OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Richland Hills, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Richland Hills City Council Meeting – August 24, 2026 – FY2027 Budget and Tax Rate Adopted

City Council — Monday, August 24, 2026
BodyRichland Hills, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, August 24, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:01:55

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

8:36

Microphones on, everybody.

8:44

Good evening.

8:45

I'll now call the work session of the Richmond Hill City Council to order.

8:49

The time is five thirty-one.

8:51

Item one is discussion of the items listed on tonight's City Council agenda.

8:57

No formal action will be taken during the work session.

9:00

Each action item will be considered during the regular session.

9:03

Jason, or some items you want to go over for us.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

It's a discussion item regarding the city's code compliance community strategy, including tree limbs.

Speaker 1

10:05

By grass and weeds and other approaches to increase compliance.

10:09

Jason, can you present this item to us?

Speaker 2

10:12

Yes, sir.

10:13

We talked a couple meetings ago about the tree limbs and the letters that went out, and I just wanted to come back to you and give you an update on that.

10:23

We have had several compliance properties comply with that.

10:28

We have also not pursued any citations related to those at this point in time, but we did receive some uh quite a bit of compliance.

10:38

Um but going forward, uh, we'll continue to monitor those uh not just those properties but high grass and weeds, anything urgent as far as far as our code compliance strategy.

10:50

And I've talked to a few of you about this, but when we when we look at code compliance, if you think about a pendulum, okay, we can go all the way to one side where we're like an HOA.

11:04

You know, it's every time there's a violation, we immediately send an NOV a notice of violation.

11:09

They have seven to ten days, depending on what it is, to remediate for a citation is issued.

11:16

Um what that means is we immediately send out the letter, we come back and we have to reinspect after that seven day ten day period.

11:25

JP is it ten or seven?

11:27

Seven days.

11:28

Um, and so that is a follow-up process that we'd have to employ,

Unassigned speaker

11:33

uh,

Speaker 2

11:34

which we do, but uh to ensure that every time there's a notice of violation issued, we're we're now utilizing both iWorks and Trello to be more efficient in that process, also to track so that staff, myself

Unassigned speaker

11:47

and

Speaker 2

11:48

uh JP and his team uh can see where code issues have had those issues the compliance letters sent.

11:57

So there's the the pendulum where we're sending the immediately the immediate notice of violation.

12:03

Um then there's the other pendulum.

12:06

If you swing it back the other way, we have the courtesy letters that we could send out to say, hey, just maybe you may not have known, but there are uh subdivision and code compliance requirements as a property owner in the city, and so we want to bring these to your attention.

12:24

You are in technical violation of this specific one or multiple, and we are asking for your help to comply.

12:33

And then beyond that, if nothing is returned or commented or anything's done, then we move into a notice of violation.

12:41

And in some cases, uh, we have provided courtesy notices in multiple occasions to try to assist before notice of violations entered.

12:50

Obviously, I think both extremes um don't really work well, and for counsel's benefit, you're gonna get complaints on both ends.

12:59

You're not hard enough, you're you're not

Unassigned speaker

13:02

you

Speaker 2

13:02

know, staff's not you know making these property owners clean up, or you're too hard on citizens that can't do some of these things themselves.

13:11

So

Speaker 3

13:12

we just wanted

Speaker 2

13:12

to have this as a counsel direction of obviously we're gonna use common sense, and I think with our code officers, that's what they do.

13:21

Um, but we want to prioritize what you believe to be the urgent matters that hey, these things need to go straight to a notice of violation, or repeat offenders need to go straight to a violation.

13:35

Um the city doesn't have the resources to go abate every single problem.

13:40

We can't go mow everybody's yard just because we can put a lien on the property, doesn't mean we're ever gonna get that revenue back.

13:46

Um, in some cases where it's a health life safety issue, we would recommend abatement.

Unassigned speaker

13:52

Um,

Speaker 2

13:52

so and we have done those over the last year and beyond uh prior.

Unassigned speaker

13:57

So

Speaker 2

13:57

I wanted to ask council some for some direction so we can pass it along to staff on number one.

14:04

What are those urgent matters that you want us to really focus on, and then two, what's kind of communication strategy to the residents?

14:13

We can do educational campaigns.

14:14

So on the slide, I've

Unassigned speaker

14:15

got

Speaker 2

14:16

we can do videos, we can post um more communication

Unassigned speaker

14:21

to

Speaker 2

14:21

the residents informing them.

14:22

These are our codes.

14:24

Um these are the time of year that you know we have both pick up so that people can really plan for those out in advance.

14:30

So I think a combination of things from staff's perspective, we're ready and able to do with your direction on what what you see is more the urgent and strategy for how we write tickets or pursue these components.

Speaker 4

14:46

Where are we right now on this pendulum?

Speaker 2

14:48

Well, in

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████████████████38%
Code Enforcement█████████████████████21%
Procedural██████████10%
Public Engagement██████6%
Fiscal Sustainability██████6%
Taxation Policy█████5%
Community Engagement█████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure████4%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Richland Hills City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting – August 24, 2026

The Richland Hills City Council met on August 24, 2026, starting with a work session at 5:31 p.m. and convening the regular meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. The agenda centered on code enforcement strategy, adoption of the Fiscal Year 2027 budget, ratification of a property tax increase, and setting the FY2027 tax rate.

Work Session: Code Compliance Communication Strategy

  • Staff described an updated code compliance approach using iWorks and Trello, with a “pendulum” between immediate notices of violation and courtesy letters. They reported that recent tree-limb letters produced compliance without citations.
  • Council members discussed a seven-day compliance window and directed staff to combine a courtesy/resource letter with the notice of violation, including contact information for residents needing help, while sending repeat offenders and health/safety hazards directly to enforcement.
  • Council members also raised concerns about tall grass and tree limbs blocking visibility and fire-truck clearance, commercial corridor nuisances, and use of liens on vacant or chronically non-compliant properties. A proposed citywide tree-trimming user fee was rejected.
  • No formal action was taken during the work session.

Work Session: FY2027 Budget and Tax Rate Discussion

  • Jason presented the proposed FY2027 budget spanning 19 funds, with total revenues of $25.19 million and expenditures of $26.71 million, including a $1 million distribution related to the Tarrant County TIF closeout.
  • The proposed property tax rate was $0.569027 per $100 valuation, composed of a $0.430632 maintenance-and-operations rate and a $0.138395 debt-service rate. This rate is the voter-approval rate and would raise $90,351, or 1.78%, more property tax revenue than FY2026.
  • Staff discussed a possible FY2028 move of about $327,000 in vehicle lease payments from maintenance-and-operations to debt service to create future budget capacity.

Citizen Comments

  • Sayyid Al-Sayed, identified as Richland Hills’ representative to the Tarrant Appraisal District, expressed concern about the appraisal district’s performance, stating Tarrant County lost 12% of taxable value in 2025, 13.2% in 2026, and expects a 17% loss next year, partly due to automatic business personal property exemptions.
  • Bernadette Reed, a Kevin Drive resident, asked for aggressive attention to a rental property at Chaffin and Landy with downed trees, a half-open garage door, and overgrown conditions. She said senior residents on her street were receiving grass citations while struggling to maintain properties, and she praised the fire department’s response to an emergency at her home.

Council Comments and July Department Reports

  • Council members provided community announcements and thanked staff for budget analysis, police for utility support, and public works for water-meter leak detection.
  • Terry Lee presented the state-required quarterly investment report for the quarter ending June 30, 2026: portfolio holdings decreased from about $31 million to $29.2 million; interest earnings were about $209,000; the average interest rate was 2.74%; checking accounts held 54% of the portfolio and pools held 46%.

Consent Calendar

  • The council unanimously approved the August 17, 2026 minutes and Resolution 664-26 approving a negotiated settlement between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division regarding the company’s 2026 rate review mechanism filing.

New Business: FY2027 Budget Adoption

  • Council members debated whether to adopt the budget at the proposed voter-approval rate or at a higher rate, with one member proposing $0.58 per $100 for additional margin.
  • GW, a public speaker, opposed asking residents for more money, arguing the tax increase would be bad optics and that residents are tightening their belts.
  • Doug Knowlton expressed concern about aging infrastructure but said he could support either rate.
  • The council adopted Ordinance 1544-26 on a 6-1 vote, with Councilmember Skier voting no.

Ratification of Property Tax Increase

  • In a separate 7-0 vote, the council ratified the property tax increase reflected in the FY2027 budget, which raises $90,351, or 1.78%, more in property tax revenue than the FY2026 budget.

Public Hearing and Tax Rate Adoption

  • No additional speakers appeared during the public hearing for Ordinance 1546-26, which sets the FY2027 tax rate.
  • Staff noted the median homestead taxable value is $241,063. Under the adopted $0.569027 rate, city taxes on that home would be about $1,371.72, compared with $1,216.88 in FY2026 and $1,340.31 at the no-new-revenue rate.
  • The council adopted the tax rate ordinance on a 7-0 vote.

Key Outcomes

  • FY2027 budget adopted 6-1; property tax increase ratified 7-0; FY2027 tax rate set at $0.569027 per $100 valuation by a 7-0 vote.
  • Consent agenda approved unanimously.
  • Code compliance staff were directed to use a combined courtesy/notice-of-violation letter with resident resources, maintain a seven-day compliance window, and prioritize repeat offenders and health/safety hazards.

Meeting Transcript

Microphones on, everybody. Good evening. I'll now call the work session of the Richmond Hill City Council to order. The time is five thirty-one. Item one is discussion of the items listed on tonight's City Council agenda. No formal action will be taken during the work session. Each action item will be considered during the regular session. Jason, or some items you want to go over for us. It's a discussion item regarding the city's code compliance community strategy, including tree limbs. By grass and weeds and other approaches to increase compliance. Jason, can you present this item to us? Yes, sir. We talked a couple meetings ago about the tree limbs and the letters that went out, and I just wanted to come back to you and give you an update on that. We have had several compliance properties comply with that. We have also not pursued any citations related to those at this point in time, but we did receive some uh quite a bit of compliance. Um but going forward, uh, we'll continue to monitor those uh not just those properties but high grass and weeds, anything urgent as far as far as our code compliance strategy. And I've talked to a few of you about this, but when we when we look at code compliance, if you think about a pendulum, okay, we can go all the way to one side where we're like an HOA. You know, it's every time there's a violation, we immediately send an NOV a notice of violation. They have seven to ten days, depending on what it is, to remediate for a citation is issued. Um what that means is we immediately send out the letter, we come back and we have to reinspect after that seven day ten day period. JP is it ten or seven? Seven days. Um, and so that is a follow-up process that we'd have to employ, uh, which we do, but uh to ensure that every time there's a notice of violation issued, we're we're now utilizing both iWorks and Trello to be more efficient in that process, also to track so that staff, myself and uh JP and his team uh can see where code issues have had those issues the compliance letters sent. So there's the the pendulum where we're sending the immediately the immediate notice of violation. Um then there's the other pendulum. If you swing it back the other way, we have the courtesy letters that we could send out to say, hey, just maybe you may not have known, but there are uh subdivision and code compliance requirements as a property owner in the city, and so we want to bring these to your attention. You are in technical violation of this specific one or multiple, and we are asking for your help to comply. And then beyond that, if nothing is returned or commented or anything's done, then we move into a notice of violation. And in some cases, uh, we have provided courtesy notices in multiple occasions to try to assist before notice of violations entered. Obviously, I think both extremes um don't really work well, and for counsel's benefit, you're gonna get complaints on both ends. You're not hard enough, you're you're not you know, staff's not you know making these property owners clean up, or you're too hard on citizens that can't do some of these things themselves. So we just wanted to have this as a counsel direction of obviously we're gonna use common sense, and I think with our code officers, that's what they do. Um, but we want to prioritize what you believe to be the urgent matters that hey, these things need to go straight to a notice of violation, or repeat offenders need to go straight to a violation. Um the city doesn't have the resources to go abate every single problem. We can't go mow everybody's yard just because we can put a lien on the property, doesn't mean we're ever gonna get that revenue back. Um, in some cases where it's a health life safety issue, we would recommend abatement. Um, so and we have done those over the last year and beyond uh prior. So I wanted to ask council some for some direction so we can pass it along to staff on number one. What are those urgent matters that you want us to really focus on, and then two, what's kind of communication strategy to the residents? We can do educational campaigns.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com