OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rochester EDA Meeting May 19, 2025: Citywalk Apartments TIF Plan Approved

City CouncilMonday, May 19, 2025
BodyRochester, Minnesota
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, May 19, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Seconded by council member Fredericks.

0:02

All in favor say aye.

0:03

Aye.

0:04

Any opposed say nay.

0:05

The motion carries.

0:06

Uh I'll now call to order the uh Rochester Economic Development Authority meeting for May 19th, 2025.

0:16

And uh our first item is to approve the consent agenda.

0:22

Is there a motion?

0:24

Uh it's moved moved by council member Wall, seconded by Councilmember Fredericks.

0:29

All in favor say aye.

0:30

Aye.

0:31

Any uh opposed, say nay.

0:34

Uh motion passes.

0:36

We have one public hearing on our uh agenda.

0:40

It is the economic development plan and tax increment financing plan for citywalk apartments, and I believe Mr.

0:49

Johnson, you will be presenting this item.

0:52

Yeah, thank you, President Schubert and Council members.

0:54

Um tonight before us we have a public hearing uh and a request to uh approve an economic development plan for economic development district number eighty five and a tax increment financing plan for the redevelopment tax increment financing district number eighty five one.

1:08

Um so this project consists of five parcels located at the uh intersection and corner of 2nd Street Southwest and Sixth Avenue Southwest.

1:18

Uh the project proposal is a 13-story 340 unit uh highly amenitized uh and high density housing.

1:26

Uh I think when we're looking for density of housing, this location makes a ton of sense.

1:32

It's obviously across the intersection from where Mayo's bold forward on bound projects expanding to.

1:37

Uh it's also about 60 yards away from where there's going to be a future high frequency transit uh station uh right across the street.

1:46

Um other benefits of the project is uh the site currently houses some very underutilized and some vacant uh buildings.

1:55

Um in order for us to um request a redevelopment district, the owner had to uh conduct a blight study.

2:03

Uh the study considered all of the current structures on the building to be structurally substandard.

2:08

So this is revitalizing that corner, uh, bringing it to a much higher and better use.

2:12

Um we've spent a considerable amount of time this evening talking about intersections.

2:16

One of the other benefits of this project is it is going to improve this intersection.

2:20

Right now, when you turn south going on Sixth Avenue, you enter sort of a blind uh merge into that lane where you have to look backwards to see uh if there's traffic coming.

2:30

Uh so we'll improve the safety uh vehicular safety as well as the pedestrian safety uh by making access going north across 2nd Street or east across 6th Avenue more uh safe for pedestrians.

2:43

Um the other, I think unique facet or creative facet of this project is we know that we need more housing.

2:51

Uh we know we need both market rate housing, but we also need affordable housing.

2:54

Uh in order to make the numbers work on this project, it was really, really difficult because it's on thin margins already to incorporate affordable housing into the 340 units.

3:02

So what we did is we worked with the current owner of those sites.

3:05

Uh he happens to also own an apartment complex to the east and apartment complex directly to the south.

3:10

So through the negotiations, we actually uh came to terms in an agreement to put those what are now naturally occurring affordable housing into the county's 4D program, which ensures affordability for the next 20 years.

3:23

So there'll be two two cycles of 10-year renewal cycles uh into the county's program.

3:29

Um when I was looking uh through the Maxfield study, um, it indicated the vulnerable vulnerable vulnerability of naturally occurring affordable housing, especially in areas like this that are receiving or seeing economic revitalization with Mayo's uh project with infrastructure improvements and the Link Rapid Transit project.

3:47

So it's only gonna be more difficult to have affordable housing along this corridor.

3:52

So uh what Maxfield said is many of these older developments are vulnerable to redevelopment due to their age, modest rents, and deferred maintenance.

3:59

So I them um committing to a 20-year process uh that gives us uh a longer ownership horizon and incentivizes more um uh more updates and and and more investment into those properties long term.

4:15

Um other things that I want to mention is we often talk about TIFF project and development projects, and I think we we we feel like they they're occurring much more rapidly than they maybe are.

4:26

Uh so also in the Maxfield study it said that 74% of the market rate rental development in the DMC area occurred during the last decade.

4:33

So there's actually been no new development of market rate units uh that has happened since 2020.

4:38

Um the exception to that would be um uh the former YMCA development, but that's not fully constructed yet, so those units haven't come online.

4:47

Um the only other project that we approved was a mixed income project, that would be the BRIC, uh, which uh that development assistance uh was approved in 2021.

5:00

Um a couple of other just TIFF related items since it's been a while since we've uh you know re-looked at where we're currently standing with TIFF.

5:06

So our current percentage of TIFF compared to our overall tax capacity in 2024 was four and a half percent.

5:13

Uh we pulled nine other comparable cities, some of them are cities in comparable size, some of them are just cities more located proximity to Rochester.

5:23

Um the average over a five year span of of those nine municipalities was 4.5%.

5:29

So we're right in the you know mid range of uh of other municipalities.

5:34

Um they also range from one percent from St.

5:37

Cloud percentage of tax capacity all the way up to about 11% for St.

5:40

Louis Park.

5:41

So I'd say we we we're still in a very healthy spot in terms of our overall TIFF commitment.

5:46

Um another fact that I just want to touch on really quick and then we'll open it up to the public hearing, is that uh we did look and we have we anticipate seven TIFF projects to come in line in about the next three years or in about three years, and that'll be about the time that if this TIFF district is approved that we're actually will actually be collecting increment on Citywalk.

6:07

Um and those seven TIFF projects would account for about 103 million dollars in total market value.

6:13

So in about three years, we'll be decertifying uh seven projects with a value of about 130 million dollars.

6:20

So I think that's another um key point to add.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Tax Increment Financing█████████████████████████████████████████████70%
Affordable Housing██████████16%
Public Works████6%
Public Engagement███4%
Procedural███4%
Summary of Proceedings

Rochester Economic Development Authority Meeting - May 19, 2025

The Rochester Economic Development Authority (EDA) met on May 19, 2025, following the regular City Council meeting. The primary agenda item was a public hearing and vote on an Economic Development Plan and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan for the Citywalk Apartments project, a 13-story, 340-unit high-density market-rate housing development at the corner of 2nd Street SW and 6th Avenue SW. The meeting also included approval of the consent agenda and a brief update on a separate development agreement with Sherman Associates.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The EDA unanimously approved the minutes of the February 19, 2025, meeting. Motion by Councilmember Wall, seconded by Councilmember Fredericks.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public spoke during the public hearing. The hearing was opened and closed with no testimony.

Discussion Items

Citywalk Apartments TIF Plan (Public Hearing)

  • Presentation: Economic Development Director Josh Johnson presented the request for an Economic Development District No. 85 and Redevelopment TIF District No. 85-1 for the Citywalk Apartments. The project involves five parcels at the intersection of 2nd Street SW and 6th Avenue SW. The site currently contains underutilized and vacant buildings deemed structurally substandard by a blight study. The proposed 13-story building will include 340 units: 250 market-rate apartments and 90 short-term rental units, with 264 structured underground parking stalls. Estimated project value is $86 million, generating approximately $1.3 million in annual property taxes after the TIF period. The developer, Justin Fincher of Reuter Walton, plans to break ground by late 2025 or early 2026 with a 24-month construction timeline.
  • Affordable Housing Component: As part of the project, the developer's partner (the current landowner) will place 76 units from two adjacent apartment buildings (west and south of the site) into the county’s 4D affordable housing program for 20 years (two 10-year renewal cycles). These units are not within the TIF district but are part of a separate development agreement tied to the project.
  • Council Questions & Concerns:
    • Councilmember Palmer questioned the parking ratio (264 spaces). Fincher stated that lenders require that level of parking for market-rate projects, and that the project originally had fewer spaces.
    • Councilmember Keene expressed skepticism about the “but-for” test (that the project would not happen without TIF) and requested a robust independent financial analysis from Baker Tilly at the next stage. He also noted confusion about combining naturally occurring affordable housing with a government program.
    • Councilmember Wall supported the project but voiced broader concern about the frequency of TIF use. Johnson noted that seven TIF projects (valued at $103 million) are expected to decertify within three years, and that Rochester’s TIF-to-tax-capacity ratio (4.5%) matches peer city averages.
    • Councilmember Doring inquired about prior subsidies: the project had already received a $500,000 DMC Main Street grant for intersection and public realm improvements. She also stressed that the two affordable housing buildings need deferred maintenance addressed, and Johnson confirmed that discussions are ongoing.
    • Councilmember Miller asked about the building’s useful life (estimated well over 50 years) and the long-term economic benefit of foregone taxes. Administrator Steinhauser clarified that TIF is “last money in” after extensive legal and financial vetting, and that the city’s revised TIF policy provides clear guidelines for 15-, 20-, and 25-year terms. The 25-year term is justified by the inclusion of the affordable housing component.
  • Other Stats: Johnson provided context: no new market-rate rental housing has opened in the DMC area since 2020; Maxfield study shows a shortage of 3,336 market-rate units over the next decade; the seven soon-to-decertify TIF projects will free up $103 million in tax base.

Key Outcomes

  • Adoption of Resolution: The EDA unanimously approved the resolution adopting the Economic Development Plan for District No. 85 and the TIF Plan for District No. 85-1 for the Citywalk Apartments. Motion by Councilmember Keene, seconded by Councilmember Palmer. The vote was 7-0 (all present in favor).
  • Next Steps: The project will return for a separate Development Assistance Agreement, which will include further financial analysis. The affordable housing component will be secured through a separate agreement with the owner of the adjacent buildings.
  • Other Business: Councilmember Palmer asked about the Sherman Associates development agreement, which expires June 30, 2025. Staff confirmed that if no deal is reached by then, the agreement terminates. No further action was taken.
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned by motion of Councilmember Miller, seconded by Councilmember Palmer.

Meeting Transcript

Seconded by council member Fredericks. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed say nay. The motion carries. Uh I'll now call to order the uh Rochester Economic Development Authority meeting for May 19th, 2025. And uh our first item is to approve the consent agenda. Is there a motion? Uh it's moved moved by council member Wall, seconded by Councilmember Fredericks. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any uh opposed, say nay. Uh motion passes. We have one public hearing on our uh agenda. It is the economic development plan and tax increment financing plan for citywalk apartments, and I believe Mr. Johnson, you will be presenting this item. Yeah, thank you, President Schubert and Council members. Um tonight before us we have a public hearing uh and a request to uh approve an economic development plan for economic development district number eighty five and a tax increment financing plan for the redevelopment tax increment financing district number eighty five one. Um so this project consists of five parcels located at the uh intersection and corner of 2nd Street Southwest and Sixth Avenue Southwest. Uh the project proposal is a 13-story 340 unit uh highly amenitized uh and high density housing. Uh I think when we're looking for density of housing, this location makes a ton of sense. It's obviously across the intersection from where Mayo's bold forward on bound projects expanding to. Uh it's also about 60 yards away from where there's going to be a future high frequency transit uh station uh right across the street. Um other benefits of the project is uh the site currently houses some very underutilized and some vacant uh buildings. Um in order for us to um request a redevelopment district, the owner had to uh conduct a blight study. Uh the study considered all of the current structures on the building to be structurally substandard. So this is revitalizing that corner, uh, bringing it to a much higher and better use. Um we've spent a considerable amount of time this evening talking about intersections. One of the other benefits of this project is it is going to improve this intersection. Right now, when you turn south going on Sixth Avenue, you enter sort of a blind uh merge into that lane where you have to look backwards to see uh if there's traffic coming. Uh so we'll improve the safety uh vehicular safety as well as the pedestrian safety uh by making access going north across 2nd Street or east across 6th Avenue more uh safe for pedestrians. Um the other, I think unique facet or creative facet of this project is we know that we need more housing. Uh we know we need both market rate housing, but we also need affordable housing. Uh in order to make the numbers work on this project, it was really, really difficult because it's on thin margins already to incorporate affordable housing into the 340 units. So what we did is we worked with the current owner of those sites. Uh he happens to also own an apartment complex to the east and apartment complex directly to the south. So through the negotiations, we actually uh came to terms in an agreement to put those what are now naturally occurring affordable housing into the county's 4D program, which ensures affordability for the next 20 years. So there'll be two two cycles of 10-year renewal cycles uh into the county's program. Um when I was looking uh through the Maxfield study, um, it indicated the vulnerable vulnerable vulnerability of naturally occurring affordable housing, especially in areas like this that are receiving or seeing economic revitalization with Mayo's uh project with infrastructure improvements and the Link Rapid Transit project. So it's only gonna be more difficult to have affordable housing along this corridor. So uh what Maxfield said is many of these older developments are vulnerable to redevelopment due to their age, modest rents, and deferred maintenance. So I them um committing to a 20-year process uh that gives us uh a longer ownership horizon and incentivizes more um uh more updates and and and more investment into those properties long term. Um other things that I want to mention is we often talk about TIFF project and development projects, and I think we we we feel like they they're occurring much more rapidly than they maybe are. Uh so also in the Maxfield study it said that 74% of the market rate rental development in the DMC area occurred during the last decade. So there's actually been no new development of market rate units uh that has happened since 2020. Um the exception to that would be um uh the former YMCA development, but that's not fully constructed yet, so those units haven't come online. Um the only other project that we approved was a mixed income project, that would be the BRIC, uh, which uh that development assistance uh was approved in 2021. Um a couple of other just TIFF related items since it's been a while since we've uh you know re-looked at where we're currently standing with TIFF. So our current percentage of TIFF compared to our overall tax capacity in 2024 was four and a half percent. Uh we pulled nine other comparable cities, some of them are cities in comparable size, some of them are just cities more located proximity to Rochester.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com