OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Education and Human Services Standing Committee Meeting – September 10, 2026

City CouncilThursday, September 10, 2026
BodyRichmond, Virginia
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 10, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 41:18

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

All right, Madam Cleck, we'll bring this EHS meet into order.

0:05

Madam Clerk, can you call the chamber emergency evacuation announcements?

0:10

Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building.

0:15

Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the north or south starewell outside the rear doors of the chamber.

0:22

Do not use elevators or escalators.

0:25

After exiting the building, security would direct everyone down 9th Street to the fence area located between cleanly streets.

0:32

Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors exiting the building.

0:36

Individuals wishing to speak during public hearings in the public comment period are generally allowed three minutes to speak.

0:42

Persons appearing before the committee are not allowed to campaign for public office, promote private business ventures, use language of a personal nature, which insults or demeans any person, including comments directed at public officials or staff members that are not related to their official duties or address the question staff members directly.

1:00

All questions are to be directed to the committee chair.

1:03

Failure to adhere to the guidelines may result in speakers forfeiting any remaining time and further disciplinary action as necessary, which can include barring from attendance at future meetings of the community of a for a period of six months.

1:16

And Madam Vice Chair, all members are in attendance today with the exception of Miss Lynch and you do have a quorum.

1:21

Thank you.

1:22

Can we do the public comment period?

1:24

Public comment is now open.

1:26

Is there anyone present who wishes to address this committee regarding items not on today's agenda?

1:32

Madam Vice Chair seeing no one.

1:35

Public comment period is now closed and back to the committee.

1:37

All right, we move right on through this.

1:39

Approval of the minutes.

1:40

The minutes to be approved are for July 9th, 2026 for the education and human services standing committee meeting held at 2 p.m.

1:48

If there are no amendments or corrections, then the minute the meeting minutes will stand approved as presented.

1:54

Those minutes have been approved.

1:56

Thank you.

1:56

Thank you.

1:57

We'll do well, let's keep it in the same order.

1:59

So let's go to presentations.

2:05

And we will have uh who's put oh miss okay, Mr.

2:08

Dominic Barrett.

2:21

Testing.

2:21

Can I hear me?

2:22

I'll do my best here.

2:23

Let me know if I can't be uh heard.

2:26

Good afternoon.

2:28

Uh Vice Chair slash acting chair Jones, Councilmember Breton, Dominic Barrett, Senior Policy Advisor with the Office of the DCO for Human Services.

2:36

Um I'm grateful for the invitation to be here today to provide an update on our new grant making process.

2:42

Can you all hear me okay if I stand back from the mic a little bit like this?

2:45

If it extends any further.

2:47

Um I'm gonna do my best to keep this to 10 minutes.

2:52

I'm gonna quickly walk through some background to frame things up, but I don't want to dwell on that since we've shared that information with council in a variety of settings and ways, both at presentations and in um emailed memos, but do want to make sure we're mindful of that context and then spend most of our time on sort of where we are in the process now and what to look forward to in the months ahead.

3:13

Uh want to start by just reminding folks where this new grant process sort of sits and lives within the budget and where it exists relative to our other um items within the outside agency budget.

3:24

So we have our organizational subsidy category, which is things like GRTC, RBHA, et cetera.

3:30

We have our strategic city-driven initiatives, and these are these critical city identified city-directed services with a provider typically identified via a competitive process that's managed by the city.

3:40

Um, and then we have what we're here to talk about today.

3:43

Um, formally the non-departmental grant process, now called the Richmond Thrives Grant Program, managed by three outside grant makers delivering a competitive grant making process in those four priority areas there.

3:56

This new process uh is the product of several years of feedback and engagement with council, the nonprofit community, the administration.

4:03

This wasn't designed in a vacuum or overnight, um, and it's something that's been discussed with this committee off and on over the years.

4:09

Uh we saw to identify a new process that meets this you know high standard of stewardship of taxpayer resources and dollars, but also wanting to do it in a way that's expanding access, um improving the experience for applicants, um, and increasing overall community impact as a key goal.

4:24

Ultimately, as I've talked about before, we want a process that's rigorous but but reasonable.

4:28

Um, and that's uh both increasing accountability but also increasing accessibility for our nonprofit partners.

4:38

Uh as we discussed, the process the new process and the new framework has four priority areas and our uh lengthy RFP process to identify competitive those grant makers, really focused on making sure we had grantmakers that had local experience with subject matter expertise and grant making experience in those specific um issue areas that they could deliver equitable and transparent processes that neither preferenced or disadvantaged organizations based on whether they had or hadn't been funded by the city in the past.

5:04

We wanted faster turnaround from application period to fund disbursement.

5:08

We wanted meaningful community and subject matter expert participation in the review process, and then a goal of making sure that all fire all four priority areas could have funds dispersed within the 2026 calendar year.

5:22

This slide tracks our progress.

5:24

And I think one thing to note is overall this transition has been of a bit of a go slow to go fast model.

5:29

Lots of time in sort of thinking through the model and managing the RFP process and then ultimately hitting the ground running as soon as possible.

5:36

So when council uh authorized via ordinance us to move forward with that with those appropriations on the 27th, we then two days later had our kickoff session for nonprofits on the 29th.

5:47

And then within two weeks, all grantmakers were opening application processes or hosting their own information sessions and technical assistance uh sessions.

5:58

So where are we now?

5:59

We are SMACDAB in the middle of those application windows that you'll see there in the middle of the slide with our first two priority areas closing tomorrow.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Human Services████████████████████████████████████████████44%
Education Funding██████████████████████████26%
Public Safety████████8%
Gun Safety████████8%
Procedural██████6%
Library Services█████5%
Public Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Education and Human Services Standing Committee Meeting – September 10, 2026

The Education and Human Services (EHS) Standing Committee met on September 10, 2026. The supplied timestamp indicates a 9:00 a.m. start, although several speakers in the transcript say "Good afternoon." Vice Chair/Acting Chair Jones presided, and Councilmember Breton was present. All committee members were present except Ms. Lynch, and the committee had a quorum. No agenda or minutes were available, so this summary is based on the raw transcript. The meeting included public comment, approval of the July 9, 2026 meeting minutes, a Richmond Thrives Grant Program presentation, a Richmond Public Schools facilities modernization update, an ordinance to accept juvenile detention center grant funds, and closing human services updates.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • The public comment period for items not on the agenda was opened and closed with no speakers.
  • The public hearing for Ordinance 2026-191 was opened; no one spoke in opposition or in support.

Discussion Items

  • Richmond Thrives Grant Program — Dominic Barrett, Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the DCO for Human Services. Barrett described the new competitive grant-making process replacing the former non-departmental grant process, with four priority areas (arts and culture; children and families; economic mobility; health) managed by three external grantmakers, including CultureWorks and United Way. He said the first two application windows close on September 11, 2026, and the new timeline from application closing to fund disbursement is about three to four months, compared with roughly 10 months under the previous model. Administrative costs were capped at 15% in the RFP process and are coming in closer to 10% across all four priority areas. The city will co-create guidelines, review applications for duplication, monitor grantmakers, report outcomes, and refine the process; grantmakers will provide equitable applications, community advisory input, and aggregate reporting. Grantees are expected to be announced in December, with an initial investment summary provided to council. A councilmember praised the program for increasing accountability and accessibility and suggested reviving a capacity-building training program for nonprofits; Barrett said the feedback was well received and that there remains a role for the city in supporting nonprofit training.

  • Richmond Public Schools Facilities Modernization — Patrick Harrell, Chief Operating Officer, with RPS Board Chair Fernandez. The superintendent sent apologies. RPS has held two community prioritization sessions and has seven remaining; the next is September 15 for District 9. Phase one is about prioritizing schools for modernization, not consolidation, rezoning, or specific capital projects; phase two would address implementation questions such as new construction versus renovation. Data cited by Harrell: enrollment is up about 1.8%; average building age is 62 years; over 20% of buildings are at least 100 years old. The transcript's sentence about buildings over 50 years old is garbled ("over 69% of our buildings, 36% of our buildings are over 50 years old"), so the exact percentage is unclear. An independent assessment identifies about $680 million in maintenance needs over 20 years, while projected annual funding is about $2.5 million; the nearly $10 million capital allocation from council averages out to about $2.5 million per year. Harrell credited meals tax funding for recent school construction and referenced the proposed 1% sales tax as a potential source. In the community activity, tables sort 26 school cards into high, medium, or low priority using building condition, enrollment trends, student need concentration, and historical context. Harrell and Fernandez said some parents and principals who arrived to advocate for their own schools instead recognized greater needs at other schools. Councilmember Breton, who attended a session, praised the activity and reported hearing an attendee say, "You convinced me, I'll vote yes." Acting Chair Jones said she planned to attend the District 9 session.

  • Ordinance 2026-191 — Juvenile Detention Center JAG Grant (Department of Justice Services Director Greg Hopkins). The ordinance authorizes the Chief Administrative Officer to accept $137,038 from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services and to create and appropriate a new special fund for a juvenile detention center program. The transcript contains an amount discrepancy: it reads $137,038 for the accepted funds but $137,003 for the appropriation. Hopkins said the one-time grant would fund equipment, staff training, and facility upgrades to make the detention center more trauma-informed and youth-friendly, including replacing furniture that has not been upgraded since 2011 and improving intake and visitation areas. He noted that Richmond offers post-dispositional services, and youth can remain in custody for up to six months; he cited Cook County Juvenile Detention Center as a best-practice model. A councilmember asked whether the funding was for one-time activities; Hopkins confirmed it was. The public hearing had no speakers.

  • Human Services Office Updates — DCAO Ms. Popovich. Popovich introduced Lamont Barnes as the new Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Gun Violence Prevention, described his previous work in violence prevention, juvenile behavioral health, and youth workforce development, and noted that the post-dispositional program recently visited the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C. She highlighted September as Library Card Month, a 35% increase in summer reading participation over four years with support from the Shea Berg Foundation, and the launch of the Central VA Resource Navigator website (centralvaresourcenavigator.org), a substance use and behavioral health resource hub developed with 1,500 hours of work by Monica Kelly and more than 130 organizations, in partnership with Henrico County and regional partners, during National Recovery Month. Acting Chair Jones praised the updates and introduced her liaison, Catherine Brown.

Key Outcomes

  • The July 9, 2026 EHS meeting minutes, held at 2 p.m., were approved as presented.
  • The committee approved a motion to recommend approval of Ordinance 2026-191; no vote tally was recorded in the transcript.
  • No key action items or follow-up items were recorded in the staff report.
  • Next steps for Richmond Thrives: first application windows close September 11, 2026; grantees announced in December; an initial summary report to council; and the mayor's FY28 budget in March would propose allocations to the four priority areas.
  • The next EHS committee meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2026, with anticipated updates on early childhood enrollment from the Office of Children and Families and homeless services strategic planning.

Meeting Transcript

All right, Madam Cleck, we'll bring this EHS meet into order. Madam Clerk, can you call the chamber emergency evacuation announcements? Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the north or south starewell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security would direct everyone down 9th Street to the fence area located between cleanly streets. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors exiting the building. Individuals wishing to speak during public hearings in the public comment period are generally allowed three minutes to speak. Persons appearing before the committee are not allowed to campaign for public office, promote private business ventures, use language of a personal nature, which insults or demeans any person, including comments directed at public officials or staff members that are not related to their official duties or address the question staff members directly. All questions are to be directed to the committee chair. Failure to adhere to the guidelines may result in speakers forfeiting any remaining time and further disciplinary action as necessary, which can include barring from attendance at future meetings of the community of a for a period of six months. And Madam Vice Chair, all members are in attendance today with the exception of Miss Lynch and you do have a quorum. Thank you. Can we do the public comment period? Public comment is now open. Is there anyone present who wishes to address this committee regarding items not on today's agenda? Madam Vice Chair seeing no one. Public comment period is now closed and back to the committee. All right, we move right on through this. Approval of the minutes. The minutes to be approved are for July 9th, 2026 for the education and human services standing committee meeting held at 2 p.m. If there are no amendments or corrections, then the minute the meeting minutes will stand approved as presented. Those minutes have been approved. Thank you. Thank you. We'll do well, let's keep it in the same order. So let's go to presentations. And we will have uh who's put oh miss okay, Mr. Dominic Barrett. Testing. Can I hear me? I'll do my best here. Let me know if I can't be uh heard. Good afternoon. Uh Vice Chair slash acting chair Jones, Councilmember Breton, Dominic Barrett, Senior Policy Advisor with the Office of the DCO for Human Services. Um I'm grateful for the invitation to be here today to provide an update on our new grant making process. Can you all hear me okay if I stand back from the mic a little bit like this? If it extends any further. Um I'm gonna do my best to keep this to 10 minutes. I'm gonna quickly walk through some background to frame things up, but I don't want to dwell on that since we've shared that information with council in a variety of settings and ways, both at presentations and in um emailed memos, but do want to make sure we're mindful of that context and then spend most of our time on sort of where we are in the process now and what to look forward to in the months ahead. Uh want to start by just reminding folks where this new grant process sort of sits and lives within the budget and where it exists relative to our other um items within the outside agency budget. So we have our organizational subsidy category, which is things like GRTC, RBHA, et cetera. We have our strategic city-driven initiatives, and these are these critical city identified city-directed services with a provider typically identified via a competitive process that's managed by the city. Um, and then we have what we're here to talk about today. Um, formally the non-departmental grant process, now called the Richmond Thrives Grant Program, managed by three outside grant makers delivering a competitive grant making process in those four priority areas there. This new process uh is the product of several years of feedback and engagement with council, the nonprofit community, the administration. This wasn't designed in a vacuum or overnight, um, and it's something that's been discussed with this committee off and on over the years. Uh we saw to identify a new process that meets this you know high standard of stewardship of taxpayer resources and dollars, but also wanting to do it in a way that's expanding access, um improving the experience for applicants, um, and increasing overall community impact as a key goal. Ultimately, as I've talked about before, we want a process that's rigorous but but reasonable. Um, and that's uh both increasing accountability but also increasing accessibility for our nonprofit partners.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com