The December 1, 2025, Rochester City Council meeting began with public comments regarding business licensure enforcement and property taxes. The Council proceeded to approve the agenda and consent calendar before holding a public hearing on the 2026 property tax levy, operating budget, and capital improvement plan (
Please rise as you're able to for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the United States of America and to the Republic religious one nation under God with liberty and justice for all. Welcome everybody to our December 1st uh city council meeting. We begin each council meeting with our open comment period. This is an opportunity for anyone from the public to speak on items that we we will not be taking a separate public hearing on later in the agenda. Each person has up to two minutes to speak for a total of 20 minutes. Participants are further encouraged to limit comments generally to topics that are within the scope and jurisdiction of the council's ability to affect policy. Council members and staff do not respond to your comments during public comment, but will instead follow up on any specific requests separately. If you have materials to share with the council, please give them to the city clerk who is to the right of me. Uh and uh she will distribute it to uh council members. And at this point, I will invite you up uh in the order in which you signed up. First up is Casey McGregor. Hello, company. Oh, yep, there we go. Hello, council, uh Casey McGregor. I believe like our I believe licensed business owners are the backbone of our community. I've heard politicians on both sides of the political spectrum discussing enforcements to move move a political agendas. Removing the judicial branch from the procedure of licensure enforced is not trivial. Most important is when a business itself is put at risk. So I asked the council to consider amending the authorization for licensed enforcements via an administrative alternate to add the limitations that if a business is put at risk, the clerk's office must go through the courts and not use the expedited administration track, requiring the clerk to consider the implications of the enforcement before acting is part of the point. By federal constitution guarantee, the people are not to be deprived by government action of our property without due process of the law, and licenses are recognized property interests in protected under the constitution. See Wayne Lafayette. It is furthermore proper for council to reconsider and amend the licensor changes as the passage was not executed properly, as the substance of the item was changed without necessary action. The original proposed action considered of 17 business types, and the clerk removed gambling licenses from the administration enforcement, making it a list of 16. Council rules match Roberts' rules, and thus the action was improperly executed in revising this matter to correct the council should adopt a limitation that the clerk's office should revert to the actual court procedures if a business is reasonably at risk of undergoing the enforcement measure. A business owner could be shuttered with only limited appeal as means of any examination from a court. It is a fair enough principle that you should be able to see an actual judge before losing your business. Thank you. This is uh our open comment period. Anyone wishing to be uh heard, please step forward. Anyone wishing to be heard, please step forward. Seeing no one, we will close the public comment period. And uh Clerk Caso, could you please call the roll? Good evening. Councilmember Keene. Here, Councilmember Miller, here, Councilmember Wall. Here. Councilmember Fredericks. Here. Councilmember Palmer. Here. Councilmember Doring. Here. Council President Schubring. Here. Mayor Norton. Present. Thank you. Next up we have the City Administrators Report. Administrator Zelms.