OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Richland Hills, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Richland Hills City Council Regular Meeting - July 27, 2026

City Council — Monday, July 27, 2026
BodyRichland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, July 27, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:40:01

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

6:02

Yeah, I'm gonna be swatting that flat if I hit you during the meeting.

6:05

Sorry.

Speaker 2

6:14

Microphones on everybody.

6:17

Okay, good

Unassigned speaker

6:18

deal.

Unassigned speaker

6:20

Good

Speaker 2

6:20

evening.

6:20

I'm now I'll now call the work session for the City of Richmond Hills to order.

6:26

At 5 31 p.m.

6:28

We'll begin by discussing items listed on tonight's city council agenda.

6:33

No formal action will be taken during the work session.

6:36

Each action item will be considered during the regular session.

6:40

Jason, is there anything you'd like to talk to the council about on these or call our attention to?

Speaker 3

6:44

So I will bring your attention to the final new business item, which is the TERS dissolution.

6:50

And I can uh reiterate this during that time in case the public um wants to if they're not here today or until that point.

6:58

Um but that does require an ordinance for the Texas tax code, not a resolution.

7:03

So that's my fault.

7:04

I drafted a resolution.

Unassigned speaker

7:06

Um

Speaker 3

7:06

it's gonna be an ordinance, it doesn't impact the the timing of things from a financial standpoint, but we do need to not take action on that item.

7:15

Don't even table it, just we'll withdraw the item um when we get to that, and then we'll bring it back as an ordinance.

Speaker 2

7:23

Okay.

Speaker 3

7:24

That's the only thing, Mayor, that I have

Speaker 2

7:25

to regular.

Speaker 3

7:38

Yes,

Unassigned speaker

7:38

sir.

Speaker 3

7:39

Thank you, Mayor.

7:40

Good evening, council.

7:41

So we do have uh an infrastructure meeting that was um that took place this morning and we had a good conversation about our projects and the process that we put together for you for the five-year plan.

7:54

There is a

Unassigned speaker

7:55

uh

Speaker 3

7:56

a public hearing just to have public input um on the plan later on part of the session.

8:03

You can vote to take action on adopting the plan, or you can wait until a future uh date as well as simultaneous with the budget adoption.

Unassigned speaker

8:11

But

Speaker 3

8:12

just to let you know that there will be an additional item later on the agenda.

Unassigned speaker

8:17

So

Speaker 3

8:17

what we looked at if you recall uh a couple months ago when we brought to you a framework for how we score projects.

8:24

Uh we have gone through that process.

8:27

Uh we've got every asset that's over fifty thousand dollars and put into an ar uh asset management plan, uh which is a spreadsheet with all kinds of tabs in

Unassigned speaker

8:36

it.

Speaker 3

8:37

And from there we've put together what the five-year plan can be funded based on the scoring.

8:43

And so there is a proposed 23.

8:50

Most of that is one project, and you'll see kind of the details of that shortly.

Unassigned speaker

8:54

Uh

Speaker 3

8:55

but there's 10 total projects um that are three or tier one, uh, which was the highest scoring when we go through the scoring, it was a 75 or above.

9:04

And then there's seven tier two, which are the next uh grouping down.

9:09

60 to 75.

9:12

So just to reiterate, um first thing we do is we gotta make sure that the project or the item that we're looking at is over 50,000.

9:20

It's gotta have a long long life, 10 years or or longer uh to be able to use capital funds.

9:26

And typically it's a one-time so construction acquisition or a major rehabilitation.

9:33

So once we know that this item passes that part of the test, uh then that's when the staff was working on scoring.

9:40

We took the average of those scores, we gave it the uh the tier, and then we try to match it to the available funding.

9:48

So here's the breakdown of your framework for the scoring.

9:53

So this just shows you on the left um how these projects are scored.

Unassigned speaker

9:57

So this is just again the public health and safety gets 25 points.

Speaker 3

10:01

So within that section, we're we're scoring projects based off if there's a public health or safety issue that needs to be addressed with the project.

10:12

So after we did that, uh tier one projects, which is 86% of the program uses, Booth Callaway, Cecil Drive, and Spruce Park.

10:23

And you'll see that Booth Callaway is about 17.2 million.

10:28

We do I do have a breakdown of how that cost estimate came to be, and I'll explain

Unassigned speaker

10:33

that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████25%
Budget Equity Analysis███████████████15%
Taxation Policy█████████████13%
Procedural████████████12%
Miscellaneous████████████12%
Fiscal Sustainability█████5%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Public Safety█████5%
Water And Wastewater Management███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Richland Hills City Council Regular Meeting - July 27, 2026

The Richland Hills City Council held a regular meeting on July 27, 2026, beginning with a work session at 5:31 PM, followed by executive session, and then the regular session at 6:22 PM. The meeting covered the proposed FY 2027–2031 Capital Improvement Program, FY 2027 tax rate options, the FY 2027 operating budget, and an interlocal agreement with Tarrant County for the Booth Calloway Road reconstruction. The council also took action on several routine items.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the consent agenda as presented, which included:
    • Excusing the absence of Councilmember Roland Goveas from the June 8, 2026 regular meeting.
    • Approving the minutes from the June 22, 2026 regular City Council meeting.

No items were removed for separate discussion.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public signed up to speak during the citizen comments portion of the meeting.

Discussion Items

  • Proposed FY 2027–2031 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP):

    • Staff presented a CIP with 10 total projects: three tier-one (scoring 75 or above) and seven tier-two (scoring 60–75). Tier-one projects include Booth Calloway Road ($17.2 million), Cecil Drive, and Spruce Park Drive. Funding sources include debt/CO proceeds, external partners (federal and Tarrant County), utility fund cash, and RHDC (Type B sales tax) funds. The total program is heavily weighted toward Booth Calloway, which constitutes 86% of the proposed spending.
    • A splash pad project originally included was recommended for removal by the Infrastructure Committee due to persistent operational failures; funding would instead be redirected to enhance the playground at The Link. Council members expressed strong support for this change.
    • A drainage stabilization project at Hoven Camp ($865,000) was also discussed.
    • The council adopted the CIP unanimously after a public hearing.
  • Proposed FY 2027 Tax Rate Options:

    • Staff presented three options: the no new revenue rate, the voter approval rate, and the de minimis rate. The de minimis rate (0.600068 total) would generate an additional $500,000 in M&O revenue but carries a risk of a petition election if 5% of registered voters (approximately 50 people) request one within 90 days of adoption. The recommended approach is to use the de minimis rate while drawing down $745,000 from the debt service fund balance to keep the interest and sinking (I&S) rate lower (0.1343 instead of 0.1671). Council members expressed support for the de minimis rate, citing the city's financial needs and low probability of a petition.
  • Proposed FY 2027 Operating Budget:

    • Staff reviewed major funds: General Fund (revenues $9.5M, expenditures $9.9M, deficit partly due to flat sales tax and increased personnel costs), Crime Control District (projected $500,000 deficit), Road and Street Fund (fully allocated to mill and overlay work), Type B Sales Tax (RHDC), Utility Fund (needs rate adjustment due to Fort Worth pass-through increases of 15% water and 18% wastewater), Drainage Utility Fund, and Debt Service Fund.
    • No pay increases are currently included; staff proposed one-time compensation options for public safety and other employees using the Strategic Initiatives Fund, with safeguards such as retention requirements. Council discussed the challenge of competing with neighboring cities that do not pay Social Security tax.
  • Interlocal Agreement for Booth Calloway Road Reconstruction:

    • The council approved a resolution authorizing an interlocal agreement with Tarrant County for $5,821,025 in funding from the 2006 and 2021 Transportation Bond Programs. The funds were originally allocated for Glenview but are being reallocated to Booth Calloway. Staff clarified that $99,000 of that amount has already been spent, leaving an effective match of approximately $5.7 million. The agreement is 50% reimbursement-based, with about $410,000 in discretionary funds available immediately without matching. The item will go to Tarrant County Commissioner's Court on August 18, 2026.
  • TIRZ Dissolution (Withdrawn):

    • The item regarding the dissolution of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One was withdrawn because the required action is an ordinance, not a resolution. It will be brought back at a future meeting as an ordinance.

Key Outcomes

  • Adopted the Proposed FY 2027–2031 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (motion carried unanimously).
  • Approved the Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County for Booth Calloway Road Reconstruction (motion carried unanimously). The city manager is authorized to execute the agreement and related documents.
  • Withdrew the TIRZ Dissolution item; to be re-presented as an ordinance.
  • Council provided direction to proceed with the de minimis tax rate and to develop one-time compensation options for staff to be presented at a future public hearing on the budget.
  • The next steps include publishing tax rate notices, holding public hearings in August, and adopting the budget in late August/early September.

Meeting Transcript

Yeah, I'm gonna be swatting that flat if I hit you during the meeting. Sorry. Microphones on everybody. Okay, good deal. Good evening. I'm now I'll now call the work session for the City of Richmond Hills to order. At 5 31 p.m. We'll begin by discussing items listed on tonight's city council agenda. No formal action will be taken during the work session. Each action item will be considered during the regular session. Jason, is there anything you'd like to talk to the council about on these or call our attention to? So I will bring your attention to the final new business item, which is the TERS dissolution. And I can uh reiterate this during that time in case the public um wants to if they're not here today or until that point. Um but that does require an ordinance for the Texas tax code, not a resolution. So that's my fault. I drafted a resolution. Um it's gonna be an ordinance, it doesn't impact the the timing of things from a financial standpoint, but we do need to not take action on that item. Don't even table it, just we'll withdraw the item um when we get to that, and then we'll bring it back as an ordinance. Okay. That's the only thing, Mayor, that I have to regular. Yes, sir. Thank you, Mayor. Good evening, council. So we do have uh an infrastructure meeting that was um that took place this morning and we had a good conversation about our projects and the process that we put together for you for the five-year plan. There is a uh a public hearing just to have public input um on the plan later on part of the session. You can vote to take action on adopting the plan, or you can wait until a future uh date as well as simultaneous with the budget adoption. But just to let you know that there will be an additional item later on the agenda. So what we looked at if you recall uh a couple months ago when we brought to you a framework for how we score projects. Uh we have gone through that process. Uh we've got every asset that's over fifty thousand dollars and put into an ar uh asset management plan, uh which is a spreadsheet with all kinds of tabs in it. And from there we've put together what the five-year plan can be funded based on the scoring. And so there is a proposed 23. Most of that is one project, and you'll see kind of the details of that shortly. Uh but there's 10 total projects um that are three or tier one, uh, which was the highest scoring when we go through the scoring, it was a 75 or above. And then there's seven tier two, which are the next uh grouping down. 60 to 75. So just to reiterate, um first thing we do is we gotta make sure that the project or the item that we're looking at is over 50,000. It's gotta have a long long life, 10 years or or longer uh to be able to use capital funds. And typically it's a one-time so construction acquisition or a major rehabilitation.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com