OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Riverton, Utah/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Riverton Planning Commission Meeting – May 8, 2025

Meeting Portal — Thursday, May 8, 2025
BodyRiverton, Utah
SessionMeeting Portal
DateThursday, May 8, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:34:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:08

And you have to go into the table where it'll space here.

0:16

Okay.

0:22

Just turn displays on control.

0:44

At least it's chair back.

0:51

When Chris comes on his name, you don't have to get it.

2:13

Yeah.

2:16

I just light scroll through it.

2:26

Slide show.

2:30

Slide show.

2:40

Is it just doing that itself?

2:44

So you can space barrow.

2:59

But it doesn't look like it doesn't go on or it does.

3:02

No.

3:14

I think so crazy.

3:16

There's all portions.

3:18

Yes.

3:18

And then I'm going to present twenty six and twenty-eight six.

3:23

But it's nice and swap that outside the whole right.

3:38

So if I came back today, one time part of the part of the shoulders and partial areas.

4:02

I don't know what any subject is.

4:25

So the issues are running franchise or regular ring range of things.

4:48

So then you go over the point of the mountain.

4:51

And you guys are getting a marriage more than each other ships.

5:02

So you can you draw the five mile circles of the far west side or stuff?

5:09

Um better hair and like themselves out to get the car to ships because they have no function.

5:19

So they take up something used to the ships or not um standard regulationship.

5:31

Yeah.

5:32

They won't make the request.

5:35

So these did you know about it from the four and uh off an idea?

5:43

No, I'm right over here.

5:45

So by the forward and um I've heard that onto it.

5:50

And then ship away to shut where it's a chip.

5:56

And some things might be a right across the road from each other.

5:59

I think our colours are out here.

6:01

Yeah.

6:08

Oh yeah.

6:09

Yeah.

6:10

We could have been drummers and don't fancy.

6:17

So they still are they still everywhere time?

6:20

No.

6:21

No.

6:26

Okay.

6:36

Yeah, um, yeah, I mean sound uh easily three way.

6:48

Really?

6:49

Yeah, we're gonna um look at me rehab for hospital.

6:55

Um shine and last time, so back to travel and very case.

7:26

They almost always ask.

7:29

They ask a lot.

7:30

Like when I work with West Valley, they asked for like they asked for an error a lot.

7:36

Well, I remember years ago when um Dan case down.

7:41

He was sponsoring some kind of legislation.

7:46

Businesses complaining, cities against each other.

7:49

Because he says it's real common that somebody knows carabin rivers and sound toward the left and they just don't be only cheaper circle.

8:02

And he also gave the examples and for Costco.

8:06

Could they give them years?

8:10

We should like lifetime Costco.

8:17

Infrastructure, all that leasing everything and the tax dollars had uh USM.

8:25

We just cannot do that if you uh community mean for the community to do it, or they want the parties.

8:42

Carol just said about holes in anything coming out.

8:50

Maybe you can put them all for it.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations████████████████████████████████████36%
Procedural███████████████████████████27%
Land Use Regulation███████████████████19%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████7%
Traffic Calming Measures████4%
Economic Development██2%
Fencing Regulation██2%
Public Safety██2%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Riverton Planning Commission Meeting – May 8, 2025

The Riverton City Planning Commission met at 6:30 PM on May 8, 2025, at City Hall (12830 S. Redwood Road). The agenda was reordered to hear two decision items first, followed by a public hearing on a rezone request. The commission approved final/detail plans for Mountain Ridge Phase 26A and 26B (93 residential units on 12.48 acres and a 2.4-acre road/park phase) and recommended approval of the Priority Builders Rezone (General Plan amendment and rezone to RM-8 on 4.28 acres) with conditions. The meeting adjourned at 7:54 PM.

Mountain Ridge Phase 26A & 26B (Decision Items)

  • Staff Presentation: City Planner Tim Prestwich presented the two phases concurrently. Phase 26A includes 89 townhomes and 4 single-family lots, a clubhouse, trails, and stormwater ponds. Phase 26B includes a public road (Greenford Lane) and stormwater ponds that will double as playing fields for a future park. Traffic mitigation islands on Sentinel Ridge Boulevard were required; one island must be installed before 30 units, and all others before occupancy. A wrought-iron fence along the canal was added as a condition after discussion.
  • Applicant Remarks: Brandon Watson of Edge Homes agreed to install the wrought-iron fence before occupancy and expressed excitement about starting the east side of Sentinel Ridge.
  • Votes: Both phases approved unanimously with conditions (9 conditions for 26A, 7 for 26B). The motions were made by Commissioner Cluff and seconded by Commissioner Keele.

Priority Builders Rezone (Public Hearing)

  • Staff Report: Scott Yermish of Priority Builders seeks a General Plan amendment to Medium-High Density Residential and a rezone from R-4, RR-22, and C-G to RM-8 (multifamily, up to 8 units/acre). The original RM-14 request was reduced to RM-8 after noticing. The property is near 11800 S. and Redwood Road, adjacent to existing townhomes. Staff determined the request is compatible with the area but noted typical RM-8 developments average about 7.2 units/acre.
  • Public Comments: Four speakers addressed the commission:
    • Ryan Clerico (outside 1,000-ft notice) noted loss of architectural standards and increased traffic.
    • Luke Sieverts (adjacent property) expressed concerns about flood insurance, density on buildable area, and traffic.
    • Shelley Sieverts (across the street) cited increased theft, safety issues, and already congested roads (Redwood Road and 11800 South).
    • Noah Dixon (adjacent east) emphasized safety, theft, and the need for lower density.
  • Commission Discussion: Topics included traffic impacts (right-in/right-out from Redwood Road due to UDOT restrictions), Midas Creek flood risks (Salt Lake County study for 100-year storm), and the possibility of a Special Development (SD) district to limit development to townhomes only. Chair Park arrived at 6:55 PM.
  • Applicant Response: Scott Yermish stated he will negotiate with the neighboring HOA for shared access to reduce traffic on 11800 South, and that Midas Creek solutions (bridge or storm drain) will be finalized after zoning is secured.
  • Motion and Vote: Commissioner Cannon moved to recommend approval of the General Plan amendment to Medium-High Density (5-8 dwelling units/acre) and rezone to RM-8, with the stipulation that a Special Development district be required to limit construction to townhomes only, and that Midas Creek improvements meet or exceed 100-year storm standards. Commissioner Rushton seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Minutes Approval

  • The commission approved the minutes of the April 24, 2025, meeting with a unanimous voice vote.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: Mountain Ridge Phase 26A Final Plan (PLZ-25-8001) with 9 conditions.
  • Approved: Mountain Ridge Phase 26B Final Plan (PLZ-25-8002) with 7 conditions.
  • Recommended Approval (to City Council): Priority Builders Rezone (PLZ-25-4004) with General Plan amendment, rezone to RM-8, and requirement for a Special Development district limiting development to townhomes. Additional condition for Midas Creek to meet 100-year storm standards.
  • Approved: Meeting minutes from April 24, 2025.

Meeting Transcript

And you have to go into the table where it'll space here. Okay. Just turn displays on control. At least it's chair back. When Chris comes on his name, you don't have to get it. Yeah. I just light scroll through it. Slide show. Slide show. Is it just doing that itself? So you can space barrow. But it doesn't look like it doesn't go on or it does. No. I think so crazy. There's all portions. Yes. And then I'm going to present twenty six and twenty-eight six. But it's nice and swap that outside the whole right. So if I came back today, one time part of the part of the shoulders and partial areas. I don't know what any subject is. So the issues are running franchise or regular ring range of things. So then you go over the point of the mountain. And you guys are getting a marriage more than each other ships. So you can you draw the five mile circles of the far west side or stuff? Um better hair and like themselves out to get the car to ships because they have no function. So they take up something used to the ships or not um standard regulationship. Yeah. They won't make the request. So these did you know about it from the four and uh off an idea? No, I'm right over here. So by the forward and um I've heard that onto it. And then ship away to shut where it's a chip. And some things might be a right across the road from each other. I think our colours are out here. Yeah. Oh yeah. Yeah. We could have been drummers and don't fancy. So they still are they still everywhere time? No. No. Okay. Yeah, um, yeah, I mean sound uh easily three way. Really? Yeah, we're gonna um look at me rehab for hospital. Um shine and last time, so back to travel and very case. They almost always ask. They ask a lot. Like when I work with West Valley, they asked for like they asked for an error a lot. Well, I remember years ago when um Dan case down.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com