Sacramento Law and Legislation Committee Special Meeting Summary - June 1, 2021
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Sacramento Law and Legislation Committee Meeting Summary - June 1, 2021
The Law and Legislation Committee of the Sacramento City Council met on June 1, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. in a teleconference-only format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chair Shineer was absent; Vice Chair Harris presided, with Councilmembers Valenzuela and Guerra present, establishing a quorum. The meeting covered a consent calendar item and one discussion item, concluding with committee comments and adjournment.
Consent Calendar
- Law and Legislation Log (File ID: 2021-00207): The committee unanimously approved the Law and Legislation Log. Councilmember Valenzuela inquired about the timeline for the tenant protection program item; staff (Consuelo Hernandez) reported that data collection is ongoing and slower than expected, with a detailed update to follow. The motion was made by Valenzuela, seconded by Guerra, and passed with unanimous approval.
Discussion Items
- 2021 Title 17 Omnibus Ordinance (Bundle) (File ID: 2021-00512): Garrett Norman, Associate Planner, presented the ordinance, which amends various provisions of Title 17 of the Sacramento City Code relating to planning and development. The presentation highlighted stakeholder feedback from the Sacramento Valley Manufacturing Association, the Power and Alliance, and community garden advocates. Key points included:
- The manufacturing association expressed concern about decreasing industrial properties and saw the CUP requirement for community/market gardens in industrial zones as helping preserve industrial land.
- The Power and Alliance shared similar concerns about agricultural uses converting industrial properties but focused on mixed-light cannabis buildings; staff clarified that cannabis regulations are not amended and CUPs are already required.
- Community garden advocates noted that CUP application costs would be burdensome for small grassroots groups, but acknowledged that community gardens are best located in centralized, accessible areas rather than industrial zones.
- The ordinance originally proposed allowing the Planning Director to initiate special planning district (SPD) amendments, aiming to reduce processing time and ensure consistency with other Title 17 provisions. However, Councilmember Valenzuela expressed strong concerns, emphasizing the community engagement burden, citing her experience with the Broadway/Stockton SPD change in Oak Park. She moved to strike Section 29 (the SPD initiation change) from the ordinance.
- Staff (including Evan Compton) acknowledged the added processing time (about one month) but agreed to omit the provision. Councilmember Guerra supported the motion, and Vice Chair Harris concurred. The motion passed unanimously.
Committee Comments & Other Matters
- Councilmember Guerra requested adding an update on the digital sign pilot program for the Little Saigon Business Improvement District to the Law and Legislation Log, noting the anniversary of the Little Saigon rededication. Staff confirmed this would be captured.
Key Outcomes
- Approved the Law and Legislation Log unanimously (3-0).
- Forwarded the 2021 Title 17 Omnibus Ordinance to City Council with a recommendation for approval, amended to strike Section 29 (removing the Planning Director's authority to initiate special planning district amendments). The motion passed unanimously (3-0).
- Directed staff to add the digital sign pilot program update to the Law and Legislation Log for future committee discussion.
Meeting Transcript
All right. Welcome everybody to the June 1st meeting of the law and legislation committee. Welcome. And Clerk, will you please call roll to establish requorum? Thank you. Councilmember Getta. Councilmember Valenzuela. Here. Vice Chair Harris. And I am here. And for the record, Chair Shineer will be absent today. Very good. Well, members, we have a pretty simple agenda today. Item number one is consent, the long ledge log file. Do we have any comments or anything to add? Yes, Chair. I just like to ask Consuelo about timeline for the tenant protection program item. Okay. I believe she's here, Consuelo. Go ahead and ask your question. Yes, I'm here. Okay. Do you have any estimate, Consuelo, on like when we will get that item back for discussion and deliberation? I apologize. That was I missed a little part of your first question. This is the tenant protection program. Yes, correct. Yes. I did get an update from staff. They are still working on collecting the data that was requested, and I can get you and your staff a more detailed update there. It's it's still in process, but I think that the data collection is going a little slower than they thought it would. Okay, that's fair. Thank you. With that, I'll go ahead and move consent, Chair. Thank you, Katie. Um Eric. Very good. We have a motion by member Valenzuela and a second by member Gera. Um Madam Clerk, will you please call the role? Thank you. And for the record, we have no callers on the consent calendar. Councilmember Getta. All right. Councilmember Valenzuela. Yes, and Vice Chair Harris. Hi. Very good. So moving on to our one discussion item, um, which is the omnibus ordinance. I believe Garrett Norman is making a presentation. Hello, Garrett.
openpublica.com