OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rochester City Council Study Session on 2026-2027 Operating Budget - September 4, 2025

City CouncilThursday, September 4, 2025
BodyRochester, Minnesota
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, September 4, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:56:12

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Eight weeks is it approximately.

0:04

And as the council chamber is uh is being renovated with state-of-the-art equipment.

0:11

So we're excited to be here and excited about uh things to come there.

0:17

So uh this uh setup just for my colleagues, this is the setup that we will use for our regular council meetings.

0:26

Uh if uh we have future study sessions, we uh may have a little more informal uh setup, but we wanted folks to kind of get used to the uh the council regular council meetings set up.

0:43

So uh if you have any suggestions for tweaking it, let our city administrator know or or Aaron.

0:56

Uh uh with that, uh we are here today to continue our discussion of our 2026, 2027 budget presentation.

1:10

So uh administrator Zelms, uh take it away.

1:14

All right, thank you, Council President, Council members Mayor Norton, members of mostly uh staff of the organization and community.

1:22

Um, I am just gonna kick off with a little bit of a brief reminder of um what we started with in the initial study session, as there might be people watching that um weren't part of that.

1:31

And for anyone that's presenting after me, you need to point the clicker this way.

1:34

So a little dancer.

1:37

Um so it's moved twice.

1:41

Um, so just starting off with this.

1:43

Um, we have adopted the new strategic priorities and um adjusted foundational principles.

1:49

And so when I'm thinking about the budget, um, first those foundational principles, we do a lot of things at the city that are continuation, and then how we layer on top of that the strategic priorities and balance the foundational principles becomes a little bit of dynamic tension when we're in the budget process because there are things that we need to continue to do year after year, and then there are ways that we can layer on top of that.

2:11

But of course, we also have this foundational principle of fiscal responsibility and sustainability.

2:16

Um, and that's probably where most of the dynamic tension comes in when we're looking at the budget.

2:21

Um, obviously, we've been working on this, and um the team here in the audience has been and and at tables have been working on this for quite a long time to bring you a two-year budget.

2:31

Um, and we are in this September phase of answering questions, and that's really what we're here to do today is to respond to some of um more deeper questions that had come up on the first uh study session conversation, and so be thinking about um if there's additional questions, we do have some things scheduled for you at your next study session as well, um, in order to be able to make good use of the time.

2:56

So, as a reminder, we're still sitting um with this uh tax rate um below 50% of our net tax capacity rate.

3:03

Um, that's been true for most of the last 10 years.

3:06

There's a few years there in the 2018 to 20 uh 20 time frame where we were bumping a little bit above the 50% net tax capacity rate level.

3:14

Um, but again, with some of the growth, both in valuation and new construction happening in the city, um, we are able to absorb some of these increases in cost and investment in uh community services through both the new construction growth and valuation adjustment.

3:30

And that's the biggest way that someone's tax bill is going to change year over year is based on the proportionality of the value of their home or the value of their commercial retail business versus all of the rest of the uh properties that are in that category, and then the larger piece of all of the property that is within the city limits of Rochester.

3:49

So just important to point out um as you can see, the increase in total levy year over year is just shy of 6.6 million dollars.

3:58

That's a pretty low number as um as the tax levy goes year over year over the last few years.

4:03

Um, and the team worked really hard to keep that as low as possible, um, bringing it down from about 10.68% in your final um levy that was projected at the end of 2024.

4:14

Uh, we also have some rate adjustments in sewer, electric, and water that we discussed, and as you can see, the total budget adds up to um just about six hundred and sixty-four million dollars in 2026 and 630, about 636 million in 2027.

4:32

There's some vacillations in the debt service in the capital improvement program when we're finishing a very large capital project and all of those expenses are hitting in one year, that can make some pretty um large changes in the total budget overall operations, as you can see in the gray um square uh to the left of that chart does uh increase, but it decreases again when you get into that 2027 year.

4:56

So some changes happening there across the entire book of business of the city of Rochester.

5:01

So uh council member Keene.

5:04

Just on that chart, I am interested, like just in the operations box.

5:07

It struck me that uh like that's the more stable part of the budget compared, but I noticed that we're doing like a nominal increase over 2025 into 26, but then we have a drop going into 27.

5:19

Can you talk about that?

5:20

So a lot of that is related to how the debt service is showing up and the power purchase agreements are showing up in the Rochester Park utilities budget.

5:29

So with all of the vacillation happening there, that's atypical to what you would normally see.

5:33

And um that explains the power.

5:38

No, I didn't expect to see that in the every 30 years or so, you see something like that.

5:42

And so it's just a bit different than how we would normally carry some of those numbers.

5:46

Thank you.

5:47

I understand it better now.

5:48

Sure.

5:49

Um, and you can see um decision packages are a portion of that.

5:53

We made some significant reductions in order to be able to bring that tax levy down almost in half.

5:59

Um, we are in our final year and absorbing um the holistic budget stability funds that the council wisely put towards um reducing what the tax levy would need to absorb as we were climbing back out of some of those pandemic changes, and then um just being able to really stabilize our equipment revolving fund.

6:18

We've been working on that for a few years and help get our budget in order and make sure that we have structural integrity to our operation and being able to provide services.

6:27

And the levy supported employee services costs, those are typically the lion's share of the increase of the levy.

6:34

Um, we do have contractual obligations to our labor units, and a number of those are levy funded positions, but not all of them.

6:44

So you can see that the general fund um is the lot the largest supported fund with uh with the tax levy.

6:51

That is where your 24-7 services of police, fire, and sometimes public works is a 24-7 service, are located.

6:58

Um, some administration, um uh some some of those typical departments that you see, but we also do have um parks and recreation and the library um receiving funds, about eight million dollars, eight to ten million dollars a year of our capital improvement program in the tax levy, and then a tiny sliver there to fund the utilities and customs at the Rochester International Airport.

7:20

The rest of those funds are paper with airport related revenue.

7:24

Um, and as you can see, what we're projecting out into the future years, and sometimes we're able to mitigate those as we were in this year.

7:32

Um, you're seeing uh on average about a seven and a half percent adjustment year over year in the levy, a significant amount of that is regular personnel costs.

7:42

We typically expect that to be about 5.5% adjustment year over year for personnel costs, which isn't just the actual salary, those are things like salary, health insurance, those types of things.

7:54

And of course, we're also absorbing uh some other impacts this year with the paid family medical leave and things of that nature.

8:00

And despite all of those things, um, the team did a great job of trying to bring this budget in um lower than had been anticipated.

8:07

So, with that, I'm only going to be part of the talking heads this evening, uh, this afternoon.

8:11

And so I'm gonna turn it over to Brian Anderson to talk a little bit about debt service.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis████████████████████20%
Library Funding████████████12%
Natural Gas Franchise Fees█████████9%
Sustainability Initiatives████████8%
Public Engagement██████6%
Community Development Block Grant██████6%
Environmental Protection██████6%
Public Works█████5%
Parks and Recreation█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Rochester City Council Study Session on 2026-2027 Operating Budget - September 4, 2025

The Rochester City Council held a study session on September 4, 2025, to continue discussions on the 2026-2027 operating budget. The meeting focused on follow-up items from the initial study session, including debt service, decision packages, library staffing, parking subsidies, community building fund, 311 services, council budget, arborist staffing, facility maintenance, and environmental stewardship, including a potential natural gas franchise fee. No formal votes were taken; the session was for discussion and direction.

Discussion Items

  • Budget Overview and Tax Levy Reduction: Administrator Zelms presented the recommended 2026-2027 budget, noting a total levy increase of just under $6.6 million (5.9%), a reduction from the earlier projected 10.68%. The levy remains below 50% of net tax capacity. Operational costs are stable, but debt service and power purchase agreements cause fluctuations in total budget (approximately $664 million in 2026 and $636 million in 2027).

  • Debt Service: Brian Anderson presented the city's debt portfolio, totaling $359 million in principal as of year-end 2024. The city has significant borrowing capacity (2% debt limit of $378 million, with current debt at 0.23%). The proposed regional sports and recreation complex would be funded by sales tax revenue bonds, not affecting the debt limit.

  • Decision Packages: Administrator Zelms reviewed 2026 recommended decision packages, emphasizing reductions to keep the levy low. Council members discussed prioritization, fleet strategy (including EV transition), and the need for equipment revolving fund sustainability. A deeper dive on fleet and EV is scheduled for the next study session.

  • Library Services: Director Karen Lemke proposed converting four part-time positions (18.5 hours/week) to full-time roles to improve efficiency and service, funded by reducing temporary part-time hours. The net cost is $192,000. Council members expressed support for the conversion and opposed closing the library on Sundays, citing high usage and community need. The library master plan update is expected in October/November.

  • Evening and Weekend Parking: Director Zhang presented data on free parking in ramps, estimating $1.88 million in value (based on guesstimates for free one-hour, weekday evenings, and weekends). Councilmember Keene noted this supports downtown businesses but did not seek immediate changes.

  • Community Building Fund: Director Martella reported on the fund, currently budgeted at $50,000 annually (with a one-time $50,000 addition in 2025 from contingency). Council members proposed increasing the base to $100,000, with a $10,000 cap for large grants, and exploring a tiered structure. Staff will return with a proposal.

  • 311 Service: Administrator Zelms discussed cost allocation for 311, noting it is not yet applied but will be reviewed annually. Councilmember Palmer inquired about extending hours, but staff noted it would require significant resources. A decision package for an additional call taker is included.

  • City Council Budget: Mr. Nigber reviewed the council budget, including salaries, travel, and training. Councilmember Palmer expressed concern about increasing travel and training, while Mayor Norton raised the issue of salary adjustments tied to median income, noting past council direction not to bring it forward unless requested. The travel and training budget was restored to 2024 levels.

  • Arborist Decision Package: Mr. Nigber presented the need for two additional arborists (one in 2026, one in 2027) to address a 20-year pruning cycle, storm response, and liability. Council members expressed support, noting the city's growth and the cost-effectiveness of in-house staff versus contractors.

  • Maintenance Service Center and BRT Facility: Zach Woodward requested four FTEs for the new maintenance center and BRT stations. The new facility adds 90,000 sq ft and complex systems. Staffing is below industry standards. The BRT is expected to offset 25% of the cost. Council discussed timing and budget impact.

  • Environmental Stewardship and Natural Gas Franchise Fee: Mr. Parrish presented a framework for a potential natural gas franchise fee, with options (flat fee, per therm, percentage of revenue). Estimated revenue could be $1-2.4 million annually. Council members expressed varied views: Councilmember Wall opposed as regressive; Councilmember Palmer supported to offset property tax; Councilmember Miller supported to fund energy efficiency programs; Councilmember Keene remained open but cautious; Councilmember Doring was in favor. Direction was given to continue discussions and bring back a process for engagement. The fee would not affect the 2026 budget.

Key Outcomes

  • Council directed staff to explore a process for implementing a natural gas franchise fee, with further discussion expected.
  • For the library, council expressed support for the full-time conversion and opposition to reducing hours.
  • For the Community Building Fund, council indicated intent to increase the base to $100,000 with a $10,000 cap for large grants, pending a formal proposal.
  • The next study session on September 15, 2025, will cover fleet/EV, equipment revolving fund, collaboration with RCTC, RPU fee proposals, and public music. The preliminary levy must be set by September 22, 2025.
  • No formal votes were taken; all discussed items are subject to future action.

Meeting Transcript

Eight weeks is it approximately. And as the council chamber is uh is being renovated with state-of-the-art equipment. So we're excited to be here and excited about uh things to come there. So uh this uh setup just for my colleagues, this is the setup that we will use for our regular council meetings. Uh if uh we have future study sessions, we uh may have a little more informal uh setup, but we wanted folks to kind of get used to the uh the council regular council meetings set up. So uh if you have any suggestions for tweaking it, let our city administrator know or or Aaron. Uh uh with that, uh we are here today to continue our discussion of our 2026, 2027 budget presentation. So uh administrator Zelms, uh take it away. All right, thank you, Council President, Council members Mayor Norton, members of mostly uh staff of the organization and community. Um, I am just gonna kick off with a little bit of a brief reminder of um what we started with in the initial study session, as there might be people watching that um weren't part of that. And for anyone that's presenting after me, you need to point the clicker this way. So a little dancer. Um so it's moved twice. Um, so just starting off with this. Um, we have adopted the new strategic priorities and um adjusted foundational principles. And so when I'm thinking about the budget, um, first those foundational principles, we do a lot of things at the city that are continuation, and then how we layer on top of that the strategic priorities and balance the foundational principles becomes a little bit of dynamic tension when we're in the budget process because there are things that we need to continue to do year after year, and then there are ways that we can layer on top of that. But of course, we also have this foundational principle of fiscal responsibility and sustainability. Um, and that's probably where most of the dynamic tension comes in when we're looking at the budget. Um, obviously, we've been working on this, and um the team here in the audience has been and and at tables have been working on this for quite a long time to bring you a two-year budget. Um, and we are in this September phase of answering questions, and that's really what we're here to do today is to respond to some of um more deeper questions that had come up on the first uh study session conversation, and so be thinking about um if there's additional questions, we do have some things scheduled for you at your next study session as well, um, in order to be able to make good use of the time. So, as a reminder, we're still sitting um with this uh tax rate um below 50% of our net tax capacity rate. Um, that's been true for most of the last 10 years. There's a few years there in the 2018 to 20 uh 20 time frame where we were bumping a little bit above the 50% net tax capacity rate level. Um, but again, with some of the growth, both in valuation and new construction happening in the city, um, we are able to absorb some of these increases in cost and investment in uh community services through both the new construction growth and valuation adjustment. And that's the biggest way that someone's tax bill is going to change year over year is based on the proportionality of the value of their home or the value of their commercial retail business versus all of the rest of the uh properties that are in that category, and then the larger piece of all of the property that is within the city limits of Rochester. So just important to point out um as you can see, the increase in total levy year over year is just shy of 6.6 million dollars. That's a pretty low number as um as the tax levy goes year over year over the last few years. Um, and the team worked really hard to keep that as low as possible, um, bringing it down from about 10.68% in your final um levy that was projected at the end of 2024. Uh, we also have some rate adjustments in sewer, electric, and water that we discussed, and as you can see, the total budget adds up to um just about six hundred and sixty-four million dollars in 2026 and 630, about 636 million in 2027. There's some vacillations in the debt service in the capital improvement program when we're finishing a very large capital project and all of those expenses are hitting in one year, that can make some pretty um large changes in the total budget overall operations, as you can see in the gray um square uh to the left of that chart does uh increase, but it decreases again when you get into that 2027 year. So some changes happening there across the entire book of business of the city of Rochester. So uh council member Keene. Just on that chart, I am interested, like just in the operations box. It struck me that uh like that's the more stable part of the budget compared, but I noticed that we're doing like a nominal increase over 2025 into 26, but then we have a drop going into 27. Can you talk about that? So a lot of that is related to how the debt service is showing up and the power purchase agreements are showing up in the Rochester Park utilities budget. So with all of the vacillation happening there, that's atypical to what you would normally see. And um that explains the power. No, I didn't expect to see that in the every 30 years or so, you see something like that. And so it's just a bit different than how we would normally carry some of those numbers. Thank you. I understand it better now. Sure. Um, and you can see um decision packages are a portion of that. We made some significant reductions in order to be able to bring that tax levy down almost in half. Um, we are in our final year and absorbing um the holistic budget stability funds that the council wisely put towards um reducing what the tax levy would need to absorb as we were climbing back out of some of those pandemic changes, and then um just being able to really stabilize our equipment revolving fund. We've been working on that for a few years and help get our budget in order and make sure that we have structural integrity to our operation and being able to provide services. And the levy supported employee services costs, those are typically the lion's share of the increase of the levy. Um, we do have contractual obligations to our labor units, and a number of those are levy funded positions, but not all of them. So you can see that the general fund um is the lot the largest supported fund with uh with the tax levy.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com