OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Richmond, Virginia/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Organizational Development Standing Committee Meeting - November 2, 2026

City Council — Monday, November 2, 2026
BodyRichmond, Virginia
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, November 2, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:40:07

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

16:06

Members, if you will join on the day so we can get started.

16:21

Okay.

16:21

Good afternoon, everyone.

16:24

The organizational development standing committee of the Richmond City Council will now come to order.

16:30

Mr.

16:31

Clerk, if you will provide us with the chamber emergency evacuation announcement followed by the agenda announcement.

Speaker 2

16:40

Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building.

16:45

Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the north or south stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber.

16:53

Do not use elevators or escalators.

16:55

After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down 9th Street to the fenced area located between Clay and Lee Streets.

17:01

Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building.

17:06

And Madam Chair, all members of the committee are in attendance this afternoon except members Trammell, Abu Bacher, and Lynch, and you do have a quorum.

Speaker 1

17:14

Thank you.

17:15

Let's proceed with the agenda items, please.

17:31

Thank you.

17:32

At this time, we'll have a uh presentation by uh CRB manager Joseph Lowry.

17:46

Welcome, Mr.

17:47

Lowry.

Speaker 3

17:53

Thank you for having me.

17:55

I'm sorry, ma'am.

Speaker 1

18:00

No, I we're good to go.

Speaker 3

18:02

Oh, okay.

18:03

Well, thanks for having us.

18:04

But before we begin, I want to take a moment to reflect what this report uh represents for the Richmond Civilian Review Board.

18:11

Um as many of you know, establishing the CRB uh took uh a long time.

18:17

It was many years of community advocacy, um planning, collaboration, and before I got here, there was still a lot of work to be done for the CRB.

18:31

And in order for us to fulfill our mission.

18:33

So reaching that point took took a lot of patience, uh persistence, and a commitment of many people.

18:40

This report represents more than a summary of our first year.

18:43

It also documents the work that was done to build that foundation for civilian oversight in the city here.

18:53

Um it also talks about what we did as far as training, um, establishing the policies and procedures, and making sure that our work was accessible to the public.

19:03

Now we also realized that this is just the beginning.

19:07

So our first year provided a valuable experience for us.

19:11

Um helped us identify some areas in which we can improve as well as it raised some important questions to ensure that the board had the information and the resources to fulfill our responsibilities effectively.

Angela Fontaine · Speaker 4Inferred

20:08

Uh thank you for having me uh again.

20:10

My name is Angela Fontaine.

20:12

I am the chair of the Civilian Review Board.

20:14

Um, for those of you who were here prior to, I was also the chair of the task force of establishing the civilian review board.

20:21

Um let me get oriented with my clicker.

20:24

Okay, great.

Speaker 1

20:26

And welcome, thank you.

20:28

Thank you so

Unassigned speaker

20:28

much.

Speaker 1

20:30

Oops,

Angela Fontaine · Speaker 4Inferred

20:31

I pushed the wrong button.

Speaker 5

20:35

There we go.

Unassigned speaker

20:36

Over.

Angela Fontaine · Speaker 4Inferred

20:37

Um so to start us off, um the council created this board after years of community advocacy during the 2020 protests.

20:49

Uh this uh it was advocated for before beforehand, but that really got the ball rolling.

20:54

Um and this first year was about building the structure to do this work well, as with any organization.

21:00

Uh the first year is about uh establishing a foundation, um, aligning on uh our direction and making sure that we are reinforced to do this work well.

21:10

Um in our first year, we uh uh we have reviewed four cases.

21:16

Um four out of four of those cases uh we concurred with internal affairs findings.

21:23

Um and currently we have seven of the eight seats filled.

21:27

Um one member was uh removed per SOPs due to um attendance.

21:33

Um and we've really worked hard to be as accessible to the public as possible.

21:37

Um all of our meetings are virtual.

21:39

Uh we post them on YouTube and also try our best to have our meetings in uh in spaces that are accessible to members of the community.

21:49

Uh these are the members, the slide in front of you, the members of the board and what council districts that they represent.

21:56

Uh they're uh um one seat is vacant again due to the uh attendance requirements.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████61%
Civilian Review Board███████████████21%
Public Safety████████████16%
Legal Procedure█1%
Public Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Organizational Development Standing Committee Meeting - November 2, 2026

The Organizational Development Standing Committee of the Richmond City Council met on November 2, 2026, to hear the first-year report from the Civilian Review Board (CRB) and discuss upcoming changes to council rules and procedures. The committee also voted to enter a closed session for legal consultation.

Civilian Review Board First-Year Report

  • CRB Manager Joseph Lowry and Chair Angela Fontaine presented the board’s first annual report. The board reviewed four cases in its first year, all of which initially concurred with Internal Affairs (IA) findings; however, in October 2026, the board reached a non-concurrence for the first time, and the report on that case is being drafted. The board has seven of eight seats filled; one member was removed due to attendance requirements.
  • The board’s scope is limited to officer-involved shootings, deaths in custody, serious injuries in custody, and physical or verbal abuse complaints (the latter only if a complaint is filed). Verbal abuse is narrowly defined as identity-based slurs or sexual language, excluding threats or intimidation. The board found that only the “excessive force” category from IA maps closely to its physical abuse category, and it is working with RPD to align the classification systems.
  • The board expected to receive five to eight cases per month but received only four in the entire year, leading to concerns that the scope may be too narrow or that cases are not being referred properly. CRB Chair Fontaine noted that the board is on par with other civilian review boards in Virginia (e.g., Fairfax, Virginia Beach, Charlottesville) that review four to six cases annually, but also acknowledged the expectation mismatch.
  • The board is working with RPD to align complaint categories and improve data transparency. Councilmember Breton asked about the crosswalk of data between CRB and IA categories and offered council assistance if RPD cooperation lagged. Councilwoman Gibson emphasized the importance of transparency and noted that mandatory complaint review is needed to build trust; she asked whether a FOIA request could be used to obtain redacted complaint data and questioned why such data had not been provided. The CRB chair responded that the board is pursuing a collaborative approach with RPD and will escalate to council if needed.
  • A council member inquired about the definitions of review categories and the board’s relationship with RPD, and was informed that the categories are defined in the ordinance and changes would require council approval, and that an RPD liaison attends all board meetings.
  • Councilwoman Gibson and Councilman Breton expressed support for expanding the board’s scope and for policy changes to mandate greater transparency. The CRB chair stated that the board will bring proposed SOP amendments and possible ordinance changes to the council after the first of the year.

Council Rules and Procedures Update

  • Council Chief of Staff RJ Warren informed the committee that the council’s organizational meeting is scheduled for January 2027, at which rules of procedure are typically adopted. He is reviewing potential amendments, including administrative cleanups and a proposal to move regular council meetings from Mondays to Tuesdays to improve preparation time. Warren stated that the final decision rests with a majority of council.
  • Councilwoman Gibson raised concerns that moving meetings to Tuesdays could conflict with civic association meetings in her district, where 17 to 19 civic associations meet on Tuesdays, potentially limiting resident participation and her ability to attend. Councilmember Lynch indicated he had not yet submitted any proposed rule changes but planned to do so. Warren said he will provide a full list of proposed changes in November for review before the January meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • The committee voted unanimously (three ayes: Councilmember Breton, Vice Chair Jordan, and Chair Newbell) to enter a closed meeting pursuant to the Virginia Freedom of Information Act to consult with legal counsel regarding a joint petition by Dominion Energy Inc. and NextEra Energy Inc. pending before the State Corporation Commission. The closed session was held, and the committee later exited and adjourned.
  • No other formal votes were taken. The CRB committed to delivering SOP amendment recommendations to the council in early 2027.

Meeting Transcript

Members, if you will join on the day so we can get started. Okay. Good afternoon, everyone. The organizational development standing committee of the Richmond City Council will now come to order. Mr. Clerk, if you will provide us with the chamber emergency evacuation announcement followed by the agenda announcement. Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the north or south stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down 9th Street to the fenced area located between Clay and Lee Streets. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. And Madam Chair, all members of the committee are in attendance this afternoon except members Trammell, Abu Bacher, and Lynch, and you do have a quorum. Thank you. Let's proceed with the agenda items, please. Thank you. At this time, we'll have a uh presentation by uh CRB manager Joseph Lowry. Welcome, Mr. Lowry. Thank you for having me. I'm sorry, ma'am. No, I we're good to go. Oh, okay. Well, thanks for having us. But before we begin, I want to take a moment to reflect what this report uh represents for the Richmond Civilian Review Board. Um as many of you know, establishing the CRB uh took uh a long time. It was many years of community advocacy, um planning, collaboration, and before I got here, there was still a lot of work to be done for the CRB. And in order for us to fulfill our mission. So reaching that point took took a lot of patience, uh persistence, and a commitment of many people. This report represents more than a summary of our first year. It also documents the work that was done to build that foundation for civilian oversight in the city here. Um it also talks about what we did as far as training, um, establishing the policies and procedures, and making sure that our work was accessible to the public. Now we also realized that this is just the beginning. So our first year provided a valuable experience for us. Um helped us identify some areas in which we can improve as well as it raised some important questions to ensure that the board had the information and the resources to fulfill our responsibilities effectively. Uh thank you for having me uh again. My name is Angela Fontaine. I am the chair of the Civilian Review Board. Um, for those of you who were here prior to, I was also the chair of the task force of establishing the civilian review board. Um let me get oriented with my clicker. Okay, great. And welcome, thank you. Thank you so much. Oops, I pushed the wrong button. There we go. Over. Um so to start us off, um the council created this board after years of community advocacy during the 2020 protests. Uh this uh it was advocated for before beforehand, but that really got the ball rolling. Um and this first year was about building the structure to do this work well, as with any organization.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com