OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Rockport, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rockport City Council Budget Workshop #5 - June 23, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, June 23, 2026
BodyRockport, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, June 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:09:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:11

Mayor and Council, I believe you have

Unassigned speaker

0:15

a

Speaker 1

0:15

sheet that looks like this in front of you.

0:17

I think that's gonna be the easiest way for you to follow along, but we also are gonna put it on the screen up here.

0:24

Shelley, can we get you to can we knock off staff and knock off council and make this full

Unassigned speaker

0:35

you can

Speaker 1

0:36

see it out there?

0:38

Never mind.

0:38

Please know what you're doing, Shelley.

0:41

I'm sorry, okay, no problem.

Unassigned speaker

0:45

I'll

Speaker 1

0:45

quit talking on that then.

0:49

It was a good idea, but um so we changed the process a little bit this year.

0:57

If you'll remember, we took in all the applications, and then we had a committee that basically went through everything to see

Unassigned speaker

1:05

what

Speaker 1

1:05

to award, what to prioritize, and um they made recommendations based on all the requests.

1:13

Um the outside requests from all organizations were 764,891 dollars.

1:22

You had just under a million dollars in requests, the total request adding in everything else that we were looking at funding was 1.9 million dollars.

Speaker 2

1:36

I'm comfortable

Speaker 1

1:37

with a um an estimation of our tax collections at 1.5, so there's a little bit of a delta

Unassigned speaker

1:46

there.

Unassigned speaker

1:48

You

Speaker 1

1:48

can look on the third column of your spreadsheet, and you can see what everybody

Unassigned speaker

1:55

asked for

Speaker 1

1:57

the committee prioritize new events and sport tourism as they were looking through

Unassigned speaker

2:04

them,

Speaker 1

2:05

um, and then if you go all the way over to the far right side,

Unassigned speaker

2:14

you can

Speaker 1

2:14

see what was recommended, and what the total award amount would be $349,000 recommendation, go down to the bottom half after the yellow highlight, take out our regular administrative fees,

Unassigned speaker

2:35

which is

Speaker 1

2:36

um 182,000, almost 183, get the visitor center $60,000 CDB has $800,000 in here, parks asked for $100,000, that's where the total comes to 1.9.

2:59

Now, if we go over to the left, right, sorry, administrative fees, 1829, those are pretty set fees.

3:10

We bump the visitor center down to 55 down to 750,

Unassigned speaker

3:17

we put

Speaker 1

3:17

parks events and cut them in half, and we're only recommending funding 50,000 out of pot funds, and she's found the room in her budget to do the additional 50,000 out of the general fund to make her whole for all of her events.

3:34

Um so then that brings the total awarded with the above and with those that I just went through to 1.38.

3:44

Now I said 1.5.

Unassigned speaker

3:47

We

Speaker 1

3:47

have this 1.38 because we also have talked about funding a full-time strength.

3:56

That amount, I don't want to say is 100,000 because it's not, but it's about $90,000 with a $62,000 salary, and then by the time you add benefits, you get up to that about $90,000.

Unassigned speaker

4:09

So

Speaker 1

4:10

if we add that number in, we're pushing the door on that um $1.5 million.

4:16

If you'd like to go through these individually, what was requested and what was awarded, we certainly can.

4:23

Um, and we can talk about some things that we looked at as a um, and I'll use RCAD as um an example.

4:36

We gave um specific amounts of money to programs, but we more want to give that organization the money as a whole and let them kind of decide where they would best use

Unassigned speaker

4:51

it.

Speaker 1

4:52

Like if we gave them money for

Unassigned speaker

4:55

the

Speaker 1

4:55

America Sweetheart show, they asked for 40,000, we awarded 10.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

If they say we really don't want to do that, let's put the 10 towards something else that would encourage and promote the art.

Speaker 1

5:16

And then the on this, and it just

Unassigned speaker

5:22

really went.

Speaker 1

5:39

So as we're looking at that, maybe think of it more in those terms.

5:45

And I think kind of

Unassigned speaker

5:48

our

Speaker 1

5:48

cat is the only one we really did like

Unassigned speaker

5:50

that.

Speaker 1

5:55

And then we wanted to kind of fund everybody that qualified under any guys.

6:17

Like you'll see on the theater, we gave them 500 for each

Unassigned speaker

6:21

show.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Parks and Recreation████████████12%
Fiscal Sustainability███████████11%
Procedural█████████9%
Tourism Promotion████████8%
Water And Wastewater Management██████6%
Arts And Culture█████5%
Public Engagement█████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Rockport City Council Budget Workshop #5 - June 23, 2026

The City of Rockport City Council held its fifth budget workshop on June 23, 2026, to review the FY2026-2027 budget, including Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) grant recommendations, economic outlook, capital project updates, and outstanding budget topics. The meeting was led by City Manager Vanessa Shrauner and included presentations from Finance Director Robbie Sorrell and Public Works Director Ryan Picarazzi.

Discussion Items

  • HOT Grant Funding Recommendation: City Manager Shrauner presented the committee's recommendations. External organizations requested a total of $764,891; overall requests (including internal items) totaled $1.9 million. Estimated HOT tax collections are $1.5 million. The committee recommended $349,000 for external organizations, with administrative fees of approximately $182,893, Visitor Center funding reduced from $60,000 to $55,000, CDB (Community Development Block) reduced from $800,000 to $750,000, and Parks events cut from $100,000 to $50,000 (with an additional $50,000 from the general fund). Total recommended awards reach $1.38 million, leaving room for a proposed full-time position (~$90,000) staying near the $1.5 million target. Council discussed flexibility in fund usage for organizations like RCAD and the theater, and noted that advertising requests were denied. The maximum allowable expenditure for arts is $400,000, but only $22,000 was recommended for sports tourism. Staff expressed comfort with the 1.5 million estimate and encouraged maintaining the 365-day reserve policy.
  • Economic Environment and Preliminary Revenue Estimates: Finance Director Sorrell presented preliminary estimates. Property tax growth is capped at 3.5%, sales taxes estimated at 4%, sanitation revenues at 4%, and HOT collections are improving due to better enforcement. The CPI rose to 4.2%, well above the 3.5% cap for M&O. Consumer confidence is below 50%. The total tax rate is preliminarily 0.426475, with a voter-approved rate of 0.417808. The average taxable value increased by $18,000 while market value rose by $5,000. Debt service is projected to drop significantly from $5.1 million to $2.9 million by 2029 as City Hall debt matures. Total all-funds budget is projected to decrease from $59 million to $53 million (a 10% drop), with the general fund down 13% before adding capital items.
  • Capital Projects Update: Public Works Director Picarazzi provided updates on FY25-26 projects, including drainage pipe lining, purple pipe project, and park irrigation. Regarding the $800,000 set aside for parks, the pickleball association reversed its request—now asking the city not to build new courts at Memorial Park, but instead to contribute $250,000 to rehab existing school courts. Council debated the merits: some favored funding city-owned parking improvements ($60,000–$80,000 estimate) rather than spending heavily on school property; others expressed interest in supporting pickleball if it brings tournaments. City Manager Shrauner recommended directing the park funds primarily to parking at Memorial Park and continuing discussions with the pickleball association.
  • Outstanding Budget Topics: Council discussed the reserve fund: after the gas sale revenue, reserves exceeded 180 days, but pulling $200,000 for parks reduced them to 200 days. There was debate about using reserves to lower the tax rate. Staff committed to providing updated tax rate impact calculations before the next meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • Council generally accepted the HOT grant funding recommendations, with flexibility allowed for organizations to reallocate awarded amounts among approved programs.
  • Staff was directed to prioritize parking improvements at Memorial Park with the $800,000 capital fund, and to continue exploring pickleball options with the school district, withholding final commitment.
  • The next budget workshop (#6) was scheduled for July 28, 2026, at 3:30 PM, followed by a regular council meeting at 5:00 PM. A possible additional workshop may be held on July 14, 2026, at 3:30 PM. The final budget and tax rate adoption meeting is set for August 11, 2026.
  • Finance Director Sorrell will provide council with the impact of the $200,000 reserve use on the no-new-revenue tax rate prior to the July 14 meeting.
  • No formal votes were taken; decisions were made via consensus and staff direction.

Meeting Transcript

Mayor and Council, I believe you have a sheet that looks like this in front of you. I think that's gonna be the easiest way for you to follow along, but we also are gonna put it on the screen up here. Shelley, can we get you to can we knock off staff and knock off council and make this full you can see it out there? Never mind. Please know what you're doing, Shelley. I'm sorry, okay, no problem. I'll quit talking on that then. It was a good idea, but um so we changed the process a little bit this year. If you'll remember, we took in all the applications, and then we had a committee that basically went through everything to see what to award, what to prioritize, and um they made recommendations based on all the requests. Um the outside requests from all organizations were 764,891 dollars. You had just under a million dollars in requests, the total request adding in everything else that we were looking at funding was 1.9 million dollars. I'm comfortable with a um an estimation of our tax collections at 1.5, so there's a little bit of a delta there. You can look on the third column of your spreadsheet, and you can see what everybody asked for the committee prioritize new events and sport tourism as they were looking through them, um, and then if you go all the way over to the far right side, you can see what was recommended, and what the total award amount would be $349,000 recommendation, go down to the bottom half after the yellow highlight, take out our regular administrative fees, which is um 182,000, almost 183, get the visitor center $60,000 CDB has $800,000 in here, parks asked for $100,000, that's where the total comes to 1.9. Now, if we go over to the left, right, sorry, administrative fees, 1829, those are pretty set fees. We bump the visitor center down to 55 down to 750, we put parks events and cut them in half, and we're only recommending funding 50,000 out of pot funds, and she's found the room in her budget to do the additional 50,000 out of the general fund to make her whole for all of her events. Um so then that brings the total awarded with the above and with those that I just went through to 1.38. Now I said 1.5. We have this 1.38 because we also have talked about funding a full-time strength. That amount, I don't want to say is 100,000 because it's not, but it's about $90,000 with a $62,000 salary, and then by the time you add benefits, you get up to that about $90,000. So if we add that number in, we're pushing the door on that um $1.5 million. If you'd like to go through these individually, what was requested and what was awarded, we certainly can. Um, and we can talk about some things that we looked at as a um, and I'll use RCAD as um an example. We gave um specific amounts of money to programs, but we more want to give that organization the money as a whole and let them kind of decide where they would best use it. Like if we gave them money for the America Sweetheart show, they asked for 40,000, we awarded 10. If they say we really don't want to do that, let's put the 10 towards something else that would encourage and promote the art.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com