OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Redwood City, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Redwood City Council Meeting on October 26, 2026: Dumbarton, Design Standards, Stanford Cancer Center

City Council — Monday, October 26, 2026
BodyRedwood City, California
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 26, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:42:27

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

7:13

Detailed instructions for public comment will be provided on the screen when the time for public comment begins.

7:19

And lastly, I'd like to remind everybody that comments should remain within the city's subject matter jurisdiction and relate to matters that are appropriately before the city council.

7:29

We welcome public participation and recognize that members of the our community may have strongly held views and strong emotions about issues before us.

7:37

However, we ask that all speakers conduct themselves respectfully.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

My name is Millie Tollison.

Speaker 2

10:01

I'm the director of planning at SAMTrans, and I am also serving as the project manager of the reimagined Dumbarton project.

10:08

I am going to be co-presenting tonight with my colleague Anna Vasadev from our government and community affairs team.

10:16

Are we rolling?

Unassigned speaker

10:19

Okay.

Speaker 2

10:22

Oh, perfect.

10:23

Thank you.

10:28

Oops.

10:29

A little too fast.

10:30

Okay, so this evening, very excited to be with you to give you an overview of a project we're calling Reimagined Dumbarton.

10:39

I'll give you a brief project overview.

10:42

We'll also tell you a little bit about the community engagement that we've done so far in the project and that we're currently doing right now.

10:49

And we'll be able to share some of our initial initial proposed project designs, and we'll wrap up with next steps.

11:01

So what is reimagined Dumbarton?

11:04

Reimagined Dumbarton is a vision to transform the former freight line, freight rail line known as the Dumbarton Rail Corridor, into a five-mile long dedicated busway, bus rapid transit style busway, and walking and bicycling trail between Redwood City and East Palo Alto.

11:23

So our study area map is on the left.

11:26

The thick blue line is the is the Dumbarton Corridor.

11:31

So that shows you the right of way as well as the area that would be converted into that dedicated busway and walking and bicycling trail.

11:42

And then we'll talk a little bit more in a few slides, but we also have some concepts and potential alignments for how the bus service would ultimately connect all the way into Redwood City Transit Center and Caltrain Station.

11:56

And some folks may know that the Dumbarton Rail Corridor also includes a rail bridge that is unusable today, but a rail bridge over the bay over into the East Bay.

12:09

But this project is a more near-term project that's focused just on uh the right of way here on the peninsula.

12:18

So why reimagine Dumbarton?

12:21

Uh the Dumbarton Corridor today is uh very underutilized.

12:25

It hasn't seen any meaningful rail service um in uh multiple decades.

12:31

Um and it really um one thing that we hear a lot from the communities uh near the corridor is that it mostly just acts as a barrier today.

12:39

So disconnecting communities from each other and from destinations that they may want to go to.

12:46

So our goals with this project are to reconnect communities, creating new walking and bicycling connections and improving access to all types of places.

12:57

Um this project really um uh presents an incredible opportunity to provide faster and more reliable transit service by offering um our buses that dedicated right-of-way, the type of dedicated right-of-way that people love uh trains for.

13:14

Our buses could benefit from having that uh typodedicated service.

13:19

Um, and this service is envisioned to be operated with zero mission buses as Sam Trans transitions our entire fleet into zero mission buses.

13:27

Um this project would incorporate active transportation and community placemaking, um, as well as be able to respond to the changing changing travel needs that we have seen in the last few years since the pandemic.

13:41

Um, and also allow us to bring improvements soon.

13:44

So this is a near-term project that we hope to get.

13:47

Um we'll talk a little bit about a potential timeline later, but hoping this is something we could really get going and get on the ground in the next 10 years.

13:56

Um while I we also one thing that we do like to say, because it is important is that this project would also preserve the potential for a rail project in the future, but again, this is a more near-term project that allows us to get this corridor activated, benefiting the community in the near term.

Unassigned speaker

14:16

Um

Speaker 2

14:17

so I I just wanted to share a few examples of where else these types of projects have been done.

14:22

I think it's really helpful to hear about some examples.

14:25

Um these types of busway projects are very successful all around the world and in multiple examples in our own country.

14:34

So some examples here include down in LA.

14:38

There's a service called the G Line, which is an incredibly productive bus uh BRT service.

14:44

Um it also uses part of a former railroad corridor.

14:47

It's a bit longer than our uh project at 18 miles long, um, but it's an incredibly productive uh and well-used project.

14:56

Um there in the middle, there's an example out of Minneapolis.

15:00

And I would say this example is maybe a little bit more similar to our context, where there would be that dedicated dedicated bus lanes and also that walking and bicycling trail, a paved trail next to it.

15:11

That's a two and a about two and a half mile long service, a little shorter.

15:16

It's used by buses, bicycles, and also used by emergency vehicles, which could be a potentially cool co-benefit of this project.

15:24

And then lastly, closest to home, I would say is uh just down in Monterey.

15:29

They're building right now a project called the Surf project, which is under construction.

15:35

Um also using a former rail corridor and preserving the tracks for possible rail in the future.

15:42

And they are, yeah, they're in construction now, so we're watching them closely.

15:49

Um, so what could our project include?

15:52

Um there's really three components.

15:54

This uh dedicated busway with um new bus stations for fast, reliable, and frequent transit service, continuous walking and bicycling trail between um University Avenue in East Palo Alto, where there's bay trail connections and Middlefield Road here in Redwood City.

16:13

Um, and lastly, public access and community spaces, 15 new access points, including um multiple new pedestrian and bicycle crossings.

Unassigned speaker

16:26

Oh,

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Community Engagement███████████████████19%
Transportation Safety███████████11%
Land Use Planning███████████11%
Zoning███████7%
Procedural██████6%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Arts and Culture██████6%
Public Safety█████5%
Public Comment████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Redwood City Council Meeting - October 26, 2026

The Redwood City Council met on October 26, 2026, to discuss several major items including a presentation on the Reimagined Dumbarton project by SamTrans, an ordinance establishing objective design standards, and a study session on a community benefits framework for the proposed Stanford Medicine Cancer Center. The council also received public comments on a range of topics, approved the consent calendar, and heard updates on committee work.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent calendar, comprising routine items, was approved unanimously on a motion by Councilmember G, seconded by Councilmember Chu. No items were pulled for discussion.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Surveillance Cameras (ALPRs): Multiple speakers from Safety Over Surveillance Redwood City, including Amber Garza Washburn, Emily, Sarah Max, Kimberly Wu, Bill Noell, and others, opposed the city’s use of automated license plate readers. They cited data sharing with over 100,000 users per month, including federal agencies like ICE and Border Patrol, and called for strong guardrails or termination of the program. Speakers noted that Half Moon Bay and other cities have ended similar contracts.
  • Objective Design Standards: Speakers Davina Gentry, Dasha Leeds (Sierra Club Loma Prieta), and Lexi Mendoza (Green Foothills) expressed support for including bird-friendly design guidelines and exterior lighting standards in the ordinance, emphasizing the Pacific Flyway and health impacts of light pollution.
  • Stanford Cancer Center Community Benefits: Fifteen in-person and three online speakers addressed the study session. Key themes included:
    • North Fair Oaks Representation: Angie Barramiller, Keith Miller, Kathleen Delhi, Gabriela Valencia, and others urged the council to ensure North Fair Oaks and Friendly Acres have a structured voice in negotiations, citing past community benefits that largely bypassed these equity priority communities.
    • Traffic and Infrastructure: Residents requested measures to slow traffic, prevent cut-throughs, and improve street sweeping near Taft Elementary and residential areas.
    • Parks and Open Space: Several speakers emphasized the need for a new park, dog park, and renovation of Taft Elementary fields (currently closed).
    • Affordable Housing: Speakers like Sarah Matlin called for very low-income housing on the remainder parcel at 1125 Arguello, noting the area’s high density and the need to serve low-wage workers.
    • Arts Center: Multiple speakers (Julie Alderson, Susie Payton, Andrew Krenna, Anu Singh, Elisa Levitan, Betsy Alaby, and others) advocated for a permanent community arts center as a community benefit, citing the success of the Center for Creativity at Hotel Sequoia and linking arts to mental well-being and community connection.
  • Other: Cindy Bickerstaff proposed using air rights above transit, including the Dumbarton Corridor, to fund transit and housing. Dreamers Club from Sequoia High School invited council to their November 20 dinner. Marceline Luna raised concerns about alcohol use at Hoover soccer fields.

Discussion Items

  • Reimagined Dumbarton Project (SAMTrans): Millie Tollison and Anna Vasadev presented a plan to convert the underutilized Dumbarton Rail Corridor into a five-mile dedicated busway, walking and bicycling trail between Redwood City and East Palo Alto. The project aims to reconnect communities, improve transit reliability, and preserve future rail potential. Councilmembers expressed enthusiasm, but emphasized the need for safe, direct connections to the Redwood City Transit Center and downtown. Concerns about privacy walls were discussed; landscaping was preferred. The project timeline targets early 2030s for construction, pending funding (e.g., Connect Bay Area measure, Measure A renewal in 2028). No action taken.
  • Objective Design Standards Ordinance: Community Development Director Jeff Schwab presented amendments to the zoning code establishing objective design standards for residential and mixed-use projects, as required by state law. The ordinance includes bird-friendly design, lighting standards, tree planting requirements (minimum 24-inch box), and provisions for parking garages (vision triangles). The Architectural Advisory Committee and Planning Commission recommended changes, including a one-year review. Council discussion focused on flexibility for missing middle housing, tree canopy equity, and gateway standards. The council voted to introduce the ordinance (motion passed unopposed).
  • Stanford Medicine Cancer Center Community Benefits Framework (Study Session): Jeff Schwab, Tim Morrison (Stanford Health Care), and Lucy Wicks (Stanford University) presented the draft framework based on 45 community engagement events and 800+ survey responses. Key priorities identified: stormwater/flooding, transportation/mobility, local jobs, health/wellness, patient lodging, and affordable housing. Stanford donated 1 acre at 1125 Arguello for an American Cancer Society Hope Lodge, with a remaining 2.3-acre parcel potentially for affordable housing. Councilmembers and public speakers stressed the need for deeper outreach to North Fair Oaks and Friendly Acres, and recommended city-led engagement. Discussion included possible partnerships for flooding mitigation, an arts center, traffic calming, and the reopening of Taft Field. No action taken; the project is in early stages with environmental review starting in December 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent calendar approved unanimously.
  • Introduction of objective design standards ordinance approved; final adoption expected in late December 2026 after a second reading.
  • Council directed staff to explore additional city-led community outreach for the Stanford Cancer Center project, with potential consultant funding from Stanford, to ensure equitable participation from North Fair Oaks and Friendly Acres.
  • Staff to report back on the status of Taft Elementary field and possible reopening.
  • The next city council meeting is scheduled for November 9, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Detailed instructions for public comment will be provided on the screen when the time for public comment begins. And lastly, I'd like to remind everybody that comments should remain within the city's subject matter jurisdiction and relate to matters that are appropriately before the city council. We welcome public participation and recognize that members of the our community may have strongly held views and strong emotions about issues before us. However, we ask that all speakers conduct themselves respectfully. My name is Millie Tollison. I'm the director of planning at SAMTrans, and I am also serving as the project manager of the reimagined Dumbarton project. I am going to be co-presenting tonight with my colleague Anna Vasadev from our government and community affairs team. Are we rolling? Okay. Oh, perfect. Thank you. Oops. A little too fast. Okay, so this evening, very excited to be with you to give you an overview of a project we're calling Reimagined Dumbarton. I'll give you a brief project overview. We'll also tell you a little bit about the community engagement that we've done so far in the project and that we're currently doing right now. And we'll be able to share some of our initial initial proposed project designs, and we'll wrap up with next steps. So what is reimagined Dumbarton? Reimagined Dumbarton is a vision to transform the former freight line, freight rail line known as the Dumbarton Rail Corridor, into a five-mile long dedicated busway, bus rapid transit style busway, and walking and bicycling trail between Redwood City and East Palo Alto. So our study area map is on the left. The thick blue line is the is the Dumbarton Corridor. So that shows you the right of way as well as the area that would be converted into that dedicated busway and walking and bicycling trail. And then we'll talk a little bit more in a few slides, but we also have some concepts and potential alignments for how the bus service would ultimately connect all the way into Redwood City Transit Center and Caltrain Station. And some folks may know that the Dumbarton Rail Corridor also includes a rail bridge that is unusable today, but a rail bridge over the bay over into the East Bay. But this project is a more near-term project that's focused just on uh the right of way here on the peninsula. So why reimagine Dumbarton? Uh the Dumbarton Corridor today is uh very underutilized. It hasn't seen any meaningful rail service um in uh multiple decades. Um and it really um one thing that we hear a lot from the communities uh near the corridor is that it mostly just acts as a barrier today. So disconnecting communities from each other and from destinations that they may want to go to. So our goals with this project are to reconnect communities, creating new walking and bicycling connections and improving access to all types of places. Um this project really um uh presents an incredible opportunity to provide faster and more reliable transit service by offering um our buses that dedicated right-of-way, the type of dedicated right-of-way that people love uh trains for. Our buses could benefit from having that uh typodedicated service. Um, and this service is envisioned to be operated with zero mission buses as Sam Trans transitions our entire fleet into zero mission buses. Um this project would incorporate active transportation and community placemaking, um, as well as be able to respond to the changing changing travel needs that we have seen in the last few years since the pandemic. Um, and also allow us to bring improvements soon. So this is a near-term project that we hope to get. Um we'll talk a little bit about a potential timeline later, but hoping this is something we could really get going and get on the ground in the next 10 years. Um while I we also one thing that we do like to say, because it is important is that this project would also preserve the potential for a rail project in the future, but again, this is a more near-term project that allows us to get this corridor activated, benefiting the community in the near term. Um so I I just wanted to share a few examples of where else these types of projects have been done. I think it's really helpful to hear about some examples. Um these types of busway projects are very successful all around the world and in multiple examples in our own country. So some examples here include down in LA. There's a service called the G Line, which is an incredibly productive bus uh BRT service. Um it also uses part of a former railroad corridor. It's a bit longer than our uh project at 18 miles long, um, but it's an incredibly productive uh and well-used project. Um there in the middle, there's an example out of Minneapolis. And I would say this example is maybe a little bit more similar to our context, where there would be that dedicated dedicated bus lanes and also that walking and bicycling trail, a paved trail next to it. That's a two and a about two and a half mile long service, a little shorter.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com