OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Riverton City Council and Planning Commission Joint Work Session on General Plan Vision - June 3, 2026

Meeting PortalWednesday, June 3, 2026
BodyRiverton, Utah
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, June 3, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:45:51

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

I'll have a chance to kind of go on and say hello.

0:02

I noticed that a couple of you did Sunny College every day.

0:08

So welcome.

0:09

This is very exciting.

0:10

We've been talking about doing this since the first of January.

0:13

So it's great to have you all here.

0:14

And we hope to do this a couple more times.

0:17

I know it's a it's an inconvenient to the planning, which it's really out of your normal schedule, but I really appreciate being here.

0:25

We want this to be very, very free-flowing, but an opportunity for everyone to speak, um, which is why we're all gathered here around this table.

0:35

And I'm going to start and I'll start with number one.

0:38

When we get to number two, Jason's going to take over.

0:40

But it says, what is our overall vision for Ruinchild City going forward?

0:46

What are our strengths of the city and how can the general plan support constraints?

0:51

So I've shared this conversation before, but uh for me, I always look to South Jordan as our model.

0:58

Because I feel like they have a really strong general plan, and when you go down River Road in South Jordan, it feels like it has purpose.

1:06

And yet it still feels very nice, even though there's some identity along there, it it it has a sense of uh community, it has a sense of green, right?

1:17

There's parks and things, and I worry that Rimerton is headed in the direction of more of what West Jordan used to look like, just spotting this and that and the other thing.

1:29

And we really want to get our general plan to a place where it really communicates to our developers, to anyone, but this is what we want to have happen, and we're gonna stick to that.

1:39

And Councilmember McDougal's always been very good, very clear to emphasize we should create a general plan, and then we should stick to the general plan.

1:49

I've talked to South Jordan about how they've managed to accomplish that, and I think there's a couple of things they've done in summer one, they had a great vision back in 2000 about what they wanted it to look like, and they followed through on that vision.

2:02

And one way they've been able to do that is they've actually had interestingly enough, they've had two mayors, but their city council does not have a lot of turnover.

2:10

So they had a whole bunch of people buy in very early on about what they wanted to look like, and they they stuck to that general plan.

2:18

So I'm hoping we can get to a place that our general plan also looks very reasonable, very logical, is something that everybody wants to buy into going forward.

2:27

I mean, I already have that experience as mayor where uh developers come to see me, and of course, what they're hoping is I'm gonna go, yeah, that's just the odd that's just great.

2:36

That's what we want, and that they don't have to really consider our general plan because they've got something that's really just gonna fit so nicely with their plan.

2:45

And what we need to do is figure out what our plan is.

2:49

So with that, um I'm gonna say one more thing that I won't have to interrupt, but it was interesting for me.

2:55

So what Jason and Tim did is they scheduled a field trip for myself and drove me around to all the places that you've had the opportunity to go see and asked me how I felt about all of them.

3:07

And I thought that I was extremely clear about which ones I liked and which ones I didn't.

3:15

And when I came back and talked to Tim a couple of days later, he said, I am very confused about what you like mayor and what you don't want to do.

3:25

So I said, I I don't understand.

3:27

I I thought I was pretty clear, and I realized I really wasn't, because what I was thinking I was communicating was density.

3:34

Oh, I like six units per acre, oh I like eight units per acre.

3:38

But what I failed to really recognize within myself is that what I really liked was those developments regardless of density that had a sense of community about them, that had sidewalks throughout them.

3:52

I mean, you look at that windsler down there on Bangar next to the Bangalore Highway, but it has a sense of community about it because the homes face each other, they're all connected, um, and there's just a little bit of green space.

4:06

The ones I don't like are the ones that don't have that sense of community and don't have that sense of green space.

4:13

You know, and our favorite example is always of course the right homes up there off of 126, which are which are independent, well they're not independent units.

4:24

I can't remember what that zoning is, but there's no sense of connectedness to the different homes.

4:31

There's no sense of six.

4:33

Yeah, six.

4:36

But it does not have that sense of community, and then the sad, sorry little park they put in the middle doesn't help does it.

4:42

Yeah.

4:43

So with that introduction, I'm gonna turn over to Jason and thank him for all his hard work and getting us going.

4:49

Thanks, Mary.

4:50

And and really the purpose tonight is is to listen, but just kind of along with what the mayor said, and I if you'll forgive me for this, I don't mean it to get too deep, but um there's a a great scene in the the book and the movie Alice in Wonderland where she comes to a fork in the road, and the Cheshire Cat's sitting there and she says, Well, which fork should I take?

5:00

And I if you'll forgive me for this, I don't need it to get too deep, but uh there's a a great scene in the the book and the movie Alice in Wonderland where she comes to a fork in the road, and the Cheshire cat's sitting there and she says, Well, which fork should I take?

5:08

And the cat says, Well, where are you trying to go?

5:10

And she says, I I don't know.

5:11

And so he says, Well then it doesn't really matter, does it?

5:15

So part of this exercise and and part of what we're trying to accomplish with the general plan is as as the commission council, as we all know, it there's we've had a lot of questions about density, commercial residential, is it six, is it eight, is it fourteen, and and those are difficult questions.

5:33

But part of the answer to that really is what what are we trying to accomplish?

5:38

What what is the look and the feel as the mayor said, what what is it that we want to see in our city?

5:44

And so this first part, especially with uh kind of that list of sites that we that we gave, but we wanted to get some feedback from from all of you, commission and council, on the things that you like, dislike, the the feel of it, um, what were some of the things not just density, but but even looking beyond density and saying what do you feel like worked what didn't, and what do we want to take from that and and see in the city?

6:08

So with that, and I I also don't mean to imply that we've just been kind of going blind into all of our land use decisions.

6:16

We have denied.

6:18

But we are at a stage with our city with Redwood and 126 and elsewhere that that it's it's the right time to take a step back and say what what is it that we're looking for as far as not just multifamily but our our development and and the things that are important to us as a city.

6:34

So with that, sorry, this went off on its own.

6:37

Um with that uh that list of sites that we gave you, or any other uh you know, places you visited, or we really would just like to hear what are some of the things that you felt worked, what didn't work.

6:51

Um and sometimes that's easier to say these are the things we really didn't like and don't want to see again, wherever that will take you, I'll just open it up.

6:59

I've got Google Earth up on the screen, so if you want to say, hey, um, you know, this one that the mayor mentioned down on Bangar and Redwood, we can zoom in there.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████18%
Affordable Housing█████████████13%
Historic Preservation████████8%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Zoning Regulations█████5%
Parking Regulation███3%
Developer Relations██2%
Transportation Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Riverton City Council and Planning Commission Joint Work Session on General Plan Vision - June 3, 2026

This was a joint work session of the Riverton City Council and Planning Commission on June 3, 2026, to discuss the city's general plan update, development vision, and specific issues along Redwood Road and Sentinel Ridge. The meeting was facilitated by the Mayor and Councilmember Jason.

Discussion Items

General Plan Vision and Community Feel

  • The Mayor opened by emphasizing the need for a strong general plan, modeled after South Jordan, to guide development with a sense of community, green space, and connectivity. He noted that the city currently lacks a cohesive vision and that developers often push their own agenda.
  • Councilmember Jason used the Alice in Wonderland analogy to stress the importance of defining the city's goals before making land-use decisions.
  • Councilmember Elliot described biking to all sites and praised developments with bike access and community feel, while disliking cramped, poorly connected ones like the development behind Peterson's (20-foot streets, no community).
  • Councilmember Alex, who lives in a townhome, shared personal experience: his development has severe parking shortages (5 guest spots for 400 units), lack of community, but he is building equity. He highlighted the affordability crisis: median income in Riverton is $119,000, but income needed for a multifamily home is $130,391 and for a single-family home is $191,098. He advocated for a mix of affordable ownership options and warned against rental-only developments.
  • Councilmember Troy argued that density does not equal affordability, noting that developers do not pass savings to buyers. He pointed out that 3,000 units are already approved in the city, mostly high-density, and suggested a sunset law to force developers to build already-entitled units.
  • Discussion on parking: shallow driveways, small garages, and spillover parking into adjacent businesses. Council members emphasized the need for updated parking standards.
  • Several council members favored developments with a sense of community, such as the senior housing near 3600 W and the development on Bangetter/Redwood. Disliked developments included the "right homes off 126" (no connectedness) and the one behind Peterson's.

Redwood Road Corridor Vision

  • Discussion focused on the stretch from 12600 S to Bangetter Highway, particularly the east side where many small, odd-shaped parcels exist.
  • The Mayor noted that the east side was never properly zoned commercial, leading to a hodgepodge. The previous general plan walk-back to half-acre residential backfired, making it difficult to achieve cohesive development.
  • Councilmember Troy advocated for holding the line on density, saying the city's first obligation is to protect existing residents' property values. He opposed high-density (14 units/acre) along Redwood and favored a "step-down" zoning.
  • Councilmember Shelley suggested preserving older homes in front and using the deep rear lots for light commercial/industrial uses (e.g., landscapers) with strict aesthetic standards and maintenance requirements. This idea received support from several members.
  • Councilmember Gary (planning commissioner) supported the idea of keeping old homes as offices and developing behind, noting that many older homes have value and can be incorporated.
  • Councilmember Andy preferred commercial over high-density residential, but cautioned about traffic and advocated for a buffer between commercial and adjacent neighborhoods.
  • Councilmember Evan asked about state pressure for density; others assured that the city is protected and should make decisions based on local vision.
  • Consensus: Create a new zoning category for Redwood Road that allows low-intensity commercial and residential (e.g., office, small business, limited residential), but not high-density. The general plan should include visual examples to guide developers.

Sentinel Ridge Median and Traffic Mitigation

  • City Engineer Matt Castle presented the issue: The intersection of Sentinel Ridge and 13400 S is already failing due to the apartment complex (235 units). Options include traffic signal, roundabout, partial median, three-quarter median, or full median.
  • Signal is not preferred due to short spacing (899 feet) similar to the problematic Pasture Road/Bangetter intersection.
  • Roundabout was favored by the engineer and some council members, but not pursued due to right-of-way constraints and developer reluctance.
  • Councilmember Troy expressed strong preference for a roundabout to keep traffic flowing, calling it the only option that doesn't stop traffic.
  • Councilmember Elliott noted that 13400 S is already a weak link and that adding a signal could cause backups.
  • The discussion ended with a suggestion to go into closed session to discuss legal options to force a roundabout. No formal decision was made; the developer has drawn plans for a three-quarter median, but council may consider further action.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken.
  • Council and commission agreed to develop a new zoning category for Redwood Road, focusing on low-intensity mixed use with preservation of older homes and strict aesthetic standards.
  • City staff will incorporate the feedback into the general plan update, including visual examples.
  • The Sentinel Ridge issue will be discussed further in closed session regarding potential legal action to require a roundabout or other mitigation.
  • Additional work sessions will be scheduled to continue the general plan discussion.

Meeting Transcript

I'll have a chance to kind of go on and say hello. I noticed that a couple of you did Sunny College every day. So welcome. This is very exciting. We've been talking about doing this since the first of January. So it's great to have you all here. And we hope to do this a couple more times. I know it's a it's an inconvenient to the planning, which it's really out of your normal schedule, but I really appreciate being here. We want this to be very, very free-flowing, but an opportunity for everyone to speak, um, which is why we're all gathered here around this table. And I'm going to start and I'll start with number one. When we get to number two, Jason's going to take over. But it says, what is our overall vision for Ruinchild City going forward? What are our strengths of the city and how can the general plan support constraints? So I've shared this conversation before, but uh for me, I always look to South Jordan as our model. Because I feel like they have a really strong general plan, and when you go down River Road in South Jordan, it feels like it has purpose. And yet it still feels very nice, even though there's some identity along there, it it it has a sense of uh community, it has a sense of green, right? There's parks and things, and I worry that Rimerton is headed in the direction of more of what West Jordan used to look like, just spotting this and that and the other thing. And we really want to get our general plan to a place where it really communicates to our developers, to anyone, but this is what we want to have happen, and we're gonna stick to that. And Councilmember McDougal's always been very good, very clear to emphasize we should create a general plan, and then we should stick to the general plan. I've talked to South Jordan about how they've managed to accomplish that, and I think there's a couple of things they've done in summer one, they had a great vision back in 2000 about what they wanted it to look like, and they followed through on that vision. And one way they've been able to do that is they've actually had interestingly enough, they've had two mayors, but their city council does not have a lot of turnover. So they had a whole bunch of people buy in very early on about what they wanted to look like, and they they stuck to that general plan. So I'm hoping we can get to a place that our general plan also looks very reasonable, very logical, is something that everybody wants to buy into going forward. I mean, I already have that experience as mayor where uh developers come to see me, and of course, what they're hoping is I'm gonna go, yeah, that's just the odd that's just great. That's what we want, and that they don't have to really consider our general plan because they've got something that's really just gonna fit so nicely with their plan. And what we need to do is figure out what our plan is. So with that, um I'm gonna say one more thing that I won't have to interrupt, but it was interesting for me. So what Jason and Tim did is they scheduled a field trip for myself and drove me around to all the places that you've had the opportunity to go see and asked me how I felt about all of them. And I thought that I was extremely clear about which ones I liked and which ones I didn't. And when I came back and talked to Tim a couple of days later, he said, I am very confused about what you like mayor and what you don't want to do. So I said, I I don't understand. I I thought I was pretty clear, and I realized I really wasn't, because what I was thinking I was communicating was density. Oh, I like six units per acre, oh I like eight units per acre. But what I failed to really recognize within myself is that what I really liked was those developments regardless of density that had a sense of community about them, that had sidewalks throughout them. I mean, you look at that windsler down there on Bangar next to the Bangalore Highway, but it has a sense of community about it because the homes face each other, they're all connected, um, and there's just a little bit of green space. The ones I don't like are the ones that don't have that sense of community and don't have that sense of green space. You know, and our favorite example is always of course the right homes up there off of 126, which are which are independent, well they're not independent units. I can't remember what that zoning is, but there's no sense of connectedness to the different homes. There's no sense of six. Yeah, six. But it does not have that sense of community, and then the sad, sorry little park they put in the middle doesn't help does it. Yeah. So with that introduction, I'm gonna turn over to Jason and thank him for all his hard work and getting us going. Thanks, Mary. And and really the purpose tonight is is to listen, but just kind of along with what the mayor said, and I if you'll forgive me for this, I don't mean it to get too deep, but um there's a a great scene in the the book and the movie Alice in Wonderland where she comes to a fork in the road, and the Cheshire Cat's sitting there and she says, Well, which fork should I take? And I if you'll forgive me for this, I don't need it to get too deep, but uh there's a a great scene in the the book and the movie Alice in Wonderland where she comes to a fork in the road, and the Cheshire cat's sitting there and she says, Well, which fork should I take? And the cat says, Well, where are you trying to go? And she says, I I don't know. And so he says, Well then it doesn't really matter, does it? So part of this exercise and and part of what we're trying to accomplish with the general plan is as as the commission council, as we all know, it there's we've had a lot of questions about density, commercial residential, is it six, is it eight, is it fourteen, and and those are difficult questions.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com