OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Riverton, Utah/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Riverton Law Enforcement Service Area Board Meeting - October 20, 2026

Meeting Portal — Tuesday, October 20, 2026
BodyRiverton, Utah
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, October 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 56:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:04

We're ready to begin.

0:10

Thank you for coming.

Speaker 2

0:22

Yeah.

Speaker 1

0:32

Okay.

0:33

Our final meeting of the night.

0:35

Call it to order.

0:37

And we will start with minute approval.

0:48

Don't we need a motion?

0:50

Move to approve.

0:52

Thank you, Councilmember.

Speaker 3

0:54

Councilmember

Speaker 1

0:55

Johnson.

Unassigned speaker

0:56

You

Speaker 3

0:57

second it?

0:57

Yep.

Speaker 1

0:58

Okay.

0:58

All in favor, please.

1:01

Thank you very much.

1:02

We will now move to item two B, the long range plan for police operations.

1:08

Mr.

1:08

Geer.

Speaker 4

1:21

Thank you, mayor, council, or you know, board members, as we are in a

Speaker 5

1:25

different

Speaker 4

1:25

meeting.

1:26

So it's always I just have to remember that we talk as though we're we're board members for this.

Unassigned speaker

1:34

A

Speaker 4

1:34

few weeks back, we started to have conversations about our long-range plan for the city.

1:40

Um we're now having kind of a similar meeting, but for our Riverton law enforcement service area.

1:46

Okay.

1:47

I want to take just a minute to remind us what the long range plan is and what it is not.

1:53

The long range plan is not a budget, right?

1:56

This is a tool that is helping that is meant to help us try to predict the future.

2:01

And I say try, I don't have a crystal ball to tell you exactly what's going to happen one year, two year, three years, four years, five years.

2:08

But what we do is we try to make assumptions.

2:10

We try to look at history and we try to make estimates about what that's going to be.

2:14

The biggest takeaway that I hope more than anything is we have this discussion tonight, is that we have a discussion about the long-term health and and long-term goals and plans of our law enforcement service area.

2:31

That's the purpose of this discussion and the purpose of what we want to accomplish today.

2:37

This slide is a slide that you guys have seen in different ways, shapes, and forms for every one of the presentations I've done so far.

2:44

And it's very similar, but this one's probably very starkly different than some of the others, where it's very clear our revenues and our even our transfers in don't quite equate to what we're doing for operating expenditures and capital outlay.

2:59

And over time it kind of gets worse, right?

3:04

Same graphic in a different way.

3:06

This just shows how the fund balance is projected to end over the next five years, which is we we know is going to be going a little bit farther down the hole.

3:15

Councilman Pucci, sorry, does that.

Unassigned speaker

3:17

Yeah, sorry.

Speaker 5

3:18

Yeah, please hit me.

3:21

Are these projections based upon if we fund everything that's been recommended in the long term?

3:26

Okay, I just wanted to.

3:27

It

Speaker 4

3:27

is based upon that and is based on a few other things, such as no change to revenue, and no additional general fund assistance outside of paying for animal control.

Speaker 5

3:39

Those are good those and all of the hiring, all of the vehicles, all of the.

Speaker 4

3:43

All of that is included.

Speaker 5

3:44

This is just to show us because again, that's what the long-range

Speaker 4

3:46

plan is, right?

3:47

Yeah.

3:48

Yeah.

3:48

Great question.

3:49

Thank you for that clarification, council member.

Speaker 6

3:52

Councilmember Smith, do you have a question?

3:54

I just didn't turn it off from at the end last time.

3:57

Sorry.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Fiscal Sustainability███████████████████████████████31%
Property Tax Education██████████████14%
Procedural██████████10%
Public Infrastructure District███3%
Budget Equity Analysis█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Riverton Law Enforcement Service Area Board Meeting Summary - October 20, 2026

The Riverton Law Enforcement Service Area Board met on October 20, 2026, at 12830 South Redwood Road, Riverton, UT. The meeting began at 7:30 PM and focused on approving prior meeting minutes and discussing the long-range financial plan for police operations. Key topics included the projected deficit, potential property tax increases, and the level of general fund subsidy for the police department.

Consent Calendar

  • Minute Approval (June 16, 2026): The board unanimously approved the minutes from the previous meeting on June 16, 2026. Motion by Councilmember Johnson, seconded, with all in favor.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were made during the meeting.

Discussion Items

  • Long Range Plan for Police Operations: Nick Geer, Administrative Services Director, presented the long-range financial plan for the Riverton Law Enforcement Service Area (RLESA). He emphasized that the plan is a forecasting tool, not a budget, and is intended to guide long-term goals.
    • Financial Outlook: The presentation showed that projected revenues and transfers are insufficient to cover operating expenditures and capital outlay, with fund balance declining over the next five years. In fiscal year 2027, the general fund is transferring approximately $1.12 million, which includes about $275,000–$280,000 for animal control and an estimated $800,000 subsidy for police operations. Without changes, the deficit is expected to worsen, with a projected shortfall of about $4.0 million if all requested items are funded, the general fund subsidy is eliminated, and a 5% fund balance is maintained.
    • Staffing and Costs: 85–90% of the police budget is wages and salaries. New requests include additional personnel (e.g., a shelter technician, corporals, sergeants) and capital purchases (e.g., a bear cat).
    • Property Tax Options: Geer presented estimates for potential property tax increases. If the board funded all requests, eliminated the general fund subsidy, and maintained a 5% fund balance, the needed additional revenue would be approximately $4.0 million, equating to a 58.15% increase in the property tax rate. The projected city rate without increase is 0.0010125, compared to the current SLVESA rate of 0.0016013. For residents, the monthly impact would vary; for example, a home valued at $500k would see an increase of about $25 per month under the highest scenario.
    • Board Discussion: Councilmembers debated the philosophy of police operations standing alone versus receiving general fund subsidies. Some advocated for each fund to be self-sufficient, while others supported a gradual approach due to the burden on residents, noting other potential tax increases from Salt Lake County, school districts, and other entities. Councilmember Perucci requested options for different funding paths, including smaller annual increases versus larger lump sums. Councilmember Heyman emphasized the importance of messaging to residents about the savings achieved since forming RLESA (an estimated $36.7 million compared to staying with SLVESA) and the value of police services. Councilmember Johnson asked for a comprehensive view of shortfalls across all city funds before police-specific decisions. Councilmember Smith requested more detailed information to feel confident in voting.
    • Future Meetings: The board agreed to continue this discussion in November, inviting the police chief to address staffing levels, operational needs, and animal shelter data. Additional work sessions are scheduled for November 17 and December 15, starting at 4 PM.

Key Outcomes

  • Next Steps: The board directed staff to prepare detailed funding scenarios (e.g., high-end, moderate, and no-change options) and to provide a comprehensive view of all city funds' shortfalls. Councilmember Perucci requested line-item budget details for each department before property tax decisions are made. City staff acknowledged the request but noted that the prior detailed budget book was labor-intensive and that the new system may not easily reproduce it; they will work to find a solution.
  • Adjournment: Councilmember McDougall moved to adjourn, seconded by Councilmember Heyman. The motion passed unanimously, and the meeting adjourned at approximately 9:20 PM.

Meeting Transcript

We're ready to begin. Thank you for coming. Yeah. Okay. Our final meeting of the night. Call it to order. And we will start with minute approval. Don't we need a motion? Move to approve. Thank you, Councilmember. Councilmember Johnson. You second it? Yep. Okay. All in favor, please. Thank you very much. We will now move to item two B, the long range plan for police operations. Mr. Geer. Thank you, mayor, council, or you know, board members, as we are in a different meeting. So it's always I just have to remember that we talk as though we're we're board members for this. A few weeks back, we started to have conversations about our long-range plan for the city. Um we're now having kind of a similar meeting, but for our Riverton law enforcement service area. Okay. I want to take just a minute to remind us what the long range plan is and what it is not. The long range plan is not a budget, right? This is a tool that is helping that is meant to help us try to predict the future. And I say try, I don't have a crystal ball to tell you exactly what's going to happen one year, two year, three years, four years, five years. But what we do is we try to make assumptions. We try to look at history and we try to make estimates about what that's going to be. The biggest takeaway that I hope more than anything is we have this discussion tonight, is that we have a discussion about the long-term health and and long-term goals and plans of our law enforcement service area. That's the purpose of this discussion and the purpose of what we want to accomplish today. This slide is a slide that you guys have seen in different ways, shapes, and forms for every one of the presentations I've done so far. And it's very similar, but this one's probably very starkly different than some of the others, where it's very clear our revenues and our even our transfers in don't quite equate to what we're doing for operating expenditures and capital outlay. And over time it kind of gets worse, right? Same graphic in a different way. This just shows how the fund balance is projected to end over the next five years, which is we we know is going to be going a little bit farther down the hole. Councilman Pucci, sorry, does that. Yeah, sorry. Yeah, please hit me. Are these projections based upon if we fund everything that's been recommended in the long term? Okay, I just wanted to. It is based upon that and is based on a few other things, such as no change to revenue, and no additional general fund assistance outside of paying for animal control. Those are good those and all of the hiring, all of the vehicles, all of the.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com