Sacramento Community Police Review Commission – October 12, 2020
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Sacramento Community Police Review Commission Meeting – October 12, 2020
The Sacramento Community Police Review Commission met virtually on October 12, 2020, at 6:00 PM. Key actions included unanimous support for a proposed City Council resolution redefining public safety to include youth, discussion of the Sacramento Police Department's (SPD) responses to 2018/2019 recommendations, and updates from three ad hoc committees on rules of procedure, discipline/accountability, and mental health.
Consent Calendar
- Approved meeting minutes from July 29, August 10, and September 14, 2020.
- Received and filed the April–June 2020 Police Complaint Activity Report.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were received on any agenda item.
Discussion Items
- Item 3: Commission’s Position on Proposed City Council Resolution to Redefine Public Safety – Councilmember Jay Schenirer and D’Angelo Mack presented a resolution to redefine public safety by centering youth voice and community-based solutions. Commissioners expressed support and raised questions about implementation, funding, and integration with existing systems. Commissioners voted unanimously to support the resolution.
- Item 4: Discuss Meeting with SPD regarding 2018/2019 Commission Recommendations – Chair Guerrero reported that the commission met with SPD on September 3, 2020. SPD agreed to several recommendations (e.g., adding language from AB392, defining necessary force) but disagreed on others (e.g., “last resort” force language, pre-adoption policy review, mandatory drug testing after use-of-force incidents). Commissioners expressed disappointment over SPD’s refusal to provide draft policies for review and the lack of a quarterly meeting with the police chief.
- Item 5: Rules of Procedure Ad Hoc Recommendations – Co-chair Castillo Krings reported that the committee is finalizing a mission statement and guidance document with legal counsel. A virtual town hall is scheduled for October 21, 2020, 6:00–7:30 PM.
- Item 6: Discipline and Accountability Ad Hoc Recommendations – Chair Carter presented draft recommendations including a disciplinary matrix modeled after San Diego, emphasis on honesty/deceit in police reports, hiring reforms, prohibition of carotid hold, and data analysis. Community outreach town hall on October 18, 2020, 1:00–3:00 PM.
- Item 7: Mental Health Ad Hoc Recommendations – Co-chair Falcone reported that recommendations are still being refined, with a focus on community-based crisis response. The committee requested additional time, with a vote expected in December 2020.
- Item 8: Follow-Up Log – Commissioners discussed outstanding data requests, SPD’s refusal to meet quarterly, and the need for the full commission to receive the Public Records Act response that denied most mental health data requests.
Key Outcomes
- Unanimous motion (9-0) to support the proposed City Council resolution to redefine public safety (Item 3).
- Commission will return to City Council for an up-or-down vote on 2018/2019 recommendations, given that discussions with SPD have concluded.
- Ad hoc committees to hold public outreach town halls: Discipline/Accountability on October 18, 2020 (1–3 PM) and Rules of Procedure on October 21, 2020 (6–7:30 PM).
- Mental Health Ad Hoc vote postponed to December 2020.
- Directors to facilitate meeting between each ad hoc committee and SPD for feedback on recommendations.
- The commission expressed disappointment over SPD’s unwillingness to meet quarterly and share draft policies; individual commissioners will follow up with their appointing council members.
- The chair requested OPSA to arrange meetings for each ad hoc committee with SPD before the November 9, 2020 commission meeting.
Meeting Transcript
I tracked and sidelined by the introduction of a new safety consent, COVID-19. Shortly after learning of the pandemic, racism and police brutality in our country were at the center of the world's news. During this time, our collective communities' idea of safety was rocked. Moreover, communities of color whose idea of safety had already historically been shaky, was now shattered. Our partners in the collective spent time with young people from across the city and ask these questions. One, how would you define safety? Two, how would you describe feeling safe? Three, what do you need to feel safe or safer? And four, does this resolution reflect your definition of safety? I would like to just briefly quote some of the youth who shared in answering these questions. JM wrote, when we define safety, I think most people have a tendency to only look at what their environment looks like and physical safety, i.e., is there anything in my immediate vicinity that can harm me? Am I being physically harmed? Safety to me means more than just providing care to a to a danger only seen on the surface. True safety, true public and equitable safety comes from fostering environments that will not and cannot allow danger to compromise the mental, physical, and systemic security of the people in the public. Safety for me feels like freedom to live. It feels like I can breathe knowing that there is no malice intent within the systemic structures from which I abide. And those we have have hired and elected to protect uh actually follow through with that oath. Uh lastly, another said safety is safety in action looks like resources and opportunity to provide such safety that is community based and ran. Strict accountability to those who take up the position to protect the people. In order for myself to feel more safe, I believe community must be centralized, not the government. These are just a few examples of what youth believe to be important when talking about public safety and creating the resolution. Now, in closing, um, I'm very thankful for the opportunity to work with our community on such a powerful resolution. Uh, one that is not only unique in its design, but also innovative in its thinking about what true public safety could and should be for all. Sacramento has always been a leader in government and community relations. And once again, the opportunity has presented itself to show how true this is. I want to leave you with this quote from the late great James Ballin. For these are all of our children, we will all profit by or pay for what they become. Thank you very much. Thanks, D'Angelo. Just a couple of things to wrap up. Um, you know, the city has been working on youth issues now for a number of years. We adopted a youth development framework so that we could make sure that the programs that we run, the programs that we fund uh had the right characteristics to really promote success for young people. We reorganized our department of parks into a department of youth uh parks and community enrichment to make sure that we had a division that wakes up every day thinking, what do I do better for young people? And we've added resources and programs like our summer at City Hall and Thousand Strong. Uh, this is another piece of the puzzle around what we need to do for our young people to ensure their success and to ensure the success of the city over time. Uh, when I think about sustainability, I don't necessarily think about green buildings. I think about our young people and what we need for them because hopefully they'll be taking care of us uh for some of us sooner than we think. Uh as D'Angelo said, I think this will be a first in the nation. We cannot, we certainly could not find anything in California. We looked around the country, no one has done anything like this, so we think this could be a model. And finally, we think the timing of this is really um really right on. Uh, with the city looking towards inclusive economic development, uh, with the Office of Community Response, we're trying to change the way we do business. This is again another piece of that puzzle that will add to it. So, with that, I am happy and D'Angelo as well to answer any questions you might have. Uh I ask that you pass a motion here to support this resolution that we would take then to the city council on the 27th, along with motions by the youth commission and the measure you committee. Uh thanks very much. I have one other thing that I'd like to say when we're done, but um at this point, again, happy to answer any questions. Thank you, Councilmember Fanier, and thank you, uh Mr. Mack. Uh as the police commission, we certainly understand that uh we want Cal, we want Sacramento, um Sacramento, the city of Sacramento to lead um in policies, including police reform.
openpublica.com