Sacramento City Council Meeting - May 13, 2025: Budget, Rezoning, and Public Hearings
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Sacramento City Council Meeting - May 13, 2025
The Sacramento City Council met on Tuesday, May 13, 2025, starting at 5:31 p.m. and adjourning at 9:27 p.m. The meeting featured special presentations for Affordable Housing Month and Jewish American Heritage Month, a unanimous consent calendar, a public hearing for the ParkeBridge East Rezone, a detailed overview of the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Proposed Budget, and the continuation of the Animal Care Services Division audit. Public comments addressed homelessness, youth programs, park services, and budget priorities.
Consent Calendar
- Item 1 (Watt Avenue Bridge Project): Adopted Resolution No. 2025-0121 authorizing an agreement with Sacramento County for up to $800,000 for bridge improvements.
- Item 2 (Active Transportation in Work Zones): Adopted Resolution No. 2025-0122 approving a new policy and rescinding the Sidewalk Closures Policy.
- Item 3 (Legal Services Contract): Passed Motion No. 2025-0132 increasing contract with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore to $545,000.
- Item 4 (EMS Corps Wraparound Services): Passed Motion No. 2025-0133 awarding a $660,000 contract to Greater Sacramento Urban League for two years.
- Item 5 (Fire PPE): Passed Motion No. 2025-0134 increasing contract to $640,000 for fire equipment through June 2025.
- Item 6 (Neighborhood Landscaping District): Adopted Resolution No. 2025-0123 approving FY 2025/26 assessments and setting a public hearing for May 27, 2025.
- Item 7 (Meadows Park Phase 3): Passed Motion No. 2025-0135 awarding a $872,545 contract to Parker Landscape Development, Inc.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Matters Not on the Agenda (from 2:00 p.m.): Speakers raised concerns about gerrymandering in District 2, tenant rights to counsel (noting 600 evictions in two weeks), and homelessness resources. One speaker advocated for bike safety and thanked Councilmember Maple for support.
- Consent Calendar: A speaker supported Item 2 (active transportation policy), while another highlighted the need for accessible vehicles due to poor sidewalks.
- Item 8 (ParkeBridge East Rezone): No public comments were made; the public hearing was opened and closed without testimony.
- Item 9 (Budget Overview): Seventeen speakers addressed the council. Topics included support for museums (MOSAC, Sacramento History Museum), opposition to reduced hours at the 28th and B Skate Park (citing its unique covered, shaded facility), calls for better community engagement in budget decisions, concerns about $1.8 billion in unfunded capital maintenance, and requests to redirect funding from police vacancies to community-based youth programs. Several speakers urged maintaining investments in active transportation and youth services.
- Item 10 (Animal Care Audit – Continuation): Two speakers (representing Friends of Front Street) expressed concerns about the audit's conclusions and recommendations, particularly regarding a proposed MOU. They requested the Animal Wellbeing Commission review the audit before council action.
- Public Comments – Matters Not on the Agenda (end of meeting): Residents opposed a proposed 14-unit duplex development on Blaine Avenue, citing safety and infrastructure concerns. Another speaker urged keeping community school funding to support adult education. Homeless advocates requested opening park bathrooms and providing food/water.
Discussion Items
- Fiscal Year 2025/26 Proposed Budget Overview (Item 9): Finance Director Peter Coletto and Budget Manager Mirthala Santizo presented a balanced budget closing a $62.2 million funding gap. The $1.6 billion all-funds budget (including $847 million general fund) uses a mix of revenue enhancements (e.g., parking fee increases, EMS fee adjustments) and expenditure reductions (including elimination of 70.5 FTE positions, with only 7 filled positions impacted). Assistant city managers detailed reductions across departments: community services ($5.5M in savings), internal services ($3.2M cuts, including eliminating organizational development team), municipal services ($12M savings via parking program changes and limited cuts), and public safety ($15.3M savings, largely through vacancy elimination and overtime management). Councilmembers debated priorities: preserving youth programs, protecting filled positions, addressing structural deficit, absorbing police vacancies, and updating the Business Operations Tax (BOT). The item was reviewed with direction for final adoption.
- Audit of Animal Care Services Division (Item 10): Councilmember Guerra moved to continue the item until after the Animal Wellbeing Commission reviews it. Seconded by Councilmember Pluckebaum, the motion passed unanimously (8-0). Public comment was allowed on the continuation; speakers urged the commission to consider concerns about the audit's recommendations. The item will return after the commission's meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (9-0) with no items removed.
- ParkeBridge East Rezone (Item 8): Approved unanimously after a public hearing with no opposition. The 4.87-acre site will be rezoned for 41 residential lots (R-1A-PUD) as part of the ParkeBridge PUD.
- FY 2025/26 Budget Overview (Item 9): Reviewed, commented, and provided direction for final adoption. Council will deliberate further on May 20th (fees and charges) and June 3rd (vacancy hearing), with adoption set for June 10th.
- Animal Care Audit (Item 10): Continued to a later date after the Animal Wellbeing Commission reviews the audit (likely June or later). The motion passed 8-0.
- No further actions taken: Council comments included reports on the Cap-to-Cap trip to Washington, D.C., and announcements of community events.
Meeting Transcript
Mayor Ready when you are. Okay, thank you. We'll call this meeting to order of the Sacramento City Council. Please call the roll. Thank you. Councilmember Kaplan. Councilmember Dickinson. Vice Mayor Talamantes. Councilmember Pleckibaum. Councilmember Maple. Mayor Pro Temgata. Here. Councilmember Jennings. Here. Councilmember Vang is expected momentarily. And Mayor McCarty. Here. Councilmember Bluckybomb. Can you leave us on the land acknowledgement and pledge? Please rise if you're able. So the original people of this land, the Nissanon people, the Southern Maidu Valley Plains, Miwok, Patwin Wintu peoples, and the people of the Wilton Rancheria, Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe. May we acknowledge and honor the Native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands by choosing to gather together today in the active practice of acknowledgement and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous people's history, contribution, and lives. Thank you. Pledge. I pledge to the flag of the United States of America. One nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all the questions. Um from the 2 p.m. So I'd like to take them now. If that's okay with you. I have seven speakers. Um I apologize to the group that stayed. I'm gonna read off some names. Lambert, Michael Bevins, Sheree Dimmerling, Sherry Martinez. Uh yes, I I hope everyone pays attention because this is discipline on my part. I arrived here at a quarter to two, and I submitted uh some paperwork to speak on the consent calendar. And I was passed over for whatever reason, and so I just waited so I could say, well, maybe they'll call me after this, after that. So I ended up having to wait three hours to speak. And what you don't understand is there's a lot of people following me now. They're starting to document what I'm talking about. And I'm glad this happened today because uh it's a lot of people following what I'm saying now. And what I wanted to talk to was on the consent calendar, it was number 12, and it was talking about district two PB. This is an example of a district that has over 20 communities, and this is a whoever did this report did a wonderful job. And to me, I should get four minutes because I don't want to stay here and wait for another public comment when I was here at two o'clock. But if you say uh my time is up, then we got a problem with that, because this is this is not enough time to show what I was gonna talk about, but it does show gerrymandering in district two. District two is one of the most gerrymandered districts in California. I'm a native, I know about Sacramento, but uh that's what happens when you don't have Minty Cuppy here. Things were out of whack, unless it was intentional. So do I get four minutes or do I just get two? Thank you for your comments, Mr. Davis.
openpublica.com