uh Willing Wilmington and Irving, Texas, as they offer similar services as we do.

20:57

And you can see that we are lower than them right now.

21:01

Our neighboring peers, Apex, Holly Springs, Zebulon, they contract with an external vendor for these services.

21:08

So what makes it even harder is for example, Apex uses an external vendor for garbage and recycling, but the town collects yard waste.

21:17

So while our fee may seem higher as a monthly minimum, but other municipalities like Holly Springs, Apex, they charge fees for additional monthly card collection and higher fee.

21:30

Our fee is only $2 per additional card for yard waste collection.

21:33

Theirs can go up to $12 for the month for an additional card.

21:42

So with the rate increase I proposed, we are hoping to uh close our budget gap and uh balance our budget.

21:49

So the rate increase will uh provide us about 4.6 million, and then we'll also use some fund balance appropriation to uh to balance the budget and reduce uh reduce our gap to zero.

22:03

And uh now I'm gonna focus a little bit of my energy on yard waste enhancement program that we are working on, provide you some visuals on what uh what these changes will look like.

22:14

So we'll we are going from 26 yearly collections per customer to 52 yearly collections per customer.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability██████████████████████████████30%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████20%
Water And Wastewater Management██████████████████18%
Arts And Culture█████████████13%
Community Engagement█████5%
Active Transportation█████5%
Parking███3%
Economic Development██2%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Raleigh City Council Work Session: April 6, 2026

This work session covered presentations and discussions on solid waste services rates, external agency grant recommendations, parking rate adjustments, the capital improvement program, and a dire budget outlook. No formal votes were taken; staff will return with final proposals in May and June.

Solid Waste Services Overview

  • Solid Waste Services Director Shika Gupta presented the FY27 budget, highlighting a $8.47 million budget gap driven by personnel costs, the yard waste enhancement transition, and reduced revenue from transportation tip fees.
  • Proposed a 9.8% rate increase ($2.55 per account) and a $10 increase in the yard waste center tip fee with a corresponding residential minimum fee adjustment. The increase is higher than the previously presented 7.7%, needed to fund weekly yard waste collection (from 26 to 52 collections per year).
  • The department is moving toward enterprise cost recovery; currently, services like bulky collection ($35 fee vs. $80 cost), central business district, and multifamily are not recovering full costs. A food waste processing pilot launched January 5, 2026, with results expected mid-July.
  • Council questions focused on staffing for growth (Councilmember Branch), a program for disabled/elderly residents (Councilmember Jones – confirmed existing assistance program and ongoing assessment), and long-term rate increase projections (Councilmember Patton asked when increases might slow to 2-3%; staff said future years are still projected at 9.8% but modeling will identify break-even).

External Agency Grant Recommendations

  • Katie Conyers (Budget & Management) outlined the city’s competitive grant programs (arts, community enhancement, human services) with a total of $4.55 million in general fund recommendations for FY27, plus $200,000 from CDBG for community enhancement grants.
  • Raleigh Arts Commission (Tony Gadston, Carl Wilkins) recommended $1.95 million for 36 organizations, including three new applicants (Red Bud Writing Project, Raleigh Film and Art Festival, Black Box Dance Theater) and two returning organizations (Diamante Arts, VAE Raleigh). Raleigh Little Theatre has a multi-year agreement and also receives program support grants; Councilmember Branch raised concerns about leadership and community outreach, and staff confirmed reimbursement-based funding.
  • Community Enhancement Grants (Ashley Tucker) recommended four $50,000 awards to Early Years, Women’s Center of Wake County, Family Promise of the Triangle, and Interact, funded by CDBG. Councilmember Jones questioned the stagnant federal funding level despite population growth; staff will provide historical data.
  • Human services grant recommendations will be presented at the second council meeting in April.

Parking Rates Review

  • Parking Manager Caitlin Parker presented a revised, more modest proposal compared to a previous aggressive plan. Key recommendations for off-street: non-event garages (City Hall, Wilmington, Moore Square) increase to $3/hour with $21 daily max, maintaining Monday-Friday 7AM-7PM and two-hour free parking. Event garages (Cabarrus, Convention Center, etc.) increase to $4/hour with $24 daily max, with Cabarrus moving to 24/7 operations. Monthly parking increases from $125 to $135. Programs (free two-hour, nights/weekends, small business) remain. Projected additional revenue: $1.8 million.
  • On-street: all meters increase to $1.50/hour (currently 68% at $1.25, 32% already at $1.50). Revenue can fund meter replacement, bike/scooter corrals, residential parking permit program, traffic striping, and enforcement. Council supported the scaled-back approach; Councilmember Silver requested clarification on pedestrian striping and stop bars; Councilmember Melton noted funds cannot currently support streeteries but suggested future legislative changes. A virtual meeting with DRA is scheduled for that week.
  • Next steps: parking study RFQ/RFP and RFI for Wilmington Street parking deck.

Capital Improvement Program

  • Hannah Osborne (Budget & Management) presented the general fund pay-go CIP for FY27-FY31. $58.4 million dedicated to affordable housing, street resurfacing, and parks maintenance. Other projects include $26.6 million for transportation (bridge maintenance, sidewalk repair, traffic intersection improvements), $16 million for fire station improvements, and one-time interest revenue of $4.4 million for projects like historic markers (up to 40 markers) and facility maintenance.
  • Advanced planning continues for three limited obligation bond projects: Fire Training Center, Fire Station 23/Northwest Police Station, and Southeast Remote Operations Center. Rough cost estimates are preliminary. The city’s steady-state debt affordability is $203 million. If voters approve 2026 GO bonds (transportation and housing), spending would begin in FY28. If all advanced planning projects move forward, a tax rate increase may be needed in FY28.
  • Councilmember Silver asked about prioritization of sidewalk and crosswalk maintenance; Transportation’s Kenneth Richie explained that sidewalk repair is maintenance-driven and that the markings program faces an $800,000 gap to achieve optimal life cycles.

Proposed Budget Outlook

  • Sadia Satari (Budget & Management) delivered a sobering update: property tax growth is near zero due to increased commercial appeals, brownfield exemptions, and a tax loophole used by multifamily complexes. The city faces a $13 million base budget gap for FY27 – the first such gap in her tenure – even before including salary increases, the fire master plan, or other supplemental requests (over $45 million annually).
  • A property tax increase will be necessary to balance the budget. An increase of 1.11 cents (like last year) would only cover the base gap; additional needs remain unfunded. Economic uncertainty from tariffs and inflation adds further pressure. The city manager noted uncertainty around state-level fixes (e.g., closing the Blue Ridge loophole) and a proposed levy limit, which are being watched.
  • Public hearing on the budget is June 2, with council work sessions throughout June and adoption expected by end of June. The city manager’s proposed budget will be presented on May 19.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes were taken. Staff will return with final rate recommendations, grant approvals, parking adjustments, and the full proposed operating and capital budgets in May and June.
  • The budget outlook indicates a likely property tax increase for FY27 to address the $13 million gap and other pressures.

Meeting Transcript

Absent and excused, but we're glad to have everyone else. And we will start uh with a solid waste services overview with Ms. Gupta from Solid Waste. Good afternoon, uh, Mayor and Council. I'm Shika Gupta. I'm the Solid Waste Services Director. Um today completes three months of my service with the city, so excited to be here. Thank you. Um I sincerely want to thank my team and acknowledge them for all the work they've put together for this presentation and for the budget of our department. Um they've been really patient with me and helping me learn the budget and getting me here in front of you today. And also I sincerely want to thank our budget and finance team for their support as well as we talk about uh solid waste services budget. So um today we'll go over what Solid Waste Services Department does, our key accomplishments for fiscal year twenty-six, our uh base budget for fiscal year twenty seven, and what proposed fee we bring to the table. And then we we will look at some benchmarking and then our yard waste enhancement program that we have been working on. Uh, from the uh from the organics. This is a such a great example of circular economy at a local level and a zero waste initiative that we meet uh through this facility we have. And under other services, um, Solid Waste Services offers an on-demand collection service such as bulky special or items um collection. We also allow residents to schedule the removal of specific household items upon request, for example, e-waste, and then we also provide services at city sponsored and non-sponsored events. While the total number of bus stops have remains relatively stable, container locations and collection routes are adjusted regularly. Um this is our first year utilizing the model that has been uh created in support uh with support from uh consultant for budgeting and forecasting, and the model has the ability to forecast for 20 plus years. Just for context, Raleigh Water and Stormwater utilize a similar model for many years, and they have reached a and to get to a stable enterprise, this is uh this is an amazing tool that we have started to use as well. Our contract with Sonoko Recycling for processing our recyclables um in this third year, um, we are continue to provide uh conduct audits there, and what those audits help us with is kind of guide our outreach and education for specific items that we want to focus uh our residents' attention to to provide a cleaner material that we can collect through our recycling um cards. And I'll I'll um talk this about yard waste enhancement transition from transportation a little bit more detailed, but just as a reminder, this transition was approved by council in June of 2026, and we have start we started planning for it and have been planning through this fiscal year as well. Another major accomplishment for uh that we are continuing to work on our um yard waste center pilot for food waste processing, and we have been collecting data starting of January of 20 uh of this year, and I'm gonna provide you some more information on this on a future slide. So for fiscal year 27, our budget um before any rate increases looks like this. So we have a budget gap of about 8.47 million dollars, and um the revenue for our fiscal 27 is um is reducing a little bit uh because we are only uh um realizing about 1% growth rate in our revenue, as well as we have a reduction in our yard waste revenue from uh transportation not bringing the leaves that they collect to the yard waste center and giving us a tip fee. So that's about a $637,000 reduction in our revenue there. And then also, as you can see, our expenses have also gone up. So just to go a little bit in more detail on that, um so our budget increased drivers are mainly personnel. So our personal exp personnel expenses have increased 3.8 million, driven mainly by the yard waste enhancement transition since we're adding staff and trucks, and increasing in increase in benefits and merit. Internal transfer um in expenses have increased about $600,000, which are driven by higher shared service and direct costs, risk costs, and the new fleet CIP transfer included in this year's uh budget. And then the last but not the least is our operational expenses have also increased by about 200,000, primarily driven by higher contractual services and other operational costs. It is also worth noting that this category includes our transfer to our CIP fund, which remains consistent with the prior year contribution of about $819,000. So looking forward now, um, what we are proposing as a rate increase overall is about 9.8%, which amounts to $2.55 per account. Um this increase is a little more bit more than what was presented to council at 7.7% um earlier, and oops. It'll wake up in a second, I believe. Um so the 7.7% was what was presented earlier, but we are looking for a 9.8% rate increase to accommodate for the yard waste enhancements that we are making. Also, we are proposing a $10 increase in the yard waste center tip fee along with a corresponding increase to the residential minimum fee. Historically, this minimum was um said to reflect the cost of half a ton of yard waste. However, while the per ton tip fee has risen over time, the residential minimum has not been adjusted accordingly. So this minimum fee will now cover the cost of processing that material. So with weekly yard waste collection, we are hoping that um beginning with that program, it should bring um reduction in residential res uh residents having to go to the yard waste center. So they should be able to use the weekly collection service instead of going there directly. So we are intentionally approaching the rate increase and being proactive about it. So if you uh so that's why we are hoping that to maintain an approximate 9.8% growth in rate over next five fiscal years. And these rate increases are needed to offset general fund subsidy decrease and supporting our yard waste enhancement transition. This slide provides comparison with other cities in the state as well as out of state. So while it's challenging to identify municipalities that provide the exact same services as we do, we have compiled a group of peer cities that have similar services. So the comparative rates shown here are based on fiscal year 26 figures. Given the inflate inflation happening everywhere around the nation, it is likely that many of those services will uh cities will also increase their rates this year. So we have comparison with Richmond, uh Willing Wilmington and Irving, Texas, as they offer similar services as we do.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com