Law and Legislation Committee Meeting Summary - December 3, 2019
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Law and Legislation Committee Meeting - December 3, 2019
The Law and Legislation Committee met on December 3, 2019, to consider several items including an ordinance on hotel worker protection, the city's state and federal legislative platform, and updates to historic district plans. All items were forwarded to the City Council with unanimous votes.
Consent Calendar
- Approved Items 1–3: Legislative Advocacy Correspondence (2019-00800), Law and Legislation Log (2019-00801), and an Ordinance Amending Sections 8.132.030 and 8.132.050 Relating to Illegal Cultivation of Cannabis (2019-01710). These routine items were passed unanimously by motion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 6 (Historic Districts Plans):
- William Berg (President, Preservation Sacramento) expressed strong support, noting the plans reduce risk and remove ambiguity for property owners and builders.
- Jackie Whitelam (Chair, Preservation Commission) urged adoption, correcting misperceptions that the plan would impede infill housing or circumvent SB 330, explaining the timeline predated the state law.
- Karen Jacques (longtime central city resident and former Preservation Commission chair) supported, citing decades of need for clarity.
- Gregory Van Acker spoke in favor.
- John Marshack (Boulevard Park Neighborhood Association) supported but requested a change to a height guideline, asking that new construction not exceed the tallest contributing resource on the block.
- Deborah Condon opposed, arguing the plan contains subjective standards that could expose the city to litigation and that the emergency ordinance to avoid SB 330 is unwarranted; she urged objective standards and a timeline for changes.
- Vickie Villeen (Midtown resident, Preservation Sacramento board) supported, asking for passage.
- Bay Miri (developer) supported, stating the plan will reduce ambiguity for developers.
- Craig Houseman (architect) supported, saying the plan provides a clear and fair path for development.
Discussion Items
- Item 4: Ordinance Relating to Hotel Worker Protection – Staff presented the ordinance adding Chapter 5.78 to the City Code, requiring panic buttons and sexual harassment policies for hotel workers. Councilmember Guerra moved to forward with an amendment changing the implementation date to six months after council passage to give industry time to comply. Councilmember Hansen seconded. Discussion clarified enforcement (annual fire department inspections, fines via administrative penalties). All members voiced support. Vote: unanimous.
- Item 5: Review and Approval of City’s State and Federal Legislative Platform – State lobbyists Will Gonzalez and Ross Buckley reviewed 2019 highlights and 2020 outlook (homelessness, housing, water, climate). Councilmember Hansen proposed changing the phrase “local control” to “local values” to avoid negative connotations and called for a more coordinated, proactive work plan with regional partners. Councilmember Harris supported and added a request to track legislation on homeless encampments on levees. Councilmember Guerra seconded, emphasizing support for illegal grow house enforcement and the California Mobility Center. Chair Schenirer added a request to include federal cannabis decriminalization. Motion passed unanimously to approve the platform as amended.
- Item 6: Historic Districts Plans and Updates to the Sacramento Register – Staff presented the final draft, which includes updated surveys and district-specific infill guidelines. The plan clarifies contributing/non-contributing properties, reduces risk, and will streamline staff-level review for many projects. Public testimony was predominantly supportive, with one speaker raising concerns about objective standards and the emergency ordinance. Councilmember Hansen moved to forward to council, praising the balance between preservation and infill. Councilmember Harris seconded, noting the plan will reduce appeals and uncertainty. Vote: unanimous.
Key Outcomes
- Item 4: Motion passed unanimously to forward the Hotel Worker Protection ordinance to the City Council with the amendment (implementation six months after council adoption).
- Item 5: Motion passed unanimously to approve the Legislative Platform with amendments: replace “local control” with “local values” and add federal cannabis decriminalization.
- Item 6: Motion passed unanimously to forward the Historic Districts Plans, related resolutions, and ordinances to the City Council for consideration.
- All items were approved by unanimous votes of the committee members present (Chair Schenirer, Member Hansen, Member Harris, Member Guerra). No abstentions or opposition recorded.
Meeting Transcript
I'd like to call this meeting of the law and legislation committee to order. Um, City Clerk, could you please call the role to establish a quorum? Of course. Member Harris? Member Hansen. He just stepped away. Member Guerrero? Here. And Chair Shaneer. Here. We have a quorum. If you're here today to speak to the committee, you'll need to fill out a speaker slip. They're located in the back window and must be turned into the clerk prior to the start of that item. This is the time I would also ask you to check your cell phones and turn them to silent. If you need an assisted listening or speaking device, you'll also see the assistant clerk. Any thoughts or questions or motion? Um for the uh Folsom Boulevard Special Planning District. Okay, with that direction. Any other comments? We have a second. All those in favor signify that. Aye. Aye. Opposed, abstained motion carries unanimously. Let's move to item four. All right. The first is a proposed ordinance relating to hotel worker protection. This item was before you in June. We're bringing it back today because substantive new language was added after the last committee meeting. The intent language encourages hotel operators to provide notice to guests that they provide their employees who clean guest rooms with panic buttons. It also encourages operators to provide written notice to employees that they have a sexual harassment policy to protect employees against sexual assault and sexual harassment by hotel guests and others. So that may be something to discuss because the implementation date as drafted may come before it is passed at council. So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions. Great. We have uh no members of the public who wish to speak on this, so let's go directly to Mr. Gera. Thank you very much. Uh first I want to thank uh you know our city's uh attorney staff, both thank you very much for uh working uh this out with uh all the stakeholders, uh all of our uh hotel workers and hotel workers association. Uh I want to move this item with the uh also the amendment to change the implementation date uh to six months after the passage of council. I think that that'll help the industry make sure that they're uh they have ample time to to um uh comply with the ordinance. Uh first I think this is a a great step forward for the city. Uh I know the county uh was the pioneer on this, and I want to thank uh Supervisor Cerna for doing that, but a big chunk of the hotels are in the city uh limits of Sacramento, and not just in downtown, but throughout the entire region. In fact, we just went to a uh great opening for one of them on Stockton Boulevard with Councilmember Shaneer. Um and there's one to come here with uh councilmember Harris's district. Uh but I think uh this was uh good effort moving forward, and I only had one question for city staff regarding um the the uh when we issue fines, uh, and that is uh what's our process when a violation happens? How do we help uh uh make sure that the the uh industry and the hotel itself is complying faster? Do we immediately issue a fine or do we help them address the corrective action immediately yes? Bo Parker's for the city of Sacramento. Um address that question uh typically what's going to happen well on the enforcement. The most likely scenario that's going to happen is that the fire department, uh the prevention officers, so under the direction of the fire marshal are going to make an annual inspection each year as required under the government code.
openpublica.com