OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sacramento Redistricting Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting - May 2, 2011

Disabilities Advisory CommissionMonday, May 2, 2011
BodySacramento, California
SessionDisabilities Advisory Commission
DateMonday, May 2, 2011
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Ladies and gentlemen, if I could have your attention, those of you in the audience and those committee members will go ahead and start the meeting.

0:08

Okay, we'll do roll call.

0:09

Roman Porter.

0:12

Here.

0:13

Bill Cam.

0:14

Here.

0:16

Cyril Shaw, he did email and say he was going to be a little bit late.

0:20

Steve Hansen.

0:21

Here.

0:21

Bill Muttmans?

0:23

Here.

0:24

Bernard Bowler.

0:25

Here.

0:26

Senator Fry Lucas.

0:28

Steve Mabiglio.

0:30

Here.

0:30

Leon Holm.

0:32

Here.

0:33

Miranda Perry.

0:34

Here.

0:35

Phil Pluckenbaum.

0:36

Here.

0:37

Maya Wallace.

0:39

Here.

0:39

Michelle Rubikava?

0:41

Here.

0:42

And Nadia Leal Curio.

0:45

And then, of course, our chair, Julius Cherry.

0:48

I'm here.

0:48

For those of you in the audience or and those of us who are here on the dias, if you have a BlackBerry, as do I, please make sure you put it to silent or vibrate or something so that I just remembered to do mine, so I won't be the first one embarrassed to have it go off in the middle of the middle of the meeting.

1:04

Okay.

1:05

Good.

1:08

Oh.

1:10

Yes.

1:11

Just for the public's record, these meetings are video streamed and are available as an archive video any time after the facts.

1:18

So if you're not able to see it in person, you can always watch it on the video stream.

1:21

We have speaker slips in the back.

1:23

For anyone in the audience that wishes to speak, please complete one and turn it into the front here to the assistant city clerk.

1:29

Thank you.

1:42

Come up at the end, whether we have people come at the beginning.

1:45

There was some sentiment from the body here that we wanted to give the public ample opportunity to speak to us on items not on the agenda.

2:04

Is that we will ask now if there are members who want to speak to us on items that are not on the agenda.

2:11

We will also ask again at the end of the meeting.

2:14

However, if during the meeting someone has that wants to fill out a slip and give it to our staff person, those slips will be given to me.

2:23

I certainly would not interrupt the flow in order to have somebody speak to us on an item not on the agenda.

2:28

However, when we finished a major portion of an item before we go on to the next item, I would ask the will of the body whether or not we would be willing to hear that person at that time or whether we should have them simply wait to the end.

2:40

We'll obviously let circumstances dictate if the meeting is going to be over in five minutes, they might as well wait to the end.

2:45

However, if it's a pressing circumstance for that citizen who has a dying desire to for us to hear from them, and there's going to be a while, the body could take that up as long as it's the will of the body.

2:56

And that's the suggestion.

2:58

If that's okay with everybody, that's what I plan to do.

3:04

I think that's all my comments.

3:06

Okay.

3:07

And with that, I believe our first item of business is a staff presentation.

3:11

Correct.

3:12

It's the weekly report out of the redistricting activities.

3:16

Good evening, Scott Mendy with staff.

3:18

I'd like to highlight uh three areas for you that have been going on of recent.

3:24

Firstly, is the media coverage.

3:27

Uh there were uh in the last week about at least five different uh media articles.

3:33

Uh the first was uh, and and by the way, we're gonna post all of these on our redistricting website, um, although I want to note that we don't affirm the accuracy of the articles nor express a view regarding the opinions expressed in those articles.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Redistricting█████████████████████████████████████████████62%
Procedural██████████14%
Public Participation█████████12%
Voting Rights Act████5%
Public Engagement██3%
Technology and Innovation██3%
Budget and Finance1%
Summary of Proceedings

Sacramento Redistricting Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting - May 2, 2011

The Sacramento Redistricting Citizens Advisory Committee met on May 2, 2011, at 6:03 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber. Chair Julius Cherry presided. The committee received updates on redistricting activities, a software demonstration, approved previous meeting minutes, and debated the meeting schedule. A motion to extend the map submission deadline failed, while the original schedule was approved.

Consent Calendar

  • Weekly Report Out of Redistricting Activities: Received and filed.
  • Redistricting Software Demonstration and Map Submittal Process: Received and filed.
  • Approval of April 25, 2011 Committee Minutes: Unanimously approved (15-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were made on matters not on the agenda.

Discussion Items

  • Review of Committee Schedule: Two motions were considered.
    • Motion by Hansen/Porter to add a week to the map submission schedule. Failed (7-8: Yes: Porter, Hansen, Maviglio, Hom, Perry, Wallace, Leal-Carillo; No: Bowler, Camp, Frye-Lucas, Motmans, Pluckebaum, Rubalcava, Shah, Chair Cherry).
    • Motion by Pluckebaum/Bowler to approve the schedule without alteration. Passed (13-2: Yes: Bowler, Camp, Frye-Lucas, Leal-Carillo, Maviglio, Motmans, Perry, Pluckebaum, Porter, Rubalcava, Shah, Wallace, Chair Cherry; No: Hansen, Hom).

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the April 25, 2011 meeting minutes.
  • Rejected the proposal to extend the map submission deadline by one week.
  • Approved the original meeting schedule without changes.
  • Member Hansen requested that map review priorities be addressed at the next meeting.

Note: The chair indicated that public comment on non-agenda items may be allowed between agenda items at the will of the body, but none were offered at this meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Ladies and gentlemen, if I could have your attention, those of you in the audience and those committee members will go ahead and start the meeting. Okay, we'll do roll call. Roman Porter. Here. Bill Cam. Here. Cyril Shaw, he did email and say he was going to be a little bit late. Steve Hansen. Here. Bill Muttmans? Here. Bernard Bowler. Here. Senator Fry Lucas. Steve Mabiglio. Here. Leon Holm. Here. Miranda Perry. Here. Phil Pluckenbaum. Here. Maya Wallace. Here. Michelle Rubikava? Here. And Nadia Leal Curio. And then, of course, our chair, Julius Cherry. I'm here. For those of you in the audience or and those of us who are here on the dias, if you have a BlackBerry, as do I, please make sure you put it to silent or vibrate or something so that I just remembered to do mine, so I won't be the first one embarrassed to have it go off in the middle of the middle of the meeting. Okay. Good. Oh. Yes. Just for the public's record, these meetings are video streamed and are available as an archive video any time after the facts. So if you're not able to see it in person, you can always watch it on the video stream. We have speaker slips in the back. For anyone in the audience that wishes to speak, please complete one and turn it into the front here to the assistant city clerk. Thank you. Come up at the end, whether we have people come at the beginning. There was some sentiment from the body here that we wanted to give the public ample opportunity to speak to us on items not on the agenda. Is that we will ask now if there are members who want to speak to us on items that are not on the agenda. We will also ask again at the end of the meeting. However, if during the meeting someone has that wants to fill out a slip and give it to our staff person, those slips will be given to me. I certainly would not interrupt the flow in order to have somebody speak to us on an item not on the agenda. However, when we finished a major portion of an item before we go on to the next item, I would ask the will of the body whether or not we would be willing to hear that person at that time or whether we should have them simply wait to the end. We'll obviously let circumstances dictate if the meeting is going to be over in five minutes, they might as well wait to the end. However, if it's a pressing circumstance for that citizen who has a dying desire to for us to hear from them, and there's going to be a while, the body could take that up as long as it's the will of the body. And that's the suggestion. If that's okay with everybody, that's what I plan to do.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com