OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Rockville, Maryland/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rockville City Council Meeting - September 2, 2026: Zoning Ordinance Rewrite and Future Agenda Preview

Meeting Portal — Wednesday, September 2, 2026
BodyRockville, Maryland
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, September 2, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 26:12

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:05

Good

Speaker 1

0:06

morning, Barry.

0:12

All right.

0:12

Just a quick reminder tonight that we do have the meetings with superintendent schools.

Unassigned speaker

0:17

Hope you guys saw that all in your schedules.

Speaker 1

0:20

If you need anything on that, just let us know.

0:24

We have two proclamations tonight.

0:26

We're kind of out of proclamation season, but we have a couple on the consent agenda.

0:33

We have

Unassigned speaker

0:34

a

Speaker 1

0:35

writer agreement for environmental quality resources for some work that they do for us every year.

0:43

We have another award for uh chemicals at the water treatment plant.

0:51

We have authorization for an amendment to the MCOG enhanced mobility grant, which is great.

0:58

We have an award for um contracting for vegetation management services, hopefully attacking invasives invasives, and we have approval of the minutes.

1:10

Any questions on the consent agenda?

1:12

Councilmember Valeri.

Speaker 2

1:15

Um I I noticed um is item C extending the period of performance.

1:21

Is that essentially asking for an extension to fulfill that grant?

Speaker 1

1:26

That's correct.

Speaker 2

1:28

Okay.

1:28

I just want to flag that um just to see if where the bottleneck or the delays might be occurring because this is not um the first time that we've seen extensions of grants, and unfortunately, we've seen um not for the uh the COG one, but in other grants that there is a a punitive aspect to asking for extensions.

Speaker 1

1:52

Yep.

1:52

Uh appreciate that.

1:54

Um I'll talk more on my one-on-ones with you guys, but just broadly speaking.

1:57

We apply for a lot more grants than we have the staff to pull off sometimes in a timely manner, just facts, but we keep getting the grants.

2:04

But I'll I'll ask to see if there's any more details on that one, council member, and I'll circle back.

2:09

Thank

Unassigned speaker

2:09

you.

Unassigned speaker

2:10

Uh

Speaker 2

2:10

thanks.

Speaker 1

2:11

You bet.

Unassigned speaker

2:12

Um,

Speaker 1

2:13

a couple of action items, um, big ones, of course.

2:15

You guys have probably been reading a lot this weekend if you've had time.

2:19

It's filing the uh tax amendment for the big um zoning ordinance rewrite and also the map amendment.

2:26

I can't stress enough, and I tried to stress this in the staff report and others.

2:29

All this is tonight is filing,

Unassigned speaker

2:32

and

Speaker 1

2:32

it's really to say to the community hey, we think this might be it, but we want your opinion.

2:37

So there's lots of meetings, follow-up meetings with um plan commission, community engagement, et cetera, before it come back comes back to council again, targeting June 1st adoption.

2:48

I saw council member Valerian and then I saw the mayor.

Speaker 2

2:52

I'll defer to the mayor to start this one off.

Speaker 1

2:55

Okay.

2:55

Mayor.

Speaker 3

3:00

Sorry about

Unassigned speaker

3:01

that.

Speaker 4

3:01

Um I just wanted to check in because uh I don't know the range of edits that we'll be getting um tonight.

3:11

And uh I know this is the file, though we generally try to have somewhat of a clean document that we're putting out to the public.

3:20

So I was I was just curious um if there are significant editor comments or uh additional questions from our colleagues.

3:30

Um can we have a back pocket bring it back date?

3:34

We may be fine and move forward, but I just want to subplan ahead.

Unassigned speaker

3:38

We

Speaker 4

3:38

saw that with the King Farm Farmstead and other major documents.

3:41

I just wanted to be prepared for that.

Speaker 1

3:44

Yep, thanks, Mira.

3:45

I've received a handful of comments, but not an overwhelming amount.

3:49

Um, but you know, the whole point of this is to say here we think it is, and then again, a whole half a year of making sure we get it exactly right.

3:57

I understand the the goal of trying to get a pretty clean document out there, but I think it's important for us to message to the community that this isn't the final document.

4:06

I think if we do that, it could have a chilling effect on people coming out engaging.

Speaker 4

4:11

I agree.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Ordinance Rewrite█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Community Engagement████████████████████23%
Procedural██████████12%
Tree Preservation█████6%
Forestry Management█████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Rockville City Council Meeting - September 2, 2026: Zoning Ordinance Rewrite and Future Agenda Preview

The Rockville City Council met on September 2, 2026, at 5:00 PM UTC to discuss the filing of the major zoning ordinance rewrite (ZOR) and associated map amendment, approve the consent calendar, and preview upcoming meeting agendas. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to Councilmember concerns about the timeline, clarity of the draft document, and the need for additional work sessions before the public engagement phase.

Consent Calendar

The consent calendar was approved, including:

  • Two proclamations
  • Writer agreement for environmental quality resources
  • Award for chemicals at the water treatment plant
  • Authorization for amendment to the MCOG enhanced mobility grant (extending the period of performance)
  • Award for vegetation management services
  • Approval of minutes

Councilmember Valeri questioned the extension on the MCOG grant, flagging concerns about grant delays and potential punitive aspects. Staff noted they would follow up with more details.

Discussion Items

Zoning Ordinance Rewrite (ZOR) and Map Amendment Filing

Staff (Jeff) introduced the items as a "filing" to signal to the community that this is a draft subject to extensive further review, with a target adoption date of June 1, 2026. The filing is intended to kick off a six-month process involving Planning Commission review, community engagement, and multiple work sessions before final adoption.

Councilmember deliberations included:

  • Mayor Ashton expressed support for filing but requested flexibility to bring the item back if major edits arise, noting that a majority discussion on Rockville Pike (MD 355) was not reflected in the draft.
  • Councilmember Valerian voiced strong frustration about the timeline, stating that the draft document was received only a few days before the meeting and over a holiday weekend. She argued that it was unclear what the Council had agreed to in prior work sessions and that staff additions were not clearly flagged. She requested a consolidated list of agreed-upon items and Planning Commission feedback before filing.
  • Councilmember Van Grack acknowledged the document's size but thanked staff for providing it as soon as possible. He supported using the evening as a work session to discuss edits and agreed that additional work sessions might be needed before formal filing.
  • Councilmember Shaw agreed that another work session may be necessary and noted that some elements in the draft did not align with her understanding of prior agreements.
  • Councilmember Fulton supported filing tonight, viewing it as part of an iterative process with ample time for changes.
  • Councilmember Valeri emphasized that the public may not understand the iterative nature and called for clearer communication in agenda items. She expressed frustration about the lack of a summary of Council decisions and the absence of Planning Commission feedback from a March meeting.

City Attorney Robert clarified that the Council could vote to authorize filing the ZTA with specific changes agreed upon tonight, and staff would incorporate those changes before transmitting the document to the Planning Commission.

Future Meeting Preview

Staff previewed upcoming agendas for December 8 and December 15, 2026:

  • December 8: Consent items (DNR grant extension, Cisco systems agreement, athletic court maintenance contract, minutes); Action items: King Farm Farmstead Master Plan adoption, Community Development Block Grant (with note that RHE withdrew its request for this round); Work session on Chapter 18 (rental facilities/landlord-tenant relations).
  • December 15: Adoption of Green Building Regulations, Fire Code Regulations, Inner Rail Passenger Grant, and Maryland Transit TOD Designation for Rockville Station.

Councilmember Valerian inquired about the status of the Street Tree Master Plan, noting that it had not been updated in about a decade. Staff indicated it was not currently on the agenda and would follow up.

Key Outcomes

  • The consent calendar was approved.
  • Councilmembers generally agreed to proceed with filing the ZOR and map amendment, with the understanding that extensive further work sessions and public engagement would occur. Some members requested an additional work session before formal filing to ensure edits are incorporated.
  • Staff committed to providing clearer communication about the iterative process to the public and to compiling a summary of Council decisions from prior work sessions.
  • The City Attorney offered the option to vote on filing with specific agreed changes, which may be utilized.
  • Future meeting dates were noted: December 8 and December 15, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning, Barry. All right. Just a quick reminder tonight that we do have the meetings with superintendent schools. Hope you guys saw that all in your schedules. If you need anything on that, just let us know. We have two proclamations tonight. We're kind of out of proclamation season, but we have a couple on the consent agenda. We have a writer agreement for environmental quality resources for some work that they do for us every year. We have another award for uh chemicals at the water treatment plant. We have authorization for an amendment to the MCOG enhanced mobility grant, which is great. We have an award for um contracting for vegetation management services, hopefully attacking invasives invasives, and we have approval of the minutes. Any questions on the consent agenda? Councilmember Valeri. Um I I noticed um is item C extending the period of performance. Is that essentially asking for an extension to fulfill that grant? That's correct. Okay. I just want to flag that um just to see if where the bottleneck or the delays might be occurring because this is not um the first time that we've seen extensions of grants, and unfortunately, we've seen um not for the uh the COG one, but in other grants that there is a a punitive aspect to asking for extensions. Yep. Uh appreciate that. Um I'll talk more on my one-on-ones with you guys, but just broadly speaking. We apply for a lot more grants than we have the staff to pull off sometimes in a timely manner, just facts, but we keep getting the grants. But I'll I'll ask to see if there's any more details on that one, council member, and I'll circle back. Thank you. Uh thanks. You bet. Um, a couple of action items, um, big ones, of course. You guys have probably been reading a lot this weekend if you've had time. It's filing the uh tax amendment for the big um zoning ordinance rewrite and also the map amendment. I can't stress enough, and I tried to stress this in the staff report and others. All this is tonight is filing, and it's really to say to the community hey, we think this might be it, but we want your opinion. So there's lots of meetings, follow-up meetings with um plan commission, community engagement, et cetera, before it come back comes back to council again, targeting June 1st adoption. I saw council member Valerian and then I saw the mayor. I'll defer to the mayor to start this one off. Okay. Mayor. Sorry about that. Um I just wanted to check in because uh I don't know the range of edits that we'll be getting um tonight. And uh I know this is the file, though we generally try to have somewhat of a clean document that we're putting out to the public. So I was I was just curious um if there are significant editor comments or uh additional questions from our colleagues. Um can we have a back pocket bring it back date?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com