Raleigh City Council Meeting Summary – May 19, 2026
Raleigh City Council Meeting Summary – May 19, 2026
The Raleigh City Council met on May 19, 2026, at 6:00 PM to address a full agenda including consent items, public comments on neighborhood equity and transportation safety, approval of planning commission recommendations, endorsement of the Wake BRT Northern Corridor study, presentation of the FY2027 operating and capital budget, approval of the annual work plan for the Raleigh Arts Commission, public hearings and votes on $101.5 million affordable housing and transportation bond referendums, and numerous annexation and rezoning cases. The meeting concluded with board appointments and a closed session.
Consent Calendar
- The consent agenda was approved unanimously by voice vote.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Octavia Rainey (College Park resident) expressed concerns about neighborhood changes, vandalism of College Park signs, lack of affordable housing in College Park, and the need for cameras at the Mini Park and John Stokes Garden. She stated the city has “forgotten about us” and urged a neighborhood “for all, not exclusively for the rich.”
- Mamakai Sanders criticized the city’s focus on affordable housing, arguing it “subconsciously fuel[s] the belief that poor people aren’t good enough to be anything but poor.” She called for opportunities for upward mobility and said “there’s enough housing to eliminate homelessness right now” if the right infrastructure existed.
- Athena Wallen spoke on non-driver vulnerability during Bike Month, sharing a personal story of being struck by an inattentive driver. She urged the city to protect non-drivers through infrastructure such as painted multi-use spaces, planters, and bollards, and noted that “drivers have all the protection.”
- Chris Crew praised current water restrictions and urged the city to review the Wake County Hazard Mitigation Plan. He criticized city planning staff for “advocating on behalf of individual development interests” without acknowledging negative impacts, and noted only 5% of properties are protected by NCODs or historic overlays.
- Dave Klemp (Trees for the Triangle) discussed the nonprofit’s “pay what you can” tree planting program, emphasized the importance of native trees for social and ecological resilience, and referenced the idea of a 24,000-tree campaign.
Discussion Items
- Planning Commission Report (Z326 – Glenwood/Jones & Z526 – Newburn Avenue BRT rezonings): Staff presented two rezoning cases recommended for public hearings on June 16. Z326 (Glenwood Avenue/Jones Street) was recommended 8-2; Z526 (Newburn Avenue) was split into three motions (9-1, 7-3, 7–3) with the Raleigh Historic Development Commission recommending denial 8-1 due to potential incentivized demolition of historic structures. Council set public hearings for June 16 unanimously.
- City Manager Report – Wake BRT Northern Corridor Major Investment Study: Heeta Patel presented the final report recommending Midtown Corridor Alignment 6 (Capitol Blvd to Atlantic to Six Forks to Wake Forest to St. Albans) and Triangle Town Center Corridor Alignment 3 (Capitol Blvd to Triangle Town Center). Council endorsed both alignments unanimously, with discussion about federal funding and land-use transformation along Capitol Boulevard.
- FY2027 Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Plan Presentation: City Manager and Budget Director Sadia Sitar presented a $1.765 billion operating budget with a 1.7 cent property tax increase to 37.2 cents, driven by a $13.1 million revenue gap from property tax appeals and the “Blue Ridge loophole” (affordable housing exemptions grew 468% in two years, costing $6 million). The gap was partially closed by eliminating vacant positions and changing OPEB eligibility from 15 to 25 years (saving $62.2 million over 15 years). Key investments include 23 police officers, 12 firefighters (first since 2015), 6 call takers, 6 building safety staff, 8.7 FTE for Dix Park, a $2 million downtown parking subsidy, and weekly yard waste collection starting September 2026. Salary increases: 3% public safety, 2% exempt/non-exempt, 1.5% part-time/temporary. Median home value owner sees $122 annual increase ($67 property tax, $21 water, $3 stormwater, $31 solid waste). Capital budget $503.3 million with $12 million for street resurfacing. Staff noted council’s steady-state model allows $101.5 million housing and transportation bonds without a property tax increase.
- Raleigh Arts Commission Annual Work Plan: Chair Tony Gadsden presented highlights: 18 new artworks (total 721), 15 calls for artists, $3 million in annual grants, $516 million annual economic impact, and a new Poet Laureate program. The plan was approved unanimously.
- Public Hearings and Votes on Bond Referendums: Public hearings were held for both the $101.5 million Housing Bond and $101.5 million Transportation Bond. Octavia Rainey voiced concerns about infill development, rental rehab, and BRT displacing black ridership; Mamakai Sanders argued the housing bond perpetuates poverty and noted gap financing does not provide full funding. Council approved both bond referendums unanimously, to appear on the November 3, 2026 ballot.
- Annexation & Rezoning Cases:
- Raleigh-Knightdale Annexation Agreement (20-year renewal): Approved unanimously after public hearing. The boundary remains unchanged.
- AX2925 / Z3525 – 7929 Liggan Mill Road (60 acres, R6 conditional, 180 units): Approved unanimously. Conditions include 30% open space, 20% undisturbed, fire service contribution, and active recreation areas.
- AX0426 – 3800 Jones Sausage Road: Annexed unanimously.
- AX526 – 511 Struther Road (4.25 acres, 12 detached homes): Annexed unanimously.
- Z1525 – 7800 Battle Bridge Road (Wake County animal shelter): Rezoned to industrial mixed use 3 stories, approved unanimously. The shelter will replace an overcrowded facility; a potential school on the remainder of the site remains undecided.
- Z3725 – Avent Ferry Road area (student housing redevelopment): Rezoned to residential mixed use 5 stories conditional (max 68 ft height, unit cap tied to original RX4 request). Conditions include tenant relocation assistance ($2,500) and 120-day demolition notice. Approved unanimously.
- Z3925 – 319 Hex Street (NCOD removal, RX4 request): Continued to June 16 after council requested applicant to work with neighbors on density cap, height alignment, and possible retail allowance instead of prohibition. Vote to continue was unanimous.
- Z5325 – 5601 Six Forks Road (aging office to mixed-use): Rezoned to neighborhood mixed use 5 stories with conditions (prohibited uses, no grocery store). Approved unanimously.
- Other Items: Two public nuisance abatement liens were pulled for re-noticing due to a clerical error.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Approved.
- Public Hearings Set: Z326 and Z526 rezonings set for June 16, 2026.
- BRT Endorsement: Council endorsed Midtown Alignment 6 and Triangle Town Center Alignment 3 as locally preferred alternatives.
- FY2027 Budget: The proposed budget and CIP were presented; work sessions begin June 1; public hearing June 2 at 7 PM. Formal adoption to follow.
- Bond Referendums: Both $101.5 million housing and transportation bonds approved for November 2026 ballot.
- Rezonings Approved: Z3525 (Liggan Mill Road), Z1525 (Battle Bridge Road), Z3725 (Avent Ferry Road), Z5325 (Six Forks Road) – all unanimously.
- Annexations Approved: AX2925, AX0426, AX526 – all unanimously.
- Raleigh-Knightdale Annexation Agreement: Renewed for 20 years, effective upon town council approval.
- 319 Hex Street Rezoning: Continued to June 16, 2026, for further conditions and neighbor input.
- Arts Commission Work Plan: Approved.
- Appointments: Multiple board appointments approved; Raleigh Historic Development Commission vacancies to be filled later.
- Closed Session: Council entered closed session to discuss a potential claim (City of Raleigh vs. Barnett Brothers partnership).
Meeting Transcript
All right. Welcome everybody to the council meeting. We will start with a pledge of allegiance, and Counselor Lambert Melton, can you lead us? One nation under God. All right. Do we have a motion to approve the consent agenda? So moved. Second. All in favor of the motion, aye. Aye. All opposed, and that passes, which then um takes us to public comment. And we have five folks signed up today. And three minutes each. First is Miss Octavia Rainey. Oh, yes, we just uh we did receive a number of comments today on voicemail, and then consistent with the council's rules regarding public comment and public hearings. Only comments made during the public hearing for the item will be uh formally considered. I would like to thank the city of Raleigh for putting college park up on the signs, okay? Okay. And I received fifteen phone calls, and they will be making comments. I'm also going to call a meeting about the comments that's being made on Boyd Street and Wild Drop Street. I will be sending to each and every one of you a letter that was written in twenty fifteen talking about the in our essay and what we wanted to see in College Park. Right now, we haven't seen a theme that we wanted to see. And I hate to keep saying this and and I hate to keep stressing this meeting to black people, that is very important when you're changing a neighborhood over. And that the city of Raleigh hear our comments and what you have done. You have changed it over, but you forgot about us. It's about time that you meet us halfway, so it'll be a neighborhood for all, not exclusively for the rich. And right now, we are left out. The second thing I want to bring up is one of my college park signs that went around a neighborhood, it was vandalized. It was not vandalized by any kids. They left the post, but they tooled the sign completely off the post and threw it over the fence. Now I don't know what this represents or what this means, but I am very concerned. So what's gonna happen to my other signs that we have up in the neighborhood? I'm also concerned now that we have had this problem. What is going to happen at the Mini Park and the John Stokes Garden? I asked Stephen, do we have cameras in those parts now? But I think it's very important that we go to cameras now, because the Mini Park is very vulnerable now, and we have all that artwork up, and I would hate to see somebody vandalize that. Now I'm not too sure if we can get our sign back. I don't know. But I am working with Sheeta to try to figure this out. But if this continues with our sign disappearing, you got a problem here. What do this really mean? It means something, something is going on here. And I would like for us to get ahead of this situation. But that vandalism did not occur by no child. That was an adult who did that. Because they had to put it, take it off of the post, then they to it and threw it over the fence. Thank you. Mamakai Sanders. She here? Yes.
openpublica.com