OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Redwood City, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Redwood City Special City Council Meeting – October 14, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 14, 2026
BodyRedwood City, California
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 14, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 8:10

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

1:09

All right, good evening, everyone.

1:11

We're gonna go ahead and get started.

1:12

It's six o'clock.

1:14

Thank you for joining our special city council meeting of October 14th, 2026.

1:20

We hold meetings in hybrid format with both in-person and virtual participation available.

1:26

And there will be one opportunity for public comment this evening under item five on topics on on the agenda or within the city's subject matter jurisdiction.

1:35

And members of the public may provide comments as follows.

1:39

Our in-person speakers will be called to speak first.

1:42

Speaker cards are located at the back table in the council chambers and must be turned in to the city clerk here at the Dais.

1:49

Please be sure to indicate the agenda item number you wish to speak on.

1:53

And attendees who have joined us by Zoom will be called to speak after the in-person comments have been given.

1:58

Detailed instructions for public comment will be provided on the screen when the time for public comment begins.

2:04

And lastly, I'd like to remind everyone that comments should remain within the city's subject matter jurisdiction and relate to matters that are appropriately before the city council.

2:14

We welcome public participation and recognize that members of our community may have a strongly held views and at times strong emotions about the issues before us.

2:23

However, we ask that all speakers conduct themselves respectfully.

Speaker 2

2:58

Thank you, Mayor.

2:59

And I will start with Councilmember Chu.

Speaker 3

3:02

Here.

Speaker 1

4:25

And if you're attending virtually, feel free to raise your hand on Zoom and press star nine if you've joined by phone.

4:31

Once we've begun public comment, no additional speakers will be allowed to cue up to speak.

4:36

And I'll pass things back over to our assistant city clerk.

Speaker 2

4:48

And no public comment.

4:59

Sorry.

5:00

John Slater, please come to the podium.

Speaker 3

5:02

Is this the podium?

Speaker 2

5:04

Thank you.

5:04

Yes.

5:10

Can you hear me?

5:11

Okay.

Speaker 3

5:12

Shall I start?

5:13

Why not?

5:14

Right?

Speaker 2

5:16

Yes, please.

Speaker 3

5:17

The environmental review for the Redwood City Ferry Terminal projects $7 million in revenue against $13 million in annual operating expenses.

5:27

We are consistently asked to bail out public transportation, and this will add six million dollars a year in shortfalls.

5:35

Or even greater shortfalls of readership if ridership does not meet projections.

5:40

And this does not even account for the eighty million dollars that'll have to be spent for the ferries themselves.

5:47

Any ferry ridership that occurs will probably take revenue off of Caltrain, and Caltrain, as you know, is underutilized and in running is running deficits.

6:06

A ferry ticket will cost $18 and 75 cents.

6:11

Three times what Keltrain charges.

6:14

A ticket price that covers all costs, including the ferries would be $50.

6:19

So each trip that you make is going to cost taxpayers $31.

6:25

This trip will take twice as long as a Kel train ride.

6:34

The report, the environment our environmental report says that the average trip to the ferry will be four and a half miles.

6:51

Realistically, how many people will choose to use the ferry?

6:54

Which adds over an hour in each day's round trip commuting.

6:59

According to the review, fuel efficiency is fifty passenger miles per gallon if the ferries are 100% full all the time.

Unassigned speaker

7:09

A

Speaker 3

7:09

hybrid car with two people doubles this.

7:13

EVs of course do much better.

7:16

If the ferries also have tier four diesel engines, which will produce more pollution than what if everybody just used cars.

7:24

So why is this project a priority?

Speaker 2

7:28

Thank you, John.

7:30

And that concludes speaking public comment.

Speaker 1

7:34

Thank you, and thank you to our public commenter for joining us tonight.

7:38

And with that, we'll now adjourn to closed session to discuss public employee performance evaluations as identified on tonight's agenda.

7:47

As there will be no reportable action following the closed session, we will adjourn meeting excuse me, we'll adjourn the meeting immediately following closed session, and the city council will not return to the days.

7:59

The next regular City Council meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 26th.

8:04

Thank you for joining tonight's meeting, and we wish you all a great evening and great week ahead.

8:09

Thank

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Transportation Safety██████████████████████████████████36%
Public Comment███████████████16%
Summary of Proceedings

Redwood City Special City Council Meeting – October 14, 2026

The Redwood City City Council held a special hybrid meeting on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, beginning at 6:00 p.m. The meeting included one public comment opportunity under agenda item five and then adjourned to closed session for public employee performance evaluations. There was no reportable action following closed session.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • John Slater, a member of the public, spoke in opposition to the Redwood City Ferry Terminal project, citing the environmental review. He stated the project would generate $7 million in revenue against $13 million in annual operating expenses, adding roughly $6 million per year in shortfalls, or more if ridership does not meet projections, and that this does not include the $80 million cost of the ferries themselves.
  • Slater argued ferry ridership would likely draw revenue away from Caltrain, which he said is underutilized and running deficits. He noted the ferry ticket would cost $18.75, about three times Caltrain's fare, and estimated a cost-covering ticket would be $50, meaning each trip would cost taxpayers about $31.
  • Slater also said the ferry trip would take twice as long as a Caltrain ride, with the average trip to the ferry amounting to 4.5 miles. He cited the environmental review's fuel-efficiency figure of 50 passenger miles per gallon only if ferries are 100 percent full, compared with a hybrid car with two people doubling that efficiency and EVs doing much better. He stated that tier 4 diesel engines would produce more pollution than if everyone used cars, and questioned why the project is a priority.

Closed Session

  • Following public comment, the city council adjourned to closed session to discuss public employee performance evaluations as identified on the agenda. No reportable action was expected or taken.

Key Outcomes

  • The city council took no action on the ferry terminal during the open portion of the meeting.
  • The meeting was adjourned immediately after closed session, with no return to open session.
  • The next regular City Council meeting was announced for Monday, October 26, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good evening, everyone. We're gonna go ahead and get started. It's six o'clock. Thank you for joining our special city council meeting of October 14th, 2026. We hold meetings in hybrid format with both in-person and virtual participation available. And there will be one opportunity for public comment this evening under item five on topics on on the agenda or within the city's subject matter jurisdiction. And members of the public may provide comments as follows. Our in-person speakers will be called to speak first. Speaker cards are located at the back table in the council chambers and must be turned in to the city clerk here at the Dais. Please be sure to indicate the agenda item number you wish to speak on. And attendees who have joined us by Zoom will be called to speak after the in-person comments have been given. Detailed instructions for public comment will be provided on the screen when the time for public comment begins. And lastly, I'd like to remind everyone that comments should remain within the city's subject matter jurisdiction and relate to matters that are appropriately before the city council. We welcome public participation and recognize that members of our community may have a strongly held views and at times strong emotions about the issues before us. However, we ask that all speakers conduct themselves respectfully. Thank you, Mayor. And I will start with Councilmember Chu. Here. And if you're attending virtually, feel free to raise your hand on Zoom and press star nine if you've joined by phone. Once we've begun public comment, no additional speakers will be allowed to cue up to speak. And I'll pass things back over to our assistant city clerk. And no public comment. Sorry. John Slater, please come to the podium. Is this the podium? Thank you. Yes. Can you hear me? Okay. Shall I start? Why not? Right? Yes, please. The environmental review for the Redwood City Ferry Terminal projects $7 million in revenue against $13 million in annual operating expenses. We are consistently asked to bail out public transportation, and this will add six million dollars a year in shortfalls. Or even greater shortfalls of readership if ridership does not meet projections. And this does not even account for the eighty million dollars that'll have to be spent for the ferries themselves. Any ferry ridership that occurs will probably take revenue off of Caltrain, and Caltrain, as you know, is underutilized and in running is running deficits. A ferry ticket will cost $18 and 75 cents. Three times what Keltrain charges. A ticket price that covers all costs, including the ferries would be $50. So each trip that you make is going to cost taxpayers $31. This trip will take twice as long as a Kel train ride. The report, the environment our environmental report says that the average trip to the ferry will be four and a half miles. Realistically, how many people will choose to use the ferry? Which adds over an hour in each day's round trip commuting. According to the review, fuel efficiency is fifty passenger miles per gallon if the ferries are 100% full all the time. A hybrid car with two people doubles this. EVs of course do much better.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com