OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Riverton City Council Meeting – November 12, 2024

Meeting PortalTuesday, November 12, 2024
BodyRiverton, Utah
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, November 12, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:49:21

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

Okay, well, we'd like to call our work session meeting to order.

0:07

We have all of our elected officials present here today.

0:11

A number of things to discuss, so we'll start right away with item 5A.

0:17

This is an animal control discussion.

0:19

Kevin, we'll turn it over to you.

0:21

Yes, thank you, Mayor.

0:22

Um council, I've put together, or I shouldn't say I we, I mean, this has been a joint effort with uh uh myself, Jason Lethbridge, Craig Calvert, um, Chief Shane Taylor, um, and Nick Geere as we've been looking at the different options to now roll out the city animal shelter.

0:39

Uh, we've put together a presentation.

0:42

Um, the plan is to go through and just show you the different options that we've come up with, and then from there talk about some of the considerations that we need to think through.

0:51

Um, the hope is that we can have a good discussion and potentially have some direction from the council so that we can come back on December 3rd with a budget adjustment so we can get the ball rolling because we do need to move relatively quickly to get this thing up and running.

1:05

Um, so as we go through, the first thing I wanted to show you is uh just a little quick background of what has happened over the past seven years just to refresh everybody's mind.

1:15

We've uh about seven years ago we left Salt Lake Cannon, Salt Lake County Animal Services and decided to contract with Stone Ridge Veterinary Services for the shelter.

1:25

Um over that time frame, the city, when comparing with what we would have been paying through Salt Lake County, uh we have saved the city about 1.5 million dollars.

1:36

And you can see there it's estimated that each year it was about 240, 250 ish.

1:41

Some years was a little bit more, uh, depending on obviously um how everything panned out.

1:47

Um if we go to the next slide, um, jumping right in.

1:51

As I mentioned, I will move relatively quickly, jumping right into uh what it would look like for us to do our own animal shelter.

2:00

Uh the operating budget, we would be asking for one additional FTE.

2:05

Uh, that would be someone that would be more of a shelter technician that would help run the shelter.

2:10

Uh the intent is the adoption and placement services are gonna be overseen by the communications team so that they can help get everything on Facebook and also help market work, have some good relationships with the different uh uh animal rescues in the area so that we can uh keep the animals flowing through quickly.

2:28

Uh we would anticipate the first year's net expenditure, so that's after all of our revenues that we would be bringing in.

2:36

Uh, we would expect those to be about 355,000.

2:40

Um, do a little bit of comparison for you.

2:42

If we were to go to Salt Lake County Animal Services for this year, we'd be paying about 475.

2:47

And so we would still be enjoying the savings, even though we are looking at bringing this in-house fully now with the shelter.

2:54

Um, and for reference, so you can understand a little bit, Harriman Animal Control.

2:58

You can see there, they they spend about 440 per year.

3:02

Draper animal control spends about 414.

3:05

Um, the big issue though, as we know is going to be the startup costs.

3:09

Uh when we looked at the different startup costs, we did have five different options that came up.

3:15

When we were considering these options, we didn't look into purchasing land because obviously that would take some time and it'd be pretty pricey.

3:22

We looked at what options could we do with the land that the city currently has.

3:27

And then there is one rental option that we also are looking at as well.

3:31

Um I have confirmed with Stone Ridge.

3:34

They have graciously uh been accommodating to extend to June 30th.

3:39

So we have through the end of June of next year to um uh to uh um utilize Stone Ridge.

3:47

In the event that we can't get this stood up by July 1st, Harriman has also offered us some help as a temporary solution.

3:55

I just want to emphasize that's temporary.

3:57

That wouldn't be permanent, but it does give us that ample time.

4:00

Um, really, I I do this is a moment where I'll give give the mayor some props.

4:04

I think um Dr.

4:06

Cannon was very adamant that he wanted to help out and not leave us stranded.

4:10

I think the relationship that the mayor has with Dr.

4:12

Canyon has kind of helped alleviate that even with some of their concerns they've had.

4:16

He was very willing to say, no, I don't want to leave you hanging.

4:19

So I definitely want to publicly thank him as well for their willingness to um both Dr.

4:24

Can and Ann Marney.

4:26

Um so here are a quick overview of the different options, and we'll go through each of them individually.

4:31

Option A, and this is not really in any particular order, they just it's how they played out as we started coming up with some ideas.

4:38

Option A would be station 120.

4:40

We'll get into that in a moment.

4:41

Option B would be uh building a new shelter at the watershop land.

4:45

So we would just use the same land and put a shelter out there.

4:48

BA is kind of a unique one.

4:50

Um I'll get into the reasons why we had to separate that, but it would still be the same as option B in terms of a new shelter, but we would use the rot water reception area as the public facing part of the shelter.

5:01

You'll see why as we get into some of the details.

5:04

Option C would be building a new shelter at the Garamandi well site.

5:08

This is a well that's currently not being used and actually slated to be abandoned anyways in the current budget year.

5:14

And then option D is a little bit of a unique one.

5:17

This is actually what Harriman City is currently doing for their animal shelter, and that's what gave us the idea.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation███████████████████19%
Youth Programs█████████████13%
Animal Welfare██████████10%
Zoning Regulations████████8%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Public Safety██████6%
Procedural██████6%
Public Engagement█████5%
Elected Official Reports████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Riverton City Council Meeting – November 12, 2024

The Riverton City Council held a hybrid work session at 6:00 PM followed by a regular council meeting at 7:00 PM on November 12, 2024. The work session included discussions on animal control, fee schedule changes, and the youth council ordinance. The council meeting featured citizen comments, presentations, three public hearings, and action on several ordinances. Votes were taken on a development agreement (denied), accessory structure regulations (adopted with amendment), planning commission code changes (adopted), the youth council ordinance (adopted with amendments), and the false alarm code (adopted).

Consent Calendar

  • Approved unanimously: minutes from October 15, 2024; Resolution No. 24-95 (Performance Bond release for Crossman-Succo Subdivision); Resolution No. 24-96 (Warranty Bond release for Mountain Ridge West Phase 17); Resolution No. 24-97 (Performance Bond release for Mountain Ridge Phase 23); Resolution No. 24-98 (Performance Bond release for Mountain Ridge Phase 24); Resolution No. 24-99 (Declaring City Equipment as Surplus).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Bryce Isaacson (Riverton resident) requested an off-leash area for dogs at Margaret Park, citing mobility issues and the park's fencing. He proposed limited daily hours at no cost to the city.
  • Rebecca Ballard (Riverton resident) supported formalizing the Youth Council but urged moving elections from August to May to avoid conflicts with graduating seniors, and suggested peer voting or advisor interviews for officer selection.
  • Many residents spoke during the public hearing on Ordinance 24-21 (development agreement at 2682 West 13400 South). Over 20 individuals expressed opposition, citing safety concerns, traffic congestion, precedent for future high-density development on adjacent 80-acre property, preservation of small-town character, and property value impacts. The applicant, Dan McCay (Senator and developer), defended the project, citing traffic data and housing affordability needs. Councilmember McCay recused herself due to a conflict of interest.
  • One speaker (Jeremy Sorenson) supported Councilmember McCay’s position on the cargo container ordinance (Ordinance 24-22).

Discussion Items

  • Animal Control Shelter Options (Work Session): City Manager Kevin Hicks presented five options for a city-operated animal shelter. Options ranged from retrofitting Station 120 ($372,000) to building at the Water Shop land ($1.1M) or using the Water Reception Area ($645,000), the Garamandi Well site ($1.2M), or renting flex space ($313,000). Mayor Staggs favored the Water Shop with the reception area (Option BA). Councilmembers expressed support for Option BA, citing long-term cost savings and control. Councilmember Pierucci questioned cost-effectiveness given low animal numbers. Council agreed to bring a final decision to the December 3 meeting.
  • Fee Schedule Discussion (Work Session): Mayor Staggs reported that of nearly 400 fee line items, about 85 were eliminated, leaving ~300. Impact fees are under separate review. Council discussed false alarm fees; Hicks said fees are sufficient to discourage repeat offenses. The fee schedule will return for a public hearing on December 3.
  • Youth Council Ordinance (Work Session and Meeting): The draft ordinance formalizes the Youth Council, which operated informally for over 20 years. Hicks noted a 50-member cap is common in other cities. Councilmember McCay proposed raising the cap to 60 or 80. Councilmember McDougal supported the cap to manage logistics and quality. Citizen Ballard raised timing concerns. After discussion, the council adopted the ordinance with amendments: elections moved to May, terms from June to May, and officer appointment process determined by bylaws. The 50-member cap will take effect in May 2025. Vote: 4-1 (McCay dissenting).

Key Outcomes

  • Ordinance 24-21 (Development Agreement for 2682 West 13400 South): DENIED unanimously (4-0, with McCay recused) after public hearing and council debate. Motion by Councilmember McDougal, seconded by Pierucci. The property remains zoned R-3, allowing a single-family home with an accessory dwelling unit.
  • Ordinance 24-22 (Accessory Structures – Cargo Containers): ADOPTED with alternative amendment (staff recommendation) by a 4-1 vote (McCay dissenting). The amendment requires cargo containers to be encased with exterior materials consistent with accessory building standards, rather than the Planning Commission’s recommendation to allow painted containers with no additional cladding.
  • Ordinance 24-23 (Planning Commission Code Amendments): ADOPTED unanimously with a Council amendment to retain language allowing a concurring or dissenting report from commission members.
  • Ordinance 24-24 (Riverton City Youth Council): ADOPTED 4-1 (McCay dissenting) with amendments: election month changed from August to May, term end from September to June, officer titles listed, and appointment process left to bylaws. The 50-member cap goes into effect May 2025.
  • Ordinance 24-25 (City Alarm Code – False Alarm Fees): ADOPTED unanimously. The ordinance renumbers and amends administration fees and penalties related to false alarms.
  • Next Meeting: December 3, 2024 – Work Session & City Council Meeting (includes public hearing on fee schedule and final animal shelter decision).

Meeting Transcript

Okay, well, we'd like to call our work session meeting to order. We have all of our elected officials present here today. A number of things to discuss, so we'll start right away with item 5A. This is an animal control discussion. Kevin, we'll turn it over to you. Yes, thank you, Mayor. Um council, I've put together, or I shouldn't say I we, I mean, this has been a joint effort with uh uh myself, Jason Lethbridge, Craig Calvert, um, Chief Shane Taylor, um, and Nick Geere as we've been looking at the different options to now roll out the city animal shelter. Uh, we've put together a presentation. Um, the plan is to go through and just show you the different options that we've come up with, and then from there talk about some of the considerations that we need to think through. Um, the hope is that we can have a good discussion and potentially have some direction from the council so that we can come back on December 3rd with a budget adjustment so we can get the ball rolling because we do need to move relatively quickly to get this thing up and running. Um, so as we go through, the first thing I wanted to show you is uh just a little quick background of what has happened over the past seven years just to refresh everybody's mind. We've uh about seven years ago we left Salt Lake Cannon, Salt Lake County Animal Services and decided to contract with Stone Ridge Veterinary Services for the shelter. Um over that time frame, the city, when comparing with what we would have been paying through Salt Lake County, uh we have saved the city about 1.5 million dollars. And you can see there it's estimated that each year it was about 240, 250 ish. Some years was a little bit more, uh, depending on obviously um how everything panned out. Um if we go to the next slide, um, jumping right in. As I mentioned, I will move relatively quickly, jumping right into uh what it would look like for us to do our own animal shelter. Uh the operating budget, we would be asking for one additional FTE. Uh, that would be someone that would be more of a shelter technician that would help run the shelter. Uh the intent is the adoption and placement services are gonna be overseen by the communications team so that they can help get everything on Facebook and also help market work, have some good relationships with the different uh uh animal rescues in the area so that we can uh keep the animals flowing through quickly. Uh we would anticipate the first year's net expenditure, so that's after all of our revenues that we would be bringing in. Uh, we would expect those to be about 355,000. Um, do a little bit of comparison for you. If we were to go to Salt Lake County Animal Services for this year, we'd be paying about 475. And so we would still be enjoying the savings, even though we are looking at bringing this in-house fully now with the shelter. Um, and for reference, so you can understand a little bit, Harriman Animal Control. You can see there, they they spend about 440 per year. Draper animal control spends about 414. Um, the big issue though, as we know is going to be the startup costs. Uh when we looked at the different startup costs, we did have five different options that came up. When we were considering these options, we didn't look into purchasing land because obviously that would take some time and it'd be pretty pricey. We looked at what options could we do with the land that the city currently has. And then there is one rental option that we also are looking at as well. Um I have confirmed with Stone Ridge. They have graciously uh been accommodating to extend to June 30th. So we have through the end of June of next year to um uh to uh um utilize Stone Ridge. In the event that we can't get this stood up by July 1st, Harriman has also offered us some help as a temporary solution. I just want to emphasize that's temporary. That wouldn't be permanent, but it does give us that ample time. Um, really, I I do this is a moment where I'll give give the mayor some props. I think um Dr. Cannon was very adamant that he wanted to help out and not leave us stranded. I think the relationship that the mayor has with Dr. Canyon has kind of helped alleviate that even with some of their concerns they've had. He was very willing to say, no, I don't want to leave you hanging. So I definitely want to publicly thank him as well for their willingness to um both Dr. Can and Ann Marney. Um so here are a quick overview of the different options, and we'll go through each of them individually. Option A, and this is not really in any particular order, they just it's how they played out as we started coming up with some ideas. Option A would be station 120.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com